Advertisement

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 45, Issue 6, pp 1133–1145 | Cite as

Longitudinal Profiles of Girls’ Irritable, Defiant and Antagonistic Oppositional Symptoms: Evidence for Group Based Differences in Symptom Severity

  • Khrista Boylan
  • Richard Rowe
  • Eric Duku
  • Irwin Waldman
  • Stephanie Stepp
  • Alison Hipwell
  • Jeffrey Burke
Article

Abstract

Three subdimensions of ODD symptoms have been proposed –angry/irritable (IR), argumentative/defiant (DF) and antagonism (AN). This study tested whether longitudinal symptom trajectories could be identified by these subdimensions. Group-based trajectory analysis was used to identify developmental trajectories of IR, DF and AN symptoms. Multi-group trajectory analysis was then used to identify how subdimension trajectories were linked together over time. Data were drawn from the Pittsburgh Girls Study (PGS; N = 2450), an urban community sample of girls between the ages of five--eight at baseline. We included five waves of annual data across ages five-13 to model trajectories. Three trajectories were identified for each ODD subdimension: DF and AN were characterized by high, medium and low severity groups; IR was characterized by low, medium stable, and high increasing groups. Multi-trajectory analysis confirmed these subdimensions were best linked together based on symptom severity. We did not identify girls’ trajectory groups that were characterized predominantly by a particular subdimension of ODD symptoms. Membership in more severe symptom groups was significantly associated with worse outcomes five years later. In childhood and early adolescence girls with high levels of ODD symptoms can be identified, and these youth are characterized by a persistently elevated profile of IR, DF and AN symptoms. Further studies in clinical samples are required to examine the ICD-10 proposal that ODD with irritability is a distinct or more severe form of ODD.

Keywords

Oppositional Trajectory Girls Longitudinal 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to our dedicated research team, and to the participants for their many contributions to this study.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funding

The Pittsburgh Girls Study was funded by the National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH056630), the FISA Foundation and the Falk Fund. The manuscript preparation was supported by an early career award to Dr. Boylan from the Hamilton Health Sciences Foundation, and a grant to Dr. Burke (MH095969) from the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH).

Conflicts of Interest

Drs Boylan, Rowe, Duku, Waldman, Stepp, Hipwell and Burke have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the instutitional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.

References

  1. Althoff, R. R., Kuny-Slock, A. V., Verhulst, F. C., Hudziak, J. J., & van der Ende, J. (2014). Classes of oppositional-defiant behavior: concurrent and predictive validity. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55, 1162–1171.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. (2013). (Fifth ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  3. Angold, A., & Costello, E. J. (1996). Toward establishing an empirical basis for the diagnosis of oppositional defiant disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 35, 1205–1212.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Angold, A., Costello, E. J., & Worthman, C. M. (1998). Puberty and depression: the roles of age, pubertal status and pubertal timing. Psychological Medicine, 28, 51–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Birmaher, B., Khetarpal, S., Brent, D., Cully, M., Balach, L., Kaufman, J., & McKenzie Neer, S. (1997). The screen for child anxiety related emotional disorders (SCARED): scale construction and psychometric characteristics. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 545–553.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bongers, I. L., Koot, H. M., van der Ende, J., & Verhulst, F. C. (2004). Developmental trajectories of externalizing behaviors in childhood and adolescence. Child Development, 75, 1523–1537.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Boylan, K. R., Vaillancourt, T., & Szatmari, P. (2012). Linking oppositional behaviour trajectories to the development of depressive symptoms in childhood. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 43, 484–497.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Burke, J. D. (2012). An affective dimension within oppositional defiant disorder symptoms among boys: personality and psychopathology outcomes into early childhood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53, 1176–1183.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Burke, J., & Loeber, R. (2010). Oppositional defiant disorder and the explanation of the comorbidity between behavioral disorders and depression. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 17, 319–326.Google Scholar
  10. Burke, J. D., Hipwell, A. E., & Loeber, R. (2010). Dimensions of oppositional defiant disorder as predictors of depression and conduct disorder in preadolescent girls. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 49, 484–492.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Burke, J. D., Rowe, R., & Boylan, K. (2014). Functional outcomes of child and adolescent oppositional defiant disorder symptoms in young adult men. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55, 264–272.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. D’Unger, A., Land, K. C., McCall, P. L., & Nagin, D. S. (1998). How many latent classes of delinquent/criminal careers? Results from mixed Poisson regression analyses of the London, Philadelphia and Racine cohort studies. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 1593–1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Drabick, D. A. G., & Gadow, K. D. (2012). Deconstructing oppositional defiant disorder: clinic-based evidence for an anger/irritability phenotype. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 51, 384–393.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Gadow, K. D., & Sprafkin, J. (1994). Child symptom inventories manual. Stony Brook: Checkmate Plus. 53, 1128–1138.Google Scholar
  15. Gadow, K. D. &, Drabick, D. A. (2012). Anger and irritability symptoms among youth with ODD: cross-informant versus source-exclusive syndromes. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40, 1073–85.Google Scholar
  16. Hankin, B. L., Abramson, L. Y., Moffitt, T. E., Silva, P. A., McGee, R., & Angell, K. E. (1998). Development of depression from preadolescence to young adulthood: emerging gender differences in a 10-year longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107, 128–140.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Herzhoff, K., & Tackett, J. L. (2016). Subfactors of oppositional defiant disorder: converging evidence from structural and latent class analyses. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57, 18–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hipwell, A. E., Loeber, R., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Keenan, K., White, H. R., & Kroneman, L. (2002). Characteristics of girls with early onset disruptive and antisocial behaviour. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 12, 99–118.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Jensen, P. S., Rubio-Stipec, M., Canino, G., Bird, H. R., Dulcan, M. K., Schwab-Stone, M. E., & Lahey, B. B. (1999). Parent and child contributions to diagnosis of mental disorder: are both informants always necessary? Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 38, 1569–1579.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones, B. L., & Nagin, D. S. (2007). Advances in group-based trajectory modeling and an SAS procedure for estimating them. Sociological Methods & Research, 35, 542–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones, B. L., Nagin, D. S., & Roeder, K. (2001). A SAS procedure based on mixture models for estimating developmental trajectories. Sociological Methods & Research, 29, 373–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jung, T., & Wickrama, T. A. S. (2008). An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modelling. Social and Personality Psychology, 2, 302–317.Google Scholar
  23. Keenan, K., Loeber, R., & Green, S. (1999). Conduct disorder in girls: a review of the literature. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 2, 3–19.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Keenan, K., Hipwell, A., Chung, T., Stepp, S., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Loeber, R., & McTigue, K. (2010). The Pittsburgh girls study: overview and initial findings. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 39, 506–521.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Kuny, A. V., Althoff, R. R., Copeland, W., Bartels, M., Van Beijsterveldt, C. E. M., Baer, J., & Hudziak, J. J. (2013). Separating the domains of oppositional behavior: comparing latent models of the conners’ oppositional subscale. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 52, 172.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Lavigne, J. V., Bryant, F., Hopkins, J., & Gouze, K. (2014). Dimensions of oppositional defiant disorder in young children: model comparisons, gender and longitudinal invariance. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43, 423–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leadbeater, B. J., & Homel, J. (2015). Irritable and defiant sub-dimensions of ODD: their stability and prediction of internalizing symptoms and conduct problems from adolescence to young adulthood. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43, 407–421.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Leadbeater, B. J., Thompson, K., & Gruppuso, V. (2012). Co-occurring trajectories of symptoms of anxiety, depression, and oppositional defiance from adolescence to young adulthood. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 41, 719–730.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Lochman, J. E., Evans, S. C., Burke, J. D., Roberts, M. C., Fite, P. J., Reed, G. M., de la la Peña, F. R., Matthys, W., Ezpeleta, L., Siddiqui, S., & Elena Garralda, M. (2015). An empirically based alternative to DSM-5’s disruptive mood dysregulation disorder for ICD-11. World Psychiatry, 14, 30–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. K. (2000). Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 24, 882–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nagin, D. S. (2005). Group-based modeling of development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nagin, D., & Tremblay, R. E. (1999). Trajectories of boys’ physical aggression, opposition, and hyperactivity on the path to physically violent and nonviolent juvenile delinquency. Child Development, 70, 1181–1196.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Roeder, K., Lynch, K., & Nagin, D. (1999). Modeling uncertainty in latent class membership: a case study in criminology. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94, 766–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rudolph, K. D., & Clark, A. G. (2001). Conceptions of relationships in children with depressive and aggressive symptoms: social-cognitive distortion or reality? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 29, 41–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Stringaris, A., & Goodman, R. (2009). Three dimensions of oppositionality in youth. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 50, 216–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wiesner, M., & Kim, H. K. (2006). Co-occurring delinquency and depressive symptoms of adolescent boys and girls: a dual trajectory modeling approach. Developmental Psychology, 42, 122–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Khrista Boylan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Richard Rowe
    • 3
  • Eric Duku
    • 1
  • Irwin Waldman
    • 4
  • Stephanie Stepp
    • 5
  • Alison Hipwell
    • 5
  • Jeffrey Burke
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural NeurosciencesMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  2. 2.McMaster Children’s HospitalHamiltonCanada
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
  4. 4.Department of PsychologyEmory UniversityAtlantaGeorgia
  5. 5.Department of Psychiatry and PsychologyUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  6. 6.Department of PsychologyUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA

Personalised recommendations