Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 381–393 | Cite as

Psychopathic Traits in Youth: Is There Evidence for Primary and Secondary Subtypes?

Article

Abstract

The current study employed model-based cluster analysis in a sample of male adolescent offenders (n = 94) to examine subtypes based on psychopathic traits and anxiety. Using the Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version (PCL:YV; Forth et al. 2003) and the self-report Antisocial Process Screening Device (APSD; Caputo et al. 1999), analyses identified three clusters in males that varied in the severity of psychopathic traits (low, moderate, and high) and anxiety. The high psychopathic group exhibited more negative personality traits and was judged to be at greater risk for dangerousness whereas the low psychopathic group exhibited more positive personality traits and was judged to be at lower risk for dangerousness. Implications regarding potential developmental differences between adolescent and adult psychopathy, as well as treatment considerations are discussed.

Keywords

Psychopathy Adolescents Subtypes Model-based cluster analysis 

References

  1. Andershed, H., Köhler, D., Louden, J. E., & Hinrichs, G. (2008). Does the three-factor model of psychopathy identify a problematic subgroup of young offenders? International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 31, 189–198.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Banfield, J. D. & Raftery, A. E. (1993). Model-based Gaussian and non-Gaussian clustering. Biometrics, 49, 803–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Caputo, A. A., Frick, P. J., & Brodsky, S. L. (1999). Family violence and juvenile sex offending: the potential mediating role of psychopathic traits and negative attitudes toward women. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 338–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Christian, R. E., Frick, P. J., Hill, N. L., Tyler, L., & Frazer, D. R. (1997). Psychopathy and conduct problems in children: II. Implications for subtyping children with conduct problems. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 233–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cleckley, H. (1941). The mask of sanity. St. Louis: Mosby.Google Scholar
  6. Corrado, R. R., Vincent, G. M., Hart, S. D., & Cohen, I. M. (2004). Predictive validity of the psychopathy checklist: youth version for general and violent recidivism. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 22, 5–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Edens, J. F., Campbell, J. S., & Weir, J. M. (2007). Youth psychopathy and criminal recidivism: a meta-analysis of the psychopathy checklist measures. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 53–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Forth, A. E. (2005). Hare psychopathy checklist: Youth version. In T. Grisso, G. Vincent & D. Seagrave (Eds.), Mental health screening and assessment in juvenile justice (pp. 324–338). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  9. Forth, A. E., Kosson, D. S., & Hare, R. D. (2003). Hare psychopathy checklist: Youth version (PCL:YV). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  10. Fraley, C. & Raftery, A. E. (2002). MCLUST: Software for model-base clustering, density estimation and discriminant analysis (Technical Report No. 415). Seattle: Department of Statistics, University of Washington.Google Scholar
  11. Fraley, C. & Raftery, A. E. (2003). Enhanced model-based clustering, density estimation, and discriminant analysis software: MCLUST. Journal of Classification, 20, 263–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frick, P. J., Bodin, S. D., & Barry, C. T. (2000). Psychopathic traits and conduct problems in community and clinic-referred samples of children: further development of the psychopathy screening device. Psychological Assessment, 12, 382–393.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hair, J. F., Jr. & Black, W. C. (2000). Cluster analysis. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics (pp. 147–205). Washington: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  14. Hart, S. D., Watt, K. A., & Vincent, G. M. (2002). Commentary on Seagrave and Grisso: impressions of the state of the art. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 241–245.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hicks, B. M., Markon, K. E., Patrick, C. J., Krueger, R. F., & Newman, J. P. (2004). Identifying psychopathy subtypes on the basis of personality structure. Psychological Assessment, 16, 276–288.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones, S., Cauffman, E., Miller, J. D., & Mulvey, E. (2006). Investigating different factor structures of the psychopathy checklist: youth version: confirmatively factor analytic findings. Psychological Assessment, 18, 33–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Karpman, B. (1941). On the need of separating psychopathy into two distinct clinical types: the symptomatic and the idiopathic. Journal of Criminal Psychopathology, 3, 112–137.Google Scholar
  18. Karpman, B. (1948). Conscience in the psychopath: another version. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 18, 455–491.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee, Z., Vincent, G. M., Hart, S. D., & Corrado, R. R. (2003). The validity of the antisocial process screening device as a self-report measure of psychopathy in adolescent offenders. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21, 771–786.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Leistico, A. R. & Salekin, R. T. (2003). Testing the reliability and validity of the risk, sophistication-maturity, and treatment amenability instrument (RST-i): an assessment tool for juvenile offenders. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 2, 101–117.Google Scholar
  21. Leistico, A., Salekin, R., DeCoster, J., & Rogers, R. (2008). A large-scale meta-analysis relating the hare measures of psychopathy to antisocial conduct. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 28–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lorenz, A. R. & Newman, J. P. (2002). Deficient response modulation and emotion processing in low-anxious Caucasian psychopathic offenders: results from a lexical decision task. Emotion, 2, 91–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Murrie, D. C. & Cornell, D. G. (2002). Psychopathy screening of incarcerated juveniles: a comparison of measures. Psychological Assessment, 14, 390–396.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Murrie, D. C., Cornell, D. G., Kaplan, S., McConville, D., & Levy-Elkon, A. (2004). Psychopathy scores and violence among juvenile offenders: a multi-measure study. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 22, 49–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Murrie, D. C., Marcus, D. K., Douglas, K. S., Lee, Z., Salekin, R. T., & Vincent, G. (2007). Youth with psychopathy features are not a discrete class: a taxometric analysis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48, 714–723.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Neumann, C. S., Kosson, D. S., Forth, A. E., & Hare, R. D. (2006). Factor structure of the hare psychopathy checklist: youth version (PCL:YV) in incarcerated adolescents. Psychological Assessment, 18, 142–154.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Newman, J. P., Schmitt, W. A., & Voss, W. D. (1997). The impact of motivationally neutral cues on psychopathic individuals: Assessing the generality of the response modulation hypothesis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 563–575.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Poythress, N. G. & Skeem, J. L. (2006). Disaggregating psychopathy: Where and how to look for subtypes. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 172–192). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  29. Rutter, M. (2005). Multiple meanings of a developmental perspective on psychopathology. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2, 221–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Salekin, R. T. (2004). Risk-sophistication-treatment inventory: Professional manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  31. Salekin, R. T. & Frick, P. J. (2005). Psychopathy in children and adolescents: the need for a developmental perspective. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 403–409.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Salekin, R. T. & Lochman, J. E. (2008). Child and adolescent psychopathy: the search for protective factors. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Salekin, R. T., Neumann, C. S., Leistico, A. R., DiCicco, T. M., & Duros, R. L. (2004). Psychopathy and comorbidity in a young offender sample: taking a closer look at psychopathy’s potential importance over disruptive behavior disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113, 416–427.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Salekin, R. T., Leistico, A. R., Trobst, K. K., Schrum, C. L., & Lochman, J. E. (2005). Adolescent psychopathy and personality theory — the Interpersonal circumplex: expanding evidence of a nomological net. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 445–460.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Seagrave, D. & Grisso, T. (2002). Adolescent development and the measurement of juvenile psychopathy. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 219–239.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Skeem, J., Johansson, P., Andershed, H., Kerr, M., & Louden, J. E. (2007). Two subtypes of psychopathic violent offenders that parallel primary and secondary variants. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 395–409.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Swogger, M. T. & Kosson, D. S. (2007). Identifying subtypes of criminal psychopaths. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 953–970.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Trapnell, P. D. & Wiggins, J. S. (1990). Extension of the interpersonal adjective scales to include the big five dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 781–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vassileva, J., Kosson, D. S., Abramowitz, C., & Conrod, P. (2005). Psychopathy versus psychopathies in classifying criminal offenders. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10, 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vincent, G. M., Vitacco, M. J., Grisso, T., & Corrado, R. R. (2003). Subtypes of adolescent offenders: affective traits and antisocial behavior patterns. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21, 695–712.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Vitacco, M. J., Rogers, R., & Neumann, C. S. (2003). The antisocial process screening device: an examination of its construct and criterion-related validity. Assessment, 10, 143–150.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyThe University of AlabamaTuscaloosaUSA
  2. 2.Law and Psychiatry DepartmentUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburghUSA
  3. 3.Department of CriminologyKwantlen Polytechnic UniversitySurreyCanada
  4. 4.Center for Child and Family PolicyDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations