A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparison Between Pivotal Response Treatment (PRT) and Structured Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) Intervention for Children with Autism
- 8.7k Downloads
Accumulating studies are documenting specific motivational variables that, when combined into a naturalistic teaching paradigm, can positively influence the effectiveness of interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The purpose of this study was to compare two applied behavior analysis (ABA) intervention procedures, a naturalistic approach, pivotal response treatment (PRT) with a structured ABA approach in a school setting. A randomized clinical trial design using two groups of children, matched according to age, sex and mean length of utterance was used to compare the interventions. The data showed that the PRT approach was significantly more effective in improving targeted and untargeted areas after 3 months of intervention. The results are discussed in terms of variables that produce more rapid improvements in communication for children with ASD.
KeywordsPragmatic skills Naturalistic approach Analog approach Autism Pivotal response treatment ABA
This project was supported in part by the Zehne Ziba Rehabilitation Institute in Hamedan, Iran, and University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences in Tehran, Iran, and the National Institute of Health research grant (DC010924). We are grateful to the teachers and parents who completed the measures, and the children who participated in this research. Also, we would like to thank Diane Morovati and Robert L. Koegel for their feedback during the preparation of this manuscript. We would also like to thank the Broad Foundation, the Kind World Foundation, and the Douglas foundation for their support. In addition to being employed at the University of California at Santa Barbara, Dr. Lynn Kern Koegel is also a partner in the private firm, Koegel Autism Consultants.
- American Psychological Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- Bishop, D. V. M. (2006). Children’s communication checklist (2nd ed., U.S. ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
- Blumburg, S. J., Bramlett, M. D., Kogan, M. D., Schieve, L. A., Jones, J. R., & Lu, M. C. (2013). Changes in prevalence of parent-reported autism spectrum disorder in school-aged U.S. children: 2007-2011-1012. National Health Statistics Reports. 65, http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr065.pdf.
- Boettcher, M. A. (2004). Teaching social conversation skills to children with autism through self-management: An analysis of treatment gains and meaningful outcomes.Google Scholar
- Bryson, S. E., Koegel, L. K., Koegel, R. L., Openden, D., Smith, I. M., & Nefdt, N. (2007). Large scale dissemination and community implementation of Pivotal Response Treatment: Program description and preliminary data. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 32(2), 142–153.Google Scholar
- Catts, H. W. (1996). The relationship between speech-language impairments and reading disabilities. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1993(36), 948–958.Google Scholar
- Greenspan, S. I., Wieder, S., & Simons, R. (1998). The child with special needs: Encouraging intellectual and emotional growth. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Longman 1998.Google Scholar
- Handleman, J. S., & Harris, S. L. (Eds.). (2001). Preschool education programs for children with autism. Austin, TX: Pro-ed.Google Scholar
- Koegel, L. K. (2011). Pivotal response treatment: Using motivation as a pivotal response. Santa Barbara: University of California.Google Scholar
- Koegel, R. L., & Koegel, L. K. (2006). Pivotal response treatments. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.Google Scholar
- Koegel, L. K., Koegel, R. L., Ashbaugh, K., & Bradshaw, J. (2014). The importance of early identification and intervention for children with or at risk for autism spectrum disorders. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 0, 1–7.Google Scholar
- Koegel, R. L., O’Dell, M., & Dunlap, G. (1988). Producing speech use in nonverbal autistic children by reinforcing attempts. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18(4), 525–538.Google Scholar
- Leaf, R. B. (1999). A work in progress: Behavior management strategies and a curriculum for intensive behavioral treatment of autism (pp. 1417–1418). J. McEachin (Ed.). New York: Drl Books.Google Scholar
- Lovaas, O. I. (1981). The me book. Austin, Texas: Pro-Ed, Inc.Google Scholar
- Miller, J. F. (1981). Assessing language production in children: Experimental procedures. Boston, NY: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- National Autism Center. (2009). National standards project: Addressing the need for evidence-based practice guidelines for autism spectrum disorder. Findings and conclusions. http://www.nationalautismcenter.org/pdf/NAC%20Findings%20&%20Conclusions.pdf.
- National Research Council. (2001). Educating children with autism. Washington, D.C.: The National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Nelson, K. E., Camarata, S. M., Welsh, J., Butkovsky, L., & Camarata, M. (1996). Effects of imitative and conversational recasting treatment on the acquisition of grammar in children with specific language impairment and younger language-normal children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39(4), 850–859.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar