Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 35, Issue 6, pp 1035–1045 | Cite as

Affiliation to Youth Gangs During Adolescence: The Interaction Between Childhood Psychopathic Tendencies and Neighborhood Disadvantage

  • Véronique Dupéré
  • Éric Lacourse
  • J. Douglas Willms
  • Frank Vitaro
  • Richard E. Tremblay


Because youth gangs tend to cluster in disadvantaged neighborhoods, adolescents living in such neighborhoods are more likely to encounter opportunities to join youth gangs. However, in the face of these opportunities, not all adolescents respond in the same manner. Those with preexisting psychopathic tendencies might be especially likely to join. In this study, we tested whether a combination of individual propensity and facilitating neighborhood conditions amplifies the probabilities of youth gang affiliation. A subset of 3,522 adolescents was selected from a nationally representative, prospective sample of Canadian youth. Psychopathic tendencies (i.e., a combination of high hyperactivity, low anxiety, and low prosociality as compared to national norms) were assessed through parent reports, while neighborhood characteristics (i.e., concentrated economic disadvantage and residential instability) were derived from the 2001 Census of Canada. Our results indicated that neighborhood residential instability, but not neighborhood concentrated economic disadvantage, interacted with individual propensity to predict youth gang membership. Adolescents with preexisting psychopathic tendencies appeared especially vulnerable mainly if they were raised in residentially unstable neighborhoods.


Youth gangs Neighborhood disadvantage Neighborhood residential instability Individual propensity Psychopathic tendencies 


  1. Aber, J. L., Gephart, M., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Connell, J. P. (1997). Development in context: Implications for studying neighborhood effects. In J. Brooks-Gunn, G. J. Duncan, & J. L. Aber (Eds.), Neighborhood poverty: Context and consequences for children, Vol. 1 (pp. 44–61). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  2. Adam, E. K., & Chase-Lansdale, P. L. (2002). Home, sweet home(s): Parental separations, residential moves, and adjustment problems in low income adolescent girls. Developmental Psychology, 38, 792–805.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agnew, R., Brezina, T., Wright, J. P., & Cullen, F. T. (2002). Strain, personality traits, and delinquency: Extending general strain theory. Criminology, 40, 43–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allison, P. D. (2001). Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Astone, N. M., & McLanahan, S. S. (1994). Family structure, residential mobility, and school dropout: A research note. Demography, 31, 575–584.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beyers, J. M., Bates, J. E., Pettit, G. S., & Dodge, K. A. (2003). Neighborhood structure, parenting processes, and the development of youths’ externalizing behavior: A multilevel analysis. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 35–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brody, G. H., Ge, X., Conger, R. D., Gibbons, F. X., Murry, V. M., Gerrard, M., et al. (2001). The influence of neighborhood disadvantage, collective socialization, and parenting on African American children’s affiliation with deviant peers. Child Development, 72, 1231–1246.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brody, G. H., Murry, V. M., Ge, X., Kim, S. Y., Simons, R. L., Gibbons, F. X., et al. (2003). Neighborhood disadvantage moderates associations of parenting and older sibling problem attitudes and behavior with conduct disorders in African American children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 211–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Browning, C. R., Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2005). Sexual initiation in early adolescence: The nexus of parental and community control. American Sociologial Review, 70, 758–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cartwright, D. S., & Howard, K. I. (1966). Multivariate analysis of gang delinquency: I. Ecologic influences. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 321–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caspi, A., Roberts, B. W., & Shiner, R. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453–484.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coley, R. L., Morris, J. E., & Hernandez, D. (2004). Out-of-school care and problem behavior trajectories among low-income adolescent: Individual, family and neighborhood characteristics as added risks. Child Development, 75, 948–965.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Costello, E. J., Keeler, G. P., & Angold, A. (2001). Poverty, race/ethnicity and psychiatric disorder: A study of rural children. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 1494–1498.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Côté, S., Tremblay, R. E., Nagin, D. S., Zoccolillo, M., & Vitaro, F. (2002). Childhood behavioral profiles leading to adolescent conduct disorder: Risk trajectories for boys and girls. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 1086–1094.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Curry, G. D., & Decker, S. H. (2003). The gang experience. In G. D. Curry & S. H. Decker (Eds.), Confronting gangs: Crime and community (2nd ed., pp. 67–91). Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  16. Curry, G. D., & Spergel, I. (1988). Gang homicide, delinquency, and community. Criminology, 26, 381–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dishion, T. J., Dodge, K. A., & Lansford, J. E. (2006). Findings and recommendations: A blueprint to minimize deviant peer influence in youth interventions and programs. In K. A. Dodge, T. J. Dishion, & J. E. Lansford (Eds.), Deviant peer influences in programs for youth: Problems and solutions (pp. 366–394). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  18. Freidenfelt, J., & af Klinteberg, B. (2007). Exploring adult personality and psychopathy tendencies in former childhood hyperactive delinquent males. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frick, P. J., Lilienfeld, S. O., Ellis, M., Loney, B., & Silverthorn, P. (1999). The association between anxiety and psychopathy dimensions in children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27, 383–392.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gatti, U., Tremblay, R. E., Vitaro, F., & McDuff, P. (2005). Youth gangs, delinquency and drug use: A test of the selection, facilitation, and enhancement hypothesis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 1178–1190.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gilman, S. E., Kawachi, I., Fitzmaurice, B. M., & Buka, S. L. (2003). Socio-economic status, family disruption and residential mobility in children: Relation to onset, recurrence and remission of major depression. Psychological Medicine, 33, 1341–1355.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goering, J., & Feins, J. D. (Eds.) (2003). Choosing a better life? Evaluating the Moving to Opportunity social experiment. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hay, C., Fortson, E. N., Hollist, D. R., Altheimer, I., & Schaible, L. M. (2006). The impact of community disadvantage on the relationship between family and juvenile crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43, 326–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johansson, P., Kerr, M., & Andershed, H. (2005). Linking adult psychopathy with childhood hyperactivity-impulsivity-attention problems and conduct problems through retrospective self-reports. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 94–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kohen, D. E., Brooks-Gunn, J., Leventhal, T., & Hertzman, C. (2002). Neighborhood income and physical and social disorder in Canada: Associations with young children’s competencies. Child Development, 73, 1844–1860.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Krieger, N., Zierler, S., Hogan, J. W., Waterman, P., Chen, J., Lemieux, K., et al. (2003). Geocoding and measurement of neighborhood socioeconomic position: A US perspective. In I. Kawachi & L. F. Berkman (Eds.), Neighborhoods and health (pp. 147–178). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Lacourse, E., Nagin, D., Tremblay, R. E., Vitaro, F., & Claes, M. (2003). Developmental trajectories of boys’ delinquent group membership and facilitation of violent behaviors during adolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 183–197.