Advertisement

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 1–4 | Cite as

School-related Factors in the Development of Bullying Perpetration and Victimization: Introduction to the Special Section

  • Mara BrendgenEmail author
  • Wendy Troop-GordonEmail author
Article

Abstract

Although not limited to school contexts, bullying perpetration and victimization often emanates from social ecologies formed within the classroom. Thus, to fully illuminate risk for involvement in bullying, we must investigate contextual features of schools that heighten or minimize aggression among students and the targeting of children for peer victimization. To this end, the articles in this special section each contribute conceptually and empirically to the study of school-related factors in bullying and peer victimization. This introduction summarizes and highlights the major findings of each paper, organized around two major themes of the articles—the role of peer group ecologies and the role of the classroom teacher. We conclude our synopsis by discussing implications for intervention and the need for anti-bullying efforts that systemically address the peer group and teacher influences identified in these investigations.

Keywords

Peer victimization Bullying Teachers Peers Classrooms 

Notes

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest of financial nature or otherwise.

References

  1. Brendgen, M., Girard, A., Vitaro, F., Dionne, G., & Boivin, M. (2013a). Do peer group norms moderate the expression of genetic risk for aggression? Journal of Criminal Justice, 41, 324–330. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2013.06.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brendgen, M., Girard, A., Vitaro, F., Dionne, G., Tremblay, R. E., Pérusse, D., & Boivin, M. (2013b). Gene–environment processes linking peer victimization and physical health problems: a longitudinal twin study. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jst078.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brendgen, M., Vitaro, F., Barker, E. D., Girard, A., Dionne, G., Tremblay, R. E., & Boivin, M. (2013c). Do other people’s plights matter? A genetically informed twin study of the role of social context in the link between peer victimization and children’s aggression and depression symptoms. Developmental Psychology, 49, 327–340. doi: 10.1037/a0025665.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brendgen, M., Girard, A., Vitaro, F., Dionne, G., & Boivin, M. (2014). Gene-environment correlation linking aggression and peer victimization: do classroom behavioral norms matter? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. doi: 10.1007/s10802-013-9807-z.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1995). Developmental ecology through space and time: a future perspective. In P. Moen, G. H. J. Elden, & K. Luschen (Eds.), Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology & human development (pp. 619–647). Washington: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carney, J. V. (2000). Bullied to death. School Psychology International, 21, 213–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: a theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 201–234). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  8. Collot D’Escury, A. L., & Dudink, A. C. M. (2010). Bullying beyond school: examining the role of sports. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 235–248). New York: Routledge/Taylor Francis Group.Google Scholar
  9. Currie, C., Zanotti, C., Morgan, A., Currie, D., de Looze, M., Roberts, C., & Barnekow, V. (2012). Social determinants of health and well-being among young people. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study: International report from the 2009/2010 survey (Vol. 6). Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar
  10. Espelage, D. L., & De La Rue, L. (2012). School bullying: its nature and ecology. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 24, 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Farmer, T. W., Lines, M. M., & Hamm, J. V. (2011). Revealing the invisible hand: the role of teachers in children’s peer experiences. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32, 247–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garandeau, C. F., Ahn, H. J., & Rodkin, P. C. (2011). The social status of aggressive students across contexts: the role of classroom status hierarchy, academic achievement, and grade. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1699–1710.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gest, S. D., & Rodkin, P. C. (2011). Teaching practices and elementary classroom peer ecologies. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32, 288–296. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2011.02.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gladstone, G. L., Parker, G. B., & Malhi, G. S. (2006). Do bullied children become anxious and depressed adults? A cross-sectional investigation of the correlates of bullying and anxious depression. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 194, 201–208. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000202491.99719.c3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hamm, J. V., Farmer, T. W., Dadisman, K., Gravelle, M., & Murray, A. R. (2011). Teachers’ attunement to students’ peer group affiliations as a source of improved student experiences of the school social-affective context following the middle school transition. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychololgy, 32, 267–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huitsing, G., Veenstra, R., Sainio, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2012). “It must be me” or “It could be them?”: The impact of the social network position of bullies and victims on victims’ adjustment. Social Networks, 34, 379–386. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2010.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79, 491–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Juvonen, J., & Galvan, A. (2008). Peer influence in involuntary social groups. Lessons from research on bullying. In M. J. Prinstein & K. A. Dodge (Eds.), Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents (pp. 225–244). New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  19. Lewin, K. (1943). Psychology and the process of group living. The Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Oldenburg, B., van Duijn, M., Sentse, M., Huitsing, G., van der Ploeg, R., Salmivalli, C., & Veenstra, R. (2014). Teacher characteristics and peer victimization in elementary schools: a classroom-level perspective. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. doi: 10.1007/s10802-013-9847-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Rodkin, P. C., & Gest, S. D. (2011). Teaching practices, classroom peer ecologies, and bullying behaviors among schoolchildren. In D. L. Espelage & S. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in North American Schools (2nd ed., pp. 75–90). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Rodkin, P. C., & Hodges, E. V. E. (2003). Bullies and victims in the peer ecology: four questions for psychological and school professionals. School Psychology Review, 32, 384–400.Google Scholar
  24. Saarento, S., Boulton, A., & Salmivalli, C. (2014). Reducing bullying and victimization: Student- and classroom-level mechanisms of change. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. doi: 10.1007/s10802-013-9841-x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: a review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 112–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Salmivalli, C., Kärna, A., & Poskiparta, E. (2010). From peer putdowns to peer support: a theoretical model and how it translated into a national anti-bullying program. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 441–454). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Serdiouk, M., Rodkin, P., Madill, R., Logis, H., & Gest, S. (2014). Rejection and victimization among elementary school children: the buffering role of classroom-level predictors. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. doi: 10.1007/s10802-013-9826-9.
  28. Smith, P. K., & Brain, P. (2000). Bullying in schools: lessons from two decades of research. Aggressive Behavior, 26, 1–9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(2000)26:1<1::AID-AB1>3.0.CO;2–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Swearer, S. M., & Espelage, D. L. (2011). Expanding the social-ecological framework of bullying among youth: Lessons learned from the past and directions for the future. Bullying in North American schools, 2, 3–10.Google Scholar
  30. Troop-Gordon, W., & Ladd, G. (2014). Teachers’ victimization-related beliefs and strategies: associations with students’ aggressive behavior and peer victimization. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. doi: 10.1007/s10802-013-9840-y.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Vaillancourt, T., Brittain, H. L., McDougall, P., & Duku, E. (2013). Longitudinal links between childhood peer victimization, internalizing and externalizing problems, and academic functioning: developmental cascades. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. doi: 10.1007/s10802-013-9781-5.Google Scholar
  32. Wentzel, K. (2009). Peers and academic functioning at school. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 531–547). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Quebec at MontrealMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Ste-Justine Hospital Research CenterMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyNorth Dakota State UniversityFargoUSA

Personalised recommendations