Exploring the Social Impact of Being a Typical Peer Model for Included Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
This study examined the social impact of being a typical peer model as part of a social skills intervention for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Participants were drawn from a randomized-controlled-treatment trial that examined the effects of targeted interventions on the social networks of 60 elementary-aged children with ASD. Results demonstrated that typical peer models had higher social network centrality, received friendships, friendship quality, and less loneliness than non-peer models. Peer models were also more likely to be connected with children with ASD than non-peer models at baseline and exit. These results suggest that typical peers can be socially connected to children with ASD, as well as other classmates, and maintain a strong and positive role within the classroom.
KeywordsPeer models Autism Social networks
This study was supported by NIH 5-U54-MH-068172 (co-funded by NIMH, NICHD, NINDS, NIDCD, and NIEHS) and HRSA UA3MC11055, clinical trials number NCT00095420. We thank the children, parents, schools and teachers who participated, and the graduate students who contributed countless hours of assessments, intervention, data collection, and coding, Amanda Gulsrud, Laudan Jahromi, Lisa Lee, Eric Ishijima, Kelly Goods, Nancy Huynh, Mark Kretzmann, Tracy Guiou, and Steve Johnson.
- Bass, J. D., & Mulick, J. A. (2007). Social play skill enhancement of children with autism using peers and siblings as therapists. Psychology in the Schools Special Issue: Autism Spectrum Disorders, 44, 727–735.Google Scholar
- Bukowski, W. M., Hoza, B., & Boivin, M. (1994). Measuring friendship quality during pre- and early adolescence: The development and psychometric properties of the friendship qualities scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. Special Issue: Children’s Friendships, 11, 471–484.Google Scholar
- Cairns, R., & Cairns, B. (1994). Lifelines and risks: Pathways of youth in our time. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Cairns, R. B., Gariépy, J.-L., & Kindermann, T. A. (1990). Identifying social clusters in natural settings. Unpublished manuscript: Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina and Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
- Farmer, T. W., & Farmer, E. M. Z. (1996). Social relationships of students with exceptionalities in mainstream classrooms: Social networks and homophily. Exceptional Children, 62(5), 431–450.Google Scholar
- Hoza, B., Bukowski, W. M., & Beery, S. (2000). Assessing peer network and dyadic loneliness. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 29, 119–128.Google Scholar
- Kasari, C., & Rotheram-Fuller, E. (2007). Peer relationships of children with autism: Challenges and interventions. In E. Hollander & E. Anagnostou (Eds.), Clinical manual for the treatment of autism (pp. 235–257). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
- Kasari, C., Rotheram-Fuller, E., Locke, J., & Gulsrud, A. (in press). Making the connection: Randomized controlled trial of social skills at school for children with autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. Google Scholar