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lacourse, E., Nagin, D. S., Vitaro, F., Côté, S., Arseneault, L., & Tremblay, R. E. (2006). Prediction of early onset deviant peer group affiliation: a 12-year longitudinal study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63, 562–568.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lahey, B. B., Waldman, I. D., & McBurnett, K. (1999). The development of antisocial behavior: An integrative causal model. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 669–682.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood residence in child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 309–337.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lynam, D. R. (1996). Early identification of chronic offenders: Who is the fledging psychopath? Psychological Bulletin, 120, 209–234.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lynam, D. R. (1997). Pursuing the psychopath: Capturing the fledgling psychopath in a nomological net. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 425–438.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lynam, D. R. (2005). Adolescent Psychopathy and the Big Five: Results from two samples. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 431–433.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lynam, D. R., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Wikström, P. H., Loeber, R., & Novak, S. P. (2000). The interaction between impulsivity and neighborhood context on offending: The effects of impulsivity are stronger in poorer neighborhoods. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 563–574.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lynam, D. R., & Gudonis, L. (2005). The development of psychopathy. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 381–407.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Puderer, H. (2001). Introducing the dissemination area for the 2001 census: An update. In Geography Working Paper Series (Vol. 2000-4). Ottawa: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
  37. Reid, J. B., Patterson, G. R., & Snyder, J. (2002). Antisocial behavior in children and adolescents: A developmental analysis and model for intervention. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  38. Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing “neighborhood effects”: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 442–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multi-level study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Short, J. F. Jr. (1965). Group process and gang delinquency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  41. Simons, R. L., Simons, L. G., Burt, C. H., Brody, G. H., & Cutrona, C. (2005). Collective efficacy, authoritative parenting and delinquency: A longitudinal test of a model integrating community- and family-level processes. Criminology, 43, 989–1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Statistics Canada (1999). National longitudinal survey of children and youth (Vol. July 6 1999, Catalogue 11-001-XPE). Ottawa.Google Scholar
  43. Statistics Canada (2005). National longitudinal survey of children and youth microdata user guide—Cycle 5. Ottawa.Google Scholar
  44. Thornberry, T. P., Krohn, M. D., Lizotte, A. J., & Chard-Wiersche, D. (1993). The role of juvenile gangs in facilitating delinquent behavior. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 55–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thornberry, T. P., Krohn, M. D., Lizotte, A. J., Smith, C. A., & Tobin, K. (2003). Gangs and delinquency in developmental perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Tita, G. E., Cohen, J., & Engberg, J. (2005). An ecological study of the location of gang “set space”. Social Problems, 52, 272–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Trasher, F. M. (1927). The gang: A study of 1,313 gangs in Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  48. Tremblay, R. E., Pihl, R. O., Vitaro, F., & Dobkin, P. L. (1994). Predicting early onset of male antisocial behavior from preschool behavior: A test of two personality theories. Archives of General Psychiatry, 51, 732–739.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Valdez, A., Kaplan, C. D., & Codina, E. (2000). Psychopathy among Mexican American gang members: A comparative study. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 44, 46–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vazsonyi, A. T., Cleveland, H. H., & Wiebe, R. P. (2006). Does the effect of impulsivity on delinquency vary by level of neighborhood disadvantage? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 511–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Viding, E., Blair, R. J. R., Moffitt, T. E., & Plomin, R. (2005). Evidence for substantial genetic risk for psychopathy in 7-year-olds. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 592–597.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vitale, J. E., Newman, J. P., Bates, J. E., Goodnight, J., Dodge, K. A., & Pettit, G. S. (2005). Deficient behavioral inhibition and anomalous selective attention in a community sample of adolescents with psychopathic traits and low-anxiety traits. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 461–470.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wikström, P. H., & Loeber, R. (2000). Do disadvantaged neighborhoods cause well adjusted children to become adolescent delinquents? A study of male juvenile serious offending, risk and protective factors, and neighborhood context. Criminology, 38, 1109–1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Willms, J. D. (Ed.) (2003). Vulnerable children: Findings from Canada’s national longitudinal survey of children and youth. Edmonton: University of Alberta Press.Google Scholar
  55. Wright, B. R. E., Caspi, A., Moffit, T. E., & Silva, P. A. (2001). The effects of social ties on crime vary by criminal propensity: A life-course model of interdependence. Criminology, 39, 321–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Véronique Dupéré
    • 1
  • Éric Lacourse
    • 2
    • 5
  • J. Douglas Willms
    • 3
  • Frank Vitaro
    • 4
    • 5
  • Richard E. Tremblay
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Psychology and Research Unit on Children’s Psychosocial Maladjustment (GRIP)Université de MontréalMontréalCanada
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversité de MontréalMontréalCanada
  3. 3.Canadian Research Institute for Social PolicyUniversity of New BrunswickNew BrunswickCanada
  4. 4.Department of PsychoeducationUniversité de MontréalMontréalCanada
  5. 5.GRIPUniversité de MontréalMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations