# The number of flags in finite vector spaces: asymptotic normality and Mahonian statistics

- 235 Downloads
- 2 Citations

## Abstract

We study the generalized Galois numbers which count flags of length *r* in *N*-dimensional vector spaces over finite fields. We prove that the coefficients of those polynomials are asymptotically Gaussian normally distributed as *N* becomes large. Furthermore, we interpret the generalized Galois numbers as weighted inversion statistics on the descent classes of the symmetric group on *N* elements and identify their asymptotic limit as the Mahonian inversion statistic when *r* approaches ∞. Finally, we apply our statements to derive further statistical aspects of generalized Rogers–Szegő polynomials, reinterpret the asymptotic behavior of linear *q*-ary codes and characters of the symmetric group acting on subspaces over finite fields, and discuss implications for affine Demazure modules and joint probability generating functions of descent-inversion statistics.

## Keywords

Galois number Gaussian normal distribution MacMahon inversion statistic Rogers–Szegő polynomial Linear code Demazure module Symmetric group descent-inversion statistic## 1 Introduction

Let \(G_{N}^{(r)} (q)\) denote the number of flags \(0 = V_{0} \subseteq \cdots \subseteq V_{r} = \mathbf{F}_{q}^{N}\) of length *r* in an *N*-dimensional vector space over a field with *q* elements where repetitions are allowed. Then \(G_{N}^{(r)} (q)\) is a polynomial in *q*, a so-called generalized Galois number [23]. In particular, when *r*=2, these are the Galois numbers which give the total number of subspaces of an *N*-dimensional vector space over a finite field [5].

The generalized Galois numbers are a biparametric family of polynomials, each with nonnegative integral coefficients, in the parameters *N* and *r*. We want to analyze their limiting properties as those parameters become large. Viewing each generalized Galois number as a discrete distribution on the real line, we determine the asymptotic behavior of this biparametric family of distributions. Our first result is the following:

### Theorem 3.5

*For*

*r*≥2

*and*

*N*∈

**N**,

*let*

*G*

_{ N,r }

*be a random variable with probability generating function*\(\mathrm {E}[q^{G_{N,r}}] = r^{-N} \cdot G_{N}^{(r)} (q)\).

*Then*,

*For fixed*

*r*

*and*

*N*→∞,

*the distribution of the random variable*

*converges weakly to the standard normal distribution*.

Furthermore, we derive an exact formula in terms of weighted inversion statistics on the descent classes of the symmetric group and derive the asymptotic behavior with respect to the second parameter:

### Theorem 4.1

*Consider the Galois number*\(G_{N}^{(r)}(q) \in \mathbf{N}[q]\)

*for*

*r*≥2

*and*

*N*∈

**N**.

*Let*\(\mathfrak{S}_{N}\)

*be the symmetric group on*

*N*

*elements*,

*and for a permutation*\(\pi \in \mathfrak{S}_{N}\),

*denote by*\(\operatorname {inv}(\pi)\)

*its number of inversions and by*\(\operatorname {des}(\pi)\)

*the cardinality of its descent set*

*D*(

*π*).

*Then*,

*For fixed*

*N*

*and*

*r*→∞,

*we have*

To state one application, our exact formula in Theorem 4.1 allows us to reinterpret the asymptotic behavior of the numbers of equivalence classes of linear *q*-ary codes [7, 8, 24, 25] under permutation equivalence \((\mathfrak{S})\), monomial equivalence \((\mathfrak{M})\), and semi-linear monomial equivalence (*Γ*) as follows:

To state one application, our exact formula in Theorem 4.1 allows us to reinterpret the asymptotic behavior of the numbers of equivalence classes of linear *q*-ary codes [7, 8, 24, 25] under permutation equivalence \((\mathfrak{S})\), monomial equivalence \((\mathfrak{M})\), and semi-linear monomial equivalence (*Γ*) as follows:

### Corollary 5.2

*The number of linear*

*q*-

*ary codes of length*

*n*

*up to equivalence*\((\mathfrak{S})\), \((\mathfrak{M})\),

*and*(

*Γ*)

*is given asymptotically*,

*as*

*q*

*is fixed and*

*n*→∞,

*by*

*where*

*a*=|Aut(

**F**

_{ q })|=log

_{ p }(

*q*)

*with*\(p = \operatorname {char}(\mathbf{F}_{q})\).

*In particular*,

*the numerator of the asymptotic numbers of linear*

*q*-

*ary codes is the*(

*weighted*)

*inversion statistic on the permutations having at most*1

*descent*.

The organization of our article is as follows. Since the generalized Galois numbers are a specialization of the generalized Rogers–Szegő polynomials [23], which are generating functions of *q*-multinomial coefficients [17, 18, 22], we summarize the statistical behavior of the *q*-multinomial coefficients in Sect. 2. The determination of mean and variance for generalized Galois numbers and of the higher cumulants for *q*-multinomial coefficients in Sect. 3, allow us to prove the asymptotic normality of the generalized Galois numbers (Theorem 3.5) through the method of moments. In Sect. 4 we analyze the combinatorial interpretation of *q*-multinomial coefficients in terms of inversion statistics on permutations [21]. Based on our interpretation of the generalized Galois numbers as weighted inversion statistics on the descent classes of the symmetric group, we describe their limiting behavior toward the Mahonian inversion statistic (Theorem 4.1). We conclude with applications of our results in Sect. 5. That is, we derive further statistical aspects of generalized Rogers–Szegő polynomials in Corollary 5.1, reinterpret the asymptotic behavior of the numbers of linear *q*-ary codes in Corollary 5.2, and discuss implications for affine Demazure modules in Corollary 5.6 and joint probability generating functions of descent-inversion statistics (5.10), (5.11).

## 2 Notation and preliminaries

**N**the set of nonnegative integers {0,1,2,3,…}. Let

*q*be a variable,

*N*∈

**N**, and

**k**=(

*k*

_{1},…,

*k*

_{ r })∈

**N**

^{ r }. The

*q*-multinomial coefficient is defined as

*q*-factorial. Note that the

*q*-multinomial coefficient is a polynomial in

*q*and

*N*∈

**N**, the generalized

*N*th Rogers–Szegő polynomial \(H^{(r)}_{N}(\mathbf{z}, q) \in \mathbf{C}[z_{1}, \ldots ,\allowbreak z_{r}, q]\) is the generating function of the

*q*-multinomial coefficients:

**k**=(

*k*

_{1},…,

*k*

_{ r })∈

**N**

^{ r }. Note that by our definition of the

*q*-multinomial coefficients it is convenient to suppress the condition

*k*

_{1}+⋯+

*k*

_{ r }=

*N*in the summation index.

As described in [23], the *q*-multinomial coefficient \(\genfrac {[}{]}{0pt}{}{N}{\mathbf{k}}_{q}\) counts the number of flags \(0 = V_{0} \subseteq \cdots \subseteq V_{r} = \mathbf{F}_{q}^{N}\) subject to the conditions dim(*V* _{ i })=*k* _{1}+⋯+*k* _{ i }, and consequently the specialization of the generalized Rogers–Szegő polynomial \(H^{(r)}_{N} (\mathbf{z},q)\) at **z**=**1**=(1,…,1) counts the total number of flags of subspaces of length *r* in \(\mathbf{F}_{q}^{N}\). This number (a polynomial in *q*) is called a generalized Galois number and denoted by \(G_{N}^{(r)}(q)\). In particular, when *r*=2, the specializations of the Rogers–Szegő polynomials are the Galois numbers *G* _{ N }(*q*) which count the number of subspaces in \(\mathbf{F}_{q}^{N}\) [5].

*D*(

*π*) is the descent set of

*π*, \(\mathcal{D}_{T}\) the descent class, \(\operatorname {des}(\pi)\) the number of descents, and \(\operatorname {inv}(\pi)\) the number of inversions of

*π*, i.e., The sign ∼ refers to asymptotic equivalence, that is, for

*f*,

*g*:

**N**→

**R**

_{>0}, we write

*f*(

*n*)∼

*g*(

*n*) if lim

_{ n→∞}

*f*(

*n*)/

*g*(

*n*)=1. We write

*f*(

*n*)=

*O*(

*g*(

*n*)) if there exists a constant

*C*>0 such that

*f*(

*n*)≤

*Cg*(

*n*) for all sufficiently large

*n*, and

*f*(

*n*)=

*o*(

*g*(

*n*)) if lim

_{ n→∞}

*f*(

*n*)/

*g*(

*n*)=0.

Let us recollect some known results about statistics of *q*-multinomial coefficients. Note that one has the usual differentiation method.

### Proposition 2.1

*Let*

*X*

*be a discrete random variable with probability generating function*

*E*[

*q*

^{ X }]=

*f*(

*q*)∈

**R**[

*q*].

