Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 364–371 | Cite as

Brief Report: How Adolescents with ASD Process Social Information in Complex Scenes. Combining Evidence from Eye Movements and Verbal Descriptions

  • Megan Freeth
  • Danielle Ropar
  • Peter Mitchell
  • Peter Chapman
  • Sarah Loher
Brief Report

Abstract

We investigated attention, encoding and processing of social aspects of complex photographic scenes. Twenty-four high-functioning adolescents (aged 11–16) with ASD and 24 typically developing matched control participants viewed and then described a series of scenes, each containing a person. Analyses of eye movements and verbal descriptions provided converging evidence that both groups displayed general interest in the person in each scene but the salience of the person was reduced for the ASD participants. Nevertheless, the verbal descriptions revealed that participants with ASD frequently processed the observed person’s emotion or mental state without prompting. They also often mentioned eye-gaze direction, and there was evidence from eye movements and verbal descriptions that gaze was followed accurately. The combination of evidence from eye movements and verbal descriptions provides a rich insight into the way stimuli are processed overall. The merits of using these methods within the same paradigm are discussed.

Keywords

Transcript analysis Eye tracking Autism Social scenes Gaze following Emotion processing 

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  2. Ames, C., & Fletcher-Watson, S. (2010). A review of methods in the study of attention in autism. Developmental Review, 30(1), 52–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The ‘reading the mind in the eyes’ test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger’s Syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 241–251.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., & Jolliffe, T. (1997). Is there a ‘language of the eyes’? Evidence from normal adults and adults with autism or Asperger syndrome. Visual Cognition, 4, 311–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Birmingham, E., Bischof, W. F., & Kingstone, A. (2007). Social attention and real-world scenes: The roles of action, competition and social content. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(7), 986–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ehlers, S., Gillberg, C., & Wing, L. (1999). A Screening Questionnaire for Asperger syndrome and other high-functioning autism spectrum disorders in school age children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29(2), 129–141.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fletcher-Watson, S., Leekam, S. R., Benson, V., Frank, M. C., & Findlay, J. M. (2009). Eye-movements reveal attention to social information in autism spectrum disorder. Neuropsychologia, 47, 248–257.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Freeth, M., Chapman, P., Ropar, D., & Mitchell, P. (2010a). Do gaze cues in complex scenes capture and direct the attention of high functioning adolescents with ASD? Evidence from eye-tracking. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(5), 534–547.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Freeth, M., Ropar, D., Chapman, P., & Mitchell, P. (2010b). The eye-gaze direction of an observed person can bias perception, memory and attention in adolescents with and without Autism Spectrum Disorders. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105(1–2), 20–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Jones, W., & Klin, A. (2008). Altered salience in autism. In E. McGregor, M. Nuez, K. Cebula, & J. C. Gomez (Eds.), Autism: An integrated view from neurocognitive, clinical and intervention research (pp. 62–82). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Kingstone, A., Smilek, D., & Eastwood, J. D. (2008). Cognitive ethology: A new approach for studying human cognition. British Journal of Psychology, 99, 317–340.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Klin, A., Jones, W., Schultz, R., & Volkmar, F. (2003). The enactive mind, or from actions to cognition: Lessons from autism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 358(1430), 345–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Klin, A., Jones, W., Schultz, R., Volkmar, F., & Cohen, D. (2002). Visual fixation patterns during viewing of naturalistic social situations as predictors of social competence in individuals with autism. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 809–816.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Langton, S. R. H., O’Donnell, C., Riby, D., & Ballantyne, C. J. (2006). Gaze cues influence the allocation of attention in natural scene viewing. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(12), 2056–2064.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Müller, E., & Schuler, A. L. (2006). Verbal marking of affect by children with Asperger’s syndrome and high functioning autism during spontaneous interactions with family members. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 1089–1100.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ochs, E., & Capps, L. (2001). Living narrative: Creating lives in everyday storytelling. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Riby, D., & Hancock, P. J. B. (2008). Research note: Viewing it differently: social scene perception in Williams syndrome and autism. Neuropsychologia, 46, 2855–2860.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Riby, D., & Hancock, P. J. B. (2009). Do faces capture the attention of individuals with Williams syndrome or autism? Evidence from tracking eye movements. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 421–431.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ristic, J., Mottron, L., Friesen, C. K., Iarocci, G., Burack, J. A., & Kingstone, A. (2005). Eyes are special but not for everyone: The case of autism. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 715–718.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sasson, N., Tsuchiya, N., Hurley, R., Couture, S., Penn, D., Adolphs, R., et al. (2007). Orienting to social stimuli differentiates social cognitive impairment in autism and schizophrenia. Neuropsychologia, 45(11), 2580–2588.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Smilek, D., Birmingham, E., Cameron, D., Bischof, W., & Kingstone, A. (2006). Cognitive ethology and exploring attention in real-world scenes. Brain Research, 1080, 101–119.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Megan Freeth
    • 1
  • Danielle Ropar
    • 2
  • Peter Mitchell
    • 3
  • Peter Chapman
    • 2
  • Sarah Loher
    • 4
  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
  2. 2.School of PsychologyUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
  3. 3.School of PsychologyUniversity of Nottingham Malaysia CampusSemenyih, Selangor Darul EhsanMalysia
  4. 4.Institut für PsychologieUniversität BernBern 9Switzerland

Personalised recommendations