Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 45, Issue 4, pp 705–717 | Cite as

The Long-Term Effectiveness of the Family Check-up on Peer Preference: Parent-Child Interaction and Child Effortful Control as Sequential Mediators

  • Hyein Chang
  • Daniel S. Shaw
  • Elizabeth C. Shelleby
  • Thomas J. Dishion
  • Melvin N. Wilson
Article

Abstract

We examined the longitudinal effects of the Family Check-Up (FCU) intervention beginning in toddlerhood on children’s peer preference at school-age. Specifically, a sequential mediational model was proposed in which the FCU was hypothesized to promote peer preference (i.e., higher acceptance and lower rejection by peers) in middle childhood through its positive effects on parent-child interaction and child effortful control in early childhood. Participants were 731 low-income families (49 % female). Qualities of parent-child interaction were observed during structured activities at 2 to 5 years, child effortful control was assessed using behavioral tasks at 5 years, and peer acceptance and rejection were rated by teachers at 7.5 to 10.5 years. Results indicated that the FCU indirectly predicted peer preference by sequentially improving parent-child interaction and child effortful control. The findings are discussed with respect to implications for understanding mechanisms by which early parenting-focused programs may enhance child functioning across time and context.

Keywords

Parent-child interaction Effortful control Peer preference Early prevention 

References

  1. Brennan, L. M., Shelleby, E. C., Shaw, D. S., Gardner, F., Dishion, T. J., & Wilson, M. N. (2013). Indirect effects of the family check-up on school-age academic achievement through improvements in parenting in early childhood. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 762–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buhs, E. S., Ladd, G. W., & Herald, S. L. (2006). Peer exclusion and victimization: processes that mediate the relation between peer group rejection and children's classroom engagement and achievement? Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chang, H., Olson, S. L., Sameroff, A. J., & Sexton, H. R. (2011). Child effortful control as a mediator of parenting practices on externalizing behavior: evidence for a sex-differentiated pathway across the transition from preschool to school. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 39, 71–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Chang, H., Shaw, D. S., Dishion, T. J., Gardner, F., & Wilson, M. N. (2014). Direct and indirect effects of the family check-up on self-regulation from toddlerhood to early school-age. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 42, 1117–1128.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Chang, H., Shaw, D. S., Dishion, T. J., Gardner, F., & Wilson, M. N. (2015). Proactive parenting and children’s effortful control: mediating role of language and indirect intervention effects. Social Development, 24, 206–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark, K. E., & Ladd, G. W. (2000). Connectedness and autonomy support in parent–child relationships: links to children’s socio-emotional orientation and peer relationships. Developmental Psychology, 36, 485–498.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Connell, A., Bullock, B. M., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D., Wilson, M., & Gardner, F. (2008). Family intervention effects on co-occurring behavior and emotional problems in early childhood: A latent transition analysis approach. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 1211–1225.Google Scholar
  8. David, K. M., & Murphy, B. C. (2007). InteACP60198rparental conflict and preschoolers’ peer relations: the moderating roles of temperament and gender. Social Development, 16, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dishion, T. J. (1990). The family ecology of boys' peer relations in middle childhood. Child Development, 61, 874–892.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dishion, T. J., & Kavanagh, K. (2003). Intervening in adolescent problem behavior: a family-centered approach. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  11. Dishion, T. J., & Stormshak, E. (2007). Intervening in children’s lives: An ecological, family-centered approach to mental health care. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  12. Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., Connell, A., Wilson, M. N., Gardner, F., & Weaver, C. (2008). The family check up with high-risk families with toddlers: outcomes on positive parenting and early problem behavior. Child Development, 79, 1395–1414.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Dishion, T. J., Stormshak, E. A., & Kavanagh, K. (2011). Everyday parenting: a professional’s guide to building family management skills. Champaign: Research Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dishion, T. J., Forgatch, M. S., Van Ryzin, M. J., & Winter, C. (2012). The nonlinear dynamics of family problem solving in adolescence: the predictive validity of a peaceful resolution attractor. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 16, 33–1352.Google Scholar
  15. Dishion, T. J., Brennan, L., Shaw, D. S., McEachern, A., & Wilson, M. (2014). The prevention of early onset problem behavior through periodic family check-ups in early childhood: a health maintenance model with indigent high risk families. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 42, 343–354.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Einsenberg, N., Valiente, C., Morris, A. S., Fabes, R. A., Cumberland, A., Reiser, M., et al. (2003). Longitudinal relations among parental emotional expressivity, children’s regulation, and quality of socioemotional functioning. Developmental Psychology, 37, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eisenberg, N., Gershoff, E. T., Fabes, R. A., Shepard, S. A., Cumberland, A. J., Losoya, S. H., et al. (2001). Mothers’ emotional expressivity and children’s behavior problems and social competence: mediation through children’s regulation. Developmental Psychology, 37, 475–490.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Enders, C. K., & Bandalos, D. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 430–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Evans, G. W., & Kim, P. (2013). Childhood poverty, chronic stress, self-regulation, and coping. Child Development Perspectives, 7, 43–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kerns, K. A., Contreras, J. M., & Neal-Barnett, A. M. (2000). Family and peers: linking two social worlds. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  21. Kochanska, G., Murray, K. T., & Harlan, E. T. (2000). Effortful control in early childhood: continuity and change, antecedents, and implications for social development. Developmental Psychology, 36, 220–232.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ladd, G. W. (1999). Peer relationships and social competence during early and middle childhood. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 333–359.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ladd, G. W. (2006). Peer rejection, aggressive or withdrawn behavior, and psychological maladjustment from ages 5 to 12: an examination of four predictive models. Child Development, 77, 822–846.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ladd, G. W., & Pettit, G. S. (2002). Parenting and the development of children’s peer relationships. In M. H. Borenstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting (Vol. 5, 2nd ed., pp. 269–310). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. Lengua, L. J. (2003). Associations among emotionality, self-regulation, adjustment problems, and positive adjustment in middle childhood. Applied Developmental Psychology, 24, 595–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lunkenheimer, E. S., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., Connell, A., Gardner, F., Wilson, M. N., & Skuban, E. M. (2008). Collateral benefits of the family check up on early childhood school readiness: indirect effects of parents’ positive behavior support. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1737–1752.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. McDowell, D. J., & Parke, R. D. (2009). Parental correlates of children’s peer relations: an empirical test of a tripartite model. Developmental Psychology, 45, 224–235.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. McDowell, D. J., Parke, R. D., & Wang, S. J. (2003). Differences between mothers’ and fathers’ advice-giving style and content: relations with social competence and psychological functioning in middle childhood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mikami, A. Y., Lerner, M. D., & Lun, J. (2010). Social context influences on children’s rejection by their peers. Child Development Perspectives, 4, 123–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus User’s Guide. (7th Ed.) Los Angeles, CA; Muthén & MuthénGoogle Scholar
  32. Newcomb, A. F., Bukowski, W. M., & Pattee, L. (1993). Children’s peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 99–128.Google Scholar
  33. Noldus Information Technology (2012). The Observer XT reference manual 11.0. Wageningen. the Netherlands: Author..Google Scholar
  34. O’Neil, R., Parke, R. D., & McDowell, D. J. (2001). Objective and subjective features of children’s neighborhoods: relations to parental regulatory strategies and children’s social competence. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 22, 135–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Olson, S. L., & Lunkenheimer, E. S. (2009). Expanding concepts of self-regulation to social relationships: transactional processes in the development of early behavioral adjustment. In A. J. Sameroff (Ed.), Transactional processes in development (pp. 55–76). Washington, DC: APA Press.Google Scholar
  36. Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1987). Peer relations and later personal adjustment: are low-accepted children at risk? Psychological Bulletin, 102, 357–389.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Pedersen, S., Vitaro, F., Barker, E. D., & Borge, A. I. (2007). The timing of middle-childhood peer rejection and friendship: linking early behavior to early-adolescent adjustment. Child Development, 78, 1037–1051.Google Scholar
