Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

, Volume 42, Issue 3, pp 401–408 | Cite as

Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Do Not Preferentially Attend to Biological Motion

  • Dagmara Annaz
  • Ruth Campbell
  • Mike Coleman
  • Elizabeth Milne
  • John SwettenhamEmail author
Original Paper


Preferential attention to biological motion can be seen in typically developing infants in the first few days of life and is thought to be an important precursor in the development of social communication. We examined whether children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) aged 3–7 years preferentially attend to point-light displays depicting biological motion. We found that children with ASD did not preferentially attend to biological motion over phase-scrambled motion, but did preferentially attend to a point-light display of a spinning top rather than a human walker. In contrast a neurotypical matched control group preferentially attended to the human, biological motion in both conditions. The results suggest a core deficit in attending to biological motion in ASD.


Autism spectrum disorder Social stimuli Attention Biological motion 



This research was supported by an E.S.R.C. Grant (RES 000 23 1148) awarded to John Swettenham, Elizabeth Milne and Ruth Campbell at University College London. We are gratefully acknowledge the efforts of staff and pupils at schools and nurseries in Aberdeen who participated in the research.


  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2006). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4e., text rev. (DSM-IV-TR). Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
  2. Annaz, D., Remington, A., Milne, E., Coleman, M., Campbell, R., Thomas, M. S. C., et al. (2010). Development of motion processing in children with autism. Developmental Science, 13(6), 826–838.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson, A. P., Dittrich, W. H., Gemmell, A. J., & Young, A. W. (2004). Emotion perception from dynamic and static body expressions in point-light and full-light displays. Perception, 33(6), 717–746.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blake, R., Turner, L. M., Smoski, M. J., Pozdol, S. L., & Stone, W. L. (2003). Visual recognition of biological motion is impaired in children with autism. Psychological science, 14(2), 151–157.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cassia, V. M. (2004). Can a nonspecific bias toward top-heavy patterns explain newborns’ Face preference? Psychological Science, 15(6), 379–383.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castelli, F., Frith, C., Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2002). Autism, asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes. Brain, 125(8), 1839–1849.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chawarska, K., Klin, A., & Volkmar, F. R. (2008). Autism Spectrum Disorders in Infantsand Toddlers: Diagnosis, Assessment and Treatment Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cook, J., Saygin, A. P., Swain, R., & Blakemore, S. J. (2009). Reduced sensitivity to minimum-jerk biological motion in autism spectrum conditions. Neuropsychologia, 47(14), 3275–3278.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dawson, G., Meltzoff, A. N., Osterling, J., Rinaldi, J., & Brown, E. (1998). Children with autism fail to orient to naturally occurring social stimuli. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 28(6), 479–485.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dawson, G., Toth, K., Abbott, R., Osterling, J., Munson, J., Estes, A., et al. (2004). Early social attention impairments in Autism: Social orienting, joint attention, and attention to distress. Developmental Psychology, 40(2), 271–283.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dawson, G., Webb, S. J., Wijsman, E., Schellenberg, G., Estes, A., Munson, J., et al. (2005). Neurocognitive and electrophysiological evidence of altered face processing in parents of children with autism: Implications for a model of abnormal development of social brain circuitry in autism. Development and Psychopathology, 17(3), 679–697.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dunn, L., Dunn, L., Whetton, C., & Burley, J. (1997). British Picture Vocabulary Scale II: Windsor: NEFR-Nelson.Google Scholar
  13. Elliot, C. D., Smith, P., & McCulloch, K. (1997). British Ability Scales II: Windsor: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
  14. Farroni, T., Csibra, G., Simion, F., & Johnson, M. H. (2002). Eye contact detection in humans from birth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(14), 9602–9605.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fox, R., & McDaniel, C. (1982). The perception of biological motion by human infants. Science, 218(4571), 486–487.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frith, U. (2001). Mind blindness and the brain in autism. Neuron, 32(6), 969–979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (1999). Interacting minds—A biological basis. Science, 286(5445), 1692–1695.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grelotti, D. J., Gauthier, I., & Schultz, R. T. (2002). Social interest and the development of cortical face specialization: What autism teaches us about face processing. Developmental Psychobiology, 40(3), 213–225.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Herrington, J. D., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S. J., Singh, K. D., Bullmore, E. T., Brammer, M., et al. (2007). The role of MT +/V5 during biological motion perception in Asperger Syndrome: An fMRI study. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1(1), 14–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hubert, B., Wicker, B., Moore, D. G., Monfardini, E., Duverger, H., Da Fonséca, D., et al. (2007). Brief report: recognition of emotional and non-emotional biological motion in individuals with autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(7), 1386–1392.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jacobs, A., Pinto, J., & Shiffrar, M. (2004). Experience, context, and the visual perception of human movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(5), 822–835.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception and Psychophysics, 14(2), 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnson, M. H. (2005). Subcortical face processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(10), 766–774.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnson, M. H., Dziurawiec, S., Ellis, H., & Morton, J. (1991). Newborns’ preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline. Cognition, 40(1–2), 1–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnson, M. H., & Horn, G. (1988). Development of filial preferences in dark-reared chicks. Animal Behaviour, 36(3), 675–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jones, C., Swettenham, J., Happé, F., Marsden, A., Tregay, J., Baird, G., et al. (Submitted). Visual motion processing in autism spectrum disorders: exploring the profile of ability across a hierarchy of tasks.Google Scholar
  27. Jordan, H., Reiss, J. E., Hoffman, J. E., & Landau, B. (2002). Intact perception of biological motion in the face of profound spatial deficits: Williams syndrome. Psychological Science, 13(2), 162–167.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaiser, M. D., Delmolino, L., Tanaka, J. W., & Shiffrar, M. (2010a). Comparison of visual sensitivity to human and object motion in autism spectrum disorder. Autism Research, 3(4), 191–195.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaiser, M. D., Hudac, C. M., Shultz, S., Su Mei, L., Cheung, C., Berkena, A. M., et al. (2010b). Neural signatures of autism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(49), 21223–21228.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Klin, A., & Jones, W. (2008). Altered face scanning and impaired recognition of biological motion in a 15-month-old infant with autism: REPORT. Developmental Science, 11(1), 40–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Klin, A., Lin, D. J., Gorrindo, P., Ramsay, G., & Jones, W. (2009). Two-year-olds with autism orient to non-social contingencies rather than biological motion. Nature, 459(7244), 257–261.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lichtensteiger, J., Loenneker, T., Bucher, K., Martin, E., & Klaver, P. (2008). Role of dorsal and ventral stream development in biological motion perception. NeuroReport, 19(18), 1763–1767.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lord, C., Risi, S., Lambrecht, L., Cook, E. H., Leventhal, B. L., DiLavore, P. C., et al. (2000). The autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic: A standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorder, 30(3), 205–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Loula, F., Prasad, S., Harber, K., & Shiffrar, M. (2005). Recognizing people from their movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(1), 210–220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moore, D. G., Hobson, R. P., & Lee, A. (1997). Components of person perception: An investigation with autistic, non-autistic retarded and typically developing children and adolescents. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15(4), 401–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Neri, P., Morrone, M. C., & Burr, D. C. (1998). Seeing biological motion. Nature, 395(6705), 894–896.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. New, J. J., Schultz, R. T., Wolf, J., Niehaus, J. L., Klin, A., German, T. C., et al. (2010). The scope of social attention deficits in autism: Prioritized orienting to people and animals in static natural scenes. Neuropsychologia, 48(1), 51–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Osterling, J., & Dawson, G. (1994). Early recognition of children with autism: A study of first birthday home videotapes. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24(3), 247–257.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ozonoff, S., Macari, S., Young, G. S., Goldring, S., Thompson, M., & Rogers, S. J. (2008). Atypical object exploration at 12 months of age is associated with autism in a prospective sample. Autism, 12(5), 457–472.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Parron, C., Da Fonseca, D., Santos, A., Moore, D. G., Monfardini, E., & Deruelle, C. (2008). Recognition of biological motion in children with autistic spectrum disorders. Autism, 12(3), 261–274.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pelphrey, K. A., & Carter, E. J. (2008). Brain mechanisms for social perception: Lesons from Autism and Typical development. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1145, 283–299.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pollick, F. E., Kay, J. W., Heim, K., & Stringer, R. (2005). Gender recognition from point-light walkers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(6), 1247–1265.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pyles, J. A., Garcia, J. O., Hoffman, D. D., & Grossman, E. D. (2007). Visual perception and neural correlates of novel ‘biological motion’. Vision Research, 47(21), 2786–2797.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Saygin, A. P. (2007). Superior temporal and premotor brain areas necessary for biological motion perception. Brain, 130(9), 2452–2461.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schultz, R. T. (2005). Developmental deficits in social perception in autism: The role of the amygdala and fusiform face area. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 23(2-3 SPEC. ISS.), 125–141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Simion, F., Regolin, L., & Bulf, H. (2008). A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(2), 809–813.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Swettenham, J., Baron-Cohen, S., Cox, A., Baird, G., Drew, A., Charman, T., et al. (1998). The frequency and distribution of spontaneous attention shifts between social and nonsocial stimuli in autistic, typically developing, and nonautistic developmentally delayed infants. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39(5), 747–753.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vallortigara, G., & Regolin, L. (2006). Gravity bias in the interpretation of biological motion by inexperienced chicks. Current Biology, 16(8).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dagmara Annaz
    • 1
  • Ruth Campbell
    • 2
  • Mike Coleman
    • 1
  • Elizabeth Milne
    • 3
  • John Swettenham
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Division of Psychology and Language Science, Department of Developmental SciencesUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Division of Psychology and Language Science, Department of Human Communication Science, Deafness, Cognition and Language Research CentreUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations