Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 181–190 | Cite as

Evidence for a Cultural Influence on Field-Independence in Autism Spectrum Disorder

Original Paper

Abstract

Field-independence, or weak central coherence, is a recognised phenotype of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). There is also evidence of cultural variation in this perceptual style, as neurotypical individuals from Western nations are more field-independent than neurotypical individuals from East-Asian nations. The majority of research on perceptual style in those with ASD has been carried out in Western nations therefore it is unclear whether increased field-independence in ASD is a culturally universal phenotype. Here, we assessed perceptual style in children with and without ASD from England and Singapore using the Children’s Embedded Figures Test and the Framed-Line Test. We found increased field-independence in the English participants with ASD only, suggesting that weak central coherence in ASD is not culturally universal.

Keywords

Perceptual style Weak central coherence Culture Autism spectrum disorders 

References

  1. Academy of Medicine Singapore, Ministry of Health, Singapore (2010). Clinical practice guidelines: Autism spectrum disorders in preschool children. Retrieved 20 November, Ministry of Health online website: http://www.moh.gov.sg/mohcorp/uploadedFiles/Publications/Guidelines/Clinical_Practice_Guidelines/ASD%20book%20Apr%2010.pdf.
  2. Almeida, R., Dickinson, J. E., Maybery, M., Badcock, J., & Badcock, D. (2009). A new step towards understanding embedded figures test performance in the autism spectrum. Journal of Vision, 9(8), 1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  4. Arrindell, W. A., Hatzichristou, C., Wensink, J., Rosenberg, E., van Twillert, B., Stedema, J., et al. (1997). Dimensions of national culture as predictors of cross-national differences in subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bagley, C. (1995). Field independence in children in group-oriented cultures: Comparisons from China, Japan and North America. The Journal of Social Psychology, 135, 523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berry, J. (1991). Field dependence-independence: Cognitive style across the life span. In S. Wapner & J. Dernick (Eds.), Cultural variation in field dependence-independence (pp. 289–308). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Booth, R. (2006). Local-global processing and cognitive style in autism spectrum disorder and typical development. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Kings College, University of London, London.Google Scholar
  8. Bornstein, M. H., Toda, S., Azuma, H., Tamislemonda, C., & Ogino, M. (1990). Mother and infant activity and interaction in Japan and in the United States II: A comparative microanalysis of naturalistic exchanges focused on the organization of infant attention. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 133, 289–308.Google Scholar
  9. Brian, J. A., & Bryson, S. E. (1996). Disembedding performance and recognition memory in autism/PDD. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37, 865–872.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Department of Statistics, Singapore. (2000). Population size and growth. Retrieved 15 January 2010, from Statistics Singapore website: http://www.singstat.gov.sg/.
  11. Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Frith, U. (1989). Autism: Explaining the enigma. Blackwell Scientific Publications: Oxford.Google Scholar
  13. Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2006). The weak coherence account: Detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 5–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Happé, F., Ronald, A., & Plomin, R. (2006). Time to give up on a single explanation for autism. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 1218–1220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hofstede, G. (1983). The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories. Journal of International Business Studies, 14, 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Honda, H., Shimizu, Y., Imai, M., & Nitto, Y. (2005). Cumulative incidence of childhood autism: A total population study of better accuracy and precision. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 47(1), 10–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jarrold, C., Gilchrist, I. D., & Bender, A. (2005). Embedded figures detection in autism and typical development: preliminary evidence of a double dissociation in relationships with visual search. Developmental Science, 8, 344–351.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ji, L. J., Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (2000). Culture, control and perception of relationships in the environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 943–955.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jolliffe, T., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1997). Are people with autism and Asperger syndrome faster than normal on the embedded figures test? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 527–534.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kitayama, S., Duffy, S., Kawamura, T., & Larsen, J. T. (2003). Perceiving an object and its context in different cultures: A cultural look at new look. Psychological Science, 14, 201–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lord, C., Risi, S., Lambrecht, L., Cook, E. H., Leventhal, B. L., DiLavore, P. C., et al. (2000). The autism diagnostic observation schedule—generic: A standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 205–223.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Milne, E., & Szczerbinski, M. (2009). Global and local perceptual style, field-independence, and central coherence: An attempt at concept validation. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 5, 1–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morais, J., & Kolinsky, R. (2001). The literate mind and the universal human mind. In E. Dupoux (Ed.), Language, brain and cognitive development: Essays in honor of Jacques Mehler. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Mottron, L., Dawson, M., Soulieres, I., Hubert, B., & Burack, J. A. (2006). Enhanced perceptual functioning in autism: An update and eight principles of autistic perception. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 27–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently… and why. The Free Press: New York.Google Scholar
  27. Nisbett, R. E., & Miyamoto, Y. (2005). The influence of culture: Holistic versus analytic perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 467–473.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Norenzayan, A., Smith, E. E., Kim, B. J., & Nisbett, R. E. (2002). Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning. Cognitive Science, 26, 653–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Office of National Statistics, United Kingdom (2001). Ethnicity: Population size. Retrieved 15 January 2010, from National Statistics online website: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/.
  30. Ozonoff, S., Pennington, B. F., & Rogers, S. J. (1991). Executive function deficits in high-functioning autistic individuals: Relationship to theory of mind. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 32, 1081–1105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pellicano, E., Gibson, L., Mayberry, M., Durkin, K., & Badcock, D. R. (2005). Abnormal global processing along the dorsal visual pathway in autism: A possible mechanism for weak visuospatial coherence? Neuropsychologia, 43, 1044–1053.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pierce, C. A., Block, R. A., & Aguinis, H. (2004). Cautionary note on reporting eta-squared values from multifactor ANOVA designs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(6), 916–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Plaisted, K., Swettenham, J., & Rees, L. (1999). Children with autism show local precedence in a divided attention task and global precedence in a selective attention task. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 40, 733–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rinehart, N. J., Bradshaw, J. L., Moss, S. A., Brereton, A. V., & Tonge, B. J. (2001). A deficit in shifting attention present in high functioning autism but not Asperger’s disorder. Autism, 5, 67–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ring, H. A., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Williams, S. C. R., Brammer, M., et al. (1999). Cerebral correlates of preserved cognitive skills in autism: A functional MRI study of embedded figures task performance. Brain, 122, 1305–1315.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Rutter, M., Bailey, A., Lord, C., & Berument, S. K. (2003). Social communication questionnaire. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
  38. Schlooz, W. A., Hulstijn, W., van den Broek, P. J., van der Pijll, A. C., Gabreels, F., & van der Gaag, R. J. (2006). Fragmented visuospatial processing in children with pervasive developmental disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 1025–1037.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shah, A., & Frith, U. (1983). An islet of ability in autistic children: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 24, 613–620.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang, L., Mottron, L., Peng, D., Berthiaume, C., & Dawson, M. (2007). Local bias and local-to-global interference without global deficit: A robust finding in autism under various conditions of attention, exposure time, and visual angle. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24, 550–574.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wechsler, D. (1999). Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence (WASI). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar
  42. Witkin, H. A., & Berry, J. (1975). Psychological differentiation in cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 6, 4–87.Google Scholar
  43. Witkin, H. A., Dyk, R. B., Faterson, H. F., Goodenough, D. R., & Karp, S. (1962). Psychological differentiation: Studies of development. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. (1971). A manual for the embedded figures tests. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  45. Wong, V. C. N., & Hui, S. L. H. (2008). Epidemiological study of autism spectrum disorder in China. Journal of Child Neurology, 23(1), 67–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhou, J., Gotch, C., Zhou, Y., & Liu, Z. (2008). Perceiving an object in its context—is the context cultural or perceptual. Journal of Vision, 8, 1–5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyThe University of SheffieldSheffieldUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations