Social Withdrawal Subtypes during Early Adolescence in India
The overarching goal of this study was to examine the associations between three social withdrawal subtypes (shyness, unsociability, avoidance), peer isolation, peer difficulties (victimization, rejection, exclusion, low acceptance), and loneliness in India during early adolescence. Participants were 194 adolescents in Surat, India (M age = 13.35 years). Peer nominations of peer relations and socioemotional behaviors were gathered, along with self-reports of reasons for being alone and loneliness. Preliminary evidence of validity for the self-report measure of withdrawal subtypes and isolation was found, and factor analyses indicated that shyness, unsociability, and avoidance represent related, but distinct forms of withdrawal that are distinct from isolation. Shyness and avoidance were uniquely associated with loneliness and exclusion, but unsociability was not. The association between avoidance and loneliness was mediated by exclusion. Findings suggest that social withdrawal may be best conceptualized as a multifaceted construct during childhood and adolescence, in Western and non-Western societies.
KeywordsSocial withdrawal Shyness Isolation Peers Loneliness Unsociability Avoidance
The authors gratefully acknowledge Craig Colder, Rob Coplan, Larry Nelson, and Len Simms for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript, and the students, principals, and teachers who participated in this study.
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
- Bowker, J., Rubin, K. H., & Coplan, R. J. (2010). Social withdrawal in adolescence. In R. J. R. Levesque (Ed.), Encyclopedia of adolescence. New York: Springer (in press).Google Scholar
- Chen, X., Chung, J., & Hsiao, C. (2008). Peer interactions, relationships and groups from a cross-cultural perspective. In K. H. Rubin, W. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Coie, J., Dodge, K., & Kupersmidt, J. (1990). Peer group behavior and social status. In S. Asher & J. Coie (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 17–59). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Coplan, R. J., & Weeks, M. (2010). Unsociability in middle childhood: Conceptualization, assessment, and associations with socio-emotional functioning. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56, 105–130.Google Scholar
- Coplan, R. J., Wilson, J., Frohlick, S. L., & Zelenski, J. (2006). A person-oriented analysis of behavioral inhibition and behavioral activation in childhood. Personality and Individual Differences, 917–927.Google Scholar
- Eisenberg, N., Shepard, S., Fabes, R. A., Murphy, B., & Guthrie, I. (1998). Shyness and children’s emotionality, regulation, and coping: contemporaneous, longitudinal, and across-context relations. Child Development, 68, 767–790.Google Scholar
- Kress, V. E., Eriksen, K., Rayle, A., & Ford, S. (2005). The DSM-IV-TR and culture: considerations for counselors. Journal of Counseling & Development, 83, 97–104.Google Scholar
- Rubin, K., Bukowski, W., & Parker, J. (2006). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In N. Eisenberg, W. Damon, & R. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Volume 3, social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 571–645). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar