Advertisement

Temperament Similarities and Differences: A Comparison of Factor Structures from the Behavioral Style Questionnaire in Children with and Without Autism Spectrum Disorder

  • Brian BargerEmail author
  • Eric J. Moody
  • Caroline Ledbetter
  • Larissa D’Abreu
  • Susan Hepburn
  • Steven A. Rosenberg
OriginalPaper

Abstract

The majority of studies of temperament in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) use scales normed on typical populations. The present study examined a widely used measure of temperament, the Behavioral Style Questionnaire (McDevitt and Carey in Behavioral Styles Questionnaire, Behavioral-Developmental Initiatives Scottsdale, AZ, 1975) to determine whether it contains the temperament traits theorized by its creators. Neither confirmatory nor exploratory factor analysis, using a sample of children with ASD and a population comparison group, identified the theorized nine temperament factors; many items did not strongly load on any of the original factors. A 10 factor solution best described the ASD data and a 9 factor solution best described the typical group’s data. There were substantial similarities in the 9 factor solutions, but groups differed from one another enough to question construct similarity for several factors. These results highlight that more basic psychometric research is needed to better understand the BSQ in children with ASD.

Keywords

Autism Temperament Factor structure Developmental disabilities 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Lisa Wiggins for her helpful comments and invaluable insights while preparing this manuscript.

Author Contributions

BB, EJM, SAR contributed to study concept. BB, CL performed statistical analysis. All authors participated in the study design and methods, conceived the statistical review and interpretation, contributed to manuscript preparation and/or review.

Funding

This research was supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Centers for Autism and Developmental Disabilities Research (CADDRE), Study to Explore Early Development through six cooperative agreements: Cooperative Agreement Number U10DD000180, Colorado Department of Public Health/University of Colorado School of Medicine; Cooperative Agreement Number U10DD000181, Kaiser Foundation Research Institute (CA); Cooperative Agreement Number U10DD000182, University of Pennsylvania; Cooperative Agreement Number U10DD000183, Johns Hopkins University; Cooperative Agreement Number U10DD000184, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; and Cooperative Agreement Number U10DD000498, Michigan State University. Additional support came in part from core grants awarded to JFK Partners, the University Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities at the University Colorado School of Medicine from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, through the Administration on Developmental Disabilities Grant #90DD0561. Support for Dr. Barger from 2013 to 2015 came from a policy research grant by the Disability Research and Dissemination Center at the University of South Carolina’s School of Medicine in partnership with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities Learn the Signs. Act Early.; support from 2015 to 2017 came in part from core grants awarded to Georgia State University’s Center for Leadership in Disability, through the Administration on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities grant #90DD0662. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

10803_2018_3866_MOESM1_ESM.docx (23 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 23 KB)

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental misorders: DSM-V. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anastasi, A. (1992). What counselors should know about the use and interpretation of psychological tests. Journal of Counseling & Development, 70(5), 610–615.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1992.tb01670.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey, D. Jr., Hatton, D., Mesibov, G., Ament, N., & Skinner, M. (2000). Early development, temperament, and functional impairment in autism and Fragile X syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(1), 49–59.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005412111706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barger, B. (2013). Investigating the role of personality facets differentiating children with autism pectrum disorders from typically teveloping children. (Dissertation, Ph. D.), University of Georgia. Retrieved from http://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/barger_brian_d_201305_phd.
  5. Barger, B., Campbell, J., & Simmons, C. (2014). Measuring Five Factor Personality Traits in autism during early childhood. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 26(6), 775–792.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-014-9392-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barger, B., Campbell, J., & Simmons, C. (2016). The Five Factor Personality Model in children with ASD during middle childhood. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 31(3), 174–183.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357615583472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brock, M. E., Freuler, A., Baranek, G. T., Watson, L. R., Poe, M. D., & Sabatino, A. (2012). Temperament and Sensory Features of Children with Autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(11), 2271–2284.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1472-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buss, A. H., & Plomin, R. (1975). A temperament theory of personality development. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
  9. Buss, A. H., & Plomin, R. (2014). Temperament (PLE: Emotion): Early developing personality traits. London: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chuang, I.-C., Tseng, M.-H., Lu, L., & Shieh, J.-Y. (2012). Sensory correlates of difficult temperament characteristics in preschool children with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6(3), 988–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., Goldsmith, H. H., & Van Hulle, C. A. (2006). Gender differences in temperament: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 33–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heene, M., Hilbert, S., Draxler, C., Ziegler, M., & Buhner, M. (2011). Masking misfit in confirmatory factor analysis: A cautionary note on the usefulness of cutoff values of fit indices. Psychological Methods, 16(3), 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hepburn, S. L., & Stone, W. L. (2006). Using Carey Temperament Scales to assess behavioral style in children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(5), 637–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kagan, J., Snidman, N., Arcus, D., & Reznick, J. S. (1994). Galen’s prophecy: Temperament in human nature. Location: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  16. Kasari, C., & Sigman, M. (1997). Linking parental perceptions to interactions in young children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 27(1), 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lai, M., Lombardo, M., Auyeung, B., Chakrabarti, B., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2015). Sex/Gender differences and autism: Setting the scene for future research. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 54(1), 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Martin, R. P., Wisenbaker, J., & Huttunen, M. (1994). Review of factor analytic studies of temperament measures based on the Thomas-Chess structural model: Implications for the Big Five. In C. F. Halverson, Jr., G. A. Kohnstamm, & R. P. Martin (Eds.), The developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood (pp. 157–172). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, IncGoogle Scholar
  19. McDevitt, S. C., & Carey, W. B. (1975). Behavioral Styles Questionnaire. Scottsdale, AZ: Behavioral-Developmental Initiatives.Google Scholar
  20. Mendelson, J., Gates, J., & Lerner, M. (2016). Friendship in school-age boys with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A meta-analytic summary and developmental, process-based model. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 601–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mullen, E. M. (1995). The Mullen Scales of Eearly Learning. Circle Pines: AGS.Google Scholar
  22. Norris, M., & Lecavalier, L. (2010). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in developmental disability psychological research. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(1), 8–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pisula, E., Kawa, R., Danielewicz, D., & Pisula, W. (2015). The relationship between temperament and autistic traits in a non-clinical students sample. PLoS ONE, 10(4), e0124364.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/.
  25. Revelle, W. (2015). Psych: Package psych. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=PSYCH.
  26. Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rothbart, M. K. (2007). Temperament, development, and personality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(4), 207–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rothbart, M. K., Ahadi, S. A., & Evans, D. E. (2000). Temperament and personality: Origins and outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rutter, M., Bailey, A., & Lord, C. (2003). Social Communication Questionnaire. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
  30. Schendel, D., DiGuiseppi, C., Croen, L., Fallin, M. D., Reed, P., Schieve, L., et al. (2012). The Study to Explore Early Development (SEED): A multisite epidemiologic study of autism by the Centers for Autism and Developmental Disabilities Research and Epidemiology (CADDRE) Network. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(10), 2121–2140.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1461-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thomas, A., & Chess, S. (1977). Temperament and development. Oxford: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  32. Wiggins, L., Reynolds, A., Rice, C., Moody, E., Bernal, P., Blaskey, L., et al. (2015). Using standardized diagnostic instruments to classify children with autism in the Study to Explore Early Development. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(5), 1271–1280.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2287-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zentner, M., & Bates, J. E. (2008). Child temperament: An integrative review of concepts, research programs, and measures. European Journal of Developmental Science, 2(1–2), 7–37.Google Scholar
  34. Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, D. M., Joireman, J., Teta, P., & Kraft, M. (1993). A comparison of three structural models for personality: The Big Three, the Big Five, and the alternative five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public Health, Center for Leadership in DisabilityGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.School of Medicine, Disability Research and Dissemination CenterUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA
  3. 3.National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental DisabilitiesCenters for Disease Control and PreventionAtlantaUSA
  4. 4.University of Colorado School of MedicineAuroraUSA
  5. 5.University of DenverDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations