Psychopathic Traits in Youth: Is There Evidence for Primary and Secondary Subtypes?
- 1k Downloads
The current study employed model-based cluster analysis in a sample of male adolescent offenders (n = 94) to examine subtypes based on psychopathic traits and anxiety. Using the Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version (PCL:YV; Forth et al. 2003) and the self-report Antisocial Process Screening Device (APSD; Caputo et al. 1999), analyses identified three clusters in males that varied in the severity of psychopathic traits (low, moderate, and high) and anxiety. The high psychopathic group exhibited more negative personality traits and was judged to be at greater risk for dangerousness whereas the low psychopathic group exhibited more positive personality traits and was judged to be at lower risk for dangerousness. Implications regarding potential developmental differences between adolescent and adult psychopathy, as well as treatment considerations are discussed.
KeywordsPsychopathy Adolescents Subtypes Model-based cluster analysis
- Cleckley, H. (1941). The mask of sanity. St. Louis: Mosby.Google Scholar
- Forth, A. E. (2005). Hare psychopathy checklist: Youth version. In T. Grisso, G. Vincent & D. Seagrave (Eds.), Mental health screening and assessment in juvenile justice (pp. 324–338). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Forth, A. E., Kosson, D. S., & Hare, R. D. (2003). Hare psychopathy checklist: Youth version (PCL:YV). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
- Fraley, C. & Raftery, A. E. (2002). MCLUST: Software for model-base clustering, density estimation and discriminant analysis (Technical Report No. 415). Seattle: Department of Statistics, University of Washington.Google Scholar
- Hair, J. F., Jr. & Black, W. C. (2000). Cluster analysis. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics (pp. 147–205). Washington: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Karpman, B. (1941). On the need of separating psychopathy into two distinct clinical types: the symptomatic and the idiopathic. Journal of Criminal Psychopathology, 3, 112–137.Google Scholar
- Leistico, A. R. & Salekin, R. T. (2003). Testing the reliability and validity of the risk, sophistication-maturity, and treatment amenability instrument (RST-i): an assessment tool for juvenile offenders. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 2, 101–117.Google Scholar
- Poythress, N. G. & Skeem, J. L. (2006). Disaggregating psychopathy: Where and how to look for subtypes. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 172–192). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Salekin, R. T. (2004). Risk-sophistication-treatment inventory: Professional manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
- Salekin, R. T., Neumann, C. S., Leistico, A. R., DiCicco, T. M., & Duros, R. L. (2004). Psychopathy and comorbidity in a young offender sample: taking a closer look at psychopathy’s potential importance over disruptive behavior disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113, 416–427.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar