The Structure of Anxiety and Depression in a Normative Sample of Younger and Older Australian Adolescents

  • Phillip J. Tully
  • Ian T. Zajac
  • Anthony J. Venning
Article

Abstract

It has been reported that depression and anxiety have overlapping symptoms and are conceptually interrelated. One of the most prominent theoretical developments that explain this association is Clark and Watson’s tripartite model (Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100:316–336, 1991) that posits these two disorders and negative emotions share a latent component of negative affect (NA). The current study had two aims, (a) to compare a tripartite factor structure against competing models by Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) of the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS-21) (Lovibond and Lovibond 1995), and (b) explore the psychometric properties of the DASS-21. The DASS-21 was completed by a representative sample of 4039 young Australians, aged 12–18 years, as part of the South Australian Youth Mental Health Survey (SAYMHS), South Australia, Australia. The best fitting model for the data consisted of anhedonic depression, physiological hyperarousal, and general NA. The psychometric properties of the DASS-21 were excellent with a stable and interpretable factor structure and good internal consistency. The results of the current study suggest that the theoretical tripartite structure of depression and anxiety is robust and applicable among Australian youth. The diagnostic, clinical and theoretical implications of these findings are discussed.

Keywords

Depression Anxiety Tripartite Adolescent Factor analysis Negative affect 

References

  1. Angold, A., Costello, E. J., & Erkanli, A. (1999). Comorbidity. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 40(1), 57–87. doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00424.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antony, M. M., Bieling, P. J., Vox, B. J., Enns, M. W., & Swonson, R. P. (1998). Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychological Assessment, 10, 176–181. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.10.2.176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beauducel, A., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2006). On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 186–203. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1302_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck, R., & Perkins, T. S. (2001). Cognitive content-specificity for anxiety and depression: a meta-analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 25(6), 651–663. doi:10.1023/A:1012911104891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck, A. T., Brown, G., Steer, R. A., Eidelson, J. I., & Riskind, J. H. (1987). Differentiating anxiety and depression: a test of the cognitive content-specificity hypothesis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 96(3), 179–183. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.96.3.179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck, R., Benedict, B., & Winkler, A. (2003). Depression and anxiety: integrating the tripartite and cognitive content-specificity assessment models. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 25, 251–257. doi:10.1023/A:1025899029040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belzer, K., & Schneier, F. R. (2004). Comorbidity of anxiety and depressive disorders: issues in conceptualization, assessment, and treatment. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 10(5), 296–306. doi:10.1097/00131746-200409000-00003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boyd, C. P., & Gullone, E. (1997). An investigation of negative affectivity in Australian adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 26(2), 190–197. doi:10.1207/s15374424jccp2602_7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, T. A., Chorpita, B. F., Korotitsch, W., & Barlow, D. H. (1997). Psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) in clinical samples. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35(1), 79–89. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(96)00068-X.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buckby, J. A., Cotton, S. M., Cosgrave, E. M., Killackey, E. J., & Yung, A. R. (2008). A factor analytic investigation of the Tripartite model of affect in a clinical sample of young Australians. BMC Psychiatry, 8, 79. doi:10.1186/1471-244X-8-79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carlbring, P., Brunt, S., Bohman, S., Austin, D., Richards, J., Öst, L. G., et al. (2007). Internet vs. paper and pencil administration of questionnaires commonly used in panic/agoraphobia research. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1421–1434. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2005.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chorpita, B. F. (2002). The tripartite model and dimensions of anxiety and depression: An examination of structure in a large school sample. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30(2), 177–190. doi:10.1023/A:1014709417132.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chorpita, B. F., & Daleiden, E. L. (2002). Tripartite dimensions of emotion in a child clinical sample: measurement strategies and implications for clinical utility. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70(5), 1150–1160. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.70.5.1150.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chorpita, B. F., Daleiden, E. L., Moffitt, C., Yim, L., & Umemoto, L. A. (2000). Assessment of tripartite factors of emotion in children and adolescents I: Structural validity and normative data of an affect and arousal scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 22(2), 141–160. doi:10.1023/A:1007584423617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clara, I. P., Cox, B. J., & Enns, M. W. (2001). Confirmatory factor analysis of the depression-anxiety-stress scales in depressed and anxious patients. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 23(1), 61–67. doi:10.1023/A:1011095624717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1991). Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100(3), 316–336. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.100.3.316.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clark, D. A., Steer, R. A., & Beck, A. T. (1994). Common and specific dimensions of self-reported anxiety and depression: implications for the cognitive and tripartite models. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103(4), 645–654. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.103.4.645.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crawford, J. R., & Henry, J. D. (2003). The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS): Normative data and latent structure in a large non-clinical sample. The British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 42, 111–131. doi:10.1348/014466503321903544.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crawford, J. R., & Henry, J. D. (2004). The positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS): construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. The British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43(Pt 3), 245–265. doi:10.1348/0144665031752934.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davidson, R. J. (1998). Affective style and affective disorders: perspectives from affective neuroscience. Cognition and Emotion, 12(3), 307–330. doi:0.1080/026999398379628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Duffy, C. J., Cunningham, E. G., & Moore, S. M. (2005). The factor structure of mood states in an early adolescent sample. Journal of Adolescence, 28(5), 603–680. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.08.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gloster, A. T., Rhoades, H. M., Novy, D., Klotsche, J., Senior, A., Kunik, M., et al. (2008). Psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 in older primary care patients. Journal of Affective Disorders, 110(3), 248–259. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2008.01.023.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gorman, J. M. (1996). Comorbid depression and anxiety spectrum disorders. Depression and Anxiety, 4(4), 160–168 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6394(1996)4:4<160::AID-DA2>3.0.CO;2-J.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Greaves-Lord, K., Ferdinand, R. F., Sondeijker, F. E., Dietrich, A., Oldehinkel, A. J., Rosmalen, J. G., et al. (2007). Testing the tripartite model in young adolescents: Is hyperarousal specific for anxiety and not depression? Journal of Affective Disorders, 102(1–3), 55–63. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2006.12.009.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heller, W., & Nitschke, J. B. (1998). The puzzle of regional brain activity in and anxiety: the importance of subtypes and comorbidity. Cognition and Emotion, 12(3), 421–447. doi:10.1080/026999398379664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Henry, J. D., & Crawford, J. R. (2005). The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. The British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44(2), 227–239. doi:10.1348/014466505X29657.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Higa-McMillan, C. K., Smith, R. L., Chorpita, B. F., & Hayashi, K. (2008). Common and Unique Factors Associated with DSM-IV-TR Internalizing Disorders in Children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36(8), 1279–1288. doi:10.1007/s10802-008-9250-8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jacques, H. A. K., & Mash, E. J. (2004). A test of the tripartite model of anxiety and depression in elementary and high school boys and girls. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32(1), 13–25. doi:10.1023/B:JACP.0000007577.38802.18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Joiner Jr, T. E., & Lonigan, C. J. (2000). Tripartite model of depression and anxiety in youth psychiatric inpatients: relations with diagnostic status and future symptoms. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 29(3), 372–382. doi:10.1207/S15374424JCCP2903_8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Joiner Jr, T. E., Catanzaro, S. J., & Laurent, J. (1996). Tripartite structure of positive and negative affect, depression, and anxiety in child and adolescent psychiatric inpatients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105(3), 401–409. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.105.3.401.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kiernan, G., Laurent, J., Joiner, T. E. J., Catanzaro, S. J., & Maclachlan, M. (2001). Cross-cultural examination of the tripartite model with children: data from the Barretstown studies. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77(2), 359–379. doi:10.1207/S15327752JPA7702_15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. S. (1986). Response effects in the electronic survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 402–413. doi:10.1086/268992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  34. Lambert, S. F., McCreary, B. T., Joiner, T. E., Schmidt, N. B., & Lalongo, N. S. (2004). Structure of anxiety and depression in urban youth: an examination of the tripartite model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(5), 904–908. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.72.5.904.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Laurent, J., & Ettelson, R. (2001). An examination of the tripartite model of anxiety and depression and its application to youth. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 4(3), 209–230. doi:10.1023/A:1017547014504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lonigan, C. J., Hooe, E. S., David, C. F., & Kistner, J. A. (1999). Positive and negative affectivity in children: confirmatory factor analysis of a two-factor model and its relation to symptoms of anxiety and depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(3), 374–386. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.67.3.374.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F. (1995). Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (2nd Ed.). Sydney: Psychology Foundation Monograph.Google Scholar
  38. Meyerson, P., & Tryon, W. W. (2003). Validating Internet research: a test of the psychometric equivalence of Internet and in-person samples. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(4), 614–620.Google Scholar
  39. Mineka, S., Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1998). Comorbidity of anxiety and unipolar mood disorders. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 377–412. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.377.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998). Mplus: The comprehensive modeling program for applied research — User’s guide. Los Angeles, CA.: Muthén and Muthén.Google Scholar
  41. Nieuwenhuijsen, K., de Boer, A. G., Verbeek, J. H., Blonk, R. W., & van Dijk, F. J. (2003). The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS): detecting anxiety disorder and depression in employees absent from work because of mental health problems. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 60(Suppl 1), i77–i82. doi:10.1136/oem.60.suppl_1.i77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Norton, P. J. (2007). Depression Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS-21): psychometric analysis across four racial groups. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 20(3), 253–265. doi:10.1080/10615800701309279.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Olié, J. P., Tonnoir, B., Ménard, F., & Galinowski, A. (2007). A prospective study of escitalopram in the treatment of major depressive episodes in the presence or absence of anxiety. Depression and Anxiety, 24(5), 318–324. doi:10.1002/da.20207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ollendick, T. H., Seligman, L. D., & Goza, A. B. (2003). Anxiety and Depression in Children and Adolescents: A Factor-Analytic Examination of the Tripartite Model. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 12(2), 157–170. doi:10.1023/A:1022806731527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Page, A. C., Hooke, G. R., & Morrison, D. L. (2007). Psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) in depressed clinical samples. The British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46(3), 283–297. doi:10.1348/014466506X158996.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Philipp, L. M., Washington, C., Raouf, M., & Norton, P. J. (2008). Cross-cultural examination of the tripartite model in adults. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 1–12.Google Scholar
  47. Shankman, S. A., & Klein, D. N. (2003). The relation between depression and anxiety: an evaluation of the tripartite, approach-withdrawal and valence-arousal models. Clinical Psychology Review, 23(4), 605–637. doi:10.1016/S0272-7358(03)00038-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sukantarat, K. T., Williamson, R. C. N., & Brett, S. J. (2007). Psychological assessment of ICU survivors: a comparison between the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale and the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale. Anaesthesia, 62(3), 239–243. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04948.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Venning, A., Eliott, J., Kettler, L., & Wilson, A. (in press). Normative data for the Hope Scale using Australian adolescents. Australian Journal of Psychology.Google Scholar
  50. Watson, D. (2000). Mood and temperament. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  51. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Carey, G. (1988). Positive and negative affectivity and their relation to anxiety and depressive disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97(3), 346–353. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.97.3.346.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wong, J. G., Cheung, E. P., Chan, K. K., Ma, K. K., & Tang, S. W. (2006). Web-based survey of depression, anxiety and stress in first-year tertiary education students in Hong Kong. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 40(9), 777–782. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1614.2006.01883.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Woody, S. R., Taylor, S., MacLean, P. D., & Koch, W. J. (1998). Cognitive specificity in panic and depression: implications for comorbidity. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 22(5), 427–443. doi:10.1023/A:1018717514803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yang, J. W., Hong, S. D., Joung, Y. S., & Kim, J. H. (2006). Validation study of tripartite model of anxiety and depression in children and adolescents: clinical sample in Korea. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 21(6), 1098–1102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Phillip J. Tully
    • 1
  • Ian T. Zajac
    • 1
  • Anthony J. Venning
    • 1
  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations