Executive Function Mechanisms of Theory of Mind

  • Fayeza S. AhmedEmail author
  • L. Stephen Miller
Original Paper


This study examined the relationship between Executive Function (EF) and Theory of Mind (ToM) using the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) and three tests of ToM (Reading the Mind in the Eyes test (RMET), Strange Stories test, and Faux Pas test). Separate regression analyses were conducted, and EF predictors varied by ToM test. No EF domains accounted for significant variance in RMET scores; only estimated IQ scores were significant predictors of RMET performance. Verbal fluency and deductive reasoning were significant predictors of performance on the Strange Stories test, while verbal fluency, problem solving, and gender accounted for a significant variance in the Faux Pas test. Results suggest that the ToM tests each utilized differing cognitive mechanisms.


Executive Function Theory of Mind Neuropsychology 



We would like to thank Francesca Happé and Anita Marsden for their permission and provision of the Strange Stories test as well as Simon Baron-Cohen and the Autism Research Centre for allowing the use of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes and the Faux Pas tests. Finally, we thank LaShonda Abner, Cami Godsey, Amy Kasian, and Gemma Patel for their help in the data collection process.


  1. Ahmed, F., Miller, L. S., & Abner, L. (2007). Assessment of theory of mind: Variance among measures. Presented at the thirty-fifth annual meeting of the international neuropsychology society, Portland, OR. Abstract: (published online by Cambridge University Press, 3/8/2007), Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 13, S1, 30. doi: 10.1017/S1355617707079970.
  2. Anderson, P. (2002). Assessment and development of executive function (EF) during childhood. Child Neuropsychology, 8, 71–82. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, V., Levin, H. S., & Jocobs, R. (2002). Executive functions after frontal lobe injury: A developmental perspective. In D. T. Stuss & R. T. Knight (Eds.), Principles of frontal lobe function (pp. 1–7). Google Scholar
  4. Apperly, I. A., Samson, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2009). Studies of adults can inform accounts of theory of mind development. Developmental Psychology, 45, 190–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bach, L. J., Happé, F., Fleminger, S., & Powell, J. (2005). Theory of mind: Independence of executive function and the role of the frontal cortex in acquired brain injury. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 5, 175–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baron-Cohen, S. (1988). Social and pragmatic deficits in autism: Cognitive or affective? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18, 379–402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baron-Cohen, S., Jolliffe, T., Mortimore, C., & Robertson, M. (1997). Another advanced test of theory of mind: Evidence from very high functioning adults with autism or asperger syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 813–822.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21, 37–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baron-Cohen, S., O’Riordan, M., Stone, V., Jones, R., & Plaisted, K. (1999). Recognition of faux pas by normally developing children and children with asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29, 407–418.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 163–175. PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “reading the mind in the eyes” test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 241–251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bora, E., Vahip, S., Gonul, A. S., Akdeniz, F., Alkan, M., Ogut, M., et al. (2005). Evidence for theory of mind deficits in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 112, 110–116.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brent, E., Rios, P., Happé, F., & Charman, T. (2004). Performance of children with autism spectrum disorder on advanced theory of mind tasks. Autism, 8, 283–299.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brüne, M., & Brüne-Cohrs, U. (2005). Theory of mind-evolution, ontogeny, brain mechanisms and psychopathology. Neuroscience and Behavioral Reviews, xx, 1–19.Google Scholar
  15. Bull, R., Phillips, L. H., & Conway, C. A. (2008). The role of control functions in mentalizing dual-task conditions of theory of mind and executive function. Cognition, 107, 663–672.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carlson, S. M., Mandell, D. J., & Williams, L. (2004a). Executive function and theory of mind: Stability and prediction from ages 2 to 3. Developmental Psychology, 40, 1105–1122.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carlson, S. M., Moses, L. J., & Breton, C. (2002). How specific is the relation between executive function and theory of mind? Contributions of inhibitory control and working memory. Infant and Child Development, 11, 73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carlson, S. M., Moses, L. J., & Claxton, L. J. (2004b). Individual differences in executive functioning and theory of mind: An investigation of inhibitory control and planning ability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87, 299–319.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cole, K., & Mitchell, P. (2000). Siblings in the development of executive control and a theory of mind. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18, 279–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cuerva, A. G., Sabe, L., Kuzis, G., Tiberti, C., Dorrego, F., & Starkstein, S. E. (2001). Theory of mind and pragmatic abilities in dementia. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, & Behavioral Neurology, 14, 153–158.Google Scholar
  21. Delis, D. C., Kaplan, E., & Kramer, J. H. (2001). Delis Kaplan executive function system examiner’s manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  22. Fahie, C. M., & Symons, D. K. (2003). Executive functioning and theory of mind in children clinically referred for attention and behavior problems. Applied Developmental Psychology, 24, 51–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fine, C., Lumsden, J., & Blair, R. J. R. (2001). Dissociation between ‘theory of mind’ and executive functions in a patient with early left amygdala damage. Brain, 124, 287–298.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (1996). Structured clinical interview for Axis I DSM-IV disordersPatient Edition (with psychotic screening) SCID-I/P (W/psychotic screen) (version 2). New York, New York: Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute.Google Scholar
  25. Fisher, N., & Happé, F. (2005). A training study of theory of mind and executive function in children with autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35, 757–771.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gordon, A. C. L., & Olson, D. R. (1998). The relation between acquisition of a theory of mind and the capacity to hold in mind. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 68, 70–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gottlieb, D. (2005). The strange stories test: A replication of children and adolescents with asperger syndrome. European Child Adolescent Psychiatry, 14, 73–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gregory, C., Lough, S., Stone, V., Erzinclioglu, S., Martin, L., Baron-Cohen, S., et al. (2002). Theory of mind in patients with frontal variant frontotemporal dementia and alzheimer’s disease: Theoretical and practical implications. Brain, 125, 752–764.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Happé, F. G. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters’ thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 129–154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Happé, F. G. E., Winner, E., & Brownell, H. (1998). The getting of wisdom: Theory of mind in old age. Developmental Psychology, 34, 358–362.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Homack, S., Lee, D., & Riccio, C. A. (2005). Test review: Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 27, 599–609.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hughes, C. (1998). Finding your marbles: Does preschoolers’ strategic behavior predict later understanding of mind? Developmental Psychology, 34, 1326–1339.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hughes, C., Dunn, J., & White, A. (1998). Trick or treat?: Uneven understanding of mind and emotion and executive dysfunction in “hard to manage” preschoolers. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 981–994.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hughes, C., & Graham, A. (2002). Measuring executive functions in childhood: Problems and solutions? Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 7, 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jolliffe, T., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1999). The strange stories test: A replication with high-functioning adults with autism or asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29, 395–404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Joseph, R. M., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (2004). The relationship of theory of mind and executive functions to symptom type and severity in children with autism. Development and Psychopathology, 16, 137–155.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kaland, N., Moller-Nielsen, A., Callesen, K., Mortensen, E. L., Gottlieb, D., & Smith, L. (2002). A new ‘advanced’ test of theory of mind: Evidence from children and adolescents with asperger syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 517–528.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kerr, N., Dunbar, R. I. M., & Bentall, R. P. (2003). Theory of mind deficits in bipolar affective disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders, 73, 253–259.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., & Loring, D. W. (2004). Neuropsychological assessment (4th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Maylor, E., Moulson, J. M., Muncer, A., & Taylor, L. A. (2002). Does performance of theory of mind tasks decline in old age? British Journal of Psychology, 93, 465–485.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McKinnon, M. C., & Moscovitch, M. (2007). Domain-general contributions to social reasoning: Theory of mind and deontic reasoning re-explored. Cognition, 102, 179–218.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Merten, T., Green, P., Henry, M., Blaskewitz, N., & Brockhaus, R. (2005). Analog validation of german-language symptom validity tests and the influence of coaching. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nelson, C. A. (2001). The development and neural bases of face recognition. Infant and Child Development, 10, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ozonoff, S., Pennington, B. F., & Rogers, S. J. (1991). Executive function deficits in high-functioning autistic individuals: Relationship to theory of mind. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 32, 1081–1105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Perner, J., & Lang, B. (1999). Development of theory of mind and executive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 337–344.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 515–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Richman, J., Green, P., Gervais, R., Flaro, L., Merten, T., Brockhaus, T., et al. (2006). Objective tests of symptom exaggeration in independent medical examinations. Journal of Occupational Environmental Medicine, 48, 303–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Royall, D. R., Lauterbach, E. C., Cummings, J. L., Reeve, A., Rummans, T. A., Kaufer, D. I., et al. (2002). Executive control function: A review of its promise and challenges for clinical research. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 14, 377–405.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Sabbagh, M. A., Xu, F., Carlson, S. M., Moses, L. J., & Lee, K. (2006). The development of executive functioning and theory of mind: A comparison of chinese and U.S. preschoolers. Psychological Science, 17, 74–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Saltzman, J., Strauss, E., Hunter, M., & Archibald, S. (2000). Theory of mind and executive functions in normal aging and parkinson’s disease. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 6, 781–788.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sarfati, Y., Hardy-Baylé, M. C., Besche, C., & Widlöcher, D. (1997). Attribution of intentions to others in people with schizophrenia: A non-verbal exploration with comic strips. Schizophrenia Research, 25, 199–209.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shaw, P., Lawrence, E. J., Radbourne, C., Bramham, J., Polkey, C. E., & David, A. S. (2004). The impact of early and late damage to the human amygdale on ‘theory of mind’ reasoning. Brain, 127, 1535–1548. PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stone, V. E., Baron-Cohen, S., & Knight, R. T. (1998). Frontal lobe contributions to theory of mind. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 640–656.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stuss, D. T., & Knight, R. T. (2002). Introduction. In D. T. Stuss & R. T. Knight (Eds.), Principles of frontal lobe function (pp. 1–7). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sullivan, S., & Ruffman, T. (2004). Social understanding: How does it fare with advancing years? British Journal of Psychology, 95, 1–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. The Psychological Corporation. (1996). Beck depression inventory-second edition manual. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Brace & Company.Google Scholar
  57. The Psychological Corporation. (2001). Wechsler test of adult reading. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Brace & Company.Google Scholar
  58. Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 41–68. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yirmiya, N., Erel, O., Shaked, M., & Solomonica-Levi, D. (1998). Meta-analyses comparing theory of mind abilities of individuals with autism, individuals with mental retardation, and normally developing individuals. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 283–307.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zelazo, P. D., & Frye, D. (1998). Cognitive complexity and control ii. The development of executive function in childhood. American Psychological Society, 7, 121–125.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations