Response to Distress Varies by Social Impairment and Familiarity in Infants at Risk for Autism
- 141 Downloads
Early impaired response to social partners’ distress may negatively impact subsequent social development. Identifying factors contributing to successful responding may inform assessment and intervention. This study explores how: (1) social impairment, and (2) partner familiarity relate to response to partners’ distress. Infants with and without older siblings with ASD were assessed at 12 (n = 29) and 15 (n = 35) months for social impairment markers, and responses to mother and experimenter each feigning distress. Infants with more social impairment showed less attention and affect at 15, but not 12 months. Infants attended more to the unfamiliar person, but exhibited greater affect toward the familiar person at 12 months. Results revealed social impairment and familiarity were separately related to infant response to partners’ distress.
KeywordsResponse to distress Social impairment Autism spectrum disorder Empathy Familiarity Social spectrum
Alexandra C. Dowd conceived of the theoretical approach to examining the data, was the gold-standard reliability coder, processed the experimental data, performed the analyses, interpreted the findings, designed the figures and tables, and took the lead in writing the manuscript. Dr. A. Rebecca Neal-Beevers supervised the project, provided critical feedback on the theoretical approach, aided in interpreting the results, and helped author and shape the manuscript. Kassandra Martinez helped identify nuances for the behavioral coding scheme for response to distress, behaviorally coded response to distress after reliability was established, drafted the initial methods section, and reviewed the manuscript. Dr. Bridget C. Davidson designed and directed the larger research project that this project extracts from, and she performed the experiments. Dr. J. Gregory Hixon contributed to the design of the analytic approach, supervised the analyses, and provided feedback on the manuscript.
This study was funded by Institutional Research Funds provided by the authors’ university.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Agresti, A., & Finlay, B. (2009). Statistical methods for the social sciences (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015). Autism spectrum disorder (ASD): Data & statistics. Retrieved July 10, 2015, from http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/data.html.
- Dawson, G., Toth, K., Abbott, R., Osterling, J., Munson, J., Estes, A., & Liaw, J. (2004). Early social attention impairments in autism: Social orienting, joint attention, and attention to distress. Developmental Psychology, 40(2), 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-16220.127.116.111.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Fox, J. (2002). Linear mixed models. In An R and S-Plus companion to applied regression (appendix). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
- Gammer, I., Bedford, R., Elsabbagh, M., Garwood, H., Pasco, G., Tucker, L., et al. (2015). Behavioural markers for autism in infancy: Scores on the Autism Observational Scale for Infants in a prospective study of at-risk siblings. Infant Behavior and Development, 38, 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2014.12.017.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goodman, A., Lamping, D. L., & Ploubidis, G. B. (2010). When to use broader internalising and externalising subscales instead of the hypothesised five subscales on the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ): Data from British parents, teachers and children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(8), 1179–1191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-010-9434-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hallmayer, J., Cleveland, S., Torres, A., Phillips, J., Cohen, B., Torigoe, T., et al. (2011). Genetic heritability and shared environmental factors among twin pairs with autism. Archives of General Psychiatry, 68(11), 1095–1102. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Hutman, T., Rozga, A., DeLaurentis, A. D., Barnwell, J. M., Sugar, C. A., & Sigman, M. (2010). Response to distress in infants at risk for autism: A prospective longitudinal study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51(9), 1010–1020. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02270.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Keinman, J. M., Robins, D. L., Ventola, P. E., Pandey, J., Boorstein, H. C., Esser, E. L. et al. (2008). The modified checklist for autism in toddlers: A follow-up study investigating the early detection of autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(5), 827–839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0450-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P. C., Risi, S., Gotham, K., & Bishop, S. L. (2012). Autism diagnostic observation schedule, second edition (ADOS-2). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
- Maynard, A. S., Monk, J. D., & Booker, K. W. (2011). Building empathy through identification and expression of emotions: A review of interactive tools for children with social deficits. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 6, 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/15401383.2011.579874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nadig, A., Lee, I., Singh, L., Bosshart, K., & Ozonoff, S. (2010). How does the topic of conversation affect verbal exchange and eye gaze? A comparison between typical development and high-functioning autism. Neuropsychologia, 48(9), 2730–2739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.05.020.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Ozonoff, S., Young, G. S., Belding, A., Hill, M., Hill, A., Hutman, T., et al. (2014). The broader autism phenotype in infancy: When does it emerge? Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 53(4), 398–407.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2013.12.020.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Ozonoff, S., Young, G. S., Carter, A., Messinger, D., Yirmiya, N., Zwaigenbaum, L., et al. (2011). Recurrence risk for autism spectrum disorders: A baby siblings research consortium study. Pediatrics, 128(3), e488–e495. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-2825.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Ozonoff, S., Young, G. S., Steinfeld, M. B., Hill, M. M., Cook, I., Hutman, T., et al. (2009). How early do parent concerns predict later autism diagnosis? Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 30(5), 367–375. https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0b013e3181ba0fcf.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Rutter, M., Bailey, A., & Lord, C. (2003). Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
- Sigman, M., Kasari, C., Yirmiya, N., & Kwon, J. H. (1992). Responses to the negative emotions of others by autistic, mentally retarded, and normal children. Child Development, 63(4), 796–807. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1992.tb01662.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- van der Mark, I. L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2002). Development of empathy in girls during the second year of life: Associations with parenting, attachment, and temperament. Social Development, 11(4), 451–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar