Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

, Volume 43, Issue 11, pp 2628–2648 | Cite as

A Review of Technology-Based Interventions to Teach Academic Skills to Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder

  • Victoria Knight
  • Bethany R. McKissick
  • Alicia Saunders
Original Paper

Abstract

A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted for articles published between 1993 and 2012 to determine the degree to which technology-based interventions can be considered an evidence-based practice to teach academic skills to individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Criteria developed by Horner et al. (Except Child 71:165–178, 2005) and Gersten et al. (Except Child 71:149–164, 2005) were used to determine the quality of single-subject research studies and group experimental research studies respectively. A total of 25 studies met inclusion criteria. Of these studies, only three single-subject studies and no group studies met criteria for quality or acceptable studies. Taken together, the results suggest that practitioners should use caution when teaching academic skills to individuals with ASD using technology-based interventions. Limitations and directions for future research are discussed.

Keywords

Technology Evidence-based practices Individuals with autism spectrum disorder 

References

* indicate experiments included in the analysis

  1. *Basil, C., & Reyes, S. (2003). Acquisition of literacy skills by children with severe disability. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 19, 27–49.Google Scholar
  2. Blischak, D. M., & Schlosser, R. W. (2003). Use of technology to support independent spelling by students with autism. Topics in Language Disorders, 23, 293–304.Google Scholar
  3. *Bosseler, A., & Massaro, D. W. (2003). Development and evaluation of a computer-animated tutor for vocabulary and language learning in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33, 653–672.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Braddock, D., Rizzolo, M. C., Thompson, M., & Bell, R. (2004). Emerging technologies and cognitive disability. Journal of Special Education Technology, 19(4), 49–56.Google Scholar
  5. *Chen, S. A., & Bernard-Opitz, V. (1993). Comparison of personal and computer-assisted instruction for children with autism. Mental Retardation, 31, 368–376.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. *Chen, M., Wu, T., Lin, Y., Tasi, Y., & Chen, H. (2009). The effect of different representations on reading digital text for students with cognitive disabilities. British Journal of Educational Technology,. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00869.x.Google Scholar
  7. *Clark, K., & Green, G. (2004). Comparison of two procedures for teaching dictated-word/symbol relations to learners with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 503–507.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Colby, K. M. (1973). The rationale for computer-based treatment of language difficulties in nonspeaking autistic children. Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia, 3, 254–260.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. *Coleman, M. B., Hurley, K. J., & Cihak, D. F. (2012). Comparing teacher-directed and computer assisted constant time delay for teaching functional sight words to students with moderate intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 47, 280–292.Google Scholar
  10. *Coleman-Martin, M. B., Heller, K. W., Cihak, D. F., & Irvine, K. L. (2005). Using computer-assisted instruction and the nonverbal reading approach to teach word identification. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20, 80–90.Google Scholar
  11. Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill/Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  12. Dyches, T. (1998). Effects of switch training on the communication of children with autism and severe disabilities. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 13, 151–162.Google Scholar
  13. Edyburn, D. L. (2000). Assistive technology and students with mild disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 32, 1–24.Google Scholar
  14. Edyburn, D. L. (2001). 2000 in Review: A synthesis of the special education technology literature. Journal of Special Education Technology, 16(2), 5–25.Google Scholar
  15. Edyburn, D. L. (2002). 2001 in review: A syntheses of the special education technology literature. Journal of Special Education Technology, 17(2), 5–24.Google Scholar
  16. Edyburn, D. L. (2007). Technology-enhanced reading performance: Defining a research agenda. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 146–152.Google Scholar
  17. Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D., Coyne, M., Greenwood, C., & Innocenti, M. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental research and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 149–164.Google Scholar
  18. *Heimann, M., Nelson, K., Tjus, T., & Gillberg, C. (1995). Increasing reading and communication skills in children with autism through an interactive multimedia computer program. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 25, 459–480.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. *Hetzroni, O., Rubin, C., & Konkol, O. (2002). The use of assistive technology for symbol identification by children with Rett syndrome. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 27, 57–71.Google Scholar
  20. *Hetzroni, O. E., & Shalem, U. (2005). From logos to orthographic symbols: A multilevel fading computer program for teaching nonverbal children with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20, 201–212.Google Scholar
  21. Higgins, K., & Boone, R. (1996). Creating individualized computer-assisted instruction for students with autism using multimedia authoring software. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 11, 69–78.Google Scholar
  22. Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–178.Google Scholar
  23. *Kelly, S., Green, G., & Sidman, M. (1998). Visual identity matching and auditory-visual matching: A procedural note. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 237–243.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. *Kinney, E. M., Vedora, J., & Stromer, R. (2003). Computer-presented video models to teach generative spelling to a child with an autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 5(1), 22–29.Google Scholar
  25. Lefever-Davis, S., & Pearman, C. (2005). Early readers and electronic texts: CD-ROM Storybook features that influence reading behaviors. Reading Teacher, 58, 446–454.Google Scholar
  26. Leu, D. J., Jr. (2002). Internet workshop: Making time for literacy. Reading Teacher, 55, 466–472.Google Scholar
  27. *Massaro, D. W., & Bosseler, A. (2006). Read my lips: The importance of the face in a computer-animated tutor for vocabulary learning by children with autism. Autism, 10, 495–510.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mechling, L. C. (2011). Review of twenty-first century portable electronic devices for persons with moderate intellectual disabilities and autism spectrum disorders. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 479–498.Google Scholar
  29. Mechling, L. C., Gast, D. L., & Langone, I. (2002). Computer-based video instruction to teach persons with moderate intellectual disabilities to read grocery aisle signs and locate items. Journal of Special Education, 35, 224–240.Google Scholar
  30. Mineo, B. A., Ziegler, W., Gill, S., & Salkin, D. (2009). Engagement with electronic screen media among students with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 172–187.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. *Moore, M., & Calvert, S. (2000). Brief report: Vocabulary acquisition for children with autism: Teacher or computer instruction. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 359–362.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. National Center on Educational Statistics. (2001). Computer and internet use by children and adolescents in 2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  33. National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center (NSTTAC). (2010). Decision rules. Retrieved from: http://www.nsttac.org/ebp/LiteratureReview.aspx.
  34. Nelson, K. E., & Prinz, P. M. (1991). Alpha interactive language series/gator super sentences (computer software). Warriors Mark, PA: Super Impact Images.Google Scholar
  35. Panyan, M. V. (1984). Computer technology for Autistic Students. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 14, 375–382.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Pennington, R. C. (2010). Computer-assisted instruction for teaching academic skills to students with autism spectrum disorders: A review of literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1088357610378291.
  37. *Pennington, R. C., Stenoff, D. M., Gibson, J., & Ballou, K. (2012). Using simultaneous prompting to teach computer-based story writing to a student with autism. Education and Treatment of Children, 35, 389–406.Google Scholar
  38. *Reagon, K., Higbee, T., & Endicott, K. (2007). Using video instruction procedures with and without embedded text to teach object labeling to preschoolers with autism: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Special Education Technology, 22(1), 13–20.Google Scholar
  39. *Schlosser, R. W., & Blischak, D. M. (2004). Effects of speech and print feedback on spelling by children with autism. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 848–862.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. *Schlosser, R. W., Blischak, D. M., Belfiore, P. J., Bartley, C., & Barnett, N. (1998). Effects of synthetic speech output and orthographic feedback on spelling in a student with autism: A preliminary study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 28, 309–319.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Simpson, R. L. (2005). Evidence-based practices and students with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism & Other Developmental Disabilities, 20, 140–149.Google Scholar
  42. *Simpson, K., & Keen, D. (2009). Teaching young children with autism graphic symbols embedded within an interactive song. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 22, 165–177.Google Scholar
  43. *Soares, D. A., Vannest, J., & Harrison, J. (2009). Computer-aided self-monitoring to increase academic production and reduce self-injurious behavior in a child with autism. Behavioral Interventions, 24, 171–183.Google Scholar
  44. Spooner, F., Knight, V., Browder, D., & Smith, B. (2011). Evidence-based practices for teaching academic skills to students with severe developmental disabilities. Remedial and Special Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0741932511421634.
  45. *Sugasawara, H., & Yamamoto, J. (2007). Computer-based teaching of word construction and reading in two students with developmental disabilities. Behavioral Interventions, 22, 263–277.Google Scholar
  46. *Tanji, T., & Noro, F. (2011). Matrix training for generative spelling in children with autism spectrum disorder. Behavioral Interventions, 26, 326–339.Google Scholar
  47. Test, D. W., Fowler, C. H., Richter, S. M., White, J., Mazzotti, V., Walker, A. R., et al. (2009). Evidence-based practice in secondary transition. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 115–128. doi:10.1177/0885728809336859.Google Scholar
  48. Tincani, M., & Boutot, E. A. (2005). Technology and autism: Current practices and future directions. In D. Edyburn, K. Higgins, & R. Boone (Eds.), Handbook of special education technology research and practice. Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design.Google Scholar
  49. *Tjus, T., Heimann, M., & Nelson, K. E. (2001). Interaction patterns between children and their teachers when using a specific multimedia and communication strategy: Observations from children with autism and mixed intellectual disabilities. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 5, 175–187.Google Scholar
  50. Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S. B., Smith, S. J., Davies, D. K., & Stock, S. (2008). The efficacy of technology use by people with intellectual disability: A single-subject design meta-analysis. Journal of Special Education Technology, 23(3), 21–30.Google Scholar
  51. Wehmeyer, M. L., Smith, S. J., Palmer, S. B., & Davies, D. K. (2004). Technology use by students with intellectual disabilities: An overview. Journal of Special Education Technology, 19(4), 7–22.Google Scholar
  52. *Whalen, C., Moss, D., Ilan, A. B., Vaupel, M., Fielding, P., Macdonald, K., et al. (2010). Efficacy of TeachTown: Basics of computer-assisted intervention for the intensive comprehensive autism program in Los Angeles Unified School District. Autism, 14, 179–197.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. *Whitcomb, S. A., Bass, J. D., & Luiselli, J. K. (2011). Effects of a computer-based early reading program (Headsprout®) on word list and text reading skills in a student with autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 23, 491–499.Google Scholar
  54. *Yamamoto, J., & Miya, T. (1999). Acquisition and transfer of sentence construction in Autistic Students: Analysis by computer-based teaching. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 20, 355–377.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Zemla, J. (2012). 5 Great iPad apps for children with autism. Yahoo voices. Retrieved from http://voices.yahoo.com/5-great-ipad-apps-children-8893899.html.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victoria Knight
    • 1
  • Bethany R. McKissick
    • 2
  • Alicia Saunders
    • 3
  1. 1.Peabody CollegeVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA
  2. 2.Mississippi State UniversityStarkvilleUSA
  3. 3.University North Carolina at CharlotteCharlotteUSA

Personalised recommendations