Advertisement

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

, Volume 46, Issue 5, pp 1793–1805 | Cite as

Factors Influencing the Research Participation of Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders

  • Kaaren HaasEmail author
  • Debra Costley
  • Marita Falkmer
  • Amanda Richdale
  • Kate Sofronoff
  • Torbjörn Falkmer
Original Paper

Abstract

Recruiting adults with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) into research poses particular difficulties; longitudinal studies face additional challenges. This paper reports on a mixed methods study to identify factors influencing the participation in longitudinal autism research of adults with ASD, including those with an intellectual disability, and their carers. Common and differentiating factors influencing the research participation of participants are identified and discussed. Factors influencing participation were found to differ both between and within participant categories. We propose a dichotomy whereby factors influencing research participation can be classified as those arising from a participant’s values, which act as either a motivator or a deterrent; and those based on convenience, which act as either an enabler or inhibitor. These findings are applicable to research studies that seek to recruit adults with ASD as participants.

Keywords

Autism Asperger syndrome Incentive Longitudinal studies Motivation Research recruitment Research participation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the contributions of Trevor Clark and Susanna Baldwin, Autism Spectrum Australia to project establishment and design; and the contributions of the following to participant recruitment, data collection and data analysis: Lahna Bradley, La Trobe University; Susan Bruck, Autism Spectrum Australia; Heidi Stieglitz Ham, Curtin University; Emma Hyland and Damian Santomauro, The University of Queensland. The authors sincerely thank the study participants for their time, opinions and ideas.

Funding

The authors acknowledge the financial support of the Cooperative Research Centre for Living with Autism (Autism CRC), established and supported under the Australian Government’s Cooperative Research Centre’s Program.

Author Contributions

All authors except Kaaren Haas collaborated on the conception of the study. All authors worked on the design of the study. Kaaren Haas coordinated and conducted the participant recruitment, data collection and data analysis, and drafted the manuscript, with input from all other authors. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Supplementary material

10803_2016_2708_MOESM1_ESM.docx (30 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 30 kb)
10803_2016_2708_MOESM2_ESM.docx (67 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 66 kb)

References

  1. Balfe, M., & Tantam, D. (2010). A descriptive social and health profile of a community sample of adults and adolescents with Asperger syndrome. BMC Research Notes, 3(300), 1–7.Google Scholar
  2. Baron-Cohen, S. (2000). Theory of mind and autism: A review. In L. M. Glidden (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation (Vol. 23, pp. 169–184). Cambridge: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barton, C. A., May, C., Mészáros, D., Matheson, M. C., Jenkins, M., Giles, G., et al. (2012). Reasons for ongoing participation in a longitudinal cohort study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 36(4), 397–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beadle-Brown, J., Ryan, S., Windle, K., Holder, J., Turnpenny, A., Smith, N., Richardson, L., & Whelton, B. (2012). Engagement of people with long-term conditions in health and social care research: Barriers and facilitators to capturing the views of seldom-heard populations. (Discussion Paper 2850): Quality and Outcomes of Person-centred Care Policy Research Unit.Google Scholar
  5. Bell, K. (2013). Participants’ motivations and co-construction of the qualitative research process. Qualitative Social Work, 12(4), 523–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonk, J. (2010). A road map for the recruitment and retention of older adult participants for longitudinal studies. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 58(2), 303–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brodaty, H., Gibson, L. H., Waine, M. L., Shell, A. M., Lilian, R., & Pond, C. D. (2013). Research in general practice: A survey of incentives and disincentives for research participation. Mental Health in Family Medicine, 10(3), 163–173.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Cederlund, M., Hagberg, B., Billstedt, E., Gillberg, I. C., & Gillberg, C. (2008). Asperger syndrome and autism: A comparative longitudinal follow-up study more than 5 years after original diagnosis. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(1), 72–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, T. O. M. (2010). On ‘being researched’: Why do people engage with qualitative research? Qualitative Research, 10(4), 399–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cleaver, S., Ouellette-Kuntz, H., & Sakar, A. (2010). Participation in intellectual disability research: A review of 20 years of studies. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54(3), 187–193.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Derguy, C., Michel, G., M’bailara, K., Roux, S., & Bouvard, M. (2015). Assessing needs in parents of children with autism spectrum disorder: A crucial preliminary step to target relevant issues for support programs. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 40(2), 156–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fry, C. L. (2008). Research participation and internal normativity: Understanding why people participate. The American Journal of Bioethics, 8(10), 43–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gerber, F., Bessero, S., Robbiani, B., Courvoisier, D. S., Baud, M. A., Traoré, M.-C., et al. (2011). Comparing residential programmes for adults with autism spectrum disorders and intellectual disability: outcomes of challenging behaviour and quality of life. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 55(9), 918–932.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2011). Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Haas, K., Costley, D., Falkmer, M., Richdale, A., Sofronoff, K., & Falkmer, T. (2014). Optimising the recruitment and retention of adults for longitudinal autism research: A mixed methods study. Brisbane: Cooperative Research Centre for Living with Autism. http://www.autismcrc.com.au/reports.Google Scholar
  17. Harrington, C., Foster, M., Rodger, S., & Ashburner, J. (2014). Engaging young people with Autism Spectrum Disorder in research interviews. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(2), 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Howlin, P. (2005). Outcomes in autism spectrum disorders. In F. R. Volkmar, R. Paul, A. Klin, & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders (3rd ed., Vol. 1: Diagnosis, development, neurobiology, and behavior, pp. 201–220).Google Scholar
  19. Hunter, J., Corcoran, K., Leeder, S., & Phelps, K. (2012). Appealing to altruism is not enough: Motivators for participating in health services research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 7(3), 84–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kirkland, S. A., Raina, P. S., Wolfson, C., Strople, G., Kits, O., Dukeshire, S., et al. (2009). Exploring the acceptability and feasibility of conducting a large longitudinal population-based study in Canada. Canadian Journal of Aging, 28(3), 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lennox, N., Taylor, M., Rey-Conde, T., Bain, C., Purdie, D. M., & Boyle, F. (2005). Beating the barriers: Recruitment of people with intellectual disability to participate in research. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research: JIDR, 49(4), 296–305.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Leonard, N. R., Lester, P., Rotheram-Borus, M. J., Mattes, K., Gwadz, M., & Ferns, B. (2003). Successful recruitment and retention of participants in longitudinal behavioural research. AIDS Education and Prevention, 15(3), 269.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. MacLeod, A. G., Lewis, A., & Robertson, C. (2014). ‘CHARLIE: PLEASE RESPOND!’ Using a participatory methodology with individuals on the autism spectrum. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 37(4), 407–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Madriaga, M. (2010). ‘I avoid pubs and the student union like the plague’: Students with Asperger Syndrome and their negotiation of university spaces. Children’s Geographies, 8(1), 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Magiati, I., Tay, X. W., & Howlin, P. (2014). Cognitive, language, social and behavioural outcomes in adults with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review of longitudinal follow-up studies in adulthood. Clinical Psychology Review, 34(1), 73–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Mapstone, J., Elbourne, D., & Roberts, I. (2007). Strategies to improve recruitment to research studies (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 2, Art No MR000013.Google Scholar
  27. Marcantonio, E. R., Aneja, J., Jones, R. N., Alsop, D. C., Fong, T. G., Crosby, G. J., et al. (2008). Maximizing clinical research participation in vulnerable older persons: Identification of barriers and motivators. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 56(8), 1522–1527.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Marcus, B., & Schütz, A. (2005). Who are the people reluctant to participate in research? Personality correlates of four different types of nonresponse as inferred from self- and observer ratings. Journal of Personality, 73(4), 959–984.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Mazefsky, C. A., & White, S. W. (2014). Adults with autism. In F. R. Volkmar, R. Paul, S. J. Rogers, & K. A. Pelphrey (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. Mein, G., Seale, C., Rice, H., Johal, S., Ashcroft, R. E., Ellison, G., & Tinker, A. (2012). Altruism and participation in longitudinal health research? Insights from the Whitehall II Study. Social Science and Medicine, 75(12), 2345–2352.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Nicholson, L., Colyer, M., & Cooper, S. A. (2013). Recruitment to intellectual disability research: A qualitative study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 57(7), 647–656.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Ouellette-Kuntz, H., Lunsky, Y., Lysaght, R., Martin, L., & Saaltink, R. (2013). Partnering for research in the field of intellectual/developmental disabilities—Lessons for participant recruitment. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 19(2), 25–35.Google Scholar
  33. Robinson, K. A., Dennison, C. R., Wayman, D. M., Pronovost, P. J., & Needham, D. M. (2007). Systematic review identifies number of strategies important for retaining study participants. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(8), 757–765.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Thompson, S., & Phillips, D. (2007). Reaching and engaging hard-to-reach populations with a high proportion of nonassociative members. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 1292–1303.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Tishler, C. L., & Bartholomae, S. (2002). The recruitment of normal healthy volunteers: A review of the literature on the use of financial incentives. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 42, 365–375.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Autism Spectrum AustraliaFrenchs ForestAustralia
  2. 2.School of Occupational Therapy and Social Work, Faculty of Health SciencesCurtin UniversityBentleyAustralia
  3. 3.Olga Tennison Autism Research CentreLa Trobe UniversityBundooraAustralia
  4. 4.School of PsychologyThe University of QueenslandSt LuciaAustralia

Personalised recommendations