Reliability and Validity of Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised, Japanese Version
- 835 Downloads
To examine the inter-rater reliability of Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised, Japanese Version (ADI-R-JV), the authors recruited 51 individuals aged 3–19 years, interviewed by two independent raters. Subsequently, to assess the discriminant and diagnostic validity of ADI-R-JV, the authors investigated 317 individuals aged 2–19 years, who were divided into three diagnostic groups as follows: autistic disorder (AD), pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified, and other psychiatric diagnosis or no diagnosis, according to the consensus clinical diagnosis. As regards inter-rater reliability, intraclass correlation coefficients of greater than 0.80 were obtained for all three domains of ADI-R-JV. As regards discriminant validity, the mean scores of the three domains was significantly higher in individuals with AD than in those of other diagnostic groups. As regards diagnostic validity, sensitivity and specificity for correctly diagnosing AD were 0.92 and 0.89, respectively, but sensitivity was 0.55 for individuals younger than 5 years. Specificity was consistently high regardless of age and intelligence. ADI-R-JV was shown to be a reliable tool, and has sufficient discriminant validity and satisfactory diagnostic validity for correctly diagnosing AD, although the diagnostic validity appeared to be compromised with respect to the diagnosis of younger individuals.
KeywordsAutism ADI-R Reliability Validity Japan
Declaration of interest: None of the authors have any conflict of interest to declare. The authors thank Dr. Masahiro Oshima, M.D., for recruiting children with ASD. Funding of this study was provided by a Research Grant from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan (H20-KOKORO-004: K.J. Tsuchiya, Y. Kamio), by a grant for the National Center for Child Health and Development (21S-3: K. J. Tsuchiya), by the Pfizer Health Research Fund (K. Matsumoto), and by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (A) (No. 20591396: N. Takei). These funding sources had no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of the data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the paper for publication.
- American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Task force on DSM-IV. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
- de Bildt, A., Sytema, S., Ketelaars, C., Kraijer, D., Mulder, E., Volkmar, F., et al. (2004). Interrelationship between autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic (ADOS-G), autism diagnostic interview-revised (ADI-R), and the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV-TR) classification in children and adolescents with mental retardation. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorder, 34, 129–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gray, K. M., Tonge, B. J., & Sweeney, D. J. (2008). Using the autism diagnostic interview-revised and the autism diagnostic observation schedule with young children with developmental delay: Evaluating diagnostic validity. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorder, 38, 657–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kawamura, Y., Takahashi, O., & Ishii, T. (2008). Reevaluating the incidence of pervasive developmental disorders: impact of elevated rates of detection through implementation of an integrated system of screening in Toyota, Japan. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 62, 152–159.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lord, C., Risi, S., Lambrecht, L., Cook, E. H., Jr., Leventhal, B. L., DiLavore, P. C., et al. (2000). The autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic: a standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorder, 30, 205–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mildenberger, K., Sitter, S., Noterdaeme, M., & Amorosa, H. (2001). The use of the ADI-R as a diagnostic tool in the differential diagnosis of children with infantile autism and children with a receptive language disorder. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 10, 248–255.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rutter, M., Le Couteur, A., & Lord, C. (2003). ADI-R: Autism diagnostic interview revised. WPS edition manual. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
- Sparrow, S. S., Balla, D., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1984). Vineland adaptive behavior scales (VABS). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
- Tanaka Institute of Education. (1987). Tanaka-Binet intelligence scale. Tokyo: Taken Publisher.Google Scholar
- Wechsler, D., Golombok, S., & Rust, J. (1992). Wechsler intelligence scale for children—Third edition (WISC-IIIUK). London, UK: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar