Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 307–324 | Cite as

The Impact of First-Grade “Friendship Group” Experiences on Child Social Outcomes in the Fast Track Program

  • Kristen L. Lavallee
  • Karen L. BiermanEmail author
  • Robert L. Nix
  • The Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group


Many interventions for children’s behavior problems successfully utilize a group format for social skills training, providing opportunities for practice and performance feedback from peers. Recent studies however, suggest that grouping aggressive children together may reduce intervention effectiveness or even increase risk. The present study examined the relative impact of children’s own behavior and their experiences with peers in the first-grade “friendship groups” of Fast Track, a multi-component preventive intervention program. Two-hundred sixty-six children (56% minority, 29% female) participated in 55 friendship groups. Children’s own positive and negative behavior in friendship groups was related to relative improvements in social cognitive skills, prosocial behavior, and aggression, assessed through child interviews, teacher ratings, and peer sociometric nominations. Results from hierarchical linear models also revealed that the amount of peer escalation children received for their disruptive behavior during sessions impeded some intervention gains, whereas mere exposure to other children’s positive or negative behavior was rarely related to outcomes.


aggressive behavior at-risk children social skills training group processes peer relations 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Asarnow, J. R. (1983). Children with peer adjustment problems: Sequential and nonsequential analyses of school behaviors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 709–717.Google Scholar
  2. Bagwell, C. L., Coie, J. D., Terry, R. A., & Lochman, J. E. (2000). Peer clique participation and social status in preadolescence. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45, 280–305.Google Scholar
  3. Bierman, K. L. (1986). Process of change during social skills training with preadolescents and its relation to treatment outcome. Child Development, 57, 230–240.Google Scholar
  4. Bierman, K. L. (2004). Peer rejection: Developmental processes and intervention strategies. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bierman, K. L., Greenberg, M. T., & CPPRG (1996). Social skills training in the Fast Track program. In R. D. Peters & R. J. McMahon (Eds.), Preventing childhood disorders, substance abuse, and delinquency. Banff international behavioral science series, Vol. 3 (pp. 65–89). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Bierman, K. L., Miller, C. L., & Stabb, S. D. (1987). Improving the social behavior and peer acceptance of rejected boys: Effects of social skill training with instructions and prohibitions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 194–200.Google Scholar
  7. Boivin, M., Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1995). Individual-group behavioral similarity and peer status in experimental play groups of boys: The social misfit revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 269–279.Google Scholar
  8. Cillessen, A. H. N., van IJzendoorn, H. W., van Lieshout, C. F. M., & Hartup, W. W. (1992). Heterogeneity of peer rejected boys. Child Development, 63, 893–905.Google Scholar
  9. Coie, J. D. (1990). Toward a theory of peer rejection. In S. R. Asher & J. D. Coie (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 365–401). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group (1992). A developmental and clinical model for the prevention of conduct disorder: The FAST Track program. Development and Psychopathology, 4, 509–527.Google Scholar
  11. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (1998). The FAST-Track Social Competence Scale, Technical Report. Available:
  12. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group (1999). Initial impact of the Fast Track prevention trial for conduct problems: I. The high-risk sample. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 631–647.Google Scholar
  13. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group (2002). Evaluation of the first 3 years of the Fast Track prevention trial with children at high risk for adolescent conduct problems. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 19–35.Google Scholar
  14. Dishion, T. J., McCord, J., & Poulin, F. (1999). When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior. American Psychologist, 54, 755–764.Google Scholar
  15. Dishion, T. J., Spracklen, K. M., Andrews, D. W., & Patterson, G. R. (1996). Deviancy training in male adolescent friendships. Behavior Therapy, 27, 373–390.Google Scholar
  16. Dodge, K. A. (1980). Social cognition and children’s aggressive behavior. Child Development, 51, 162–170.Google Scholar
  17. Dodge, K. A. (1986). A social information processing model of social competence in children. In M. Perlmutter (Ed.), Minnesota symposium in child psychology (pp. 77–125). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  18. Dodge, K. A., Bates, J. E., & Pettit, G. S. (1990). Mechanisms in the cycle of violence. Science, 250, 1678–683.Google Scholar
  19. Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. S., Bates, J. E., & Valente, E. (1995). Social information-processing patterns partially mediate the effect of early physical abuse on later conduct problems. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 632–643.Google Scholar
  20. Englund, M. M., Levy, A. K., Hyson, D. M., & Sroufe, L. A. (2000). Adolescent social competence: Effectiveness in a group setting. Child Development, 71, 1049–1060.Google Scholar
  21. Farmer, A. D., Bierman, K. L., & the Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (2002). Predictors and consequences of aggressive-withdrawn problem profiles in early grade school. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 31, 299–311.Google Scholar
  22. Hollingshead, A. A. (1979). Four-factor index of social status. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University, CT: New Haven.Google Scholar
  23. Hudley, C., & Graham, S. (1993). An attributional intervention to reduce peer-directed aggression among African-American boys. Child Development, 64, 124–138.Google Scholar
  24. Kellam, S. G., Ling, X., Merisca, R., Brown, C. H., & Ialongo, N. (1998). The effect of the level of aggression in the first grade classroom on the course and malleability of aggressive behavior into middle school. Development and Psychopathology, 10, 165–185.Google Scholar
  25. Kusche, C. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (1994). The PATHS curriculum. Seattle: Developmental Research and Programs.Google Scholar
  26. Ladd, G. W., & Mize, J. (1983). A cognitive-social learning model of social-skill training. Psychological Review, 90, 127–157.Google Scholar
  27. Lochman, J. E., Burch, P. R., Curry, J. F., & Lampron, L. B. (1984). Treatment and generalization effects of cognitive-behavioral and goal-setting interventions with aggressive boys. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 915–916.Google Scholar
  28. Lochman, J. E., & Lenhart, L. A. (1993). Anger coping intervention for aggressive children: Conceptual models and outcome effects. Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 785–805.Google Scholar
  29. McMahon, R. J., Slough, N., & the Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (1996). Family-based intervention in the Fast Track Program. In R. DeV. Peters & R. J. McMahon (Eds.), Preventing childhood disorders, substance abuse, and delinquency (pp. 90–110). Thousand Oaks, Sage: CA.Google Scholar
  30. Miller-Johnson, S., Coie, J. D., Maumary-Gremaud, A., Bierman, K., & the Conduct Problem Prevention Research Group (2002). Peer rejection and aggression and early starter models of conduct disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 217–230.Google Scholar
  31. Patterson, G. R., Dishion, T. J., & Yoerger, K. (2000). Adolescent growth in new forms of problem behavior: Macro- and micro-peer dynamics. Prevention Science, 1, 3–13.Google Scholar
  32. Patterson, G. R., Littman, R. A., & Bricker, D. (1967). Assertive behavior in children: A step toward a theory of aggression. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 32 (5, Serial No. 18b).Google Scholar
  33. Pepler, D., King, G., Craig, W. M., Byrd, B., & Bream, L. (1995). The development and evaluation of a multisystem social skills group training program for aggressive children. Child and Youth Care Forum, 24, 297–313.Google Scholar
  34. Poulin, F., Dishion, T. J., & Burraston, B. (2001). 3-Year iatrogenic effects associated with aggregating high-risk adolescents in cognitive-behavioral preventive intervention. Applied Developmental Science, 5, 214–224.Google Scholar
  35. Prinz, R. J., Blechman, E. A., & Dumas, J. E. (1994). An evaluation of peer coping-skills training for childhood aggression. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 23, 193–203.Google Scholar
  36. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Ribordy, S. C., Camras, L. A., Stafani, R., & Spaccarelli, S. (1988). Vignettes for emotion recognition research and affective therapy with children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 17, 322–325.Google Scholar
  38. Rubin, K. H., & Krasnor, L. R. (1986). Social-cognitive and social behavioral perspectives on problem solving. Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology, 18, 1–68.Google Scholar
  39. Stormshak, E. A., Bierman, K. L., Bruschi, C., Dodge, K. A., Coie, J. D., & Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group (1999). The relation between behavior problems and peer preference in different classroom contexts. Child Development, 70(1), 169–182.Google Scholar
  40. Thornberry, T. P., Lizotte, A. J., Krohn, M. D., Farnworth, M. & Jang, J. J. (1994). Delinquency of peers, beliefs, and delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test of interactional theory. Criminology, 32, 47–83.Google Scholar
  41. Tremblay, R. E., Pagani-Kurtz L., Mâsse, L. C., Vitaro, F., & Pihl, R. O. (1995). A bimodal preventive intervention for disruptive kindergarten boys: Its impact through mid-adolescence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 560–568.Google Scholar
  42. Vitaro, F., Brendgen, M., Pagani, L., Tremblay, R. E., & McDuff, P. (1999). Disruptive behavior, peer association, and conduct disorder: Testing the developmental links through early intervention. Development and Psychopathology, 11, 287–304.Google Scholar
  43. Vitaro, F., Tremblay, R. E., & Gagnon, C. (1992). Peer rejection from kindergarten to Grade 2: Outcomes, correlates, and prediction. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 38, 382–400.Google Scholar
  44. Walker, H. M., Stiller, B., Severson, H. H., Feil, E. G., & Golly, A. (1998). First Step to Success: Intervening at the point of school entry to prevent antisocial behavior patterns. Psychology in the Schools, 35, 259–269.Google Scholar
  45. Werthamer-Larsson, L., Kellam, S., & Wheeler, L. (1991). Effect of first-grade classroom environment on shy behavior, aggressive behavior, and concentration problems. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 585–602.Google Scholar
  46. Wright, J. C., Giammarino, M., & Parad, H. W. (1986). Social status in small groups: Individual-group similarity and the social “misfit.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 523–536.Google Scholar
  47. Zarbatany, L., & Pepper, S. (1996). The role of the group in peer group entry. Social Development, 5, 251–260.Google Scholar
  48. Zarbatany, L., Van Brunschot, M., Meadows, K., & Pepper, S. (1996). Effects of friendship and gender on peer group entry. Child Development, 67, 2287–2300.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristen L. Lavallee
    • 1
  • Karen L. Bierman
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Robert L. Nix
    • 1
  • The Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group
  1. 1.Pennsylvania State UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Children, Youth, and Family ConsortiumThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity Park

Personalised recommendations