Affective Differences Between Psychopathy Variants and Genders in Adjudicated Youth
- 916 Downloads
The present study used Model-Based Cluster analysis to identify primary and secondary psychopathy variants in a mixed-gender sample of 150 adjudicated adolescents (60 % male; M = 15.2 years old). Distinct primary and secondary psychopathy groups emerged and were entered into a structural equation path model for the purpose of predicting group differences in emotional experiences reported between youth assigned to each variant. Youth characterized by secondary psychopathy reported experiencing significantly more frequent and more intense negative affect than their primary psychopathy counterparts. Frequency and intensity of affect also mediated the association between psychopathy variants and symptoms of depression, in which the secondary psychopathy group endorsed significantly more symptoms of major depression than the primary psychopathy group. Overall, these results suggest that different causal processes and affective experiences may underlie distinct trajectories to primary and secondary psychopathy variants in adjudicated adolescents. As such, youths comprising the secondary subtype of psychopathy may be more aptly considered “callous and emotional,” compared with the primary subtype who present as prototypically callous and unemotional.
KeywordsCallous-unemotional traits Psychopathy Psychopathy variants Affect Gender
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
- American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlingon: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
- Euler, F., Jenkel, N., Stadler, C., Schmeck, K., Fegert, J. M., Kölch, M., & Schmid, M. (2014). Variants of girls and boys with conduct disorder: anxiety symptoms and callous-unemotional traits. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s10802-014-9946-x.
- Fairchild, G., Van Goozen, S. H. M., Calder, A. J., Stollery, S. J., & Goodyer, I. M. (2009). Deficits in facial expression recognition in male adolescents with early-onset or adolescence-onset conduct disorder. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 50, 627–636.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fraley, C., Raftery, A. E., Murphy, T. B., & Scrucca, L. (2012). MCLUST version 4 for R: normal mixture modeling for model-based clustering, classification, and density estimation (Technical Report No. 597). University of Washington.Google Scholar
- Frick, P. J., & Hare, R. D. (2001). The antisocial process screening device. Toronto: Multi-Health.Google Scholar
- Hare, R. D. (1991). Psychopathy checklist-revised (PCL-R). Toronto: Multi-Health.Google Scholar
- Hicks, B. M., Carlson, M. D., Blonigen, D. M., Patrick, C. J., Iacono, W. G., & MGue, M. (2012). Psychopathic personality traits and environmental contexts: differential correlates, gender differences, and genetic mediation. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3, 209–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kahn, R. E., Frick, P. J., Youngstrom, E. A., Kogos Youngstrom, J., Feeny, N. C., & Findling, R. L. (2013). Distinguishing primary and secondary variants of callous-unemotional traits among adolescents in a clinic-referred sample. Psychological Assessment, 25, 966.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Karpman, B. (1941). On the need of separating psychopathy into two distinct clinical types: the symptomatic and the idiopathic. Journal of Criminal Psychopathology, 3, 112–137.Google Scholar
- Larsen, R. J. (1984). Theory and measurement of affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic. Dissertation Abstracts International, 85, 2297B.Google Scholar
- Lykken, D. T. (1995). The Antisocial Personalities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Marsh, A. A., Finger, E. C., Schechter, J. C., Jurkowitz, I. T. N., Reid, M. E., & Blair, R. J. R. (2011). Adolescents with psychopathic traits report reductions in physiological responses to fear. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 52, 834–841.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pilkonis, P. A., & Klein, K. R. (1997). Commentary on the assessment and diagnosis of antisocial behavior and personality. In D. M. Stoff, J. Breiling, & J. D. Maser (Eds.), Handbook of antisocial behavior (pp. 109–112). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Stadler, C., Kroeger, A., Weyers, P., Grasmann, D., Horschinek, M., Freitag, C., & Clement, H.-W. (2011). Cortisol reactivity in boys with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and disruptive behavior problems: the impact of callous unemotional traits. Psychiatry Research, 187, 204–209.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Waschbusch, D. A., Carrey, N. J., Willoughby, M. T., King, S., & Andrade, B. F. (2007). Effects of methylphenidate and behavior modification on the social and academic behavior of children with disruptive behavior disorders: the moderating role of callous/unemotional traits. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 36, 629–644.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilkinson, G. S. (1993). Wide range achievement test—revision 3. Wilmington: Jastak Assoc.Google Scholar
- Woodworth, M., & Waschbusch, D. (2008). Emotional processing in children with conduct problems and callous/unemotional traits. Child: Care, Health and Development, 34, 234–244.Google Scholar