Advertisement

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

, Volume 45, Issue 4, pp 932–942 | Cite as

Risk of Autism Associated With General Anesthesia During Cesarean Delivery: A Population-Based Birth-Cohort Analysis

  • Li-Nien Chien
  • Hsiu-Chen Lin
  • Yu-Hsuan Joni Shao
  • Shu-Ti Chiou
  • Hung-Yi ChiouEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

The rates of Cesarean delivery (C-section) have risen to >30 % in numerous countries. Increased risk of autism has been shown in neonates delivered by C-section. This study examined the incidence of autism in neonates delivered vaginally, by C-section with regional anesthesia (RA), and by C-section with general anesthesia (GA) to evaluate the risk of autism associated with C-section and obstetric anesthesia. During a mean follow-up of 4.3 years, the incidence of autism was higher in neonates delivered by C-section with GA than in neonates delivered vaginally, with an adjusted risk of 1.52 (95 % confidence interval 1.18–1.94). However, the adjusted risk of autism in neonates delivered by C-section with RA and in neonates delivered vaginally was nonsignificantly different.

Keywords

Autism Cesarean delivery Obstetric anesthesia Population-based birth cohort 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan (grant number 9910220P).

Supplementary material

10803_2014_2247_MOESM1_ESM.doc (202 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 202 kb)

