Treatment Effect on Recidivism for Juveniles Who Have Sexually Offended: a Multilevel Meta-Analysis
The current study investigated the effect on recidivism of treatment aimed at juveniles who have sexually offended. It also assessed the potential moderating effect of type of recidivism, and several treatment, participant and study characteristics. In total, 14 published and unpublished primary studies, making use of a comparison group and reporting on official recidivism rates, were included in a multilevel meta-analysis. This resulted in the use of 77 effect sizes, and 1726 participants. A three-level meta-analytic model was used to calculate the combined effect sizes (Cohens d) and to perform moderator analyses. Study quality was assessed with the EPHPP Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. A moderate effect size was found (d = 0.37), indicating that the treatment groups achieved an estimated relative reduction in recidivism of 20.5% as compared to comparison groups. However, after controlling for publication bias, a significant treatment effect was no longer found. Type of recidivism did not moderate the effect of treatment, indicating that treatment groups were equally effective for all types of recidivism. Also, no moderating effects of participant or treatment characteristics were found. Regarding study characteristics, a shorter follow up time showed a trend for larger effect sizes, and the effect size calculation based on proportions yielded larger effect sizes than calculation via mean frequency of offending. Implications for future research and clinical practice are discussed.
KeywordsJuveniles Sex offending Treatment effect Recidivism Meta-analysis
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
The asterisks indicate original research included in the analysis.
- Armijo-Olivo, S., Stiles, C. R., Hagen, N. A., Biondo, P. D., & Cummings, G. G. (2012). Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: A comparison of the Cochrane collaboration risk of bias tool and the effective public health practice project quality assessment tool. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18, 12–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barbaree, H. E., & Marshall, W. L. (2006). The juvenile sex offender. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- *Barlow, K. N. (1998). Recidivism rates of level six residential programs for youthful male sexual offenders: 1995–1996. Unpublished Master’s thesis. Utah: Utah State University.Google Scholar
- Beaudry-Cyr, M., Jennings, W. G., Zgoba, K. M., & Tewksbury, R. (2015). Examining the continuity of juvenile sex offending into adulthood and subsequent patterns of sex and general recidivism. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 9, 1–18.Google Scholar
- Bonta, J., & Andrews, D. A. (2007). Risk-need-Responsivity model for offender assessment and rehabilitation. Ottawa: Public Safety Canada.Google Scholar
- *Borduin, C. M., Henggeler, S. W., Blaske, D. M., & Stein, R. J. (1990). Multisystemic treatment of adolescent sexual offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 996, 105–113.Google Scholar
- *Borduin, C. M., Heiblum, N., & Schaeffer, C. M. (2009). A randomized clinical trial of Multisystemic therapy with juvenile sexual offenders: Effects on youth social ecology and criminal activity. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 77, 26–37.Google Scholar
- Caldwell, M. F. (2016). Quantifying the decline in juvenile sexual recidivism rates. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 22, 414–426.Google Scholar
- Drew, C. H. (2013). Classification of juvenile sexual offenders by victim age based subgroups. Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations. Paper 7359.Google Scholar
- *Gillis, H. L., & Gass, M. A. (2010). Treating juveniles in a sex offender program using adventure-based programming: A matched group design. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 19, 20–34.Google Scholar
- *Guarino-Ghezzi, S., & Kimball, L. M. (1998). Juvenile sex offenders in treatment. Corrections Management Quarterly, 2, 45–54.Google Scholar
- Hanson, R. K., Bourgon, G., Helmus, L., & Hodgson, S. (2009). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: Risk, need, and Responsivity. Ottawa: Public Safety Canada.Google Scholar
- Hendriks, J. (2006). Jeugdige zedendelinquenten. Een studie naar subtypen en recidive. [Juvenile sex offenders. A study on subtypes and recidivism]. Dissertation. Retrieved from http://dare.ubvu.vu.nl/handle/1871/15503.
