Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

, Volume 43, Issue 9, pp 2048–2061 | Cite as

Residual Difficulties with Categorical Induction in Children with a History of Autism

  • Letitia R. Naigles
  • Elizabeth Kelley
  • Eva Troyb
  • Deborah Fein
Original Paper


In two experiments, typically developing (TD) children, high-functioning children with autism (HFA) and children with a history of autism who have achieved optimal outcomes (OOs), matched on age (M = 13 years) and nonverbal IQ, were asked to extend properties of categories to new items (categorical induction). All groups demonstrated some knowledge of category structure by extending at above-chance levels; however, the TD group extended more consistently than the OO and HFA groups. More consistent extenders had higher lexical and nonverbal IQ scores (Experiment 1) or higher pragmatics scores (Experiment 2). Thus, even very high functioning individuals with autism, or with an OO, still exhibit residual difficulties with category knowledge and extension; moreover, category tasks relate to a variety of verbal and nonverbal abilities. The difficulty these groups had with categorical induction may be related to their difficulty with generalization more widely; future research should investigate this possibility.


Optimal outcome Categorical induction Semantics Pragmatics 


  1. Alderson-Day, B., & McGonigle-Chambers, M. (2011). Is it a bird? Is it a plane? Category use in problem-solving in children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41, 555–565.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bishop, D. V. M., & Norbury, C. F. (2002). Exploring the borderlands of autistic disorder and specific language impairment: A study using standardised diagnostic instruments. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 43, 917–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Church, B., Krauss, M., Lopata, C., Toomey, J., Thomeer, M., Coutinho, M., et al. (2010). Atypical categorization in children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 862–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deng, W. S., & Sloutsky, V. M. (2012). Carrot eaters or moving heads: Inductive inference is better supported by salient features than by category labels. Pscyhological Science, 23, 178–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dunn, M., & Bates, J. (2005). Developmental change in neural processing of words by children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35, 361–376.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Peabody picture vocabulary test-third edition. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.Google Scholar
  7. Dunn, M., Gomes, H., & Sebastian, M. (1996). Prototypicality of responses in autistic, language-disordered, and normal children in a word fluency task. Child Neuropsychology, 2, 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fein, D., Barton, M., Eigsti, I. M., Kelley, E., Naigles, L., Schultz, R., et al. (2013). Optimal outcome in individuals with a history of autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54, 195–205. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12037.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fein, D., Dixon, P., Paul, J., & Levin, H. (2005). Brief report: Pervasive developmental disorder can resolve into ADHD: Case illustrations. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35, 525–534.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gastgeb, H., Dundas, E., Minshew, N., & Strauss, M. (in press). Category formation in autism: Can individuals with autism form categories and prototypes of dot patterns? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. doi:10.1007/s10803-011-1411-x.
  11. Gastgeb, H., Strauss, M., & Minshew, N. (2006). Do individuals with autism process categories differently? The effect of typicality and development. Child Development, 77, 1717–1729.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gelman, S. A. (2003). The essential child. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gelman, S. A., & Markman, E. M. (1986). Categories and induction in young children. Cognition, 23, 183–209.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gutheil, G., & Gelman, S. (1997). Children’s use of sample size and diversity information within basic-level categories. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 64, 159–174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Happe, F., & Frith, U. (2006). The weak coherence account: Detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 5–25. doi:10.1007/s10803-005-0039-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Helt, M., Kelley, E., Kinsbourne, M., Pandey, J., Boorstein, H., Herbert, M., et al. (2008). Can children with autism recover? If so, how? Neuropsychology Reviews, 18, 339–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kamio, Y., Robins, D., Kelley, E., Swainson, B., & Fein, D. (2007). Atypical lexical/semantic processing in high-functioning autism spectrum disorders without early language delay. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1116–1122.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kamio, Y., & Toichi, M. (2000). Dual access to semantics in autism: Is pictorial access superior to verbal access? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 859–867.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kelley, E. (2011). Language in ASD. In D. Fein (Ed.), The neuropsychology of autism (pp. 123–137). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kelley, E., Naigles, L. R., & Fein, D. (2010). An in-depth examination of optimal outcome children with a history of autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 4, 526–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kelley, E., Paul, J., Fein, D., & Naigles, L. (2006). Residual language deficits in optimal outcome children with a history of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 807–828.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kjelgaard, M. M., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (2001). An investigation of language impairment in autism: Implications for genetic subgroups. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 287–308.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Klinger, L. G., & Dawson, G. (2001). Prototype formation in autism. Development and Psychopathology, 13, 111–124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P., & Risi, S. (2002). Autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
  25. Lord, C., Rutter, M., & LeCouteur, A. (1995). Autism diagnostic interview-revised (3rd ed., Short Form). Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  26. Luyster, R., Richler, J., Risi, S., Hsu, W., Dawson, G., Bernier, R., et al. (2005). Early regression in social communication in autism spectrum disorders: A CPEA study. Developmental Neuropsychology, 27, 311–336. doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2703_2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Minshew, N., Meyer, J., & Goldstein, G. (2002). Abstract reasoning in autism: A dissociation between concept formation and concept identification. Neuropsychology, 16, 327–334.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Norbury, C. (2005). Barking up the wrong tree? Lexical ambiguity resolution in children with language impairments and autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 90, 142–171.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Osherson, D., Smith, E., Wilkie, O., Lopez, A., & Shafir, E. (1990). Category-based induction. Psychological Review, 97, 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Phelps-Terasaki, D., & Phelps-Gunn, T. (1992). Test of Pragmatic Language. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  31. Rhodes, M., Brickman, D., & Gelman, S. A. (2008). Sample diversity and premise typicality in inductive reasoning: Evidence for developmental change. Cognition, 108, 541–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Semel, E., Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. A. (2003). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  33. Sparrow, S. S., Balla, D. A., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1984). Vineland adaptive behavior scales. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service, Inc.Google Scholar
  34. Sutera, S., Pandey, J., Esser, E. L., Rosenthal, M. A., Wilson, L. B., Barton, M., et al. (2007). Predictors of optimal outcome in toddlers diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 98–107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tager-Flusberg, H. (1985). Basic level and superordinate level categorization by autistic, mentally retarded, and normal children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 40, 450–469.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tager-Flusberg, H., & Joseph, R. M. (2003). Identifying neurocognitive phenotypes in autism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 358, 303–314.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tek, S., Jaffery, G., Fein, D., & Naigles, L. R. (2008). Do children with autism show a shape bias in word learning? Autism Research, 1, 202–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler intelligence scale for children-fourth edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Letitia R. Naigles
    • 1
  • Elizabeth Kelley
    • 1
    • 2
  • Eva Troyb
    • 1
  • Deborah Fein
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA
  2. 2.Queen’s UniversityKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations