Advertisement

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

, Volume 44, Issue 2, pp 417–430 | Cite as

iSocial: Delivering the Social Competence Intervention for Adolescents (SCI-A) in a 3D Virtual Learning Environment for Youth with High Functioning Autism

  • Janine P. Stichter
  • James Laffey
  • Krista Galyen
  • Melissa Herzog
Original Paper

Abstract

One consistent area of need for students with autism spectrum disorders is in the area of social competence. However, the increasing need to provide qualified teachers to deliver evidence-based practices in areas like social competence leave schools, such as those found in rural areas, in need of support. Distance education and in particular, 3D Virtual Learning, holds great promise for supporting schools and youth to gain social competence through knowledge and social practice in context. iSocial, a distance education, 3D virtual learning environment implemented the 31-lesson social competence intervention for adolescents across three small cohorts totaling 11 students over a period of 4 months. Results demonstrated that the social competence curriculum was delivered with fidelity in the 3D virtual learning environment. Moreover, learning outcomes suggest that the iSocial approach shows promise for social competence benefits for youth.

Keywords

3D virtual learning environments High functioning autism Social competence Distance education 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was funded in part by the Institute of Educational Sciences (R324A090197).

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  2. Arici, A. D. (2009). Meeting kids at their own game: A comparison of learning and engagement in traditional and 3D MUVE educational-gaming contexts, Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses Database. Publication no. 3342204.Google Scholar
  3. Attwood, T. (2007). The complete guide to Asperger syndrome. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Baio, J. (2012). Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders—autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 14 sites, United States, 2008. In Morbidity and mortality weekly report, 61, 1–19. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
  5. Barab, S., Thomas, M., Dodge, T., Carteaux, R., & Tuzun, H. (2005). Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(1), 86–107. doi: 10.1007/BF02504859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baron-Cohen, S., O’Riordan, M., Stone, V., Jones, R., & Plaisted, K. (1999). Recognition of Faux Pas by normally developing children and children with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29, 407–418. doi: 10.1023/A:1023035012436.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Spong, A., Scahill, V., & Lawson, J. (2001). Are intuitive physics and intuitive psychology independent? A test with children with Asperger syndrome. Journal of Developmental and Learning Disorders, 5, 47–78.Google Scholar
  8. Berry, A. B., Petrin, R., Gravelle, M., & Farmer, T. (2011). Issues in special education teacher recruitment, retention, and professional development: Considerations in supporting rural teachers. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 30(4), 3–11.Google Scholar
  9. Borrelli, B., Sepinwall, D., Ernst, D., Bellg, A. J., Czajkowski, S., Breger, R., et al. (2005). A new tool to assess treatment fidelity and evaluation of treatment fidelity across 10 years of health behavior research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(5), 852–860. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.5.852.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carnine, D. W. (1976). Effects of two teacher-presentation rates on off-task behavior, answering correctly, and participation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9(2), 199–206. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1976.9-199.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carroll, C., Patterson, M., Wood, S., Booth, A., Rick, J., & Balain, S. (2007). A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implementation Science, 2, 40–48. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-2-40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheng, Y., Chiang, H. C., Ye, J., & Cheng, L. H. (2010). Enhancing empathy instruction using a collaborative virtual learning environment for children with autistic spectrum conditions. Computers & Education, 55, 1449–1458. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cheng, Y., & Ye, J. (2010). Exploring the social competence of students with autism spectrum conditions in a collaborative virtual learning environment—the pilot study. Computers & Education, 54, 1068–1077. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Choi, B., & Baek, Y. (2011). Exploring factors of media characteristic influencing flow in learning through virtual worlds. Computers & Education, 57, 2382–2394. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Conners, C. K., & Staff, M. H. S. (2000). Conners’ continuous performance test II (CPT II). North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems Inc.Google Scholar
  16. Constantino, J. N., & Gruber, C. P. (2005). Social responsiveness scale (SRS). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
  17. Cook, B. G., Tankersley, M., Cook, L., & Landrum, T. J. (2008). Evidence-based practices in special education: Some practical considerations. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44, 69–75. doi: 10.1177/1053451208321452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dede, C. (2005). Planning for neomillennial learning styles. Educause Quarterly, 28(1), 7–12. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/planning-neomillennial-learning-styles.
  19. Dede, C., Ketelhut, D. J., Clarke, J., Nelson, B., & Bowman, C. (2005). Students’ motivation and learning of science in a multi-user virtual environment. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference. Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
  20. Delis, D., Kaplan, E., & Kramer, J. (2001). Delis–Kaplan executive function scale. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  21. Eames, C., Daley, D., Hutchings, J., Hughes, J. C., Jones, K., Martin, P., & Bywater, T. (2008). The leader observation tool: A process skills treatment fidelity measure for the Incredible Years parenting programme. Child: Care, Health and Development, 34(3), 391–400. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2008.00828.Google Scholar
  22. Eaves, L. C., & Ho, H. H. (1997). School placement and academic achievement in children with autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 9(4), 277–291. doi: 10.1023/A:1024944226971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fombonne, E. (2007). Autism spectrum disorders: Rates, trends and links with immunizations. In Lecture presented at advances in autism conference: New insights in the diagnosis, neurobiology, genetics, and treatment of autism. New York.Google Scholar
  24. Fombonne, E. (2009). Epidemiology of pervasive developmental disorders. Pediatric Research, 65, 591–598. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e31819e7203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gioia, G. A., Isquith, P. K., Guy, S. C., & Kenworthy, L. (2000). Behavior rating of executive functioning: Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.Google Scholar
  26. Gray, L., & Lewis, L. (2009). Educational technology in public school districts: Fall 2008 (NCES 2010–003). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  27. Hannum, W. H., Irvin, M. J., Banks, J. B., & Farmer, T. W. (2009). Distance education use in rural schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 24(3). Retrieved from: http://jrre.psu.edu/articles/24-3.pdf.
  28. Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2010). Use of three-dimensional (3-D) immersive virtual worlds in K-12 and higher education settings: A review of the research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 33–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00900.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hickey, D., Ingram-Goble, A., & Jameson, E. (2009). Designing assessments and assessing designs in virtual educational environments. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(2), 187–208. doi: 10.1007/s10956-008-9143-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Horrigan, J.B. (2010). Broadband adoption and use in America, OBI Working Paper Series No. 1. Washington, DC: Federal Communications Commission. Retrieved from http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296442A1.pdf.
  31. Howlin, P. (2000). Outcome in adult life for more able individuals with autism or asperger syndrome. Autism, 4, 63–83. doi: 10.1177/1362361300004001005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Howlin, P., Mawhood, L., & Rutter, M. (2000). Autism and developmental receptive language disorder: A follow-up comparison in early adult life. II: Social, behavioural, and psychiatric outcomes. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 561–578. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00643.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Iqbal, A., Kankaanranta, M., & Neittaanmäki, P. (2010). Engaging learners through virtual worlds. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 3198–3205. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jimerson, L. (2005). Placism in NCLB: How rural children are left behind. Equity and Excellence in Education, 38, 211–219. doi: 10.1080/10665680591002588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Johnson, J., & Strange, M. (2007). Why rural matters 2007: The realities of rural education growth. Arlington, VA: Rural School and Community Trust.Google Scholar
  36. Kazdin, A. E. (2010). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. London: Oxford Publishing.Google Scholar
  37. Keegan, D. (1996). Foundations of distance education (3rd ed.). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  38. Kendall, R. M. (1992). Evaluating the benefits of a computer based telecommunication network: Telementoring and teletraining for educators in rural areas. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 8(1), 41–46. Retrieved from http://jrre.psu.edu/articles.html.
  39. Ketelhut, D. J., & Schifter, C. C. (2011). Teachers and game-based learning: Improving understanding of how to increase efficacy of adoption. Computers & Education, 56(2), 539–546. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Laffey, J., Schmidt, M., Ding, N. & Galyen, K. (2010a). A design research approach to innovation in 3D virtual learning environments. Paper presented at a special conference to honor Professor Thomas C Reeves, educational design research: Local change and global impact. Athens, GA.Google Scholar
  41. Laffey, J., Schmidt, M., Galyen, K., & Stichter, J. (2012). Smart 3D collaborative virtual learning environments: A preliminary framework. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, 4(1), 49–66. doi: 10.3233/AIS-2011-012.Google Scholar
  42. Laffey, J., Schmidt, M., Henry, H., Wang, X. & Stichter, J. (2010b). Examining interaction in 3D VLE: A case study of an analytic approach. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver, CO.Google Scholar
  43. Laffey, J., Schmidt, M., Stichter, J., Wang, X., Schmidt, C. & Ding, N. (2011a). Examining the impact of social orthotics on behavior in a 3D VLE for youth with autism spectrum disorders. Poster presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  44. Laffey, J., Stichter, J., & Schmidt, M. (2010c). Social orthotics for youth with ASD to learn in a collaborative 3D VLE. In S. Seok, E. L. Meyen, & B. DaCosta (Eds.), Handbook of research on human cognition and assistive technology: Design, accessibility and transdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 1–20). New York: Idea Group.Google Scholar
  45. Laffey, J., Stichter, J., Schmidt, M., & Galyen, K. (2011b). Development and research of a technology implementation of a curriculum to enhance social competence. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Psychological Science. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  46. Leonard, A., Mitchell, P., & Parsons, S. (2002). Finding a place to sit: A preliminary investigation into the effectiveness of virtual environments for social skills training for people with autistic spectrum disorders. In Proceedings of International conference on disabilities, virtual reality and associated technology (ICDVRAT) (pp. 249–258). Veszprem, Hungary: University of Reading. Retrieved from http://www.icdvrat.reading.ac.uk/2002/index2002.htm.
  47. Lord, C., Rutter, M., & Couteur, A. (1994). Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised: A revised version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasive developmental disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24(5), 659–685. doi: 10.1007/BF0217214.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P. C., & Risi, S. (2003). Autism diagnostic observation schedule. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
  49. Martens, B. K., & Witt, J. C. (1982). The intervention rating profile. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska-Lincoln.Google Scholar
  50. Mennecke, B. E., Triplett, J. L., Hassall, L. M., Conde, Z. J., & Heer, R. (2011). An examination of a theory of embodied social presence in virtual worlds. Decision Sciences, 42(2), 413–450. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2011.00317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Metcalf, S. J., Clarke, J., & Dede, C. (2009). Virtual worlds for education: River city and EcoMuve. Paper presented at MiT6 international conference, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  52. Metcalf, S., Kamarainen, A., Tutwiler, M. S., Grotzer, T., & Dede, C. (2011). Ecosystem science learning via multi-user virtual environments. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations, 3(1), 86–90. doi: 10.4018/jgcms.2011010107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mineo, B., Ziegler, W., Gill, S., & Salkin, D. (2009). Engagement with electronic screen media among students with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(1), 172–187. doi: 10.1007/s10803-008-0616-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Moore, D., Cheng, Y., McGrath, P., & Powell, N. J. (2005). Collaborative virtual environment technology for people with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20(4), 231–243. doi: 10.1177/10883576050200040501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Myles, B. S., & Simpson, R. L. (2002). Asperger syndrome: An overview of characteristics. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 17, 132–137. doi: 10.1177/10883576020170030201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Newman, L., Wagner, M., Knokey, A.-M., Marder, C., Nagle, K. et al. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2011-3005). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from: www.nlts2.org/reports/.
  57. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (2002). Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat., 1425, 20 U.S.C. §§6301 et seq.Google Scholar
  58. Nowicki, S., & Carton, J. (1993). The measurement of emotional intensity from facial expressions. Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 749–750. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1993.9713934.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Parsons, S., & Mitchell, P. (2002). The potential of virtual reality in social skills training for people with autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 46(5), 430–443. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2788.2002.00425.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Parsons, S., Mitchell, P., & Leonard, A. (2005). Do adolescents with autistic spectrum disorders adhere to social conventions in virtual environments? Autism, 9(1), 95–117. doi: 10.1177/1362361305049032.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Picciano, A. G., & Seaman J. (2009). K-12 online learning: A 2008 follow-up of the Survey of U.S. School District Administrators. Retrieved from: http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/k-12online2008.
  62. Rice, K. (2006). A comprehensive look at distance education in the K-12 context. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(4), 425–448.Google Scholar
  63. Rule, S., Salzberg, C., Higbee, T., Menlove, R., & Smith, J. (2006). Technology-mediated consultation to assist rural students: A case study. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 25(2), 3.Google Scholar
  64. Rutten, A., Cobb, S., Neale, H., Kerr, S., Leonard, A., Parsons, S., et al. (2003). The AS interactive project: Single-user and collaborative virtual environments for people with high-functioning autistic spectrum disorders. The Journal of Visualization and Computer Animation, 14, 233–241. doi: 10.1002/vis.320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schmidt, M. M. (2010). Social influence in a 3D virtual learning environment for individuals with autism spectrum disorders, Doctoral Dissertation. Retrieved from: http://laurel.lso.missouri.edu/record=b8183270~S8.
  66. Schmidt, M., Laffey, J. M., Schmidt, C. T., Wang, X., & Stichter, J. (2012). Developing methods for understanding social behavior in a 3D virtual learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 405–413. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schmidt, M., Laffey, J. & Stichter, J. (2011). Virtual social competence instruction for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: Beyond the single-user experience. In Proceedings of CSCL 2011 (pp 816–820). Hong Kong, China.Google Scholar
  68. Schmidt, C., & Stichter, J. P. (2012). The use of peer-mediated interventions to promote the generalization of social competence for adolescents with high-functioning autism and Asperger’s Syndrome. Exceptionality, 20, 94–113. doi: 10.1080/09362835.2012.669303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schmidt, C., Stichter, J. P., Lierheimer, K., McGhee, S., & O’Connor, K. V. (2011b). An initial investigation of the generalization of a school-based social competence intervention for youth with high-functioning autism. Autism Research and Treatment, 1–11, 589539. doi: 10.1155/2011/589539.Google Scholar
  70. Simpson, R. L., Lacava, P. G., & Sampson Graner, P. (2004). The No Child Left Behind act: Challenges and implications for educators. Intervention in School and Clinic, 40(2), 67–75. doi: 10.1177/10534512040400020101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Standen, P. J., & Brown, D. J. (2006). Virtual reality and its role in removing the barriers that turn cognitive impairments into intellectual disability. Virtual Reality, 10(3), 241–252. doi: 10.1007/s10055-006-0042-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Stichter, J. P., Herzog, M. J., O’Connor, K. V., & Schmidt, C. (2012). A preliminary examination of a general social outcome measure. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 38, 40–52. doi: 10.1177/153450841245521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Stichter, J., Herzog, M., Visovsky, K., Schmidt, C., Randolph, J., Schultz, T., et al. (2010). Social competence intervention for youth with Asperger syndrome and high-functioning autism: An initial investigation. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(9), 1067–1079. doi: 10.1007/s10803-010-0959-1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Strange, M., Johnson, J., Showalter, D., & Klein, R. (2012). Why rural matters 20112012: The condition of rural education in the 50 states. Washington, DC: Rural School and Community Trust. Retrieved from http://www.nwp.org/cs/public/print/resource/3771.
  75. Sutherland, K. S., & Wehby, J. H. (2001). Exploring the relationship between increased opportunities to respond to academic requests and the academic and behavioral outcomes of students with EBD. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 113–121. doi: 10.1177/074193250102200205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Torres, C., Farley, C. A., & Cook, B. G. (2012). A special educator’s guide to successfully implementing evidence-based practices. Teaching Exceptional Children, 45(1), 64–73.Google Scholar
  77. US Government Accountability Office. (2004). No child left behind act: Additional assistance and research on effective strategies would help small rural districts. Publication No. GAO-04-909. Washington, DC: United States Government Accountability Office. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d04909.pdf.
  78. Wheeler, J. J., Carter, S. L., Mayton, M. R., & Thomas, R. A. (2002). Structural analysis of instructional variables and their effects on task-engagement and self-aggression. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 391–398.Google Scholar
  79. White, S., Hill, E., Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2009). Revisiting the Strange Stories: Revealing mentalizing impairments in autism. Child Development, 80, 1097–1117. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01319.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wicks, M. (2010). A national primer on K-12 online learning. International Association for K-12 Online. Retrieved from: http://www.inacol.org/research/bookstore/detail.php?id=22.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janine P. Stichter
    • 1
  • James Laffey
    • 1
  • Krista Galyen
    • 1
  • Melissa Herzog
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MissouriColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations