Advertisement

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 33–44 | Cite as

Teacher Characteristics and Peer Victimization in Elementary Schools: A Classroom-Level Perspective

  • Beau OldenburgEmail author
  • Marijtje van Duijn
  • Miranda Sentse
  • Gijs Huitsing
  • Rozemarijn van der Ploeg
  • Christina Salmivalli
  • René Veenstra
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether there is an association between teacher characteristics and peer victimization in elementary schools. We used data of 3,385 elementary school students (M age = 9.8) and 139 of their teachers (M age = 43.9) and employed Poisson regression analyses to explain the classroom victimization rate. Results showed a higher victimization rate in the classrooms of teachers who attributed bullying to external factors—factors outside of their control. In addition, the results suggest that both teachers’ perceived ability to handle bullying among students and teachers’ own bullying history were positively associated with the classroom victimization rate. We also took into account classroom composition characteristics and found lower victimization rates in multi-grade classrooms and in classrooms with older students. The results support the notion of an association between teacher characteristics and peer victimization. Findings are discussed with regards to current literature and suggestions for future research are made.

Keywords

Teachers Bullying Peer victimization Schools Classroom characteristics 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research is part of the Dutch KiVa project. KiVa has been financed by a grant from the Dutch Ministry of Education (Onderwijs Bewijs) to the last author. We are grateful to all students and teachers who participated in this study and all the colleagues working to realize the KiVa project. Furthermore, we would like to thank an anonymous reviewer for suggesting and providing useful references to the literature, which helped to strengthen the theoretical framework of this study.

References

  1. Atlas, R., & Pepler, D. (1998). Observations of bullying in the classroom. The Journal of Educational Research, 92, 86–99. doi: 10.1080/00220679809597580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanisms in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122–147. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  4. Bauman, S., & Del Rio, A. (2005). Knowledge and beliefs about bullying in schools: comparing pre-service teachers in the United States and the United Kingdom. School Psychology International, 26, 428–442. doi: 10.1177/0143034305059019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borg, M. G., & Falzon, J. M. (1990). Teachers’ Perception of primary schoolchildren’s undesirable behaviors: the effects of teaching experience, pupil’s age, sex and ability stream. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 60, 220–226. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1990.tb00939.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boulton, M. (1997). Teachers’ View on bullying: definitions, attitudes and ability to cope. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 223–233. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1997.tb01239.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradley, G. W. (1978). Self-serving biases in the attribution process: a reexamination of the fact or fiction question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 56–71. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.36.1.56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32, 513–531. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.32.7.513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2013). Regression analysis of count data (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Craig, W., & Pepler, D. (1997). Observations of bullying and victimization in the schoolyard. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 2, 41–60. doi: 10.1177/082957359801300205.Google Scholar
  11. Craig, W., Henderson, K., & Murphy, J. G. (2000). Prospective teachers’ attitudes toward bullying and victimization. School Psychology International, 21, 5–20. doi: 10.1177/014034300211001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dijkstra, J. K., Lindenberg, S., & Veenstra, R. (2008). Beyond the class norm: bullying behavior of popular adolescents and its relation to peer acceptance and rejection. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 1289–1299. doi: 10.1007/s10802-008-9251-7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Espelage, D., & Swearer, S. (2004). Introduction: a social-ecological framework of bullying among youth. In D. Espelage & S. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American schools: a social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention (pp. 1–12). New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Gnanadesikan, R., & Kettenring, J. R. (1972). Robust estimates, residuals, and outlier detection with multiresponse data. Biometrics, 28, 81–124. doi: 10.2307/2528963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hektner, J. M., & Swenson, C. A. (2011). Links from teacher beliefs to peer victimization and bystander intervention: tests of mediating processes. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 32, 516–536. doi: 10.1177/0272431611402502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Isaacs, J., Hodges, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2008). Long-term consequences of victimization: a follow-up from adolescence to young adulthood. European Journal of Developmental Science, 2, 387–397.Google Scholar
  17. Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Poskiparta, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2010). Vulnerable children in varying classroom contexts: bystanders’ behaviors moderate the effects of risk factors on victimization. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56, 261–282. doi: 10.1353/mpq.0.0052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Little, T., Poskiparta, E., Kaljonen, A., & Salmivalli, C. (2011). A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa antibullying program: Grades 4–6. Child Development, 82, 311–330. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01557.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Khoury-Kassabri, M. (2011). Student victimization by peers in elementary schools: individual teacher-class, and school level predictors. Child Abuse & Neglect, 35, 273–282. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kochenderfer-Ladd, B., & Pelletier, M. (2008). Teachers’ views and beliefs about bullying: Influences on classroom management strategies and students’ coping with peer victimization. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 431–453. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2007.07.005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kokko, T., & Pörhölä, M. (2009). Tackling bullying: victimized by peers as a pupil, an effective intervener as a teacher? Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 1000–1008. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2009.04.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using sata (2nd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  23. Miller, A. (1995). Teachers’ attributions of causality, control and responsibility in respect of difficult pupil behaviour and its success management. Educational Psychology, 15(4), 457–471. doi: 10.1080/0144341950150408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mishna, F., Scarello, I., Pepler, D., & Wiener, P. (2005). Teachers understanding of bullying. Canadian Journal of Education, 28, 718–738. doi: 10.2307/4126452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nishina, A., & Juvonen, J. (2005). Daily reports of witnessing and experiencing peer harassment in middle school. Child Development, 76, 435–450. doi: 10.1111/j.1467–8624.2005.00855.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: what we know and what we can do. Malden, M.A.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  27. Olweus, D. (1996). The revised Olweus bully/victim questionnaire. Bergen, Norway: Research Center for Health Promotion (HEMIL Center), University of Bergen.Google Scholar
  28. Poulou, M., & Norwich, B. (2002). Cognitive, emotional, and behavioural response to students with emotional and behavioural difficulties: a model of decision-making. British Educational Research Journal, 28, 111–138. doi: 10.1080/01411920120109784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pozzoli, T., Gini, G., & Vieno, A. (2012). The role of individual correlates and class norms in defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying: a multilevel analysis. Child Development, 83, 1917–1931. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01831.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ramasut, A., & Papatheodorou, T. (1994). Teachers’ perceptions of children’s behaviour problems in nursery classes in Greece. School Psychology International, 15, 145–161. doi: 10.1177/0143034394152004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sairanen, L., & Pfeffer, K. (2011). Self-reported handling of bullying among junior high school teachers in Finland. School Psychology International, 32, 330–344. doi: 10.1177/0143034311401795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Salmivalli, C. (2002). Is there an age decline in victimization by peers at school? Educational Research, 44, 269–278. doi: 10.1080/00131880210135331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: a review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 112–120. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Scholte, R., Engels, R., Overbeek, G., De Kemp, R., & Haselager, G. (2007). Stability in bullying and victimization and its association with social adjustment in childhood and adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 217–228. doi: 10.1007/s10802- 006-9074-3.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sijtsema, J. J., Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). Empirical test of bullies’ status goals: assessing direct goals, aggression, and prestige. Aggressive Behavior, 35, 57–67. doi: 10.1002/ab.20282.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith, P. K., Morita, J., Junger-Tas, D., Olweus, D., Catalano, R., & Slee, P. (1999). The nature of school bullying: a cross-national perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Solberg, M. E., & Olweus, D. (2003). Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 239–268. doi: 10.1002/ab.10047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stanovich, P., & Jordan, A. (1998). Canadian teachers’ and principals’ beliefs about inclusive education as predictors of effective teaching in heterogeneous classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 98, 221–238. doi: 10.1086/461892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Statistics Netherlands. (2012). Jaarboek onderwijs in cijfers: 2012 [Yearbook education: 2012]. Den Haag/Heerlen: Centraal bureau voor de statistiek.Google Scholar
  40. Tolsma, J., Van Deurzen, I., Stark, T., & Veenstra, R. (2013). Who is bullying whom in ethnically diverse primary schools? Exploring links between bullying, ethnicity, and ethnic diversity in Dutch primary schools. Social Networks, 35, 51–61. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2012.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Van Hattum, M. (1997). Pesten. Een onderzoek naar de beleving, visie en handelen van leraren en leerlingen [Bullying. Teachers’ and students’ experiences, visions, and behavior]. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  42. Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Oldehinkel, A., de Winter, A., Verhulst, F., & Ormel, J. (2005). Bullying and victimization in elementary schools: a comparison of bullies, victims, bully/victims, and uninvolved preadolescents. Developmental Psychology, 41, 672–682. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.41.4.672.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Zijlstra, B. J. H., De Winter, A. F., Verhulst, F. C., & Ormel, J. (2007). The dyadic nature of bullying and victimization: testing a dual perspective theory. Child Development, 78, 1843–1854. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01102.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Verlinden, M., Veenstra, R., Ringoot, A. P., Jansen, P. W., Raat, H., Hofman, A., et al. (2014). Detecting bullying in early elementary school with a computerized peer–nomination instrument. Psychological Assessment.Google Scholar
  45. Weiner, B. (1980). A cognitive (attribution)-emotion-action model of motivated behavior: an analysis of judgements of help giving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(2), 186–200. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.39.2.186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yoneyama, S., & Naito, A. (2003). Problems with the paradigm: the school as a factor in understanding bullying (with special reference to Japan). British Journal of Sociology of Education, 24, 316–330. doi: 10.1080/01425690301894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yoon, J. (2004). Predicting teachers’ interventions in students’ bullying. Education and Treatment of Children, 27, 37–45.Google Scholar
  48. Zeijl, E., Crone, M., Wiefferink, K., Keuzenkamp, S., & Reijneveld, M. (2005). Kinderen in Nederland [Children in the Netherlands]. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau (SCP).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Beau Oldenburg
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marijtje van Duijn
    • 1
  • Miranda Sentse
    • 2
  • Gijs Huitsing
    • 1
  • Rozemarijn van der Ploeg
    • 1
  • Christina Salmivalli
    • 3
  • René Veenstra
    • 1
  1. 1.Interuniversity Centre for Social Science Theory and Methodology, Department of SociologyUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TurkuGroningenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations