The Rubber Hand Illusion Reveals Proprioceptive and Sensorimotor Differences in Autism Spectrum Disorders
- 1.8k Downloads
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is characterised by differences in unimodal and multimodal sensory and proprioceptive processing, with complex biases towards local over global processing. Many of these elements are implicated in versions of the rubber hand illusion (RHI), which were therefore studied in high-functioning individuals with ASD and a typically developing control group. Both groups experienced the illusion. A number of differences were found, related to proprioception and sensorimotor processes. The ASD group showed reduced sensitivity to visuotactile-proprioceptive discrepancy but more accurate proprioception. This group also differed on acceleration in subsequent reach trials. Results are discussed in terms of weak top-down integration and precision-accuracy trade-offs. The RHI appears to be a useful tool for investigating multisensory processing in ASD.
KeywordsHigh-functioning autism spectrum disorder Rubber hand illusion Multimodal sensory integration Local processing bias
This research was supported by Australian Research Council Grants DP0984572 and FT100100322, and a Monash University Research Accelerator Grant to JH; PGE is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Research Fellowship (546244). The authors wish to thank Amity Green for assistance with data collection and Uta Frith for helpful advice and comments.
- Bebko, J. M., Weiss, J. A., Demark, J. L., & Gomez, P. (2006). Discrimination of temporal synchrony in intermodal events by children with autism and children with developmental disabilities without autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(1), 88–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01443.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Enticott, P. G., Kennedy, H. A., Bradshaw, J. L., Rinehart, N. J., & Fitzgerald, P. B. (2010). Understanding mirror neurons: Evidence for enhanced corticospinal excitability during the observation of transitive but not intransitive hand gestures. Neuropsychologia, 48(9), 2675–2680. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.05.014.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Enticott, P. G., Kennedy, H. A., Rinehart, N. J., Tonge, B. J. Bradshaw, J. L., Taffe, J. R., et al. (in press). Mirror neuron activity associated with social impairments but not age in autism spectrum disorder. Biological Psychiatry. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.09.001.
- Ernst, M., & Banks, M. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415, 429–433.Google Scholar
- Frith, U. (1989). Autism: Explaining the enigma. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Fuentes, C., Mostofsky, S., & Bastian, A. (2010). No proprioceptive deficits in autism despite movement-related sensory and execution impairments. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(10), 1352–1361.Google Scholar
- Hohwy, J., & Paton, B. (2010). Explaining away the body: Experiences of supernaturally caused touch and touch on non-hand objects within the rubber hand illusion. PloS One, 5(2), e9416. http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009416.
- Kaiser, M. D., & Pelphrey, K. A. (2012). Disrupted action perception in autism: Behavioral evidence, neuroendophenotypes, and diagnostic utility. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2(1), 25–35. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2011.05.005.
- Kammers, M. P. M., Verhagen, L., Dijkerman, H. C., Hogendoorn, H., De Vignemont, F., & Schutter, D. J. L. G. (2009c). Is this hand for real? Attenuation of the rubber hand illusion by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the inferior parietal lobule. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(7), 1311–1320. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21095.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moseley, G. L., Gallace, A., & Spence, C. (2012). Bodily illusions in health and disease: Physiological and clinical perspectives and the concept of a cortical ‘body matrix’. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(1), 34–46. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.03.013.
- Moseley, G. L., Olthof, N., Venema, A., Don, S., Wijers, M., Gallace, A., et al. (2008). Psychologically induced cooling of a specific body part caused by the illusory ownership of an artificial counterpart. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(35), 13169–13173. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803768105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rinehart, N., Bradshaw, J., Brereton, A., & Tonge, B. (2001). Movement preparation in high-functioning autism and Asperger disorder: A serial choice reaction time task involving motor reprogramming. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31(1), 79–88. doi: 10.1023/a:1005617831035.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rinehart, N. J., Tonge, B. J., Bradshaw, J. L., Iansek, R., Enticott, P. G., & Johnson, K. A. (2006). Movement-related potentials in high-functioning autism and Asperger’s disorder. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 48(4), 272–277. doi: 10.1017/s0012162206000594.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rogers, S. J., Cook, I., & Meryl, A. (2005). Imitation and play in autism. In F. R. Volkmar, R. Paul, A. Klin, & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders (3rd ed., pp. 382–405). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Schwabe, L., & Blanke, O. (2008). The vestibular component in out-of-body experiences: a computational approach. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2(Article 17), 1–10.Google Scholar