References

  1. Afolabi, B. B., & Lesi, F. E. (2012). Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 10, CD004350. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004350.pub3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Almqvist, C., Cnattingius, S., Lichtenstein, P., & Lundholm, C. (2012). The impact of birth mode of delivery on childhood asthma and allergic diseases: A sibling study. Clinical and Experimental Allergy, 42, 1369–1376. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2012.04021.x.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Anello, A., et al. (2009). Brief report: Parental age and the sex ratio in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 1487–1492. doi: 10.1007/s10803-009-0755-y.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Austin, P. C. (2008). A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003. Statistics in Medicine, 27, 2037–2049. doi: 10.1002/sim.3150.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Austin, P. C. (2011). An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 399–424. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.568786.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bailey, A., et al. (1995). Autism as a strongly genetic disorder: Evidence from a British twin study. Psychological Medicine, 25, 63–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Barber, E. L., Lundsberg, L. S., Belanger, K., Pettker, C. M., Funai, E. F., & Illuzzi, J. L. (2011). Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 118, 29–38. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821e5f65.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bilder, D., Pinborough-Zimmerman, J., Miller, J., & McMahon, W. (2009). Prenatal, perinatal, and neonatal factors associated with autism spectrum disorders. Pediatrics, 123, 1293–1300. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-0927.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Boulet, S. L., Boyle, C. A., & Schieve, L. A. (2009). Health care use and health and functional impact of developmental disabilities among US children, 1997–2005. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 163, 19–26. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2008.506.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bragg, F., et al. (2010). Variation in rates of caesarean section among english NHS trusts after accounting for maternal and clinical risk: Cross sectional study. BMJ, 341, c5065. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c5065.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Buggy, D. (2000). Can anaesthetic management influence surgical-wound healing? The Lancet, 356, 355–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burke, J. P., et al. (2014). Does a claims diagnosis of autism mean a true case? Autism, 18, 321–330. doi: 10.1177/1362361312467709.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Burt, R. D., Vaughan, T. L., & Daling, J. R. (1988). Evaluating the risks of cesarean section: Low Apgar score in repeat C-section and vaginal deliveries. American Journal of Public Health, 78, 1312–1314. doi: 10.2105/ajph.78.10.1312.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Casey, B. J., Galvan, A., & Hare, T. A. (2005). Changes in cerebral functional organization during cognitive development. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15, 239–244. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2005.03.012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cook, V., Hu, X. J., & Swartz, T. (2011). Cox regression with covariates missing not at random. Statistics in Biosciences, 3, 208–222. doi: 10.1007/s12561-010-9031-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crow, J. F. (1997). The high spontaneous mutation rate: Is it a health risk? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94, 8380–8386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Declercq, E., Young, R., Cabral, H., & Ecker, J. (2011). Is a rising cesarean delivery rate inevitable? trends in industrialized Countries, 1987 to 2007. Birth, 38, 99–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00459.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. DiMaggio, C., Sun, L. S., Kakavouli, A., Byrne, M. W., & Li, G. (2009). A retrospective cohort study of the association of anesthesia and hernia repair surgery with behavioral and developmental disorders in young children. Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology, 21, 286–291. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181a71f11.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Dodds, L., Fell, D., Shea, S., Armson, B., Allen, A., & Bryson, S. (2011). The role of prenatal, obstetric and neonatal factors in the development of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41, 891–902. doi: 10.1007/s10803-010-1114-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. D’Onofrio, B. M., et al. (2014). Paternal age at childbearing and offspring psychiatric and academic morbidity. JAMA Psychiatry, 71, 432–438. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.4525.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Eaton, W. W., Mortensen, P. B., Thomsen, P. H., & Frydenberg, M. (2001). Obstetric complications and risk for severe psychopathology in childhood. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 279–285. doi: 10.1023/a:1010743203048.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Filipek, P. A., et al. (2000). Practice parameter: screening and diagnosis of autism: Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Child Neurology Society. Neurology, 55, 468–479.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Flick, R. P., et al. (2011). Cognitive and behavioral outcomes after early exposure to anesthesia and surgery. Pediatrics, 128, e1053–e1061. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-0351.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Fombonne, E. (2003). Epidemiological surveys of autism and other pervasive developmental disorders: An update. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33, 365–382. doi: 10.1023/A:1025054610557.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Gardener, H., Spiegelman, D., & Buka, S. L. (2011). Perinatal and neonatal risk factors for autism: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 128, 344–355. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-1036.
  26. Glasson, E., Bower, C., Petterson, B., de Klerk, N., Chaney, G., & Hallmayer, J. (2004). Perinatal factors and the development of autism: A population study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61, 618–627. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.6.618.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hamilton, B. E., Hoyert, D. L., Martin, J. A., Strobino, D. M., & Guyer, B. (2013). Annual summary of vital statistics: 2010–2011. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 68, 421–422. doi: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000431312.76961.4b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Han, W. E. I., et al. (2011). Trends in live births in the past 20 years in Zhengzhou, China. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 90, 332–337. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2010.01065.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Harper, L. M., Odibo, A. O. (2010). Mode of delivery and obstetric outcomes in Asia. Women’s health (London, England) 6, 365–6. doi: 10.2217/whe.10.14.
  30. Hattori, R., Desimaru, M., Nagayama, I., & Inoue, K. (1991). Autistic and developmental disorders after general anaesthetic delivery. The Lancet, 337, 1357–1358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Herschkowitz, N., Kagan, J., & Zilles, K. (1997). Neurobiological bases of behavioral development in the first year. Neuropediatrics, 28, 296–306. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-973720.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hultman, C. M., Sparén, P., & Cnattingius, S. (2002). Perinatal risk factors for infantile autism. Epidemiology, 13, 417–423.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kosanke, J., Bergstralh, E. (2004). gmatch: Match 1 or more controls to cases using the GREEDY algorithm.Google Scholar
  34. Kottmel, A., et al. (2012). Maternal request: A reason for rising rates of cesarean section? Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 286, 93–98. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2273-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lieberman, E., Lang, J. M., Cohen, A. P., Frigoletto, F. D, Jr, Acker, D., & Rao, R. (1997). The association of fetal sex with the rate of cesarean section. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 176, 667–671. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70567-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Maimburg, R. D., & Væth, M. (2006). Perinatal risk factors and infantile autism. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 114, 257–264. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2006.00805.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. McGlennan, A., & Mustafa, A. (2009). General anaesthesia for caesarean section. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain, 9, 148–151. doi: 10.1093/bjaceaccp/mkp025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Merenstein, D. J., Gatti, M. E., & Mays, D. M. (2011). The association of mode of delivery and common childhood illnesses. Clinical Pediatrics, 50, 1024–1030. doi: 10.1177/0009922811410875.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Murphy, D. J., Liebling, R. E., Verity, L., Swingler, R., & Patel, R. (2001). Early maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with operative delivery in second stage of labour: A cohort study. The Lancet, 358, 1203–1207. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(01)06341-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. National Health Insurance Administration, M. o. H. a. W. (2013). In. http://www.nhi.gov.tw/english.
  41. Nishiyama, T., Yamashita, K., & Yokoyama, T. (2005). Stress hormone changes in general anesthesia of long duration: Isoflurane-nitrous oxide vs sevoflurane-nitrous oxide anesthesia. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 17, 586–591. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2005.03.009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. OECD (2011). Health at a Glance 2011, OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  43. Palanisamy, A., Mitani, A. A., & Tsen, L. C. (2011). General anesthesia for cesarean delivery at a tertiary care hospital from 2000 to 2005: A retrospective analysis and 10-year update. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 20, 10–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2010.07.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Reichenberg, A., Gross, R., Weiser, M., et al. (2006). Advancing paternal age and autism. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63, 1026–1032. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.9.1026.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Rice, D., & Barone, S, Jr. (2000). Critical periods of vulnerability for the developing nervous system: Evidence from humans and animal models. Environmental Health Perspectives, 108(Suppl 3), 511–533.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Roduit, C., et al. (2009). Asthma at 8 years of age in children born by caesarean section. Thorax, 64, 107–113. doi: 10.1136/thx.2008.100875.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Rosenbaum, P., & Rubin, D. (1984). Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 516–524. doi: 10.2307/2288398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shroff, R., Thompson, A. C., McCrum, A., & Rees, S. G. (2004). Prospective multidisciplinary audit of obstetric general anaesthesia in a district general hospital. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 24, 641–646. doi: 10.1080/01443610400007877.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Stukel, T. A., Fisher, E. S., Wennberg, D. E., Alter, D. A., Gottlieb, D. J., & Vermeulen, M. J. (2007). Analysis of observational studies in the presence of treatment selection bias: Effects of invasive cardiac management on ami survival using propensity score and instrumental variable methods. JAMA, 297, 278–285. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.3.278.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Sun, L. (2010). Early childhood general anaesthesia exposure and neurocognitive development. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 105, i61–i68. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq302.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2009). ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of Labor. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 114, 386–397. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Treschan, T. A., et al. (2003). The effects of epidural and general anesthesia on tissue oxygenation. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 96, 1553–1557.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Wilder, R. T., et al. (2009). Early exposure to anesthesia and learning disabilities in a population-based birth cohort. Anesthesiology, 110, 796.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Li-Nien Chien
    • 1
  • Hsiu-Chen Lin
    • 2
    • 3
  • Yu-Hsuan Joni Shao
    • 4
  • Shu-Ti Chiou
    • 5
    • 6
  • Hung-Yi Chiou
    • 7
    Email author
  1. 1.School of Health Care Administration, College of Public Health and NutritionTaipei Medical UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, College of MedicineTaipei Medical UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  3. 3.Department of Laboratory MedicineTaipei Medical University HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
  4. 4.Graduate Institute of Biomedical InformaticsTaipei Medical UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  5. 5.Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and WelfareTaipeiTaiwan
  6. 6.Institution of Public Health, School of MedicineNational Yang-Ming UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  7. 7.School of Public Health, College of Public Health and NutritionTaipei Medical UniversityTaipei CityTaiwan

Personalised recommendations