Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 44, Issue 7, pp 1387–1398 | Cite as

Bidirectional Associations Between Externalizing Behavior Problems and Maladaptive Parenting Within Parent-Son Dyads Across Childhood

  • Sytske Besemer
  • Rolf Loeber
  • Stephen P. Hinshaw
  • Dustin A. Pardini
Article

Abstract

Coercive parent–child interaction models posit that an escalating cycle of negative, bidirectional interchanges influences the development of boys’ externalizing problems and caregivers’ maladaptive parenting over time. However, longitudinal studies examining this hypothesis have been unable to rule out the possibility that between-individual factors account for bidirectional associations between child externalizing problems and maladaptive parenting. Using a longitudinal sample of boys (N = 503) repeatedly assessed eight times across 6-month intervals in childhood (in a range between 6 and 13 years), the current study is the first to use novel within-individual change (fixed effects) models to examine whether parents tend to increase their use of maladaptive parenting strategies following an increase in their son’s externalizing problems, or vice versa. These bidirectional associations were examined using multiple facets of externalizing problems (i.e., interpersonal callousness, conduct and oppositional defiant problems, hyperactivity/impulsivity) and parenting behaviors (i.e., physical punishment, involvement, parent–child communication). Analyses failed to support the notion that when boys increase their typical level of problem behaviors, their parents show an increase in their typical level of maladaptive parenting across the subsequent 6 month period, and vice versa. Instead, across 6-month intervals, within parent-son dyads, changes in maladaptive parenting and child externalizing problems waxed and waned in concert. Fixed effects models to address the topic of bidirectional relations between parent and child behavior are severely underrepresented. We recommend that other researchers who have found significant bidirectional parent–child associations using rank-order change models reexamine their data to determine whether these findings hold when examining changes within parent–child dyads.

Keywords

Bidirectional relations Parenting Child problem behavior Fixed effects analysis Within-individual change 

Supplementary material

10802_2015_124_MOESM1_ESM.docx (34 kb)
Table A1(DOCX 34 kb)
10802_2015_124_MOESM2_ESM.docx (30 kb)
Table A2(DOCX 30 kb)
10802_2015_124_MOESM3_ESM.docx (30 kb)
Table A3(DOCX 30 kb)
10802_2015_124_MOESM4_ESM.docx (30 kb)
Table A4(DOCX 30 kb)
10802_2015_124_MOESM5_ESM.docx (33 kb)
Table A5(DOCX 33 kb)
10802_2015_124_MOESM6_ESM.docx (37 kb)
Table A6(DOCX 36 kb)
10802_2015_124_MOESM7_ESM.docx (33 kb)
Table A7(DOCX 33 kb)
10802_2015_124_MOESM8_ESM.docx (33 kb)
Table A8(DOCX 33 kb)
10802_2015_124_MOESM9_ESM.docx (33 kb)
Table A9(DOCX 33 kb)
10802_2015_124_MOESM10_ESM.docx (36 kb)
Table A10(DOCX 36 kb)

References

  1. Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Integrative guide for the 1991 CBCL/4-18, YSR, and TRF Profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont.Google Scholar
  2. Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. S. (1986). Manual for the teacher’s report form and teacher version of the child behavior profile. Burlington: University of Vermont.Google Scholar
  3. Achenbach, T. M., McConaughy, S. H., & Howell, C. T. (1987). Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 213–232. American Psychological Association.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allison, P. D. (2009). Fixed effects regression models. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell, R. Q. (1968). A reinterpretation of the direction of effects in studies of socialization. Psychological Review, 75, 81–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bell, R. Q. (1971). Stimulus control of parent or caretaker behavior by offspring. Developmental Psychology, 4, 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bell, R. Q. (1977). Socialization findings re-examined. In R. Q. Bell & L. V. Harper (Eds.), Child effects on adults (pp. 53–84). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Bell, R. Q., & Chapman, M. (1986). Child effects in studies using experimental or brief longitudinal approaches to socialization. Developmental Psychology, 22, 595–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bornstein, M. H., & Bradley, R. H. (Eds.). (2012). Socioeconomic status, parenting, and child development. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Burke, J. D., Pardini, D. A., & Loeber, R. (2008). Reciprocal relationships between parenting behavior and disruptive psychopathology from childhood through adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 679–692.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bushway, S., Brame, R., & Paternoster, R. (1999). Assessing stability and change in criminal offending: a comparison of random effects, semiparametric, and fixed effects modeling strategies. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15, 23–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Byrd, A. L., Loeber, R., & Pardini, D. A. (2012). Understanding desisting and persisting forms of delinquency: the unique contributions of disruptive behavior disorders and interpersonal callousness. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53, 371–380.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cai, X., Kaiser, A. P., & Hancock, T. B. (2004). Parent and teacher agreement on child behavior checklist items in a sample of preschoolers from low-income and predominantly African American families. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 33, 303–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Capaldi, D. M., DeGarmo, D., Patterson, G. R., & Forgatch, M. (2002). Contextual risk across the early life span and association with antisocial behavior. In J. B. Reid, G. R. Patterson, & J. Snyder (Eds.), Antisocial behavior in children and adolescents: a developmental analysis and model for intervention (pp. 123–145). Washington: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Coley, R. L., & Medeiros, B. L. (2007). Reciprocal longitudinal relations between nonresident father involvement and adolescent delinquency. Child Development, 78, 132–147.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cumming, G. (2014). The new statistics: why and how. Psychological Science, 25, 7–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2011). The disaggregation of within-person and between-person effects in longitudinal models of change. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 583–619.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eddy, J. M., Leve, L. D., & Fagot, B. I. (2001). Coercive family processes: a replication and extension of Patterson’s coercion model. Aggressive Behavior, 27, 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Farrington, D. P. (2015). Prospective longitudinal research on the development of offending. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 48, 314–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fite, P. J., Wynn, P., & Pardini, D. A. (2009). Explaining discrepancies in arrest rates between black and white male juveniles. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 916–927.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hinshaw, S. P. (1987). On the distinction between attentional deficits/hyperactivity and conduct problems/aggression in child psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 443–463.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoeve, M., Dubas, J. S., Eichelsheim, V. I., Laan, P. H., Smeenk, W., & Gerris, J. R. M. (2009). The relationship between parenting and delinquency: a meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 749–775.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hollingshead, A. de B. (1975). Four factor index of social status. New Haven, CT: Unpublished working paper, Department of Sociology, Yale University.Google Scholar
  24. Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2, e124. Public Library of Science.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kaiser, A. P., & Delaney, E. M. (1996). The effects of poverty on parenting young children. Peabody Journal of Education, 71, 66–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kraemer, H. C., Lowe, K. K., & Kupfer, D. J. (2005). To your health: How to understand what research tells us about risk. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Larzelere, R. E., & Cox, R. B. (2013). Making valid causal inferences about corrective actions by parents from longitudinal data. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 5, 282–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Loeber, R., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1986). Family factors as correlates and predictors of juvenile conduct problems and delinquency. Crime and Justice, 7, 29–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Loeber, R., Farrington, D. P., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., & van Kammen, W. B. (1998). Antisocial behavior and mental health problems. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  30. Loeber, R., Drinkwater, M., Yin, Y., Anderson, S. J., Schmidt, L. C., & Crawford, A. (2000). Stability of family interaction from ages 6 to 18. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 353–369.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Loeber, R., Farrington, D. P., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., & White, H. R. (2008). Violence and serious theft: Development and prediction from childhood to adulthood. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Lytton, H. (1990). Child and parent effects in boys’ conduct disorder: a reinterpretation. Developmental Psychology, 26, 683–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Maccoby, E. E. (2000). Parenting and its effects on children: on reading and misreading behavior genetics. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 1–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McMahon, R. J., Wells, K. C., & Kotler, J. S. (2006). Conduct problems. In E. J. Mash & R. A. Barkley (Eds.), Treatment of childhood disorders (3rd ed., pp. 137–268). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  35. Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80, 252–283.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Oliver, B. R., Trzaskowski, M., & Plomin, R. (2014). Genetics of parenting: the power of the dark side. Developmental Psychology, 50, 1233–1240.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Osgood, D. W. (2010). Statistical models of life events and criminal behavior. In A. R. Piquero & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative criminology (pp. 375–396). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Osgood, D. W., Wilson, J. K., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Johnston, L. D. (1996). Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review, 61, 635–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pardini, D. A. (2008). Novel insights into longstanding theories of bidirectional parent–child influences: introduction to the special section. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 627–631.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pardini, D. A., & Loeber, R. (2008). Interpersonal callousness trajectories across adolescence: early social influences and adult outcomes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 173–196.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pardini, D. A., Obradović, J., & Loeber, R. (2006). Interpersonal callousness, hyperactivity/impulsivity, inattention, and conduct problems as precursors to delinquency persistence in boys: a comparison of three grade-based cohorts. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 35, 46–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pardini, D. A., Fite, P. J., & Burke, J. D. (2008). Bidirectional associations between parenting practices and conduct problems in boys from childhood to adolescence: the moderating effect of age and African-American ethnicity. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 647–662.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Patterson, G. R. (1982). Coercive family process. Eugene: Castalia.Google Scholar
  44. Patterson, G. R. (1995). Coercion as a basis for early age of onset for arrest. In J. McCord (Ed.), Coercion and punishment in long-term perspectives (pp. 81–105). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Patterson, G. R., & Yoerger, K. (2002). A developmental model for early- and late-onset delinquency. In J. B. Reid, J. J. Snyder, & G. R. Patterson (Eds.), Antisocial behavior in children and adolescents: A developmental analysis and model for intervention (pp. 147–172). Washington: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Patterson, G. R., Dishion, T. J., & Bank, L. (1984). Family interaction: a process model of deviancy training. Aggressive Behavior, 10, 253–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pettit, G. S., & Arsiwalla, D. D. (2008). Commentary on special section on “bidirectional parent–child relationships”: the continuing evolution of dynamic, transactional models of parenting and youth behavior problems. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 711–718.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pettit, G. S., & Loulis, S. (1997). Introduction to special issue: reciprocity and bidirectionality in parent-child relationships: new approaches to the study of enduring issues. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 435–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2012). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using stata (3rd ed.). College Station: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  50. Rescorla, L. A., Bochicchio, L., Achenbach, T. M., Ivanova, M. Y., Almqvist, F., Begovac, I., Verhulst, F. C., Rescorla, L. A., Bochicchio, L., Achenbach, T. M., Ivanova, M. Y., Almqvist, F., Begovac, I., & Verhulst, F. C. (2014). Parent–teacher agreement on children’s problems in 21 societies. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 43, 627–642. Routledge.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Robins, L. N. (1966). Deviant children grown up: A sociological and psychiatric study of sociopathic personality. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
  52. Robins, L. N. (1986). The consequences of antisocial behavior in girls. In D. Olweus, J. Block, & M. Radke-Yarrow (Eds.), Development of antisocial and prosocial behavior: Research, theories, and issues. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  53. Rutter, M. (1985). Family and school influences on behavioural development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 26, 349–368.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sameroff, A. (1975). Transactional models in early social relations. Human Development, 18, 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Scott, S. (2012). Parenting quality and children’s mental health. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 25, 301–306.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Snyder, J. J., & Stoolmiller, M. (2002). Reinforcement and coercion mechanisms in the development of antisocial behavior: The family. In J. B. Reid, G. R. Patterson, & J. J. Snyder (Eds.), Antisocial behavior in children and adolescents: A developmental analysis and the Oregon model for intervention (pp. 65–100). Washington: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Spiker, D., Kraemer, H. C., Constantine, N. A., & Bryant, D. (1992). Reliability and validity of behavior problem checklists as measures of stable traits in low birth weight, premature preschoolers. Child Development, 63, 1481–1496.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stanger, C., & Lewis, M. (2010). Agreement among parents, teachers, and children on internalizing and externalizing behavior problems. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 22, 107–116. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. StataCorp. (2011). Stata statistical software: Release 12. College Station: StataCorp LP.Google Scholar
  60. Stepp, S. D., Whalen, D. J., Scott, L. N., Zalewski, M., Loeber, R., & Hipwell, A. E. (2014). Reciprocal effects of parenting and borderline personality disorder symptoms in adolescent girls. Development and Psychopathology, 26, 361–378.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Waller, R., Gardner, F., Viding, E., Shaw, D. S., Dishion, T. J., Wilson, M. N., & Hyde, L. W. (2014). Bidirectional associations between parental warmth, callous unemotional behavior, and behavior problems in high-risk preschoolers. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 42, 1275–1285.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wilson, D. B. (2009). Missing a critical piece of the pie: simple document search strategies inadequate for systematic reviews. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 5, 429–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sytske Besemer
    • 1
  • Rolf Loeber
    • 2
  • Stephen P. Hinshaw
    • 3
  • Dustin A. Pardini
    • 4
  1. 1.University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Human DevelopmentBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburghUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of California BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA
  4. 4.School of Criminology & Criminal JusticeArizona State UniversityPhoenixUSA

Personalised recommendations