Advertisement

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

, Volume 48, Issue 11, pp 3794–3807 | Cite as

Effectiveness of a SCERTS Model-Based Intervention for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in Hong Kong: A Pilot Study

  • Lu Yu
  • Xiaoqin Zhu
OriginalPaper

Abstract

A SCERTS model-based intervention with different durations (5-month vs. 10-month) was provided to 122 children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) (age = 53.43 ± 9.05 months) in Hong Kong. Before and after the intervention, the children were assessed with the Chinese Psychoeducational Profile-Third Edition (CPEP-3) and the Developmental Assessment Chart (DAC). Educators and parents expressed their views toward the intervention in focus groups. Results showed that participating children improved significantly in their social communication and emotional behavior after the intervention, as measured by DAC and CPEP-3. Likewise, educators and parents had positive views toward the intervention and noted the children’s improvement. The results suggest that a SCERTS model-based intervention can improve social communication, emotional regulation, and other skills in children with ASD.

Keywords

SCERTS model Quasi-experiment Evaluation Chinese children with ASD Focus group 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research is financially supported by Ai You (Hong Kong) Foundation for a project at Heep Hong Society, Hong Kong. We also thank colleagues of Heep Hong Society, especially Mr. Peter Au Yeung, Ms. Yvonne Lai, and Ms. Chi Man Lui, for helping conduct data collection.

Author Contributions

LY designed the evaluative research project and monitored the whole evaluative study. LY and XZ contributed to the data interpretation of the work and drafted the paper. Both authors approve of the final version of the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Lu Yu declares that she has no conflict of interest. Xiaoqin Zhu declares that she has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association [APA] (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fifth edition: DSM-V-TR®. Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arick, J. R., Young, H. E., Falco, R. A., Loos, L. M., Krug, D. A., Gense, M. H., et al. (2003). Designing an outcome study to monitor the progress of students with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 18(2), 75–87.  https://doi.org/10.1177/108835760301800201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayson, C. (2011). The use of music therapy to support the SCERTS model objectives for a three year old boy with autism spectrum disorder in New Zealand. The New Zealand Journal of Music Therapy, 9, 7–31.Google Scholar
  4. Barnes, P. (2008). RESEARCH SECTION: Multi-agency working: What are the perspectives of SENCos and parents regarding its development and implementation? British Journal of Special Education, 35(4), 230–240.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8578.2008.00394.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Greenspan, S. I., & Wieder, S. (1997). Developmental patterns and outcomes in infants and children with disorders in relating and communicating: A chart review of 200 cases of children with autistic spectrum diagnoses. Journal of Developmental and Learning disorders, 1, 87–142.Google Scholar
  6. Handleman, J. S., & Harris, S. L. (2006). School-age education programs for children with autism. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  7. Hayes, M. J. (2015). An evaluation of the impacts of the Social Communication Emotional Regulation and Transactional Support (SCERTS®) Model on multidisciplinary collaboration. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education, 5(1), 2411–2415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heep Hong Society (2013). Developmental Assessment Chart (revised edition). Retrieved December 22, 2017, from http://www.heephong.org/webprod/eng/files/publication/261/Developmental-Learning-Package-Development-Assessment-Chart.pdf.
  9. Lin, T.-L., Chiang, C.-H., & Wu, H.-C. (2016). Comprehensive early intervention research for children with autism spectrum disorder: A narrative overview. Formosa Journal of Mental Health, 29(1), 1–46.Google Scholar
  10. Linstead, E., Dixon, D. R., Hong, E., Burns, C. O., French, R., Novack, M. N., et al. (2017). An evaluation of the effects of intensity and duration on outcomes across treatment domains for children with autism spectrum disorder. Translational Psychiatry, 7(9), e1234.  https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2017.207.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Molteni, P., Guldberg, K., & Logan, N. (2013). Autism and multidisciplinary teamwork through the SCERTS Model. British Journal of Special Education, 40(3), 137–145.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. National Research Council [NRC; USA] (2001). Educating children with autism. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  13. O’Neill, J., Bergstrand, L., Bowman, K., Elliott, K., Mavin, L., Stephenson, S., et al. (2010). The SCERTS model: Implementation and evaluation in a primary special school. Good Autism Practice, 11(1), 7–15.Google Scholar
  14. O’Reilly, M., Vostanis, P., Taylor, H., Day, C., Street, C., & Wolpert, M. (2013). Service user perspectives of multiagency working: A qualitative study with children with educational and mental health difficulties and their parents. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 18(4), 202–209.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3588.2012.00674.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Odom, S. L., Boyd, B. A., Hall, L. J., & Hume, K. (2010). Evaluation of comprehensive treatment models for individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(4), 425–436.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0825-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Prizant, B. M., Wetherby, A. M., Rubin, E., & Laurent, A. C. (2003). The SCERTS Model: A transactional, family-centered approach to enhancing communication and socioemotional abilities of children with autism spectrum disorder. Infants & Young Children, 16(4), 296–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Prizant, B. M., Wetherby, A. M., Rubin, E., Laurent, A. C., & Rydell, P. J. (2005). The SCERTS Model: A comprehensive educational approach for children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
  18. Rubin, E., Prizant, B. M., Laurent, A. C., & Wetherby, A. M. (2013). Social communication, emotional regulation, and transactional support (SCERTS). In S. Goldstein & J. A. Naglieri (Eds.), Interventions for Autism Spectrum Disorders (pp. 107–127). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schopler, E., Lansing, M. D., Reichler, R. J., & Marcus, L. M. (2005). Psychoeducational profile: PEP-3: TEACCH individualized psychoeducational assessment for children with autism spectrum disorders. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  20. Schopler, E., Mesibov, G. B., & Hearsey, K. (1995). Structured teaching in the TEACCH system. In E. Schopler & G. B. Mesibov (Eds.), Learning and cognition in autism (pp. 243–268). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shek, D. T. L., & Yu, L. (2014). Construct validity of the Chinese version of the psycho-educational profile-(CPEP-3). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(11), 2832–2843.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2143-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Shek, D. T. L., & Yu, L. (2015). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Psychoeducational Profile–Third Edition–Caregiver Report. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 40(4), 321–329.  https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2015.1073232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shek, D. T. L., Yu, L., Wu, F. K. Y., & Chai, W. Y. (2014). General University Requirements at Hong Kong Polytechnic University: Evaluation findings based on student focus groups. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(8), 1017–1031.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.960362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Virués-Ortega, J. (2010). Applied behavior analytic intervention for autism in early childhood: Meta-analysis, meta-regression and dose-response meta-analysis of multiple outcomes. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 387–399.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.01.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Virues-Ortega, J., Rodríguez, V., & Yu, C. T. (2013). Prediction of treatment outcomes and longitudinal analysis in children with autism undergoing intensive behavioral intervention. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 13, 91–100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1697-2600(13)70012-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wetherby, A. M., Guthrie, W., Woods, J., Schatschneider, C., Holland, R. D., Morgan, L., et al. (2014). Parent-implemented social intervention for toddlers with autism: An RCT. Pediatrics, 134(6), 1084–1093.  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-0757.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Wieder, S., & Greenspan, S. I. (2005). Developmental pathways to mental health: The DIR model for comprehensive approaches to assessment and intervention. In K. M. Finello (Ed.), The handbook of training and practice in infant and preschool mental health (pp. 377–401). Francisco, CA: San Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied Social SciencesThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHong KongPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations