Factors Influencing the Research Participation of Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders
- 907 Downloads
Recruiting adults with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) into research poses particular difficulties; longitudinal studies face additional challenges. This paper reports on a mixed methods study to identify factors influencing the participation in longitudinal autism research of adults with ASD, including those with an intellectual disability, and their carers. Common and differentiating factors influencing the research participation of participants are identified and discussed. Factors influencing participation were found to differ both between and within participant categories. We propose a dichotomy whereby factors influencing research participation can be classified as those arising from a participant’s values, which act as either a motivator or a deterrent; and those based on convenience, which act as either an enabler or inhibitor. These findings are applicable to research studies that seek to recruit adults with ASD as participants.
KeywordsAutism Asperger syndrome Incentive Longitudinal studies Motivation Research recruitment Research participation
The authors acknowledge the contributions of Trevor Clark and Susanna Baldwin, Autism Spectrum Australia to project establishment and design; and the contributions of the following to participant recruitment, data collection and data analysis: Lahna Bradley, La Trobe University; Susan Bruck, Autism Spectrum Australia; Heidi Stieglitz Ham, Curtin University; Emma Hyland and Damian Santomauro, The University of Queensland. The authors sincerely thank the study participants for their time, opinions and ideas.
The authors acknowledge the financial support of the Cooperative Research Centre for Living with Autism (Autism CRC), established and supported under the Australian Government’s Cooperative Research Centre’s Program.
All authors except Kaaren Haas collaborated on the conception of the study. All authors worked on the design of the study. Kaaren Haas coordinated and conducted the participant recruitment, data collection and data analysis, and drafted the manuscript, with input from all other authors. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.
- Balfe, M., & Tantam, D. (2010). A descriptive social and health profile of a community sample of adults and adolescents with Asperger syndrome. BMC Research Notes, 3(300), 1–7.Google Scholar
- Baron-Cohen, S. (2000). Theory of mind and autism: A review. In L. M. Glidden (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation (Vol. 23, pp. 169–184). Cambridge: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Beadle-Brown, J., Ryan, S., Windle, K., Holder, J., Turnpenny, A., Smith, N., Richardson, L., & Whelton, B. (2012). Engagement of people with long-term conditions in health and social care research: Barriers and facilitators to capturing the views of seldom-heard populations. (Discussion Paper 2850): Quality and Outcomes of Person-centred Care Policy Research Unit.Google Scholar
- Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Derguy, C., Michel, G., M’bailara, K., Roux, S., & Bouvard, M. (2015). Assessing needs in parents of children with autism spectrum disorder: A crucial preliminary step to target relevant issues for support programs. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 40(2), 156–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gerber, F., Bessero, S., Robbiani, B., Courvoisier, D. S., Baud, M. A., Traoré, M.-C., et al. (2011). Comparing residential programmes for adults with autism spectrum disorders and intellectual disability: outcomes of challenging behaviour and quality of life. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 55(9), 918–932.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2011). Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Haas, K., Costley, D., Falkmer, M., Richdale, A., Sofronoff, K., & Falkmer, T. (2014). Optimising the recruitment and retention of adults for longitudinal autism research: A mixed methods study. Brisbane: Cooperative Research Centre for Living with Autism. http://www.autismcrc.com.au/reports.Google Scholar
- Howlin, P. (2005). Outcomes in autism spectrum disorders. In F. R. Volkmar, R. Paul, A. Klin, & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders (3rd ed., Vol. 1: Diagnosis, development, neurobiology, and behavior, pp. 201–220).Google Scholar
- Mapstone, J., Elbourne, D., & Roberts, I. (2007). Strategies to improve recruitment to research studies (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 2, Art No MR000013.Google Scholar
- Marcantonio, E. R., Aneja, J., Jones, R. N., Alsop, D. C., Fong, T. G., Crosby, G. J., et al. (2008). Maximizing clinical research participation in vulnerable older persons: Identification of barriers and motivators. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 56(8), 1522–1527.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Mazefsky, C. A., & White, S. W. (2014). Adults with autism. In F. R. Volkmar, R. Paul, S. J. Rogers, & K. A. Pelphrey (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Ouellette-Kuntz, H., Lunsky, Y., Lysaght, R., Martin, L., & Saaltink, R. (2013). Partnering for research in the field of intellectual/developmental disabilities—Lessons for participant recruitment. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 19(2), 25–35.Google Scholar