Advertisement

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp 536–542 | Cite as

Modeling Rater Disagreement for ADHD: Are Parents or Teachers Biased?

  • Christie A. Hartman
  • Soo H. Rhee
  • Erik G. Willcutt
  • Bruce F. Pennington
Original Paper

Abstract

The present study is the first to utilize twin modeling to examine whether parent-teacher disagreement for ADHD ratings is due to parent or teacher bias, or due to raters observing different but valid ADHD behaviors. A joint analysis was conducted with 106 twin pairs, including twins selected for ADHD and control twin pairs. Total ADHD scores were analyzed using multiple rater models that estimate genetic and environmental contributions common to both raters and unique to each rater. Results suggest that 1) disagreement in ADHD ratings is strongly due to parents and teachers observing different ADHD behaviors, some of which is valid and some of which is due to bias, and 2) parents may be more biased than teachers in their ADHD ratings.

Keywords

ADHD Rater bias Twin modeling Rater disagreement 

References

  1. Aitken, A. C. (1934). Note on selection from a multivariate normal population. Proc Edinburgh Math Soc, 55, 42–58.Google Scholar
  2. Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. APA. (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th edition). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  4. Barkley, R., & Murphy, K. (1998). Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Clinical Workbook (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bartels, M., Hudziak, J. J., van den Oord, E., Van Beijsterveldt, C. E. M., Rietveld, M. J. H., & Boomsma, D. I. (2003). Co-occurrence of aggressive behavior and rule-breaking behavior at age 12: multi-rater analyses. Behavior Genetics, 33(5), 607–621.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Costello, E. J., Costello, A. J., Edelbrock, C., Burns, B., Dulcan, M. K., Brent, D., et al. (1988). Psychiatric disorders in pediatric primary care. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 45, 1107–1116.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. DeFries, J. C., Filipek, P. A., Fulker, D. F., Olson, R. K., Pennington, B. F., Smith, S. D., et al. (1997). Colorado Learning Disabilities Research Center. Learning Disabilities, 8, 7–79.Google Scholar
  8. DuPaul, G. J., Power, T. P., Anastopoulos, A. D., & Reid, R. (1998). ADHD Rating Scale – IV. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  9. Eaves, L., Silberg, J., Meyer, J., & Maes, H. (1997). Genetics and developmental psychopathology: 2. The main effects of genes and environment on behavioral problems in the Virginia Twin Study of Adolescent Behavioral Development. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 38, 965–980.Google Scholar
  10. Gadow, K. D., & Sprafkin, J. (1999). 1999 Revised Norms and Scoring Guide Child Symptom Inventory – 4. Stony Brook, NY: Checkmate Plus.Google Scholar
  11. Goodman, R., & Stevenson, J. (1989). A twin study of hyperactivity-II. The aeteological role of genes, family relationships, and perinatal adversity. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 30, 691–709.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hewitt, J. K., Silberg, J., Neale, M. C., Eaves, L., & Erickson, M. T. (1992). The analysis of parental ratings of children’s behavior using LISREL. Behavior Genetics, 22(3), 293–317.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  14. Lahey, B. B., Applegate, B., McBurnett, K., Biederman, J., Greenhill, L., Hynd, G. W., et al. (1994). DSM-IV field trials for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in children and adolescents. American Journal of Psychiatry, 151, 1673–1685.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Neale, M. C. (1997). Mx: Statistical Modeling (4th ed.). Richmond, VA: Medical College of Virginia, Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
  16. Neale, M. C., & Cardon, L. R. (1992). Methodology for Genetic Studies of Twins and Families. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers B.V.Google Scholar
  17. Pearson, K. (1902). I: mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. XI: on the influence of natural selection on the variability and correlation of organs. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A, 200, 1–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Piacentini, J. C., Cohen, P., & Cohen, J. (1992). Combining discrepant diagnostic information from multiple sources: are complex algorithms better than simple ones? J Abnorm Child Psychol, 20(1), 51–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sherman, D. K., Iacono, W. G., & McGue, M. K. (1997). Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder dimensions: A twin study of inattention and impulsivity-hyperactivity. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 36(6), 745–753.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Silberg, J., Meyer, J., Rutter, M., Simonoff, E., Hewitt, J. K., Loeber, R., et al. (1996). Genetic and environmental influences on the covariation between hyperactivity and conduct disturbance in juvenile twins. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37, 803–816.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Simonoff, E., Pickles, A., Hervas, A., Silberg, J., Rutter, M., & Eaves, L. (1998). Genetic influences on childhood hyperactivity: Contrast effects imply parental rating bias, not sibling interaction. Psychological Medicine, 28, 825–837.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Simonoff, E., Pickles, A., Meyer, J., Silberg, J., Maes, H., Loeber, R., et al. (1997). The Virginia Twin Study of Adolescent Behavioral Development: influences of age, gender, and impairment on rates of disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 54, 801–909.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Sprafkin, J., Volpe, R. J., Gadow, K. D., Nolan, E. E., & Kelly, K. (2002). A DSM-IV-referenced screening instrument for preschool children: The early childhood inventory – 4. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 604–613.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stallings, M. C., Cherny, S. S., Young, S. E., Miles, D. R., Hewitt, J. K., & Fulker, D. F. (1997). The familial aggregation of depressive symptoms, antisocial behavior, and alcohol abuse. American Journal of Medical Genetics (Neuropsychiatric Genetics), 74, 183–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Thapar, A., Harrington, R., Ross, K., & McGuffin, P. (2000). Does the definition of ADHD affect heritability? Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39(12), 1528–1536.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Thapar, A., Hervas, A., & McGuffin, P. (1995). Childhood hyperactivity scores are highly heritable and show sibling competition effects: Twin study evidence. Behavior Genetics, 25(6), 537–544.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Van Der Valk, J. C., van den Oord, E., Verhulst, F. C., & Boomsma, D. I. (2001). Using parental ratings to study the etiology of 3-year-old twins’ problem behaviors: Different views or rater bias? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(7), 921–931.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Willcutt, E. G., Chhabildas, N. A., & Pennington, B. F. (2001). Validity of the DSM-IV subtypes of ADHD. The ADHD report, 9, 2–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Willcutt, E. G., Hartung, C. M., Lahey, B. B., Pelham, W. E., & Loney, B. R. (1999). Utility of behavior ratings made by examiners during assessments of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27, 463–472.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christie A. Hartman
    • 1
    • 2
  • Soo H. Rhee
    • 2
  • Erik G. Willcutt
    • 2
  • Bruce F. Pennington
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences CenterDenverUSA
  2. 2.Institute for Behavioral GeneticsUniversity of Colorado at BoulderBoulderUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of DenverDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations