Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Brief Report: Visual Perception, Task-Induced Pupil Response Trajectories and ASD Features in Children

  • 194 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

Abstract

We applied a trajectory-based analysis to eye tracking data in order to quantify individualized patterns of pupil response in the context of global–local processing that may be associated with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) features. Multiple pupil response trajectories across both global and local conditions were identified. Using the combined trajectory patterns for global and local conditions for each individual, we were able to identify three groups based on trajectory group membership that were thought to reflect perceptual strategy. Results indicated that the proportion of children with ASD was significantly greater in the group demonstrating a local-focus response. This research presents a novel analytic approach to the objective characterization of individualized pupil response patterns that are associated with ASD features.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Notes

  1. 1.

    While stimuli were presented for 5.5 s, due to consistent variability in Tobii eyetracking acquisitions (some having slightly over and/or under 330 samples taken across each 5.5 stimulus presentation) the initial 300 collected samples within each trial were used in analyses.

  2. 2.

    We also explored potential differences in baseline pupil diameter between global and local conditions between our pupil trajectory groups; however, results did not indicate significant differences in baseline pupil diameter associated with pupil trajectory groups (p’s > 0.73).

References

  1. Ahissar, M., & Hochstein, S. (2004). The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(10), 457–464.

  2. Anderson, C. J., & Colombo, J. (2009). Larger tonic pupil size in young children with autism spectrum disorder. Developmental Psychobiology, 51(2), 207–211. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.20352.

  3. Antezana, L., Mosner, M. G., Troiani, V., & Yerys, B. E. (2016). Social-emotional inhibition of return in children with autism spectrum disorder versus typical development. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(4), 1236–1246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2661-9.

  4. Ashwin, E., Ashwin, C., Rhydderch, D., Howells, J., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2009a). Eagle-eyed visual acuity: An experimental investigation of enhanced perception in autism. Biological Psychiatry, 65(1), 17–21.

  5. Ashwin, E., Ashwin, C., Tavassoli, T., Chakrabarti, B., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2009b). Eagle-eyed visual acuity in autism. Biological Psychiatry, 66(10), e23–e24.

  6. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412.

  7. Bach, M., & Dakin, S. C. (2009). Regarding “Eagle-eyed visual acuity: An experimental investigation of enhanced perception in autism”. Biological Psychiatry, 66(10), e19–e20.

  8. Binda, P., & Murray, S. O. (2015a). Spatial attention increases the pupillary response to light changes. Journal of Vision, 15(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.1167/15.2.1.

  9. Binda, P., & Murray, S. O. (2015b). Keeping a large-pupilled eye on high-level visual processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.11.002.

  10. Binda, P., Pereverzeva, M., & Murray, S. O. (2013). Attention to bright surfaces enhances the pupillary light reflex. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(5), 2199–2204.

  11. Blaser, E., Eglington, L., Carter, A. S., & Kaldy, Z. (2014). Pupillometry reveals a mechanism for the autism spectrum disorder (ASD) advantage in visual tasks. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04301.

  12. Boev, A. N., Fountas, K. N., Karampelas, I., Boev, C., Machinis, T. G., Feltes, C., et al. (2005). Quantitative pupillometry: Normative data in healthy pediatric volunteers. Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, 103(6), 496–500.

  13. Bölte, S., Schlitt, S., Gapp, V., Hainz, D., Schirman, S., Poustka, F., et al. (2012). A close eye on the eagle-eyed visual acuity hypothesis of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(5), 726–733.

  14. Busch, N. A., Dubois, J., & VanRullen, R. (2009). The phase of ongoing EEG oscillations predicts visual perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(24), 7869–7876.

  15. Constantino, J. N., Davis, S. A., Todd, R. D., Schindler, M. K., Gross, M. M., Brophy, S. L., et al. (2003). Validation of a brief quantitative measure of autistic traits: Comparison of the social responsiveness scale with the autism diagnostic interview-revised. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33(4), 427–433.

  16. Constantino, J. N., & Todd, R. D. (2003). Autistic traits in the general population: A twin study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60(5), 524–530.

  17. Crewther, D. P., & Sutherland, A. (2009). The more he looked inside, the more piglet wasn’t there: Is autism really blessed with visual hyperacuity? Biological Psychiatry, 66(10), e21–e22.

  18. D’Souza, D., Booth, R., Connolly, M., Happé, F., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2016). Rethinking the concepts of ‘local or global processors’: Evidence from Williams syndrome, Down syndrome, and Autism Spectrum Disorders. Developmental Science, 19(3), 452–468.

  19. Dakin, S., & Frith, U. (2005). Vagaries of visual perception in autism. Neuron, 48(3), 497–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.10.018.

  20. Dale, G., & Arnell, K. M. (2013). Investigating the stability of and relationships among global/local processing measures. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75(3), 394–406. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0416-7.

  21. Dale, G., & Arnell, K. M. (2014). Lost in the forest, stuck in the trees: Dispositional global/local bias is resistant to exposure to high and low spatial frequencies. PLoS ONE, 9(7), e98625. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098625.

