Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder’s Lying is Correlated with Their Working Memory But Not Theory of Mind
The present study examined the role of executive function in lying for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The temptation resistance paradigm was used to elicit children’s self-protective lies and the Hide-and-seek task was used to elicit children’s self-benefiting lies. Results showed that children with ASD told fewer lies in the two deception tasks compared to children with intellectual disability (ID) and typically developing (TD) children. Furthermore, children with ASD’s lying were positively correlated with their working memory, but not with their theory of mind. These findings demonstrate that the mechanisms underlying deception for children with ASD are distinct from that of TD children.
KeywordsAutism spectrum disorders Deception Executive function Working memory Theory of mind
The study was supported in part by grants from the National Science Foundation of China (31600875), Hangzhou Social Science Foundation of China (2018RC2X17) and the National University of Singapore start-up grant. We thank the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive input and suggestions.
WM and LS conceived of the study. WM, LS and JJ contributed to the study design. Data collection was performed by WM, YD and JJ. CT, YD and JJ performed the data analysis. XPD and CT interpreted the data. CT and LS drafted the manuscript, and XPD provided critical revision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Hangzhou Normal University research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The parents or legal guardians of the child participants gave informed consent for the children’s participation in our study. The children also gave their oral assent prior to participation.
- American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th text revision edn. (pp. 553–557). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
- American Psychiatric Association. (2013). The Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fifth edition: DSM 5. American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
- Baron-Cohen, S. (1992). Out of sight or out of mind? Another look at deception in autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33(7), 1141–1155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1992.tb00934.x.Google Scholar
- Bowler, D. M. (1992). “Theory of mind” in Asperger’s syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33(5), 877–893. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1992.tb01962.x.Google Scholar
- Carlson, S. M., Moses, L. J., & Hix, H. R. (1998). The role of inhibitory processes in young children’s difficulties with deception and false belief. Child Development, 69(3), 672–691. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06236.x.Google Scholar
- Diamond, A. (2006). The early development of executive functions. In E. Bialystok & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Lifespan cognition: Mechanisms of change (pp. 70–95). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Frith, U. (1989). Autism: Explaining the Enigma. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
- Happé, F. G. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: understanding of story characters’ thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24(2), 129–154.Google Scholar
- Li, D., Hu, K. D., Chen, G. P., Jin, Y., & Li, M. (1988). A trial measuring report of Combined Raven’s test in Shanghai. Journal of Psychologial Science, 4, 27–31. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- Russell, J., Mauthner, N., Sharpe, S., & Tidswell, T. (1991). The “windows task” as a measure of strategic deception in preschoolers and autistic subjects. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(2), 331–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1991.tb00881.x.Google Scholar
- Sang, B., & Liao, X. (1990). The revision of trial norm of Peabody picture vocabulary test revised (PPVT-R). Journal of Psychological Science, 5, 20–25. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- Schopler, E., Reichler, R. J., Devellis, R. F., & Daly, K. (1980). Toward objective classification of childhood autism: Childhood autism rating scale (CARS). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 10(1), 91–103.Google Scholar
- Sodian, B., & Frith, U. (1992). Deception and sabotage in autistic, retarded and normal children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33(3), 591–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1992.tb00893.x.Google Scholar
- Talwar, V., Zwaigenbaum, L., Goulden, K. J., Manji, S., Loomes, C., & Rasmussen, C. (2012). Lie-telling behavior in children with autism and its relation to false-belief understanding. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 27(2), 122–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357612441828.Google Scholar
- Zelazo, P. D., & Müller, U. (2002). Executive function in typical and atypical development. In U. Goswami (Ed.), Handbook of childhood cognitive development (pp. 445–469). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar