Advertisement

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 335–345 | Cite as

Executive Inhibitory Control and Cooperative Behavior During Early School Years: A Follow-Up Study

  • Silvia CiairanoEmail author
  • Laura Visu-Petra
  • Michele Settanni
Original Paper

Abstract

Several links between aspects of executive functioning and the development of social competence have been established. The present study investigates the relation between executive inhibitory control and cooperative/non-cooperative behavior, in an ecological setting, and from a longitudinal perspective. Elementary school children (n=195) of three age groups (7, 9, 11 years, initially) were measured at two consecutive time points, at a one-year interval, with tasks tapping executive inhibitory control (the Stroop test), and social competence (a collaborative puzzle solving task). Executive inhibition was identified as the most influential stable predictor only in the case of non-cooperative behavior and presented strong concurrent relations with both cooperative and non-cooperative behavior at follow-up, even when controlling for previous level of the same behavior. The findings imply the need to consider the important role of executive inhibitory processes in multifactorial models of social competence development and in the refinement of present interventions.

Keywords

Executive inhibition Social competence Cooperative behavior School-based interventions 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Silvia Bonino and Dr. Oana Benga for support and advice throughout this research project; we would also like to thank Dr. Graham Schafer and Lindsay McDonald for their help with editing the manuscript. We gratefully acknowledge the participation of children and staff members who made this research possible.

References

  1. Anderson, V., Anderson, P., Northam, E., Jacobs, R., & Catroppa, C. (2001). Development of executive functions through late childhood and adolescence in an Australian sample. Developmental Neuropsychology, 20, 385–406.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balaraman, G. R. (2003, April). Children's self-regulation and peer interaction at 36 and 54 months: Concurrent and longitudinal relations. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Tampa, Florida.Google Scholar
  3. Barkley, R. A. (1997). Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 65–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bates, J. E., Bayles, K., Bennet, D. S., Ridge, B., & Brown, M. M. (1991). Origins of externalizing behavior problems at eight years of age. In D. J. Pepler & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 93–120). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Benga, O., & Petra, L. (2005). Social cognition and executive functioning: A constructivist developmental approach. Cognition, Brain, Behavior, 9(2), 301–317.Google Scholar
  6. Berlin, L., & Bohlin, G. (2002). Response inhibition, hyperactivity and conduct problems among preschool children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 31, 242–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blair, C. (2002). School readiness: Integrating cognition and emotion in a neurobiological conceptualization of children's functioning at school entry. American Psychologist, 57, 111–127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonino, S., & Cattelino, E. (1999). The relationships between cognitive abilities and social abilities in childhood: A research on flexibility in thinking and co-operation with peers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 23(1), 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bonino, S., & Ciairano, S. (1997). Effetto Stroop e capacità di inibire l’automatismo: una ricerca in campo evolutivo [The Stroop Effect and the capacity to overcome automatic behavior: A research in the developmental field]. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 3, 587–603.Google Scholar
  10. Brophy, M., Hughes, C., & Taylor, E. (2002). To Go or Not To Go: Inhibitory control in hard to manage children. Infant and Child Development, 11, 125–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, R. T., & Conrad, K. (1981, August). Remediation efforts for hyperactivity: Training in attention or inhibitory control. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, W. S., Thrasher, E. D., & Paul, L. K. (2001). Interhemispheric Stroop effects in partial and complete agenesis of the corpus callosum. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 7, 302–311.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carlson, S. M., & Moses, L. J. (2001). Individual differences in inhibitory control and children's. theory of mind Child Development, 72, 1032–1053.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carlson, S. M., Moses, L. J., & Breton, C. (2002). How specific is the relation between executive function and theory of mind? Contributions of inhibitory control and working memory. Infant and Child Development, 11, 73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Charman, T., Carroll, F., & Sturge, C. (2001). Theory of mind, executive function and social competence in boys with ADHD. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 6, 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ciairano, S., Bonino, S., & Miceli, R. (2006). Flexibility in thinking and social competence from childhood to early adolescence. Cognition, Brain, Behavior, 10(3), 343–366.Google Scholar
  17. Comalli, P. E., Jr., Wapner, S., & Werner, H. (1962). Interference effects of Stroop colour-word test in childhood, adulthood, and ageing. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 100, 47–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children's social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115(1), 74–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Deák, G. O., & Narasimham, G. (2003). Is perseveration caused by inhibition failure? Evidence from preschool children's inferences about word meanings. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86, 194–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Decety, J., Jackson, P. L., Sommerville, J. A., Chaminade, T., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2004). The neural bases of cooperation and competition: An fMRI investigation. NeuroImage, 23, 744–751.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dowsett, S., & Livesey, D. J. (2000). The development of inhibitory control in pre-school children: Effects of ‘executive skills” training. Developmental Psychobiology, 36(2), 161–174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Doyle, A. E., Biederman, J., Seidman, L. J., Weber, W., & Faraone, S. V. (2000). Diagnostic efficiency of neuropsychological test scores for discriminating boys with and without attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 477–488.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gallagher, H. L., & Frith, C. D. (2003). Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind.’ Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 77–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Green, V. A., & Rechis, R. (2006). Children's cooperative and competitive interactions in limited resource situations: A literature review. Applied Developmental Psychology, 27, 42–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Greenberg, M. T., & Kusché, C. A. (1993). Promoting social and emotional development in deaf children: The PATHS project. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  26. Greenberg, M. T., Kusché, C. A., Riggs, N. (2004). The PATHS curriculum: Theory and research on neuro-cognitive development and school success. In J. E. Zins, R. P. Weissberg, M. C. Wang, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What does the research say? (pp. 170–188). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  27. Grodzinsky, G. M., & Barkley, R. A. (1999). Predictive power of frontal lobe tests in the diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 13, 12–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hay, D. F., Payne, A., & Chadwick, A. (2004). Peer relations in childhood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(1), 84– 108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hightower, A. D., Work, W. C., Cowen, E. L., Lotyczewski, B. S., Spinell, A. P., Guare, J. C., & Rohrbeck, C. A. (1986). The teacher-child rating scale: A brief objective measure of elementary children's school problem behaviors and competencies. School Psychology Review, 15, 393–409.Google Scholar
  30. Hongwanishkul, D., Happaney, K. R., Lee, W., & Zelazo, P. D. (2005). Hot and cool executive function: Age-related changes and individual differences. Developmental Neuropsychology, 28, 617–644.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hughes, C., White, A., Sharpen, J., & Dunn, J. (2000). Antisocial, angry and unsympathetic: ‘Hard to manage’ preschoolers’ peer problems, and possible cognitive influences. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 41, 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hughes, C. (2002). Executive functions and development: Emerging themes. Infant and Child Development, 11, 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hughes, C., & Graham, A. (2002). Measuring executive functions in childhood: Problems and solutions? Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 3, 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hughes, C., Cutting, A., & Dunn, J. (2001). Acting nasty in the face of failure: Longitudinal observations of ‘hard to manage’ children playing a rigged competitive game with friend. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 29, 403–416PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. LaFreniere, P. J. (1996). Cooperation among peers as a conditional strategy: The influence of family ecology and kin relations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 19(1), 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leslie, A. M., & Polizzi, P. (1998). Inhibitory processing in the false belief task: Two conjectures. Developmental Science, 1, 247–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lochman, J. E. (2001). Issues in prevention with school-aged children: Ongoing intervention refinement, developmental theory, prediction and moderation, and implementation and dissemination. Prevention & Treatment, 4. Retrieved September 18, 2005, from http://www.journals.apa.org/prevention/volume4/ pre0040004c.htmlGoogle Scholar
  38. Luciana, M., & Nelson, C. A. (1998). The functional emergence of prefrontally-guided working memory systems in four-to- eight year-old children. Neuropsychologia, 36(3), 273–293.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect - an integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 163–203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McCabe, K., Houser, D., Ryan, L., Smith, V., & Trouard. T. (2001). A functional imaging study of cooperation in two-person reciprocal exchange. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 11832–11835.Google Scholar
  41. Newman, J. P., & Lorenz, A. R. (2003). Response modulation and emotion processing: Implications for psychopathy and other dysregulatory psychopathology. In R. J. Davidson, K. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of Affective Sciences (pp. 904–929). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Newman, J. P., & Schmitt, W. A. (1998). Passive avoidance in psychopathic offenders: A replication and extension. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107, 527–532.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Newman, J. P., & Wallace, J. F. (1993). Diverse pathways to deficient self-regulation: Implications for disinhibitory psychopathology in children. Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 690–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nigg, J. T. (2000). On inhibition/desinhibition in developmental psychopathology: Views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. Psychological Bulletin, 126(2), 220–246.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nigg, J. T., Quamma, J. P, Greenberg, M. T., & Kusché, C. A. (1999). A two-year longitudinal study of neuropsychological and cognitive performance in relation to behavioral problems and competencies in elementary school children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27(1), 51–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 4., pp. 1–18). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  47. Paschall, M. J., & Fischbein, D. H. (2002). Executive cognitive functioning and aggression: A public health perspective. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 215–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1987). Peer relations and later personal adjustment: Are low-accepted children at risk? Psychological Bulletin, 102(3), 357–389.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pennington, B. F., & Ozonoff, S. (1996). Executive functions and developmental psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37, 51–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Riggs, N. R., Blair, C. B., & Greenberg, M. T. (2003). Concurrent and 2-year longitudinal relations between executive function and the behavior of 1st and 2nd grade children. Child Neuropsychology, 9, 267–276.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Riggs, N. R., Jahromi, L. B., Razza, R. P., Dillworth-Bart, J. E., & Mueller, U. (2006). Executive function and the promotion of social-emotional competence. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 27, 300–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rose-Krasnor, L. (1997). The nature of social competence: A theoretical review. Social Development, 6, 111–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rueda, M. R., Rothbart, M. K., McCandliss, B. D., Saccomanno, L., & Posner, M. I. (2005). Training, Maturation, and genetic influences on the development of executive attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(41), 2005.Google Scholar
  54. Rydell, A., Hagekull, B., & Bohlin, G. (1997). Measurement of two social competence aspects in middle childhood. Developmental Psychology, 33, 824–833.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schiller, P. H. (1966). Developmental study of color-word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 105–108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Séguin, J. R., & Zelazo, P. D. (2005). Executive function in early physical aggression. In R. E. Tremblay, W. W. Hartup, & J. Archer (Eds.), Developmental origins of aggression (pp. 307–329). NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  57. Séguin, J. R., Nagin, D. S., Assaad, J.-M., & Tremblay, R. E. (2004). Cognitive-neuropsychological function in chronic physical aggression and hyperactivity. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113(4), 603–613.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Séguin, J. R., Phil, J. R., Harden, R. O., & Tremblay, P. W. (1995). Cognitive and neuropsychological characteristics of physically aggressive boys. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 614–624.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Shallice, T. (1994). Multiple levels of control processes. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV (pp. 395–420). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  60. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 643–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thorell, L. B., Bohlin, G., & Rydell, A.-M. (2004). Two types of inhibitory control: Predictive relations to social unctioning. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28(3), 193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Treisman, A., & Fearnley, S. (1969). The Stroop Test: Selective attention to colors and words. Nature, 222, 437–439.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Welsh, J. A., Bierman, K. L. (1998). Social Competence. Gale encyclopedia of childhood and adolescence. Retrieved August, the 10th, from http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_g2602/is_0004/ai_2602000487.Google Scholar
  64. Zelazo, P. D., & Müller, U. (2002). Executive functions in typical and atypical development. In U. Goswami (Ed.), Handbook of childhood cognitive development (pp. 445–469). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Silvia Ciairano
    • 1
    Email author
  • Laura Visu-Petra
    • 2
  • Michele Settanni
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Laboratory of Developmental PsychologyUniversity of TorinoTorinoItaly
  2. 2.Department of Psychology, Program of Cognitive NeuroscienceBabes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, Republicii Str. 37Cluj-NapocaRomania

Personalised recommendations