Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 34, Issue 5, pp 730–748 | Cite as

Testing Descriptive Hypotheses Regarding Sex Differences in the Development of Conduct Problems and Delinquency

  • Benjamin B. LaheyEmail author
  • Carol A. Van Hulle
  • Irwin D. Waldman
  • Joseph Lee Rodgers
  • Brian M. D’Onofrio
  • Steven Pedlow
  • Paul Rathouz
  • Kate Keenan
Original Paper


Accurate descriptions of sex differences in the development of childhood conduct problems and adolescent delinquency will inform theories of their causes in fundamentally important ways. Using data on 4,572 offspring of a national sample of women, we tested descriptive hypotheses regarding sex differences. As predicted, the magnitude of sex differences varied with age, suggesting that multiple processes differentially influence levels of these behaviors in females and males across development. During childhood, boys scored lower on measures of cognitive ability and exhibited lower sociability and compliance and greater hyperactivity, oppositional behavior, and conduct problems. Most of these variables were associated with childhood conduct problems and adolescent delinquency equally in females and males, but maternal delinquency and early childhood sociability were correlated more strongly with childhood conduct problems in males and childhood compliance predicted adolescent delinquency more strongly in females. Both sexes exhibited both childhood-onset and adolescent-onset trajectories of delinquency. Although more males followed a childhood-onset trajectory, there were few sex differences in the early childhood risk correlates of either delinquency trajectory.


Human sex differences Conduct problems Juvenile delinquency Developmental trajectories 


  1. Achenbach, T. M. (1978). The child behavior profile: I. Boys aged 6–11. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 478–488.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arvanites, T. M., & Defina, T. H. (2006). Business cycles and street crime. Criminology, 44, 139–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Babinski, L. M., Hartsough, C. S., & Lambert, N. M. (1999). Childhood conduct problems, hyperactivity-impulsivity, and inattention as predictors of adult criminal activity. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 347–355.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker, P. C., Keck, C. K., Mott, F. L., & Quinlan, S. V. (1993). NLSY child handbook. Columbus, OH: Center for Human Resources Research.Google Scholar
  5. Bongers, I. L., Koot, H. M., Van Der Ende, J., & Verhulst, F. C. (2004). Developmental trajectories of externalizing behaviors in childhood and adolescence. Child Development, 75, 1523–1537.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chase-Lansdale, P. L., Mott, F. L., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Phillips, D. A. (1991). Children of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth: A unique research opportunity. Developmental Psychology, 27, 918–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995) Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710–722.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crick, N. R., & Zahn-Waxler, C. (2003). The development of psychopathology in females and males: Current progress and future challenges. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 719–742.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody picture vocabulary test-revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  10. Dunn, L. M., & Markwardt, F. C. (1970). Peabody individual achievement test manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  11. Elliott, D. S., & Huizinga, D. (1983). Social class and delinquent behavior in a national youth panel. Criminology, 21, 149–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones, B., Nagin, D., & Roeder, K. (2001). A SAS procedure based on mixture models for estimating developmental trajectories. Sociological Methods of Research, 29, 374–393.Google Scholar
  13. Nagin, D. (1999). Analyzing developmental trajectories: A semi-parametric, group-based approach. Psychological Methods, 4, 139–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Keenan, K., Loeber, R., & Green, S. (1999). Conduct disorder in girls: A review of the literature. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 2, 3–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Keenan, K., & Shaw, D. (1997). Developmental and social influences on young girls’ early problem behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 95–113.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kratzer, L., & Hodgins, S. (1999). A typology of offenders: A test of Moffitt’s theory among males and females from childhood to age 30. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 9, 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lahey, B. B., McBurnett, K., & Loeber, R. (2000). Are attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and oppositional defiant disorder developmental precursors to conduct disorder? In A. Sameroff, M. Lewis, & S. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of developmental psychopathology 2nd ed. (pp. 431–446). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  18. Lahey, B. B., Miller, T. L., Gordon, R. A., & Riley, A. (1999). Developmental epidemiology of the disruptive behavior disorders. In H. C. Quay & A. Hogan (Eds.), Handbook of the disruptive behavior disorders (pp. 23–48). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  19. Lahey, B. B., Schwab-Stone, M., Goodman, S. H., Waldman, I. D., Canino, G., Rathouz, P. J., et al. (2000). Age and gender differences in oppositional behavior and conduct problems: A cross-sectional household study of middle childhood and adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 488–503.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lahey, B. B., & Waldman, I. D. (2003). A developmental propensity model of the origins of conduct problems during childhood and adolescence. In B. B. Lahey, T. E. Moffitt, & A. Caspi (Eds.), Causes of conduct disorder and serious delinquency (pp. 76–117). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  21. Lahey, B. B., & Waldman, I. D. (2005). A developmental model of the propensity to offend during childhood and adolescence. In D. P. Farrington (Ed.), Advances in criminological theory Vol. 13 (pp. 15–50). Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Loeber, R., Farrington, D. P., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., & Van Kammen, W. (1998). Antisocial behavior and mental health problems: Explanatory factors in childhood and adolescence. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  23. Lynch, J. P. (2002, October). Trends in juvenile violent offending: An analysis of victim survey data. Juvenile Justice Bulletin, 1–6.Google Scholar
  24. McCord, J. (1990). Problem behaviors. In S. Feldman & G. Eliot (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 414–430). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. McLoyd, V. C., & Smith, J. (2002). Physical discipline and behavior problems in African American, European American, and Hispanic children: Emotional support as a moderator. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 40–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moffitt, T. E. (1990). Juvenile delinquency and attention deficit disorder: Boys’ developmental trajectories from age 3 to 15. Child Development, 61, 893–910.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Dickson, N., Silva, P. A., & Stanton, W. (1996). Childhood-onset versus adolescent-onset antisocial conduct in males: Natural history from age 3 to 18. Development and Psychopathology, 8, 399–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moffitt, T. E., & Caspi, A. (2001). Childhood predictors differentiate life-course persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial pathways among males and females. Development and Psychopathology, 13, 355–375.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Rutter, M., & Silva, P. (2001). Sex differences in antisocial behavior. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Nelder, J. A., & Wedderburn, R. W. M. (1972). Generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 135, 370–384.Google Scholar
  32. NLSY79 Child and Young Adult Data User’s Guide. (2002). Columbus, OH: Center for Human Resource Research.Google Scholar
  33. Peterson, J. L., & Zill, N. (1986). Marital disruption, parent-child relationships, and behavior problems in children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 295–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Piquero, A. R., & White, N. A. (2003). On the relationship between cognitive abilities and life-course-persistent offending among a sample of African Americans: A longitudinal test of Moffitt’s hypothesis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 399–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Raine, A., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Loeber, R., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., & Lynam, D. (2005). Neurocognitive impairments in boys on the life-course persistent antisocial path. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 38–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rowe, D., Rodgers, J. L., & Mesech-Bushey, S. (1992). Sibling delinquency and the family environment: shared and unshared influences. Child Development, 63, 59–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rutter, M., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2003). Using sex differences in psychopathology to study causal mechanisms: Unifying issues and research strategies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44, 1092–1115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rutter, M., Giller, H., & Hagell, A. (1998). Antisocial behaviour by young people. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Silverthorn, P., & Frick, P. J. (1999). Developmental pathways to antisocial behavior: The delayed-onset pathway in girls. Development and Psychopathology, 11, 101–126.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. U. S. Department of Defense. (1982). Profile of American Youth: 1980 Nationwide administration of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery. Washington, DC: Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense.Google Scholar
  41. Zeger S. L., & Liang, K.-Y. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics, 42, 121–130.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler intelligence scales for children-revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benjamin B. Lahey
    • 1
    Email author
  • Carol A. Van Hulle
    • 1
  • Irwin D. Waldman
    • 2
  • Joseph Lee Rodgers
    • 3
  • Brian M. D’Onofrio
    • 4
  • Steven Pedlow
    • 5
  • Paul Rathouz
    • 1
  • Kate Keenan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Health Studies (MC 2007)University of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Emory University, 532 N. Kilgo CircleAtlantaUSA
  3. 3.University of OklahomaNormanUSA
  4. 4.Indiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  5. 5.National Opinion Research CenterChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations