Advertisement

Do High-Functioning People with Autism Spectrum Disorder Spontaneously Use Event Knowledge to Selectively Attend to and Remember Context-Relevant Aspects in Scenes?

  • Eva LothEmail author
  • Juan Carlós Gómez
  • Francesca Happé
Original Paper

Abstract

This study combined an event schema approach with top-down processing perspectives to investigate whether high-functioning children and adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) spontaneously attend to and remember context-relevant aspects of scenes. Participants read one story of story-pairs (e.g., burglary or tea party). They then inspected a scene (living room) of which some objects were relevant in that context, irrelevant (related to the non-emphasized event) or neutral (scene-schema related). During immediate and delayed recall, only the (TD) groups selectively recalled context-relevant objects, and significantly more context-relevant objects than the ASD groups. Gaze-tracking suggests that one factor in these memory differences may be diminished top-down effects of event schemas on initial attention (first ten fixations) to relevant items in ASD.

Keywords

Autism spectrum disorders Top-down processes Event schemas Gaze-tracking Memory 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by an ESRC early career fellowship to EL and a project grant by the Nuffield Foundation to EL, JCG and FH. We would like to thank all participants, their parents, and teachers for their help and support with this research. We also thank three anonymous reviewers for their very thoughtful and constructive comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.

References

  1. American Psychological Association (APA). (1994). DSM-IV diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. (4th ed.). Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  2. Antes, J. R. (1974). The time course of picture viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 62–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baddley, A. (1999). Essentials of human memory. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  4. Baron-Cohen, S. (2008). Autism, hypersystemizing, and truth. Quaterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (Colchester), 61(1), 64–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21, 37–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Beversdorf, D. Q., Smith, B. W., Crucian, G. P., Anderson, J. M., Keillor, J. M., Barrett, A. M., et al. (2000). Increased discrimination of “false memories” in autism spectrum disorder. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97(15), 9734–9737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bird, G., Catmur, C., Silani, G., Frith, C., & Frith, U. (2006). Attention does not modulate neural response to social stimuli in autism spectrum disorders. Neuroimage, 31, 1614–1624.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boucher, J., & Bowler, D. M. (2008). Memory in autism: Theory and evidence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowler, D. M. (1992). “Theory of mind” in Asperger’s syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33, 877–893.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowler, D. M., Gaigg, S. B., & Gardiner, J. M. (2008). Subjective organisation in the free recall learning of adults with Asperger’s Syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(1), 104–113.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bowler, D. M., Gardiner, J. M., Grice, S., & Saavalainen, P. (2001). Memory illusions: False recall and recognition in adults with Asperger Syndrome. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2000(109), 663–672.Google Scholar
  13. Bowler, D. M., Matthews, N. J., & Gardiner, J. M. (1997). Asperger’s syndrome and memory: Similarity to autism but not amnesia. Neuropsychologia, 35(1), 65–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brockmole, J. R., & Henderson, J. M. (2005). Prioritization of new objects in real-world scenes: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(5), 857–868.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Dawson, G., Meltzoff, A. N., Osterling, J., Rinaldi, J., & Brown, E. (1998). Children with autism fail to orient to naturally occuring social stimuli. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 28(6), 479–485.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Freeth, M., Chapman, P., Ropar, D., & Mitchell, P. (2010). Do gaze cues in complex scenes capture and direct the attention of high functioning adolescents with ASD? Evidence from eye-tracking. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(5), 534–547.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Friedman, A. (1979). Framing pictures: The role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(578–88), 578–588.Google Scholar
  19. Gardiner, J. M., Bowler, D. M., & Grice, S. J. (2003). Further evidence of preserved priming and impaired recall in adults with Asperger’s syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33(3), 259–269.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goodman, G. S. (1980). Picture memory: How the action schema affects retention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 473–495.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Happé, F. G. E. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters’ thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24(2), 129–154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Happé, F. G. E. (1999). Autism: Cognitive deficit or cognitive style? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(6), 216–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Happé, F., & Vital, P. (2009). What aspects of autism predispose to talent? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 364(1522), 1369–1375.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Henderson, J. M. (2003). Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 498–504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). High-level scene perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 243–271.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Henderson, J. M., Weeks, P. A., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 210–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hillier, A., Campbell, H., Keillor, J., Phillips, N., & Beversdorf, D. Q. (2007). Decreased false memory for visually presented shapes and symbols among adults on the autism spectrum. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 29(6), 610–616.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hudson, J. A. (1988). Children’s memory for atypical actions in script-based stories: Evidence for a disruption effect. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 46, 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40, 1489–1506.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johnson, M. H., & Morton, J. (1991). Biology and cognitive development: The case of face recognition. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  31. Klin, A., Jones, W., Schultz, R., & Volkmar, F. (2003). The enactive mind, or from actions to cognition: Lessons from autism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 358, 345–360.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Klin, A., Jones, W., Schultz, R., Volkmar, F., & Cohen, D. (2002a). Defining and quantifying the social phenotype in autism. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 895–908.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Klin, A., Jones, W., Schultz, R., Volkmar, F., & Cohen, D. (2002b). Visual fixation patterns during viewing of naturalistic social situations as predictors of social competence in individuals with autism. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 809–816.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Klin, A., Lin, D. J., Gorrindo, P., Ramsay, G., & Jones, W. (2009). Two-year-olds with autism orient to non-social contingencies rather than biological motion. Nature, 459(7244), 257–261.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Koch, C., & Ullman, S. (1985). Shifts in selective visual attention: Towards the underlying neural capacity. Human Neurobiology, 4, 219–227.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Loftus, G. R., & Mackworth, N. H. (1978). Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 565–572.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lord, C., Risi, S., Lambrecht, L., Cook, E. H., Leventhal, B. L., DiLavore, P. C., et al. (2000). The autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic: A standard measure of social and communciation deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 205–223.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Loth, E., Gómez, J. C., & Happé, F. (2008a). Event representation in autism: The role of theory of mind and weak coherence. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(3), 449–463.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Loth, E., Gómez, J. C., & Happé, F. (2008b). Detecting changes in naturalistic scenes: Contextual inconsistency does not influence spontaneous attention in high-functioning people with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Research, 1(3), 179–188.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Loth, E., Gómez, J. C., & Happé, F. (2010a). When seeing depends on knowing: Adults with autism spectrum conditions show diminished top-down processes in the visual perception of degraded faces but not degraded objects. Neuropsychologia, 48(5), 1227–1236.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Loth, E., Happé, F., & Gómez, J. C. (2010b). Variety is not the spice of life for people wih autism spectrum disorders: Frequency ratings of central, variable, and inappropriate aspects of common real-life events. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(6), 730–742.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Loveland, K. A., & Tunali, B. (1991). Social scripts for conversational interactions in autism and Down’s syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 21, 177–186.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mackworth, N. H., & Morandi, A. J. (1967). The gaze selects informative details within pictures. Perception and Psychophysics, 2, 547–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mandler, J. M. (1979). Categorical and schematic organization in memory. Memory organization and structure. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  45. Nelson, K. (1986). Event knowledge. Structure and function in development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  46. Osterling, J., & Dawson, G. (1994). Early recognition of children with autism: A study of first birthday home videotapes. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 247–257.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Palmer, S. (1975). The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects. Memory and Cognition, 3, 519–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Parkhurst, D., Law, K., & Niebur, E. (2002). Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual selective attention. Vision Research, 42, 422–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pitchert, J., & Anderson, R. C. (1977). Taking different perspectives on a story. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 309–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Posner, M. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rayner, K., Smith, T. J., Malcolm, G. L., & Henderson, J. M. (2009). Eye movements and visual encoding during scene perception. Psychological Science, 20(1), 6–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rensink, R. A., O’Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ropar, D., & Mitchell, P. (2002). Shape constancy in autism: The role of prior knowledge and perspective cues. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43(5), 647–653.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rosenholtz, R. (1999). A simple saliency model predicts a number of motion popout phenomena. Vision Research, 39, 3157–3163.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schank, R., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  56. Scott, F. J., Baron-Cohen, S., Bolton, P., & Brayne, C. (2002). The CAST (childhood Asperger syndrome test): Preliminary development of a UK screen for mainstream primary-school-age children. Autism, 6(1), 9–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Silva, M. M., Groeger, J. A., & Bradshaw, F. (2006). Attention-memory interactions in scene perception. Spatial Vision, 19(1), 9–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tager-Flusberg, H. (1991). Semantic processing in the free recall of autistic children: Further evidence for a cognitive deficit. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 417–430.Google Scholar
  59. Trillingsgaard, A. (1999). The script model in relation to autism. European Journal of Adolescent Psychiatry, 8(1), 45–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Volden, J., & Johnston, J. (1999). Cognitive scripts in autistic children and adolescents. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29(3), 203–211.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wechsler, D. (1999). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar
  62. World Health Organization (WHO). (1993). ICD-10 : The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  63. Yarbus, A. (1967). Eye movements and vision. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eva Loth
    • 1
    Email author
  • Juan Carlós Gómez
    • 2
  • Francesca Happé
    • 1
  1. 1.MRC Social, Genetic, and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of PsychiatryKing’s College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.School of PsychologyUniversity of St AndrewsSt AndrewsScotland, UK

Personalised recommendations