The Triple I Hypothesis: Taking Another(’s) Perspective on Executive Dysfunction in Autism
The executive dysfunction theory attempts to explain not only the repetitive behaviours but also the socio-communicative difficulties in autism. While it is clear that some individuals with autism perform poorly on certain executive function tasks, it remains unclear what underlies these impairments. The most consistent and striking difficulties are seen on tasks that are open-ended in structure, lack explicit instructions and involve arbitrary rules. I propose that impairment on such tasks is not due to executive dysfunction; instead, poor performance results from difficulties forming an implicit understanding of the experimenter’s expectations for the task, resulting in egocentric and idiosyncratic behaviour. These difficulties in taking another’s perspective may be explained parsimoniously by the mentalising difficulties robustly demonstrated to exist in autism.
KeywordsAutism Executive function Theory of mind Mentalising Implicit Arbitrary
The author wishes to thank John Morton and Uta Frith for helpful conversation and lively discussion whilst writing this paper and over a number of years. This work was supported by a British Academy Fellowship PDF/2009/213.
- Kaland, N., Smith, L., & Mortensen, E. L. (2008). Brief report: Cognitive flexibility and focused attention in children and adolescents with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism as measured on the computerized version of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 1161–1165.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kalbfleisch, M.L., & Loughan, A.R., (2012). Impact of IQ discrepancy on executive function in high-functioning autism: Insight into Twice Exceptionality. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 390–400.Google Scholar
- Lee, P. S., Yerys, B. E., Della Rosa, A., Foss-Feig, J., Barnes, K. A., James, J. D., et al. (2009). Functional connectivity of the inferior frontal cortex changes with age in children with autism spectrum disorders: A fcMRI study of response inhibition. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 1787–1794.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Morton, J., & Frith, U. (1995). Causal modeling: a structural approach to developmental psychopathology. In D. Cichetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Manual of developmental psychopathology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Nakahachi, T., Iwase, M., Takahashi, H., Honaga, E., Sekiyama, R., Ukai, S., et al. (2006). Discrepancy of performance among working memory-related tasks in autism spectrum disorders was caused by task characteristics, apart from working memory, which could interfere with task execution. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 60, 312–318.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ozonoff, S., Cook, I., Coon, H., Dawson, G., Joseph, R. M., Klin, A., et al. (2004). Performance on Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery subtests sensitive to frontal lobe function in people with autistic disorder: Evidence from the collaborative programs of excellence in autism network. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 139–150.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pellicano, E., Maybery, M., Durkin, K., & Maley, A. (2006). Multiple cognitive capabilities/deficits in children with an autism spectrum disorder: “Weak” central coherence and its relationship to theory of mind and executive control. Development and Psychopathology, 18, 77–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Russell, J. (1997). How executive disorders can bring about an inadequate “theory of mind”. In J. Russell (Ed.), Autism as an executive disorder. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Wilson, B. A., Alderman, N., Burgess, P. W., Emslie, H. C., & Evans, J. J. (1996). The behavioural assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome. Flempton, Bury St. EdmundsThames : Valley Test Company.Google Scholar
- Wimmer, H. (1989). Common-Sense Mentalismus und Emotion: entwicklungspsychologische Implikationen: I. In E. Roth (Ed.), Denken und Fühlen. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
- Yerys, B. E., Wallace, G. L., Harrison, B., Celano, M. J., Giedd, J. N., & Kenworthy, L. E. (2009). Set-shifting in children with autism spectrum disorders: Reversal shifting deficits on the Intradimensional/Extradimensional Shift Test correlate with repetitive behaviors. Autism, 13, 523–538.PubMedGoogle Scholar