Vagal Tone as a Putative Mechanism for Pragmatic Competence: An Investigation of Carriers of the FMR1 Premutation
- 57 Downloads
Pragmatic language skills exist across a continuum in typical and clinical populations, and are impaired in many neurodevelopmental disorders, most notably autism. The mechanisms underlying pragmatic impairment are poorly understood, although theory suggests dampened vagal tone plays a role. This study investigated the FMR1 premutation as a genetic model that may lend insight into the relationship between vagal function and pragmatic ability. Participants included 38 women with the FMR1 premutation and 23 controls. Vagal tone accounted for significant variance in pragmatics across both groups and statistically mediated the effect of FMR1 premutation status on pragmatic ability. Results support vagal tone as a biophysiological correlate of pragmatic ability, which informs potential mechanistic underpinnings and could have implications for targeted treatment.
KeywordsFragile X carrier HRV RSA Social communication Social (Pragmatic) Communication Disorder
We would like to thank the women who participated in this study.
JK conceived the study, led the data collection, analysis, interpretation, and drafted the manuscript. AJF provided consultation on the statistical models. JER provided guidance on the study design, data collection, and interpretation. All authors contributed to the interpretation of results and critical revising of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This study was funded by the National Institutes of Health (F32DC013934; R01MH090194; R01HD024356; U54HD079125, R01HD02274), the Research Participant Registry Core of the Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities (P30HD03110), and an ASPIRE grant from the Office of the Vice President for Research at the University of South Carolina.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Abidin, R. R. (2013). Parenting Stress Index, Fourth Edition Short Form (PSI-4-SF). Lutz: PAR, Inc.Google Scholar
- Adamsheck, H. C., Petty, E. M., Hong, J., Baker, M. W., Brilliant, M. H., & Mailick, M. R. (2017). Is low FMR1 CGG repeat length in males correlated with family history of BRCA-associated cancers? An exploratory analysis of medical records. Journal of Genetic Counseling. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0116-5.Google Scholar
- Bagner, D. M., Sheinkopf, S. J., Miller-Loncar, C. L., Vohr, B. R., Hinckley, M., Eyberg, S. M., & Lester, B. M. (2009). Parent-child interaction therapy for children born premature: A case study and illustration of vagal tone as a physiological measure of treatment outcome. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 16(4), 468–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2009.05.002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Chen, L.-S., Tassone, F., Sahota, P., & Hagerman, P. J. (2003). The (CGG) n repeat element within the 5′ untranslated region of the FMR1 message provides both positive and negative cis effects on in vivo translation of a downstream reporter. Human Molecular Genetics, 12(23), 3067–3074. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddg331.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cicchetti, D. V. (2001). Methodological commentary the precision of reliability and validity estimates re-visited: Distinguishing between clinical and statistical significance of sample size requirements. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 23(5), 695–700.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clifford, S., Dissanayake, C., Bui, Q. M., Huggins, R., Taylor, A. K., & Loesch, D. Z. (2007). Autism spectrum phenotype in males and females with fragile X full mutation and premutation. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(4), 738–747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0205-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Doussard-Roosevelt, J. A., Montgomery, L. A., & Porges, S. W. (2003). Short-term stability of physiological measures in kindergarten children: Respiratory sinus arrhythmia, heart period, and cortisol. Developmental Psychobiology, 43(3), 230–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.10136.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Filipovic-Sadic, S., Sah, S., Chen, L., Krosting, J., Sekinger, E., Zhang, W., et al. (2010). A novel FMR1 PCR method for the routine detection of low abundance expanded alleles and full mutations in fragile X syndrome. Clinical Chemistry, 56(3), 399–408. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2009.136101.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Geurts, H. M., Verté, S., Oosterlaan, J., Roeyers, H., Hartman, C. A., Mulder, E. J., et al. (2004). Can the Children’s Communication Checklist differentiate between children with autism, children with ADHD, and normal controls? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(8), 1437–1453.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Graziano, P. A., Bagner, D. M., Sheinkopf, S. J., Vohr, B. R., & Lester, B. M. (2012). Evidence-based intervention for young children born premature: Preliminary evidence for associated changes in physiological regulation. Infant Behavior and Development, 35(3), 417–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2012.04.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. In: University of Kansas, KS.Google Scholar
- Hessl, D., Wang, J. M., Schneider, A., Koldewyn, K., Le, L., Iwahashi, C., et al. (2011). Decreased FMRP expression underlies amygdala dysfunction in carriers of the fragile X premutation. Biological Psychiatry, 70(9), 859–865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.05.033.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman brief intelligence test (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
- Klusek, J., Martin, G. E., & Losh, M. (2013). Physiological arousal in autism and fragile X syndrome: Group comparisons and links with pragmatic language. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 118(6), 475–495. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944.7558-118.6.475.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Klusek, J., McGrath, S. E., Abbeduto, L., & Roberts, J. E. (2016). Pragmatic language features of mothers with the FMR1 premutation are associated with the language outcomes of adolescents and young adults with fragile X syndrome. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59, 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-15-0102.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Landa, R. (2000). Social language use in Asperger syndrome and high-functioning autism. In K. Ami, F. Volkmar & S. S. Sparrow (Eds.), Asperger syndrome (pp. 403–417). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Laws, G., Bates, G., Feuerstein, M., Mason-Apps, E., & White, C. (2012). Peer acceptance of children with language and communication impairments in a mainstream primary school: Associations with type of language difficulty, problem behaviours and a change in placement organization. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 28(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659011419234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Losh, M., Childress, D., Lam, K., & Piven, J. (2008). Defining key features of the broad autism phenotype: A comparison across parents of multiple- and single-incidence autism families. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics, 147B(4), 424–433. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.30612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Losh, M., Klusek, J., Martin, G. E., Sideris, J., Parlier, M., & Piven, J. (2012). Defining genetically meaningful language and personality traits in relatives of individuals with fragile X syndrome and relatives of individuals with autism. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics, 159B(6), 660–668. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.32070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Maddalena, A., Richards, C. S., McGinniss, M. J., Brothman, A., Desnick, R. J., Grier, R. E., et al. (2001). Technical standards and guidelines for fragile X: The first of a series of disease-specific supplements to the Standards and Guidelines for Clinical Genetics Laboratories of the American College of Medical Genetics. Genetics in Medicine, 3(3), 200–205.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Mailick, M., Hong, J., Greenberg, J., Dawalt, L. S., Baker, M. W., & Rathouz, P. J. (2017). FMR1 genotype interacts with parenting stress to shape health and functional abilities in older age. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics, 174(4), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.32529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McEwen, B. S. (1998). Stress, adaptation, and disease: Allostasis and allostatic load. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 840(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb09546.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Porges, S. W. (1985). U.S. Patent No. 4520944. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.Google Scholar
- Porges, S. W., & Bohrer, R. E. (1990). Analyses of periodic processes in psychophysiological research. In J. T. Cacioppo & L. G. Tassinary (Eds.), Principles of Psychophysiology: Physical, Social, and Inferential Elements (pp. 708–753). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Porges, S. W., Macellaio, M., Stanfill, S. D., McCue, K., Lewis, G. F., Harden, E. R., et al. (2013). Respiratory sinus arrhythmia and auditory processing in autism: Modifiable deficits of an integrated social engagement system? International Journal of Psychophysiology, 88(3), 161–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.11.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Quintana, D. S., Guastella, A. J., Outhred, T., Hickie, I. B., & Kemp, A. H. (2012). Heart rate variability is associated with emotion recognition: Direct evidence for a relationship between the autonomic nervous system and social cognition. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 86(2), 168–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.08.012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roberts, J. E., Tonnsen, B., Robinson, A., & Shinkareva, S. V. (2012). Heart activity and autistic behavior in infants and toddlers with fragile X syndrome. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 117(2), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-117.2.90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Roberts, J. E., Tonnsen, B. L., Robinson, A. R., Tackett, B., & Clark, C. (2011). Physiological mechanisms of fear and anxiety in young children with fragile X. In J.E. Roberts & H.C. Hazlett (Co-Chairs), Biomarkers and behavioral indicators of anxiety and fear in young males with fragile X syndrome. Symposium presented at the 44th Annual Gatlinburg Conference of Intellectual Disabilities. In. San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
- Seltzer, M. M., Baker, M. W., Hong, J., Maenner, M., Greenberg, J., & Mandel, D. (2012). Prevalence of CGG expansions of the FMR1 gene in a US population-based sample. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics, 159B(5), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.32065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- SPSS, I. (2012). Statistics for windows, version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
- Sumner, J. A., McLaughlin, K. A., Walsh, K., Sheridan, M. A., & Koenen, K. C. (2015). Caregiving and 5-HTTLPR genotype predict adolescent physiological stress reactivity: Confirmatory tests of gene × environment interactions. Child Development, 86(4), 985–994.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Tassone, F., De Rubeis, S., Carosi, C., La Fata, G., Serpa, G., Raske, C., et al. (2011). Differential usage of transcriptional start sites and polyadenylation sites in FMR1 premutation alleles. Nucleic Acids Research, 39(14), 6172–6185. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr100.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Tassone, F., Pan, R., Amiri, K., Taylor, A. K., & Hagerman, P. J. (2008). A rapid polymerase chain reaction-based screening method for identification of all expanded alleles of the fragile X (FMR1) gene in newborn and high-risk populations. Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, 10(1), 43–49.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thayer, J. F., Ahs, F., Fredrikson, M., Sollers, J. J., & Wager, T. D. (2012). A meta-analysis of heart rate variability and neuroimaging studies: Implications for heart rate variability as a marker of stress and health. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36, 747–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.11.009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang, J. Y., Hessl, D., Iwahashi, C., Cheung, K., Schneider, A., Hagerman, R. J., et al. (2013). Influence of the fragile X mental retardation (FMR1) gene on the brain and working memory in men with normal FMR1 alleles. Neuroimage, 65(Supplement C), 288–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.075.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Watson, L. R., Baranek, G. T., Roberts, J. E., David, F. J., & Perryman, T. Y. (2010). Behavioral and physiological responses to child-directed speech as predictors of communication outcomes in children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53(4), 1052–1064. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2009/09-0096).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Weghofer, A., Tea, M.-K., Barad, D. H., Kim, A., Singer, C. F., Wagner, K., & Gleicher, N. (2012). BRCA1/2 mutations appear embryo-lethal unless rescued by low (CGG n < 26) FMR1 sub-genotypes: Explanation for the “BRCA paradox”? PLoS ONE, 7(9), e44753. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044753.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Yang, A. C., Chen, T. J., Tsai, S. J., Hong, C. J., Kuo, C. H., Yang, C. H., & Kao, K. P. (2010). BDNF Val66Met polymorphism alters sympathovagal balance in healthy subjects. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics, 153B(5), 1024–1030. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.31069. doi.Google Scholar