Advertisement

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

, Volume 49, Issue 2, pp 468–480 | Cite as

Psychometric Properties of the Autism Spectrum Quotient: Children’s Version (AQ-Child)

  • Rapson Gomez
  • Vasileios StavropoulosEmail author
  • Alasdair Vance
Original Paper

Abstract

Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory and factor analysis (EFA) aimed to determine the optimum Autism Spectrum Quotient—Children (AQ-Child) model. Initial CFA of parent ratings of the AQ-Child for 404 clinic-referred children with ADHD, aged between 4 and 11 years, revealed mixed/moderate support for the implied AQ-Child five-factor model and the past statistically supported four-factor model (Auyeung et al., J Autism Dev Disord 38:1230–1240, 2008). Interestingly, EFA findings indicated most support for a four-factor model, with factors reflecting “mind-reading”, “social skills”, “attention to details”, and “imagination”. The items loading in these factors were different from those proposed originally for similar factors (Auyeung et al., J Autism Dev Disord 38:1230–1240, 2008). The factors in the model showed acceptable internal consistency-reliability and discriminant validity. Clinical and research implications are discussed.

Keywords

Autism Spectrum Quotient–Children’s Version Factor analysis Factor structure Four-factor model 

Notes

Acknowledgments

No source of funding has been used for the present study. It is acknowledged that the present study investigates the psychometric properties of the Autism Quotient children version using archival data of 404 children with ADHD examined at the Academic Child Psychiatry Unit (ACPU) of the Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. In that context, we are grateful to the employees of the unit that contributed to the data collection.

Author Contributions

RG contributed to the literature review, hypotheses formulation, data collection and analyses, and the structure and sequence of theoretical arguments. VS contributed to the literature review, hypotheses formulation, data collection and analyses, and the structure and sequence of theoretical arguments. AV contributed to the data collection and analyses.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors of the present study do not report any conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

10803_2018_3713_MOESM1_ESM.docx (166 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 166 KB)

References

  1. Achenbach, T. M., Becker, A., Dopfner, M., et al. (2008). Multicultural assessment of child and adolescent psychopathology with ASEBA and SDQ instruments: Research findings, applications, and future directions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 251–275.Google Scholar
  2. Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms and profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont Research Center for Children, Youth and Families.Google Scholar
  3. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder (4th edn.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  4. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder (4th edn.). Text revision). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  5. American Psychiatric Association. (2003). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IVTR. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  6. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder (5th edn.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  7. Austin, E. J. (2005). Personality correlates of the broader autism phenotype as assessed by the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ). Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 451–460.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.04.022.Google Scholar
  8. Auyeung, B., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., & Allison, C. (2008). The Autism Spectrum Quotient: Children’s Version (AQ-Child). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 1230–1240.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0504-z.Google Scholar
  9. Baron-Cohen, S. (2008b). Autism, hypersystemizing, and truth. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 64–75.Google Scholar
  10. Baron-Cohen, S., Hoekstra, R., Knickmeyer, R., & Wheelwright, S. (2006). The Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ)—Adolescent version. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 343–350.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0073-6.Google Scholar
  11. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., & Clubley, E. (2001). The Autism- Spectrum Quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger syndrome/high functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 5–17.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005653411471.Google Scholar
  12. Beauducel, A., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2006). On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling, 13(2), 186–203.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1302_2.Google Scholar
  13. Biederman, J., Carter, R. P., Fried, R., et al. (2010). Child behavior checklist clinical scales discriminate referred youth with autism spectrum disorder: A preliminary study. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 31, 485–490.Google Scholar
  14. Bölte, S., Dickhut, H., & Poustka, F. (1999). Patterns of parent-reported problems indicative in autism. Psychopathology, 32, 93–97.Google Scholar
  15. Broderick, N., Wade, J. L., Meyer, J. P., Hull, M., & Reeve, R. E. (2015). Model invariance across genders of the Broad Autism Phenotype Questionnaire. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 3133–3147.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2472-z.Google Scholar
  16. Brown, T. A. (2006). Data issues in CFA: Missing, non-normal, and categorical data. Confirmatory Factor Analysis For Applied Research, 363, 411.Google Scholar
  17. Brown, T. A. (2014). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York; Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
  18. Conners, C. K. (2008). Conners’ (3rd Edition). North Tonawanda: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  19. Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9.Google Scholar
  20. Cumming, G. (2009). Inference by eye: Reading the overlap of independent confidence intervals. Statistics in Medicine, 28, 205–220.Google Scholar
  21. Duarte, C. S., Bordin, I. A. S., de Oliveira, A., & Bird, H. (2003). The CBCL and the identification of children with autism and related conditions in Brazil: Pilot findings. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33, 703–707.Google Scholar
  22. Gargaro, B. A., Rinehart, N. J., Bradshaw, J. L., Tonge, B. J., & Sheppard, D. M. (2011). Autism and ADHD: How far have we come in the comorbidity debate? Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 1081–1088.Google Scholar
  23. Grills, A. E., & Ollendick, T. H. (2003). Multiple informant agreement and the anxiety disorders interview schedule for parents and children. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 42(1), 30–40.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200301000-00008.Google Scholar
  24. Hartini, S., Herini, E. S., & Takada, S. (2016). Usefulness of CBCL/6–18 to evaluate emotional and behavioral problems in Indonesian autism spectrum disorder children. Pediatrics International, 58, 1307–1310.Google Scholar
  25. Havdahl, K. A., Tetzchner, S., Huerta, M., Lord, C., & Bishop, L. (2016). Utility of the child behavior checklist as a screener for autism spectrum disorder. Autism Research, 9, 33–42.  https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1515.Google Scholar
  26. Hoekstra, R., Bartels, M., Cath, D. C., & Boomsma, D. I. (2008). Factor structure, reliability and criterion validity of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ): A Study in Dutch Population and Patient Groups. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 1555–1566.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-008-0538-x.Google Scholar
  27. Hoffmann, W., Weber, L., Konig, U., Becker, K., & Kamp-Becker, l (2016). The role of the CBCL in the assessment of autism spectrum disorders: An evaluation of symptom profiles and screening characteristic. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 27, 44–53.Google Scholar
  28. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424.Google Scholar
  29. Hurst, R. M., Mitchell, J. T., Kimbrel, N. A., Kwapil, T. K., & Nelson-Gray, R. O. (2007). Examination of the reliability and factor structure of the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) in a non-clinical sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1938–1949.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.06.012.Google Scholar
  30. Jensen, P. S., Rubio-Stipec, M., Canino, G., Bird, H. R., Dulcan, M. K., Schwab-Stone, M. E., & Lahey, B. B. (1999). Parent and child contributions to diagnosis of mental disorder: are both informants always necessary? Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 38(12), 1569–1579.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199912000-00019.Google Scholar
  31. Jensen, V. K., Larrieu, J. A., & Mack, K. K. (1997). Differential diagnosis between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and pervasive developmental disorder–not otherwise specified.. Clinical Pediatrics, 36, 555–561.  https://doi.org/10.1177/000992289703601001.Google Scholar
  32. Kloosterman, P. H., Keefer, K. V., Kelley, E. A., Summerfeldt, L. J., & Parker, J. D. A. (2011). Evaluation of the factor structure of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 310–314.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.08.005.Google Scholar
  33. Lau, W. Y., Gau, S. S., Chiu, Y. N., Wu, Y. Y., Chou, W. J., Liu, S. K., & Chou, M. C. (2013b). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ). Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 294–305.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.08.005.Google Scholar
  34. Lau, W. Y. P., Kelly, A. B., & Peterson, C. C. (2013a). Further evidence on the factorialstructure of the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) for adults with and without a clinical diagnosis of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorder, 43, 2807–2815.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1827-6.Google Scholar
  35. Leyfer, O. T., Folstein, S. E., Bacalman, S., Davis, N. O., Dinh, E., Morgan, J.,.. . Lainhart, J. E. (2006). Comorbid psychiatric disorders in children with autism: Interview development and rates of disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 849–861.Google Scholar
  36. Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2006). FACTOR: A computer program to fit the exploratory factor analysis model. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 88–91.Google Scholar
  37. Lubke, G. H., & Muthén, B. O. (2004). Applying multigroup confirmatory factor models for continuous outcomes to Likert scale data complicates meaningful group comparisons. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 514–534.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1104_2.Google Scholar
  38. Matson, J. L., Rieske, R. D., & Williams, L. W. (2013). The relationship between autism spectrum disorders and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: An overview. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 2475–2484.Google Scholar
  39. Mazefsky, C. A., Anderson, R., Conner, C. M., & Minshew, N. (2011). Child Behavior Checklist scores for school-aged children with autism: Preliminary evidence of patterns suggesting the need for referral. Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 33, 31–37.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-010-9198-1.Google Scholar
  40. McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified approach. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  41. Millsap, R. E., & Yun-Tein, J. (2004). Assessing factorial invariance in ordered-categorical measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 479–515.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3903_4.Google Scholar
  42. Muñiz, J. (2008). The Role of EFPA in setting standards for tests and test use. Paper presented at the 6th Conference of the International Test Commission, Liverpool, UK.Google Scholar
  43. Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2015). Growth mixture modeling with non-normal distributions. Statistics in medicine, 34(6), 1041–1058.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6388.Google Scholar
  44. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2013). Mplus 7.11. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  45. Norris, M., & Lecavalier, L. (2010). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in developmental disability psychological research. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 8–20.Google Scholar
  46. Nunnaly, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  47. Nye, C. D., & Drasgow, F. (2011). Assessing goodness of fit: Simple rules of thumb simply do not work. Organizational Research Methods, 14(3), 548–570.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428110368562.Google Scholar
  48. Olvera Astivia, O. L. (2018). Shiny apps/resources (Software). Retrieved from https://psychometroscar.com/shiny-apps-resources/. Accessed 1 May 2018.
  49. Ooi, Y. P., Rescorla, L. A., Ang, R. P., et al. (2010). Identification of autism spectrum disorders using the Child Behavior Checklist in Singapore. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41, 1147–1156.Google Scholar
  50. Reiersen, A. M., & Todd, R. D. (2008). Co-occurrence of ADHD and autism spectrum disorders: Phenomenology and treatment. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 8, 657–669.Google Scholar
  51. Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17, 354–373.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315.Google Scholar
  52. Robinson, E. B., Munir, K., Munafo`, M. R., Hughes, M., McCormick, M. C., & Koenen, K. C. (2011). Stability of autistic traits in the general population: Further evidence for a continuum of impairment. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 50, 376–384.Google Scholar
  53. Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177.Google Scholar
  54. Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74, 107–120.Google Scholar
  55. Silverman, W. K., & Albano, A. M. (1996). Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV.: Child interview schedule (Vol. 2). Oxford: Graywind Publications.Google Scholar
  56. Silverman, W. K., Saavedra, L. M., & Pina, A. A. (2001). Test-retest reliability of anxiety symptoms and diagnoses with the anxiety disorders interview schedule for DSM-IV: Child and parent versions. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40(8), 937–944.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200108000-00016.Google Scholar
  57. Simonoff, E., Pickles, A., Charman, T., Chandler, S., Loucas, T., & Baird, G. (2008). Psychiatric disorders in children with autism spectrum disorders: Prevalence, comorbidity, and associated factors in a population-derived sample. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 47, 921–929.Google Scholar
  58. Stewart, M. E., & Austin, E. J. (2009). The structure of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ): Evidence from a student sample in Scotland. Personality and Individual Difference, 47, 224–228.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.03.004.Google Scholar
  59. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  60. Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological Methods, 16, 209–220.Google Scholar
  61. Wakabayashi, A., Baron-Cohen, S., Uchiyama, T., Yoshida, Y., Tojo, Y., Kuroda, M., et al. (2007). The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ) children’s version in Japan: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 491–500.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0181-3.Google Scholar
  62. Watkins, M. W. (2013). Omega [Computer software]. Phoenix: Ed & Psych Associates.Google Scholar
  63. Zinbarg, R. E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I., & Li, W. (2005). Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and McDonald’s ωH: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70(1), 123–133.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-003-0974-7.Google Scholar
  64. Zumbo, B. D., Gadermann, A. M., & Zeisser, C. (2007). Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for Likert ratings scales. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 6, 21–29.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rapson Gomez
    • 1
  • Vasileios Stavropoulos
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
    Email author
  • Alasdair Vance
    • 3
  1. 1.School of PsychologyThe Cairnmillar InstituteCamberwell, MelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Psychology, National and KapodistrianUniversity of AthensAthensGreece
  3. 3.The Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne & The University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  4. 4.MelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations