Emergency Department Use: Common Presenting Issues and Continuity of Care for Individuals With and Without Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
This population-based cohort study examined the relationship between level of continuity of primary care and subsequent emergency department (ED) visits for adults with (n = 66,484) and without intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD)(n = 2,760,670). Individuals with IDD were more likely than individuals with no IDD to visit the ED (33.96% versus 20.28%, p < 0.0001). For both groups receiving greater continuity of primary care was associated with less ED use, but this relationship was more marked for adults with IDD. While continuity of primary care can reduce ED use for populations with and without IDD, it is a higher priority for individuals with IDD whose cognitive and adaptive impairments may complicate help-seeking, diagnosis, and treatment. Improving primary care can have far-reaching implications for this complex population.
KeywordsContinuity of care Developmental disabilities Emergency department Intellectual disabilities Primary care Primary care physicians
This paper is part of the Health Care Access Research and Developmental Disabilities (H-CARDD) Program. This paper was supported by a Partnerships in Health Systems Improvement grant (PHE #103973) from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) using data provided by the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC), and the Ontario Ministry of Community and Social Services (MCSS), to the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES). The opinions, results and conclusions reported in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the funding sources and data providers. No endorsement by the CIHR, MOHLTC, MCSS or ICES is intended or should be inferred. Parts of this material are based on data and information compiled and provided by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). However, the analyses, conclusions, opinions and statements expressed herein are those of the author, and not necessarily those of CIHI. The Johns Hopkins ACG® system Version 10 was used for the research.
AD wrote the first draft of the manuscript. ASW conducted the analysis. RB, EL and YL assisted with all parts of the manuscript preparation, including reviewing the final manuscript draft.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- Aseltine, R. H., Sabina, A. Jr, Barclay, G., & Graham, G. (2016). Variation in patient-provider communication by patient’s race and ethnicity, provider type, and continuity in and site of care: An analysis of data from the connecticut health care survey. SAGE Open Medicine, 4, 2050312115625162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- du Plessis, V., Beshiri, R., Bollman, R. D., & Clemenson, H. Definitions of rural. rural and small town Canada analysis bulletin 2001;3(3). Statistics Canada catalogue no. 21-006-XI.Google Scholar
- John Hopkins adjusted clinical groups case-mix system. (ND). Retrieved from 21 July, 2017, http://www.acg.jhsph.edu/.
- Lin, E., Balogh, R., Cobigo, V., Ouellette-Kuntz, H., Wilton, A. S., & Lunsky, Y. (2013). Using administrative health data to identify individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities: A comparison of algorithms. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 57(5), 462–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lin, E., Balogh, R., Isaacs, B., Ouellette-Kuntz, H., Selick, A., Wilton, A. S., et al. (2014). Strengths and limitations of health and disability support administrative databases for population-based health research in intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 11(4), 235 – 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lunsky, Y., Klein-Geltink, J. E., et al. (2013). Atlas on the primary care of adults with developmental disabilities in Ontario. Toronto, ON: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences and Centre for Addiction and Mental Health. Retrieved October 18, 2017, from https://www.ices.on.ca/Publications/Atlases-and-Reports/2013/Atlas-on-Developmental-Disabilities.
- Nicolaidis, C., Raymaker, D., McDonald, K., Dern, S., Boisclair, W. C., Ashkenazy, E., & Baggs, A. (2013). Comparison of healthcare experiences in autistic and non-autistic adults: A cross-sectional online survey facilitated by an academic-community partnership. Journal of General Internal Medicine., 28(6), 761–769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2262-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pines, J. M., Hilton, J. A., Weber, E. J., Alkemade, A. J., Shabanah, A. H, Anderson, P. D., et al (2011). International perspectives on emergency department crowding. Academic Emergency Medicine: Official Journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 18(12), 1358–1370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- SEEI Coordinating Centre. (2009). Moving in the right direction: SEEI final report. health systems research and consulting unit. Centre for Addiction and Mental Health. Retrieved August 5, 2017, from http://ontario.cmha.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/seei_final_report_cmha_ontario_March2003.pdf.
- Sullivan, W. F., Diepstra, H., Heng, J., et al. (2018). Primary care of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. 2018 Canadian consensus guidelines. Canadian Family Physician, 64(4) 254–279; http://www.cfp.ca/content/64/4/254.short.