- *Hendriks, J., & Bijleveld, C. (2005). Recidive van jeugdige zedendelinquenten: poliklinisch behandelden versus niet-behandelden. [Recidivism by juvenile sexual offenders: Outpatient treatment versus non treatment]. Tijdschrift voor Seksuologie, 29, 150–160.Google Scholar
- Hissel, S., Bijleveld, C., Hendriks, J., Jansen, B., & Collot d’Escury-Koenigs, A. (2006). Jeugdige zedendelinquenten: Specialisten, generalisten en first offenders [juvenile sex offenders: Specialists, generalists, and first offenders]. Tijdschrift voor Seksuologie, 30, 215–225.Google Scholar
- *Holly, M. C. (2000). Long-term follow up of a community based treatment program for adolescent sex offenders. Unpublished master’s thesis. Thunder Bay: Lakehead University.Google Scholar
- Hox, J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah: Lawrence.Google Scholar
- *Johnson Erickson, C. (2008). The effectiveness of functional family therapy in the treatment of juvenile sexual offenders. Unpublished thesis. Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar
- *Lab, S. P., Schields, G., & Schondel, C. (1993). Research note: An evaluation of juvenile sexual offender treatment. Crime and Delinquency, 39, 543–553.Google Scholar
- Letourneau, E. J., Henggeler, S. W., Borduin, C. M., Schewe, P. A., McCart, M. R., Chapman, J. E., & Saldana, L. (2009). Mutisystemic therapy for juvenile sexual offenders: 1 year results from a randomized effectiveness trial. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 89–201.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- *Letourneau, E. J., Borduin, C. M., Henggeler, S. W., McCart, M. R., Schewe, P. A., & Armstrong, K. S. (2013). Two-year follow-up of a randomized effectiveness trail evaluating MST for juveniles who sexually offend. Journal of Family Psychology, 27, 978–985.Google Scholar
- Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage publications.Google Scholar
- Lobanov-Rostovsky, C. (2015). Recidivism of juveniles who commit sexual offenses. SO+MAPI Research Brief. July 2015.Google Scholar
- Loeber, R., Hoeve, M., Slot, N. W., & Van Der Laan, P. H. (2012). Persisters and desisters in crime from adolescence into adulthood. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
- Margari, F., Lecce, P. A., Craig, F., Lafortezza, E., Lisi, A., Pinto, F., Stallone, F., Pierri, G., Pisani, R., Zagaria, G., Margari, L., & Grattagliano, I. (2015). Juvenile sex offenders: Personality profile, coping styles and parental care. Psychiatry Research, 229, 82–88.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Purcel, M. (2010). A personality based classification of male adolescent sex offenders using the MACI (Thesis). Retrieved from https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/2292/6538/01front.pdf?sequence=2.
- Ryan, G., Leversee, T., & Lane, S. (2010). Juvenile sexual offending, causes, consequences and correction. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
- *Schram, D. D., Darling Milloy, C., & Rowe, W. E. (1991). Juvenile sex offenders: a follow up study of reoffensive behavior. Unpublished research report. Washington: Washington State institute for public policy.Google Scholar
- Seabloom, W., Seabloom, M. E., Seabloom, E., Barron, R., & Hendrickson, S. (2003). A 14 to 24 year longitudinal study of a comprehensive sexual health model treatment program for adolescent sex offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47, 468–481.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Swenson, C. C., Henggeler, S. W., Taylor, I. S., & Addison, O. W. (2005). Multisystemic Therapy and Neighborhood Partnerships. New York: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
- Tabachnik, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Allynand Bacon.Google Scholar
- Ter Beek, E., Van Der Rijken, R. A. E., Kuiper, C. H. Z., Hendriks, J., & Stams, G. J. J. M. (2016). The allocation of sexually transgressive juveniles to intensive specialized treatment. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. Advance online publication.Google Scholar
- Van Outsem, R. E. (2009). Exploring psychological characteristics of sexually abusive juveniles. Unpublished Thesis. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.Google Scholar
- Veneziano, C., & Veneziano, L. (2002). Adolescent sex offenders: A review of the literature. Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 3, 247–260.Google Scholar
- *Waite, D., Keller, A., McGarvey, E. L., Wieckowski, E., Pinkerton, R., & Brown, G. L. (2005). Juvenile sex offender re-arrest rates for sexual, violent nonsexual and property crimes: A 10-year follow-up study. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 313–331.Google Scholar
- Wibbelink, C. J. M., & Assink, M. (2015). Manual for conducting a three-level meta-analysis in R. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam.Google Scholar
- Wilson, D. B. (2013). Practical meta-analysis effect size calculator. Retrieved from: http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/escalc/html/EffectSizeCalculator-Home.php.
- Wittebrood, K. (2006). Slachtoffers van criminaliteit: Feiten en achtergronden. (Victims of crime: facts and backgrounds). Den Haag: Sociaal Cultureel Planbureau.Google Scholar
- *Worling, J. R., & Curwen, T. (2000). Adolescent sexual offender recidivism: Success of specialized treatment and implications of risk prediction. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24, 965–982.Google Scholar
- *Worling, J. R., Littlejohn, M. A., & Bookalam, M. A. (2010). 20-year prospective follow-up study of specialized treatment for adolescents who offend sexually. Behavioural Sciences and the Law, 28, 46–57.Google Scholar