Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 39, Issue 8, pp 1239–1249 | Cite as

Socialization of Social Anxiety in Adolescent Crowds

  • Nejra Van Zalk
  • Maarten Herman Walter Van Zalk
  • Margaret Kerr
Article

Abstract

In this study, we looked at whether social anxiety is socialized, or influenced by peers’ social anxiety, more in some peer crowds than others. Adolescents in crowds with eye-catching appearances such as Goths and Punks (here termed Radical), were compared with three comparison groups. Using data from 796 adolescents (353 girls and 443 boys; Mage = 13.36) at three timepoints, the results show that adolescents affiliating with the Radical crowd tended to select peers from the same crowd group. Being a member of a crowd in itself did not predict socialization of social anxiety, but adolescents in the Radical crowd were more influenced by their peers’ social anxiety than adolescents who did not affiliate with the Radical crowd group. The results suggest that through a bidirectional process, adolescents affiliating with Radical crowds may narrow their peer relationship ties in time, and in turn socialize each other’s social anxiety.

Keywords

Social anxiety Peer crowds Selection Socialization Early adolescence 

References

  1. Bauman, K. E., & Ennett, S. T. (1994). Peer influence on adolescent drug use. American Psychologist, 49, 820–822.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bem, D. J. (1967). Self-perception: an alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74, 183–200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benenson, J. F. (1990). Gender differences in social networks. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 10, 472–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bešić, N., & Kerr, M. (2009). Punks, Goths, and other eye-catching peer crowds: do they fulfill a function for shy youths? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 19, 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, B. B. (1990). Peer groups and peer cultures. In S. S. Feldman & G. R. Elliott (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 171–196). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, B. B., & Lohr, M. J. (1987). Peer-group affiliation and adolescent self-esteem: an integration of ego-identity and symbolic interaction theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 47–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, B. B., Lohr, M. J., & Trujillo, C. (1990). Multiple crowds and multiple life styles: adolescents’ perceptions of peer-group stereotypes. In R. E. Muus (Ed.), Adolescent behavior and society: A book of readings, vol. 4 (pp. 30–36). NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, B. B., Mory, M. S., & Kinney, D. (1994). Casting adolescent crowds in a relational perspective: Caricature, channel and context. In R. Montemayor, G. R. Adams, & T. P. Guillota (Eds.), Personal relationships during adolescence, vol. 6 (pp. 123–167). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, B. B., Von Bank, H., & Steinberg, L. (2008). Smoke in the looking glass: effects of discordance between self- and peer rated crowd affiliation on adolescent anxiety, depression and self-feelings. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 1163–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bruch, M. A., & Cheek, J. M. (1995). Developmental factors in childhood and adolescent shyness. In R. G. Heimberg, M. R. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope, & F. R. Schneier (Eds.), Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment (pp. 163–182). NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  11. Burk, W. J., Steglich, C. E. G., & Snijders, T. A. B. (2007). Beyond dyadic interdependence: actor-oriented models for co-evolving social networks and individual behaviors. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 397–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  13. Cairns, R. B., Leung, M.-C., Buchanan, L., & Cairns, B. D. (1995). Friendships and social networks in childhood and adolescence: fluidity, reliability, and interrelations. Child Development, 66, 1330–1345.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen, G. L., & Prinstein, M. J. (2006). Peer contagion of aggression and health risk behavior among adolescent males: an experimental investigation of effects on public conduct and private attitudes. Child Development, 77, 967–983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cox, B. J., MacPherson, P. S. R., & Enns, M. W. (2005). Pscychiatric correlates of childhood shyness in a nationally representative sample. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 1019–1027.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crozier, W. R. (1981). Shyness and self-esteem. British Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 220–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Delsing, M. J. M. H., ter Bogt, T. F. M., Engels, R. C. M. E., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2007). Adolescents’ peer crowd identification in the Netherlands: structure and associations with problem behaviors. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17, 467–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dishion, T. J., Spracklen, K. M., Andrews, D. W., & Patterson, G. R. (1996). Deviancy training in male adolescents friendships. Behavior Therapy, 27, 373–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elovainio, M., Kivimäki, M., Puttonen, S., Heponiemi, T., Pulkki, L., & Keltikangas-Järvinen, L. (2004). Temperament and depressive symptoms: a population-based longitudinal study on Cloninger’s psychobiological temperament model. Journal of Affective Disorders, 83, 227–232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gren-Landell, M., Tillfors, M., Furmark, T., Bohlin, G., Andersson, G., & Svedin, C. G. (2009). Social phobia in Swedish adolescents. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 44, 1–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haynie, D. L. (2001). Delinquent peers revisited: does network structure matter? American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1013–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heaven, P. C. L., Ciarrochi, J., Vialle, W., & Cechavicuite, I. (2005). Adolescent peer crowd self-identification, attributional style and perceptions of parenting. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 15, 313–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Henrich, C. C., Kupermine, G. P., Sack, A., Blatt, S. J., & Leadbeater, B. J. (2000). Characteristics and homogeneity of early adolescent friendship groups: a comparison of male and female clique and nonclique members. Applied Developmental Science, 4, 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hogue, A., & Steinberg, L. (1995). Homophily of internalized distress in adolescent peer groups. Developmental Psychology, 31, 897–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huisman, M., & Snijders, T. A. B. (2003). Statistical analysis of longitudinal network data with changing composition. Sociological Methods Research, 32, 253–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Huisman, M., & Steglich, C. (2008). Treatment of non-response in longitudinal network studies. Social Networks, 30, 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kandel, D. B. (1978). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. The American Journal of Sociology, 84, 427–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kerr, M., Stattin, H., & Kiesner, J. (2007). Peers and problem behavior: Have we missed something? In R. C. M. E. Engels (Ed.), Friends, lovers and groups: Key relationships in adolescence. Hot topics in developmental research (pp. 125-153). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  29. Kiesner, J., Cadinu, M., Poulin, F., & Bucci, M. (2002). Group identification in early adolescence: Its relation with peer adjustment and its moderator effect on peer influence. Child Development, 73, 196–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kinney, D. A. (1993). From Nerds to Normals: the recovery of identity among adolescents from middle school to high school. Sociology of Education, 66, 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kobus, K. (2003). Peers and adolescent smoking. Addiction Special Issue: Contexts and Adolescent Tobacco Use Trajectories, 98, 37–55.Google Scholar
  32. La Greca, A., & Lopez, N. (1998). Social anxiety among adolescents: linkages with peer relations and friendships. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 26, 83–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. La Greca, A. M., Prinstein, M. J., & Fetter, M. D. (2001). Adolescent peer crowd affiliation: linkages with health-risk behaviors and close friendships. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 26, 131–143.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Laursen, B., Bukowski, W. M., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2007). Friendship moderates prospective associations between social isolation and adjustment problems in young children. Child Development, 78, 1395–1404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mackey, E. R., & La Greca, A. M. (2007). Adolescents’ eating, exercise, and weight control behaviors: does peer crowd affiliation play a role? Journal of Pediatric Psychology Special Issue: Pediatric Overweight, 32, 13–23.Google Scholar
  36. McCarroll, E. M., Lindsey, E. W., MacKinnon-Lewis, C., Campbell Chambers, J., & Frabutt, J. M. (2009). Health status and peer relationships in early adolescents: the role of peer contact, self-esteem, and social anxiety. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 18, 473–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Newman, P. R., & Newman, B. M. (1976). Early adolescence and its conflict: group identity versus alienation. Adolescence, 11, 261–274.Google Scholar
  38. Pilkonis, P. A. (1977). The behavioral consequences of shyness. Journal of Personality, 45, 596–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Prinstein, M. J. (2007). Moderators of peer contagion: a longitudinal examination of depression socialization between adolescents and their best friends. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 36, 159–170.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Prinstein, M. J., & La Greca, A. M. (2002). Peer crowd affiliation and internalizing distress in childhood and adolescence: a longitudinal follow-back study. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 12, 325–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Prinstein, M. J., & Wang, S. S. (2005). False consensus and adolescent peer contagion: examining discrepancies between perceptions and actual reported levels of friends’ deviant abd health risk behaviors. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 293–306.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Romero, L. E., & Epkins, C. C. (2008). Girls’ cognitions of hypothetical friends: are they related to depression, loneliness, social anxiety and perceived similarity? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 311–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rose, A. J. (2002). Co-rumination in the friendships of girls and boys. Child Development, 73, 1830–1843.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic books.Google Scholar
  46. Santee, R. T., & Maslach, C. (1982). To agree or not to agree: personal dissent amid social pressure to conform. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 690–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Selfhout, M. H., Branje, S. J., & Meeus, W. H. (2009). Developmental trajectories of perceived friendship intimacy, constructive problem solving, and depression from early to late adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 251–264.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Selfhout, M., Burk, W., Branje, S., Denissen, J., van Aken, M., & Meeus, W. (2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and Big Five personality traits: a social network approach. Journal of Personality, 78, 509–538.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Smith, H. M., & Betz, N. E. (2002). An examination of efficacy and esteem pathways to depression in young adulthood. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49, 438–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Snijders, T. A. B. (2001). The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. Sociological methodology, 31, 361–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Snijders, T. A. B., Steglich, C. E. G., Schweinberger, M., & Huisman, M. (2007). Manual for SIENA version 3. Groningen: University of Groningen.Google Scholar
  52. Snijders, T. A. B., van de Bunt, G. G., & Steglich, C. E. G. (2010). Introduction to actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32, 44–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stednitz, J. N., & Epkins, C. C. (2006). Girls’ and mothers’ social anxiety, social skills, and loneliness: associations after accounting for depressive symptoms. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 35, 148–154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stone, M., & Brown, B. B. (1998). In the eye of the beholder: adolescents’ perceptions of peer crowd stereotypes. In R. E. Muus (Ed.), Adolescent behavior and society: A book of readings (pp. 158–169). NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  55. Sweden, S. (2004). Köping municipal facts. Retrieved from: http://www.koping.se/kommunfakta/2004/Municipal_facts_2004.pdf.
  56. Thurlow, C. (2001). The usual suspects? A comparative investigation of crowds and social-type labelling among young British teenagers. Journal of Youth Studies, 4, 319–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Urberg, K. A., Değirmencioğlu, S. M., Tolson, J. M., & Halliday-Scher, K. (2000). Adolescent social crowds: measurement and relationship to friends. Journal of Adolescent Research, 15, 427–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Van Zalk, M. H. W., Kerr, M., Branje, S. J. T., Stattin, H., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2010). It takes three: selection, influence, and de-selection processes of depression in adolescent friendship networks. Developmental Psychology, 46, 927–938.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Van Zalk, N., Van Zalk, M., Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2011). Social anxiety as a basis for friendship selection and socialization in adolescents’ social networks. Journal of Personality, 79, 499–526.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wojslawowicz Bowker, J. C., Rubin, K. H., Burgess, K. B., Booth-LaForce, C., & Rose-Krasnor, L. (2006). Behavioral characteristics associated with stable and fluid best friendship patterns in middle childhood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52, 671–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nejra Van Zalk
    • 1
  • Maarten Herman Walter Van Zalk
    • 1
  • Margaret Kerr
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Developmental Research, JPS:PsychologyÖrebro UniversityÖrebroSweden

Personalised recommendations