Advertisement

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 55–68 | Cite as

Understanding Teasing: Lessons From Children With Autism

  • Erin A. Heerey
  • Lisa M. Capps
  • Dacher Keltner
  • Ann M. Kring
Original Article

Abstract

Teasing requires the ability to understand intention, nonliteral communication, pretense, and social context. Children with autism experience difficulty with such skills, and consequently, are expected to have difficulty with teasing. To better understand teasing concepts and behaviors, children with autism, their parents, and age and Verbal-IQ-matched comparison children and parents described concepts and experiences of teasing and engaged in a parent–child teasing interaction. The teasing of children with autism was less playful and provocative and focused less on social norms than that of comparison children. Similarly, parents of children with autism teased in less playful ways. Scores on a theory of mind task accounted for several of the observed differences. Discussion focused on the importance of understanding social context and playful behavior during teasing.

autism social interaction theory of mind teasing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abell, F., Happe, F., & Frith, U. (2000). Do triangles play tricks? Attribution of mental states to animated shapes in normal and abnormal development. Cognitive Development, 15, 1–16.Google Scholar
  2. Bara, B. G., Bosco, F. M., & Bucciarelli, M. (1999). Developmental pragmatics in normal and abnormal children. Brain and Language, 68, 507–528.Google Scholar
  3. Baron-Cohen, S., & Hammer, J. (1997). Is autism an extreme form of the “male brain”? Advances in Infancy Research, 11, 193–217.Google Scholar
  4. Baron-Cohen, S., O’Riordan, M., Stone, V., Jones, R., & Plaisted, K. (1999). Recognition of faux pas by normally developing children with asperger syndrome or high- functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29, 407–418.Google Scholar
  5. Barron, J., & Barron, S. (1992). There’s a boy in here. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  6. Bell, R. A., Buerkel-Rothfuss, N. L., & Gore, K. E. (1987). “Did you bring the yarmulke for the cabbage patch kid?” The idiomatic communication of young lovers. Human Communication Research, 14, 47–67.Google Scholar
  7. Bell, R. A., & Healey, J. G. (1992). Idiomatic communication and interpersonal solidarity in friends’ relational cultures. Human Communication Research, 18, 307–335.Google Scholar
  8. Capps, L., & Sigman, M. (1996). Autistic aloneness. In R. D. Kavanaugh, B. Zimmerberg, et al. (Eds.), Emotion: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 273–296). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Capps, L., Yirmiya, N., & Sigman, M. (1992). Understanding of simple and complex emotions in non-retarded children with autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 33, 1169–1182.Google Scholar
  10. Charman, T. (1997). The relationship between joint attention and pretend play in autism. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 1–16.Google Scholar
  11. Charman, T., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1997). Brief report: Prompted pretend play in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 27, 325–332.Google Scholar
  12. Clark, H. H. (1996). Communities, rommonalities, and communication. In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 324–355). New York: Cambridge UniversityPress.Google Scholar
  13. Clark, H. H., & Gerrig, R. J. (1984). On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 121–126.Google Scholar
  14. Dunn, J. F., & Munn, P. (1985). Becoming a family member: Family conflict and the development of social understanding in the second year. Child Development, 56, 480–492.Google Scholar
  15. Eder, D. (1993). “Go get ya a French!”: Romantic and sexual teasing among adolescent girls. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Gender and conversational interaction (pp. 17–31). New York: Oxford UniversityPress.Google Scholar
  16. Eisenberg, A. R. (1986). Teasing: Verbal play in two Mexicano homes. In B. B. Schieffelin & E. Ochs & et al. (Eds.), Language socialization across cultures (pp. 182–198). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Flavell, J. H. (1999). Cognitive development: Children’s knowledge about the mind. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 21–45.Google Scholar
  18. Frith, U. (1989). Autism and “theory of mind.” In C. Gillberg (Ed.), Diagnosis and treatment of autism (pp. 33–52). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  19. Frith, U., Happe, F., & Siddons, F. (1994). Autism and theory of mind in everyday life. Social Development, 3, 108–124.Google Scholar
  20. Glass, G. V., & Hopkins, K. D. (1996). Statistical methods in education and psychology (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  21. Grandin, T. (1995). How people with autism think. In E. Schopler & G. B. Mesibov (Eds.), Learning and cognition in autism. (pp. 137–156). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  22. Happe, F. G. E. (1993). Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: A test of relevance theory. Cognition, 48, 101–119.Google Scholar
  23. Happe, F. G. E. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters’ thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 129–154.Google Scholar
  24. Heerey, E. A., Keltner, D., and Capps, L. M. (2003). Making sense of self-conscious emotion: Linking theory of mind and emotion in children with autism, Emotion, 3, 394–400.Google Scholar
  25. Hinshaw, S. P. (1987). On the distinction between attentional deficits/hyperactivity and conduct problems/aggression in child psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 443–463.Google Scholar
  26. Hobson, J. A. (Ed.). (1989). Abnormal states of brain and mind. Cambridge, MA: Birkhaeuser.Google Scholar
  27. Jarrold, C., Boucher, J., & Smith, P. (1993). Symbolic play in autism: A review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 23, 281–307.Google Scholar
  28. Keltner, D., Capps, L., Kring, A. M., Young, R. C., & Heerey, E. A. (2001). Just teasing: A conceptual analysis and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 229–248.Google Scholar
  29. Keltner, D., Young, R. C., Heerey, E. A., Oemig, C., & Monarch, N. D. (1998). Teasing in hierarchical and intimate relations. Journal of Personalitv and Social Psychology, 75, 1231–1247.Google Scholar
  30. Klinger, L. G., & Dawson, G. (2001). Prototype fonnation in autism. Development and Psychopathology, 13, 111–124.Google Scholar
  31. Leslie, A. M. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of “theory of mind.” Psychological Review, 94, 412–426.Google Scholar
  32. Lightner, R. M., Bollmer, J. M., Harris, M. J., Milich, R., & Scambler, D. J. (2000). What do you say to teasers? Parent and child evaluations of responses to teasing. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21, 403–427.Google Scholar
  33. Lord, C., Rutter, M., & Le Couteur, A. (1994). Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised: A revised version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasiye developmental disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 659–685.Google Scholar
  34. Loveland, K. A., Pearson, D. A., Tunali-Kotoski, B., Ortegon, J., & Gibbs, M. C. (2001). Judgements of social appropriateness by children and adolescents with autism. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 31, 367–376.Google Scholar
  35. McDonnell, J. T. (1993). News from the border: A mother’s memoir of her autistic son. New York: Ticknor and Fields.Google Scholar
  36. Mundy, P., Sigman, M., & Kasari, C. (1990). A longitudinal study of joint attention and language development in autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 20, 115–128.Google Scholar
  37. Ozonoff, S., Rogers, S. J., & Pennington, B. F. (1991). Asperger’s syndrome: Evidence of an empirical distinction from high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 32, 1107–1122.Google Scholar
  38. Perner, J., Frith, U., Leslie, A. M., & Leekam, S. R. (1989). Exploration of the autistic child’s theory of mind: Knowledge, belief, and communication. Child Development, 60, 689–700Google Scholar
  39. Pilowsky, T., Yirmiya, N., Shulman, C., & Dover, R. (1998). The Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised and the Childhood Autism Rating Scale: Differences between diagnostic system and comparison between genderes. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 28, 143–151.Google Scholar
  40. Piven, J., Palmer, P., Jacobi, D., & Childress, D. (1997). Broader autism phenotype: Evidence from a family history study of multiple-incidence autism families. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 185–190.Google Scholar
  41. Shapiro, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Kessler, J. W. (1991). A three-component model of children’s teasing: Aggression, humor, and ambiguity. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 10, 459–472.Google Scholar
  42. Siegel, B. (1986). Empirically derived subclassification of the autistic syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 16, 275–293.Google Scholar
  43. Smith, P. K., & Brain, P. (2000). Bullying in schools: Lessons from two decades of research. Aggressive Behavior, 26, 1–9.Google Scholar
  44. Sobel, D. M., Capps, L. M., & Gopnik, A. (1999, May). Exploring the relationship between autisticGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erin A. Heerey
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  • Lisa M. Capps
    • 3
  • Dacher Keltner
    • 3
  • Ann M. Kring
    • 3
  1. 1.Maryland Psychiatric Research CenterUniversity of Maryland-Baltimore Medical SchoolBaltimore
  2. 2.Mental lllness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Department of Veterans’ Affairs Maryland Health Care SystemBaltimore
  3. 3.Psychology DepartmentUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeley
  4. 4.VAMHCS, MIRECC (Suite 6A)Baltimore

Personalised recommendations