  38. Peterson, J., Winter, C., Jabson, J., & Dishion, T. J. (2008). The relationship affect coding system, Unpublished coding manual. Child and Family Center, University of Oregon. OR: Eugene.Google Scholar
  39. Prinstein, M. J., & La Greca, A. M. (2004). Childhood rejection, aggression, and depression as predictors of adolescent girls' externalizing and health risk behaviors: a six-year longitudinal study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 103–112.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Rabiner, D. L., Coie, J. D., Miller-Johnson, S., Boykin, A.-S. M., & Lochman, J. E. (2005). Predicting the persistence of aggressive offending of African American males from adolescence into young adulthood: the importance of peer relations, aggressive behavior, and ADHD symptoms. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 13, 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Reavis, R., Keane, S., & Calkins, S. (2010). Trajectories of peer victimization the role of multiple relationships. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56, 303–332.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Riggs, N. R., Greenberg, M. T., Kusché, C. A., & Pentz, M. A. (2006). The mediational role of neurocognition in the behavioral outcomes of a social-emotional prevention program in elementary school students: effects of the PATHS curriculum. Prevention Science, 7, 91–102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Rose, A. J., & Rudolph, K. D. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 98–131.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Rothbart, M. K., & Bates, J. E. (2006). Temperament. In W. Damon, R. Lerner, & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Social, emotional, and personality development: Vol. 3. Handbook of Child Psychology ((6th ed., pp. 66–166). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  45. Rothbart, M. K., Ahadi, S., & Hershey, K. L. (1994). Temperament and social behavior in childhood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 40, 21–39.Google Scholar
  46. Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Parker, J. G. (2006). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In W. Damon., R. Lerner, and N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Social, emotional, and personality development: Vol. 3. Handbook of child psychology (6th ed., pp. 571–645). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  47. Sameroff, A. J. (Ed.) (2009). The transactional model of development: how children and contexts shape each other. Washington: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  48. Shaw, D. S., Dishion, T. J., Connell, A., Wilson, M. N., & Gardner, F. (2009). Maternal depression as a mediator of intervention in reducing early child problem behavior. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 417–439.Google Scholar
  49. Shelleby, E. C., Shaw, D. S., Cheong, J., Chang, H., Gardner, F., Dishion, T. J., & Wilson, M. N. (2013). Behavioral control in at-risk toddlers: the influence of the family check-up. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 41(3), 288–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sitnick, S. L., Shaw, D. S., Gill, A., Dishion, T., Winter, C., Waller, R., et al. (2015). Parenting and the family check-up: developments and changes in observed parent-child interaction during early childhood. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 44, 970–984.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Smith, J. D., Berkel, C., Hails, K. A., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., & Wilson, M. N. (2016). Predictors of participation in the family check-up program: a randomized trial of yearly services from age 2 to 10 years. Prevention Science. doi:10.1007/s11121-016-0679-7.
  52. Spinrad, T. L., Eisenberg, N., Gaertner, B., Popp, T., Smith, C. L., Kupfer, A., et al. (2007). Relations of maternal socialization and toddlers’ effortful control to children’s adjustment and social competence. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1170–1186.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  54. Vitaro, F., Pedersen, S., & Brendgen, M. (2007). Children's disruptiveness, peer rejection, friends’ deviancy, and delinquent behaviors: a process-oriented approach. Development and Psychopathology, 19, 433–453.Google Scholar
  55. Wilson, M. N., Hurtt, C. L., Shaw, D. S., Dishion, T. J., & Gardner, F. (2009). Analysis and influence of demographic and risk factors on difficult child behaviors. Prevention Science, 10, 353–365.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologySungkyunkwan UniversitySeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyNorthern Illinois UniversityDeKalbUSA
  4. 4.Department of PsychologyArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  5. 5.Department of PsychologyUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations