Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 363–374 | Cite as

Evaluation of a High School Peer Group Intervention for At-Risk Youth

  • Hyunsan Cho
  • Denise Dion Hallfors
  • Victoria Sánchez


The purpose of this paper is to examine the effectiveness of Reconnecting Youth, a prevention program for at-risk high school youth. Data are from a large, independently evaluated effectiveness trial in two diverse urban school districts. A total of 1,218 students participated; 50% were male; average age was 15. We tested whether positive efficacy trial effects could be replicated, and whether any negative behavioral effects occur when clustering high-risk youth. Although mixed program effects were observed at immediate post-intervention, only negative effects were found at 6-month follow-up. These effects included less optimal scores on measures of GPA, Anger, School Connectedness, Conventional Peer Bonding, and Peer High-Risk Behaviors. Overall, we found little support for the use of this social-influence—model intervention aimed at increasing school connectedness for high-risk youth. Further, this study provides evidence that clustering high-risk youth in preventive interventions has the potential for iatrogenic effects.


effectiveness trial indicated prevention adolescent problem behavior iatrogenic effect peer contagion substance abuse 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Battistich, V., & Hom, A. (1997). The relationship between students’ sense of their school as a community and their involvement in problem behaviors. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 1997–2001.Google Scholar
  2. Bonny, A. E., Britto, M. T., Klostermann, B. K., Hornung, R. W., & Slap, G. B. (2000). School disconnectedness: Identifying adolescents at risk. Pediatrics, 106, 1017–1021.Google Scholar
  3. Boruch, R. F. (1997). Randomized experiments for planning and evaluation: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Capaldi, D. M., Dishion, T. J., Stoolmiller, M., & Yoerger, K. (2001). Aggression toward female partners by at-risk young men: The contribution of male adolescent friendships. Developmental Psychology, 37, 61–73.Google Scholar
  5. Dishion, T. J., Capaldi, D. M., Spracklen, K., & Li, F. (1995). Peer ecology of male adolescent drug use. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 803–824.Google Scholar
  6. Dishion, T. J., Eddy, J., Haas, E., Li, F., & Spracklen, K. (1997). Friendships and violent behavior during adolescence. Social Development, 6, 207–223.Google Scholar
  7. Dishion, T. J., Kavanagh, K., Schneiger, A., Nelson, S., & Kaufman, N. (2002). Preventing early adolescent substance use: A family-centered strategy for the public middle school. Prevention Science, 3, 191–201.Google Scholar
  8. Dishion, T. J., McCord, J., & Poulin, F. (1999). When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior. American Psychologist, 54, 755–764.Google Scholar
  9. Eggert, L. L. (1996, September). Reconnecting Youth: An indicated prevention program. Paper presented at the National Conference on Drug abuse Prevention Research, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  10. Eggert, L. L., & Herting, J. R. (1993). Drug involvement among potential dropouts and “typical” youth. Journal of Drug Education, 23, 31–55.Google Scholar
  11. Eggert, L. L., Herting, J. R., & Thompson, E. A. (1998). Measurement document and questionnaire item identification for High School Questionnaire, Reconnecting At-Risk Youth NIDA Project (Rep. No. SC-76). Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Department of Psychosocial Nursing.Google Scholar
  12. Eggert, L. L., & Nicholas, L. (2001)., RY teacher training manual. Seattle, WA: University of Washington.Google Scholar
  13. Eggert, L. L., Nicholas, L. J., & Owen, L. M. (1995). Reconnecting Youth: A peer-group approach to building life skills. Bloomington, IN: National Educational Service.Google Scholar
  14. Eggert, L. L., Thompson, E. A., Herting, J. R., & Nicholas, L. J. (1994a). Prevention research program: Reconnecting at-risk youth. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 15, 107–135.Google Scholar
  15. Eggert, L. L., Thompson, E. A., Herting, J. R., Nicholas, L. J., & Dicker, B. G. (1994b). Preventing adolescent drug abuse and high school dropout through an intensive school-based social network development program. American Journal of Health Promotion, 8, 202–215.Google Scholar
  16. Fergusson, D., Aaron, S. D., Guyatt, G., & Herbert, P. (2002). Post-randomization exclusions: The intent to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis. BMJ, 325, 652–654.Google Scholar
  17. Flay, B. R. (1986). Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs Preventive Medicine, 15, 451–474.Google Scholar
  18. Friedman, L. M., Furberg, C. D., & DeMets, D. L. (1998). Fundamentals of clinical trials (3rd ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  19. Glasgow, R. E., Klesges, L. M., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Bull, S. S., & Estabrooks, P. (2004). The future of health behavior change research: What is needed to improve translation of research into health promotion practice? Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 27, 3–12.Google Scholar
  20. Gottfredson, D. (1987). Peer group interventions to reduce the risk of delinquent behavior: A selective review and a new evaluation. Criminology, 25, 671–714.Google Scholar
  21. Hallfors, D., Cho, H., Brodish, P. H., Flewelling, R. L., & Khatapoush, S. (in press). Identifying high school students at risk for substance abuse and other behavioral problems: Implications for prevention. Substance Use and Misuse.Google Scholar
  22. Hallfors, D., & Godette, D. (2002). Will the ‘principles of effectiveness’ improve prevention practice? Early findings from a diffusion study. Health Education Research, 17, 461–470.Google Scholar
  23. Hallfors, D., Vevea, J. L., Iritani, B., Cho, H., Khatapoush, S., & Saxe, L. (2002). Truancy, grade point average, and sexual activity: A meta-analysis of risk indicators for youth substance use. Journal of School Health, 72, 205–211.Google Scholar
  24. Hallfors, D., Watson, K., Khatapoush, S., Kadushin, K., & Saxe, L. (2000). A comparison of paper vs. computer assisted self interview for school alcohol, tobacco, and other drug surveys. Evaluation and Program Planning, 23, 149–155.Google Scholar
  25. Hawkins, D. J., Catalano, R. F., Kosterman, R., Abbott, R., & Hill, K. G. (1999). Preventing adolescent health-risk behaviors by strengthening protection during childhood. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 153, 226–234.Google Scholar
  26. Hawkins, D. J., Graham, J. W., Maguin, E., & Abbot, R. (1997). Exploring the effects of age of alcohol use initiation and psychosocial risk factors on subsequent alcohol misuse. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 58, 280–290.Google Scholar
  27. Institute of Medicine. (1994). Reducing risks for mental disorders: Frontiers for preventive intervention research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  28. Kellam, S. G., & Langevin, D. J. (2003). A framework for understanding “evidence” in prevention research and programs. Prevention Science, 4, 137–153.Google Scholar
  29. Kellam, S. G., Ling, X., Merisca, R., Brown, C. H., & Ialongo, N. (1998). The effect of the level of aggression in the first grade classroom on the course and malleability of aggressive behavior into middle school. Developmental Psychopathology, 10, 165–185.Google Scholar
  30. Lipsey, M. W. (1992). Juvenile delinquency treatment: A meta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects. In T. D. Cook, H. Cooper, D. S. Cordray, H. Hartmann, L. V. Hedges, R. J. Light, T. A. Louis, & F. Mosteller (Eds.), Meta-Analysis for Explanation: A Casebook (pp. 83–127). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  31. Murray, C., & Greenberg, M. T. (2000). Children’s relationship with teachers and bonds with school: An investigation of patterns and correlates in middle childhood. Journal of School Psychology, 38, 423–445.Google Scholar
  32. Palinkas, L. A., Atkins, C. J., Miller, C., & Ferreira, D. (1996). Social skills training for drug prevention in high-risk female adolescents. Preventive Medicine, 25, 692–701.Google Scholar
  33. Poulin, F., Dishion, T. J., & Burraston, B. (2001). 3-year iatrogenic effects associated with aggregating high-risk adolescents in cognitive-behavioral preventive interventions. Applied Developmental Science, 5, 214–224.Google Scholar
  34. Resnick, M. D., Bearman, P. S., Blum, R. W., Bauman, K. E., Harris, K. M., Jones, J., Tabor, J., Beuhring, T., Sieving, R. E., Shew, M., Ireland, M., Bearinger, L. H., & Udry, J. R. (1997). Protecting adolescents from harm: Findings from the National Longitudinal Study on Adolescent Health. JAMA, 278, 823–832.Google Scholar
  35. Robertson, E. B., David, S. L., & Rao, S. A. (2003). Preventing drug use among children and adolescents: A research based guide for parents, educators, and community leaders. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse.Google Scholar
  36. Schinke, S., Brounstein, P., & Gardner, S. (2002). Science-based prevention programs and principles, 2002 (DHHS Publication No. SMA-03-3764). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Substance Abuse and Prevention.Google Scholar
  37. Tobler, N. S., Roona, M. R., Ochshorn, P., Marshall, D. G., Streke, A. V., & Stackpole, K. M. (2000). School-based adolescent drug prevention programs: 1998 meta-analysis. Journal of Primary Prevention, 20, 275–336.Google Scholar
  38. Turner, C. F., Ku, L., Rogers, S. M., Lindberg, L. D., Pleck, J. H., & Sonenstein, F. L. (1998). Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: Increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science, 280, 867–873.Google Scholar
  39. Werch, C. E., & Owen, D. M. (2002). Iatrogenic effects of alcohol and drug prevention programs. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63, 581–590.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hyunsan Cho
    • 1
    • 3
  • Denise Dion Hallfors
    • 1
  • Victoria Sánchez
    • 2
  1. 1.Pacific Institute for Research and EvaluationChapel Hill
  2. 2.School of NursingUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel Hill
  3. 3.Chapel Hill

Personalised recommendations