Examining the Efficacy of Peer Network Interventions on the Social Interactions of High School Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder
- 2k Downloads
Developing positive peer relationships is important. Unfortunately, due to challenges in social communication and increased complexity of peer groups during adolescence, many secondary students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) engage in limited positive social interactions with peers. This study examined the effects of a peer network intervention implemented with three high school students with ASD. A multiple-baseline across participants design was used to evaluate the intervention on initiations and responses to and from students with ASD. The impact on frequency of victimization of students with ASD was also explored. Results indicate peer networks are effective at increasing social interactions of secondary students with ASD and provide preliminary support for the use of peer networks to reduce rates of bullying victimization.
KeywordsAutism Peer mediated intervention Social interaction Victimization
The work reported here was supported by the Organization for Autism Research, Graduate Research Grant. This study reports findings from a doctoral dissertation and was supported by three research assistants: Nelson Brunsting, Susan Hedges, and Evans Caison.
MS conceived the study in collaboration with KH and HA. MS was the primary investigator and facilitated the intervention. MS and KH participated in the design and ongoing analysis and interpretation of the data. MS, KH, and HA helped to draft the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.
The work reported here was supported by the Organization for Autism Research, Graduate Research Grant.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- Blumberg, S. J., Bramlett, M. D., Kogan, M. D., Schieve, L. A., Jones, J. R., & Lu, M. C. (2013). Changes in prevalence of parent-reported autism spectrum disorder in school-aged U.S. children: 2007 to 2011–2012. National Health Statistics Reports, 65, 1–12.Google Scholar
- Carter, E. W., & Draper, J. (2010). Making school matter: Supporting meaningful secondary experiences for adolescents who use AAC. In: D. McNaughton &, R. D & Buekelman (Eds.), Transition strategies for adolescents and young adults who use augmentative and alternative communication (pp. 69–90). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
- Carter, E. W., Sisco, L. G., & Chung, Y. (2012). Peer-mediated support strategies. In P. A. Prelock & R. McCauley (Eds.), Treatment of autism spectrum disorders: Evidence-based intervention strategies for communication and social interactions (pp. 221–254). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
- Gardner, K. F., Carter, E. W., Gustafson, J. R., Hochman, J. M., Harvey, M. N., Mullins, T. S., & Fan, H. (2014). Effects of peer networks on the social interactions of high school students with autism spectrum disorders. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 39(2), 100–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hughes, C., Golas, M., Cosgriff, J., Brigham, N., Edwards, C., & Cashen, K. (2011). Effects of a social skills intervention among high school students with intellectual disabilities and autism and their general education peers. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36(1), 46–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hughes, C., Kaplan, L., Bernstein, R., Boykin, M., Reilly, C., Brigham, N., Harvey, M. (2013). Increasing social interaction skills of secondary school students with autism and/or intellectual disability: A review of interventions. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 37(4), 288–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs†¯: methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd edn.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Koegel, R., & Koegel, L. (1988). Generalized responsivity and pivotal behaviors. In R. Horner, G. Dunlap & R. Koegel (Eds.), Generalization and maintenance: Lifestyle changes in applied settings (pp. 41–66). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
- Koegel, R. L., Fredeen, R., Kim, S., Danial, J., Rubinstein, D., & Koegel, L. (2012). Using perseverative interests to improve interactions between adolescents with autism and their typical peers in school settings. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14(3), 133–141.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Reynolds, W. M. (2003). Reynolds bully-victimization scales for schools. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
- Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Laursen, B. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Schopler, E. S., Reichler, R. J., & Renner, B. R. (1988). The childhood autism rating scale (CARS). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
- Wagner, M., Cadwallader, T. W., Garza, N., & Cameto, R. (2004). Social activities of youth with disabilities. NLTS2 Data Brief, 3(1), 1–4.Google Scholar
- Wainscot, J. J., Naylor, P., Sutcliffe, P., Tantam, D., & Williams, J. V. (2008). Relationships with peers and use of the school environment of mainstream secondary school pupils with Asperger syndrome (High-Functioning Autism): A Case-Control Study. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 8(1), 25–38.Google Scholar
- Wentzel, K. R., Donlan, A., & Morrison, D. (2012). Peer relationships and social motivational processes. In A. M. Ryan & G. W. Ladd (Eds.), Peer relationships and adjustment at school (pp. 79–108). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar