Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers Revised (MCHAT-R/F) in an Urban Metropolitan Sample of Young Children in Turkey
- 11 Downloads
The study assessed the feasibility of using a Turkish-version of the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised (M-CHAT-R/F) as a screening tool for an urban low risk population of young children. M-CHAT-R/F was completed for 6712 children between ages 16 and 36 months living in Istanbul, Turkey. Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2 was served as the main measure for diagnosis. M-CHAT-R/F screen was positive for 9.8% of children. At follow up interview, 39.7% of initial screen-positive children met criteria for ASD. The study identified 57 (1 in 117) children with ASD (0.8%; 95% CI 0.063–1.05%). M-CHAT-R/F performed comparably in Turkey as in United States. Implications of the study for future universal screening for autism in Turkey is also discussed.
KeywordsAutism MCHAT-R/F Urban population Screening Diagnosis Turkey
Drs. Ozgur Oner and Kerim Munir were supported, in part, by Fogarty International Center/NIMH Grant No. (D43TW009680) at Boston Children’s Hospital. We also like to thank Betül Yıldırım, Betul Olgun, Cansu Tacı, Fulin Kurtkaya, Betul Selcen Ozer, Ozgul Gurel, Selcen Keskin Oner, psychologists, physicians, nurses, and families that took part in the study.
Dr. Oner designed the study, collected and analyzed data, drafted the manuscript and revised it. Dr. Munir contributed to conceptualization, data analysis, discussion of findings, revision of the first draft and other versions of the manuscript.
This study was funded by İstanbul Kalkinma Ajansi (ISTKA).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Anlar, B., Bayoglu, B. U., & Yalaz, K. (2009). Denver II Screening Test: Standardization and Adaptation for Turkish Children.Google Scholar
- Baduel, S., Guillon, Q., Afzali, M. H., Foudon, N., Kruck, J., & Rogé, B. (2017). The French version of the modified-checklist for autism in toddlers (M-CHAT): A validation study on a French sample of 24 month-old children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47(2), 297–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Baio, J., Wiggins, L., Christensen, D. L., Maenner, M. J., Daniels, J., Warren, Z., et al. (2018). Prevalence of Autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years - Autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 Sites, United States, 2014. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 67(6), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Christensen, D. L., Braun, K. V. N., Baio, J., Bilder, D., Charles, J., Constantino, J. N., et al. (2012). Prevalence and characteristics of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years—autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 Sites. United States. MMWR Surveillance Summaries (2018), 65(13), 1–23.Google Scholar
- Christensen, D. L., Maenner, M. J., Bilder, D. A., Constantino, J. N., et al. (2019). Prevalence and characteristics of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 4-years- early autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, seven sites, United States, 2010, 2012 and 2014. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 68, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Council on Children With Disabilities, Section on Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics, Bright Futures Steering Committee, & Medical Home Initiatives for Children With Special Needs Project Advisory Committee. (2006). Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home: An algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening. Pediatrics, 118(1), 405–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Frankenburg, W. K., & Dodds, J. B. (1990). Denver II screening manual. Denver: Denver Developmental Materials, Inc.Google Scholar
- Kamio, Y., Haraguchi, H., Stickley, A., Ogino, K., Ishitobi, M., & Takahashi, H. (2015). Brief report: Best discriminators for identifying children with autism spectrum disorder at an 18-Month Health Check-Up in Japan. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(12), 4147–4153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P. C., Risi, S., Gotham, K., & Bishop, S. L. (2012a). Autism diagnostic observation schedule, second edition (ADOS-2) (Part I): Modules 1-4 torrance. CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
- Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P. C., Risi, S., Gotham, K., & Bishop, S. L. (2012b). Autism diagnostic observation schedule, second edition (ADOS-2) (Part II): Toddler module torrance. CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
- McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
- Munir, K. M., Lavelle, T. A., Helm, D. T., Thompson, D., Presstt, J., & Azeem, M. W. (2016). Autism: Global framework for action. Doha: World Innovation Summit in Health.Google Scholar
- National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health (UK). (2011). Autism: Recognition, referral and diagnosis of children and young people on the autism spectrum. London: RCOG Press.Google Scholar
- Robins, D. L., Fein, D., & Barton, M. (2009). The modified checklist for autism in toddlers, revised with follow-up (M-CHAT-R/F).Google Scholar
- Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1992). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectation and pupils’ intellectual development. Bancyfelin: Crown House Pub.Google Scholar