  22. Daniels, L. B., Nichols, D. F., Seifert, M. S., & Hock, H. S. (2012). Changes in pupil diameter entrained by cortically initiated changes in attention. Visual Neuroscience, 29(02), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952523812000077.

  23. DiCriscio, A. S., Hu, Y., & Troiani, V. (2018). Task induced pupil response and visual perception in adults. PLoS ONE, 13(12), e0209556.

  24. DiCriscio, A. S., Miller, S. J., Hanna, E. K., Kovac, M., Turner-Brown, L., Sasson, N. J., et al. (2016). Brief report: Cognitive control of social and nonsocial visual attention in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(8), 2797–2805.

  25. DiCriscio, A. S., & Troiani, V. (2017). Pupil adaptation corresponds to quantitative measures of autism traits in children. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 6476.

  26. Dukette, D., & Stiles, J. (2001). The effects of stimulus density on children’s analysis of hierarchical patterns. Developmental Science, 4(2), 233–251.

  27. Happe, F. (1999). Autism: Cognitive deficit or cognitive style? Trends in Cognitive Science, 3(6), 216–222.

  28. Happé, F., Briskman, J., & Frith, U. (2001). Exploring the cognitive phenotype of autism: Weak “central coherence” in parents and siblings of children with autism: I. Experimental tests. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(3), 299–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00723.

  29. Hayward, D. A., Fenerci, C., & Ristic, J. (2018). An investigation of global–local processing bias in a large sample of typical individuals varying in autism traits. Consciousness and Cognition, 65, 271–279.

  30. Heitmann, A., Guttkuhn, R., Aguirre, A., Trutschel, U., & Moore-Ede, M. (2001). Technologies for the monitoring and prevention of driver fatigue. In Proceedings of the first international driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training and vehicle design (Vol. 86). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Udo_Trutschel/publication/233389964_TECHNOLOGIES_FOR_THE_MONITORING_AND_PREVENTION_OF_DRIVER_FATIGUE/links/0fcfd50a13bf28da3e000000.pdf.

  31. Hobson, R. P., & Bishop, M. (2003). The pathogenesis of autism: Insights from congenital blindness. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 358(1430), 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2002.1201.

  32. Hobson, R. P., Lee, A., & Brown, R. (1999). Autism and congenital blindness. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29(1), 45–56.

  33. Hochstein, S., & Ahissar, M. (2002). View from the top: Hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron, 36(5), 791–804.

  34. Insel, T., Cuthbert, B., Garvey, M., Heinssen, R., Pine, D. S., Quinn, K., et al. (2010). Research domain criteria (RDoC): Toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167(7), 748–751. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09091379.

  35. Jackson, I., & Sirois, S. (2009). Infant cognition: Going full factorial with pupil dilation. Developmental Science, 12(4), 670–679.

  36. Jepma, M., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2011). Pupil diameter predicts changes in the exploration–exploitation trade-off: Evidence for the adaptive gain theory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(7), 1587–1596.

  37. Kaldy, Z., Giserman, I., Carter, A. S., & Blaser, E. (2013). The mechanisms underlying the ASD advantage in visual search. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 56, 67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1957-x.

  38. Kaldy, Z., Kraper, C., Carter, A. S., & Blaser, E. (2011). Toddlers with autism spectrum disorder are more successful at visual search than typically developing toddlers. Developmental Science, 14(5), 980–988. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01053.x.

  39. Klin, A., Jones, W., Schultz, R., Volkmar, F., & Cohen, D. (2002). Visual fixation patterns during viewing of naturalistic social situations as predictors of social competence in individuals with autism. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59(9), 809. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.59.9.809.

  40. Koldewyn, K., Jiang, Y. V., Weigelt, S., & Kanwisher, N. (2013). Global/local processing in autism: Not a disability, but a disinclination. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(10), 2329–2340.

  41. Landry, R., & Bryson, S. E. (2004). Impaired disengagement of attention in young children with autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(6), 1115–1122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00304.x.

  42. Martin, I., & McDonald, S. (2003). Weak coherence, no theory of mind, or executive dysfunction? Solving the puzzle of pragmatic language disorders. Brain and Language, 85(3), 451–466.

  43. Martineau, J., Hernandez, N., Hiebel, L., Roché, L., Metzger, A., & Bonnet-Brilhault, F. (2011). Can pupil size and pupil responses during visual scanning contribute to the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder in children? Journal of Psychiatric Research, 45(8), 1077–1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2011.01.008.

  44. Mathôt, S., van der Linden, L., Grainger, J., & Vitu, F. (2013). The pupillary light response reveals the focus of covert visual attention. PLoS ONE, 8(10), e78168. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078168.

  45. McKone, E., Davies, A. A., Fernando, D., Aalders, R., Leung, H., Wickramariyaratne, T., et al. (2010). Asia has the global advantage: Race and visual attention. Vision Research, 50(16), 1540–1549.

  46. Mottron, L., Burack, J. A., Stauder, J. E. A., & Robaey, P. (1999). Perceptual processing among high-functioning persons with autism. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 40(02), 203–211.

  47. Naber, M., Alvarez, G. A., & Nakayama, K. (2013). Tracking the allocation of attention using human pupillary oscillations. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 919.

  48. Nagin, D. S., & Nagin, D. (2005). Group-based modeling of development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  49. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9(3), 353–383.

  50. Navon, D. (1981). The forest revisited: More on global precedence. Psychological Research, 43(1), 1–32.

  51. Palinko, O., Kun, A. L., Shyrokov, A., & Heeman, P. (2010). Estimating cognitive load using remote eye tracking in a driving simulator. In Proceedings of the 2010 symposium on eye-tracking research & applications (pp. 141–144). New York: ACM.

  52. Pellicano, E., Maybery, M., Durkin, K., & Maley, A. (2006). Multiple cognitive capabilities/deficits in children with an autism spectrum disorder: “Weak” central coherence and its relationship to theory of mind and executive control. Development and Psychopathology, 18(1), 77–98.

  53. Poirel, N., Mellet, E., Houdé, O., & Pineau, A. (2008). First came the trees, then the forest: Developmental changes during childhood in the processing of visual local–global patterns according to the meaningfulness of the stimuli. Developmental Psychology, 44(1), 245.

  54. Poirel, N., Pineau, A., & Mellet, E. (2006). Implicit identification of irrelevant local objects interacts with global/local processing of hierarchical stimuli. Acta Psychologica, 122(3), 321–336.

  55. Poirel, N., Simon, G., Cassotti, M., Leroux, G., Perchey, G., Lanoë, C., et al. (2011). The shift from local to global visual processing in 6-year-old children is associated with grey matter loss. PLoS ONE, 6(6), e20879.

  56. Raney, G. E., Campbell, S. J., & Bovee, J. C. (2014). Using eye movements to evaluate the cognitive processes involved in text comprehension. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE, 10(83), e50780.

  57. RDevelopment, C. (2012). TEAM 2009: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: RDevelopment. Retrieved from http://www.r-project.org.

  58. Samson, F., Mottron, L., Soulières, I., & Zeffiro, T. A. (2012). Enhanced visual functioning in autism: An ALE meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 33(7), 1553–1581. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21307.

  59. Sasson, N. J., Elison, J. T., Turner-Brown, L. M., Dichter, G. S., & Bodfish, J. W. (2011). Brief report: Circumscribed attention in young children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(2), 242–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1038-3.

  60. Sasson, N. J., Turner-Brown, L. M., Holtzclaw, T. N., Lam, K. S. L., & Bodfish, J. W. (2008). Children with autism demonstrate circumscribed attention during passive viewing of complex social and nonsocial picture arrays. Autism Research, 1(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.4.

  61. Scherf, K. S., Behrmann, M., Kimchi, R., & Luna, B. (2009). Emergence of global shape processing continues through adolescence. Child Development, 80(1), 162–177.

  62. Simmons, D. R., Robertson, A. E., McKay, L. S., Toal, E., McAleer, P., & Pollick, F. E. (2009). Vision in autism spectrum disorders. Vision Research, 49(22), 2705–2739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2009.08.005.

  63. Stewart, L., Overath, T., Warren, J. D., Foxton, J. M., & Griffiths, T. D. (2008). fMRI evidence for a cortical hierarchy of pitch pattern processing. PLoS ONE, 3(1), e1470. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001470.

  64. Stiles, J., & Tada, W. L. (1996). Developmental change in children’s analysis of spatial patterns. Developmental Psychology, 32(5), 951.

  65. Van der Hallen, R., Evers, K., Brewaeys, K., Van den Noortgate, W., & Wagemans, J. (2015). Global processing takes time: A meta-analysis on localglobal visual processing in ASD. Worcester: American Psychological Association. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/bul/141/3/549/.

  66. Varnum, M. E., Shi, Z., Chen, A., Qiu, J., & Han, S. (2014). When “Your” reward is the same as “My” reward: Self-construal priming shifts neural responses to own vs. friends’ rewards. NeuroImage, 87, 164–169.

  67. Wechsler, D., & Hsiao-pin, C. (2011). WASI-II: Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence. London: Pearson.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Kayleigh M. Adamson, BS for her help with recruitment and data collection. This study was funded by the Simons Foundation, SFARI Explorer Award #350225.

Author information

ASD and VT designed the research. ASD programmed the task and collected the data. YH and ASD completed data analysis. ASD, YH and VT interpreted the data. ASD drafted the manuscript. ASD, YH and VT critically revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Correspondence to Antoinette Sabatino DiCriscio or Vanessa Troiani.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

We would like to extend our sincere gratitude to the individuals who participated in this study. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 215 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

DiCriscio, A.S., Hu, Y. & Troiani, V. Brief Report: Visual Perception, Task-Induced Pupil Response Trajectories and ASD Features in Children. J Autism Dev Disord 49, 3016–3030 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-04028-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Pupillometry
  • Eye tracking
  • Perception
  • Global–local processing
  • Autism