*Then*,

Via Proposition 2.1 one can prove from the definition (2.1) of the *q*-multinomial coefficient:

### Proposition 2.2

(See [1, Eqs. (1.9) and (1.10)])

*For*

**k**=(

*k*

_{1},…,

*k*

_{ r })∈

**N**

^{ r },

*let*

*X*

_{ N,k }

*be a random variable with probability generating function*\(\mathrm {E}[q^{X_{N,\mathbf{k}}}] = \binom{N}{\mathbf{k}}^{-1} \cdot \genfrac {[}{]}{0pt}{}{N}{\mathbf{k}}_{q}\).

*Then*,

*Here*,

*e*

_{ i }(

**k**)

*denotes the*

*ith elementary symmetric function in the variables*

**k**=(

*k*

_{1},…,

*k*

_{ r }).

## 3 Asymptotic normality of Galois numbers

Let us start by computing mean and variance of the generalized Galois numbers.

### Lemma 3.1

*Let*

*G*

_{ N,r }

*be a random variable with probability generating function*\(\mathrm {E}[q^{G_{N,r}}] = r^{-N} \cdot G_{N}^{(r)} (q)\).

*Then*,

### Proof

*q*=1. Since \(H^{(r)}_{N}(\mathbf{1},q) = \sum_{\mathbf{k} \in \mathbf{N}^{r}}\genfrac {[}{]}{0pt}{}{N}{\mathbf{k}}_{q}\), they can be computed from Proposition 2.2 via index manipulations in sums involving multinomial coefficients. We will need the identities

*p*

_{ s }denotes the

*s*th power sum, and Now, \(G_{N}^{(r)}(1) = r^{N}\) and, by (3.1), For the variance, we will also need (3.2). That is, □

In order to prove asymptotic normality, we use the well-known method of moments [3, Theorem 4.5.5]. We will need some preparatory statements. First, from the description through elementary symmetric polynomials in Proposition 2.2 we can derive the asymptotic behavior of the first two central moments of the central *q*-multinomial coefficients and their square-root distant neighbors.

### Proposition 3.2

*Let*\(\mathbf{k}_{\mathrm {c}}= (k_{1}^{(N)} , \ldots , k_{r}^{(N)}) \in \mathbf{N}^{r}\)

*be a sequence such that*\(k_{1}^{(N)} + \cdots + k_{r}^{(N)} = N\)

*and*\(\lfloor \frac{N}{r} \rfloor \leq k_{i}^{(N)} \leq \lceil \frac{N}{r} \rceil\).

*Let*\(X_{N,\mathbf{k}_{\mathrm {c}}}\)

*be a random variable with probability generating function*\(\mathrm {E}[q^{X_{N,\mathbf{k}_{\mathrm {c}}}}] = \binom{N}{\mathbf{k}_{\mathrm {c}}}^{-1} \cdot \genfrac {[}{]}{0pt}{}{N}{\mathbf{k}_{\mathrm {c}}}_{q}\).

*Then*,

*as*

*r*

*is fixed and*

*N*→∞,

*Furthermore*,

*for*

**k**

_{c}

*as above and any sequence*\(\mathbf{s} = (s_{1}^{(N)} , \ldots , s_{r}^{(N)}) \in \mathbf{N}^{r}\)

*such that*\(s^{(N)}_{1} + \cdots + s^{(N)}_{r} = N\)

*and*\(\lVert \mathbf{s} - \mathbf{k}_{\mathrm {c}} \rVert = O(\sqrt{N})\),

*we have*,

*as*

*r*

*is fixed and*

*N*→∞,

### Proof

**k**

_{c}’s and

**s**’s, and that all asymptotics refer to fixed

*r*and

*N*→∞. We will treat the first moment for illustration purposes: Furthermore, for the

**s**’s in question one has Therefore, the claimed asymptotic equivalences (3.5) and (3.6) follow immediately from Proposition 2.2 and the exhibited quadratic and cubic asymptotic growth (in

*N*) of \(\mathrm {E}[X_{N,\mathbf{k}_{\mathrm {c}}}]\) and \(\operatorname {Var}(X_{N,\mathbf{k}_{\mathrm {c}}})\), respectively. □

By a method of Panny [15], we can determine the cumulants of *q*-multinomial coefficients explicitly. The same technique has already been applied by Prodinger [16] to obtain the cumulants of *q*-binomial coefficients. The exact formula will be stated as (3.9), but in the sequel we will only need the following asymptotic statement:

### Lemma 3.3

*Let*

**k**=

**k**

^{(N)}∈

**N**

^{ r }

*be any sequence such that*\(k_{1}^{(N)} + \cdots + k_{r}^{(N)} = N\).

*For each*

*N*∈

**N**,

*let*

*X*

_{ N,k }

*be a random variable with probability generating function*\(\mathrm {E}[q^{X_{N,\mathbf{k}}}] = \binom{N}{\mathbf{k}}^{-1} \cdot \genfrac {[}{]}{0pt}{}{N}{\mathbf{k}}_{q} \).

*Then*,

*for all*

*j*≥1,

*the*

*jth cumulant of*

*X*

_{ N,k }

*is of order*

*as*

*N*→∞.

*Furthermore*,

*if*\(\lVert \mathbf{k} - \mathbf{k}_{\mathrm {c}}\rVert = O(\sqrt{N})\)

*for*

**k**

_{c}

*as above*,

*then as*

*r*

*and*

*α*

*are fixed*,

*and*

*N*→∞,

### Proof

*k*≥1, let

*Y*

_{ k }be a random variable with probability generating function \(\mathrm {E}[q^{Y_{k}}] = \frac{[k]_{q}!}{k!}\). Denote the

*j*th cumulant of

*Y*

_{ k }by

*κ*

_{ j,k }. Panny [15, bottom of p. 176] shows that

*B*

_{ j }(

*x*) denotes the

*j*th Bernoulli polynomial evaluated at

*x*, and

*B*

_{ j }denotes the

*j*th Bernoulli number. Note that

*B*

_{ j }=0 for odd

*j*≥3.

*X*

_{ N,k }has the probability generating function

*j*≥2, its cumulants are

*B*

_{ j }(

*x*)∼

*x*

^{ j }as

*x*→∞ and each

*k*

_{ i }=

*O*(

*N*), the first part of the lemma follows (the case

*j*=1 can be treated similarly).

*κ*

_{2β }(

*X*

_{ N,k }), we have i.e.,

*κ*

_{2β }(

*X*

_{ N,k }) is exactly of order 2

*β*+1 in

*N*.

*κ*

_{ j }(

*X*

_{ N,k }) by

*κ*

_{ j }for convenience. Recall that the moment generating function is the exponential of the cumulant generating function. Consequently, one has the following standard relation between higher moments and cumulants:

*j*th Bernoulli polynomial has degree

*j*and the higher cumulants

*κ*

_{ j }of odd order vanish, we have (cf. [15, Sect. 3]) This leads to the asymptotic expansion

*κ*

_{1}(

*X*

_{ N,k })=E[

*X*

_{ N,k }], and since \(\| \mathbf{k} - \mathbf{k}_{\mathrm {c}}\| = O(\sqrt{N}) \), our Proposition 3.2 yields

*N*→∞. This finishes the proof. □

For our proof of Theorem 3.5 by the method of moments, we need to show that the moments of the standardized central *q*-multinomial coefficients converge to the moments of the standard normal distribution. We will show this more generally for *q*-multinomial coefficients in \(O(\sqrt{N})\)-distance to the center, since our arguments yield this without extra effort. Similar results have been obtained by Canfield, Janson, and Zeilberger [1] (for a history concerning this distribution see their erratum).

### Proposition 3.4

*Let*\(\mathbf{k}_{\mathrm {c}}= (k_{1}^{(N)} , \ldots , k_{r}^{(N)}) \in \mathbf{N}^{r}\)

*be a sequence such that*\(k_{1}^{(N)} + \cdots + k_{r}^{(N)} = N\)

*and*\(\lfloor \frac{N}{r} \rfloor \leq k_{i}^{(N)} \leq \lceil \frac{N}{r} \rceil\).

*Furthermore*,

*consider a sequence*\(\mathbf{s} = (s_{1}^{(N)} , \ldots , s_{r}^{(N)}) \in \mathbf{N}^{r}\)

*such that*\(s^{(N)}_{1} + \cdots + s^{(N)}_{r} = N\)

*and*\(\lVert \mathbf{s} - \mathbf{k}_{\mathrm {c}} \rVert = O(\sqrt{N})\).

*Let*

*X*

_{ N,s }

*be a random variable with probability generating function*\(\mathrm {E}[q^{X_{N,\mathbf{s}}}] = \binom{N}{\mathbf{s}}^{-1} \cdot \genfrac {[}{]}{0pt}{}{N}{\mathbf{s}}_{q} \).

*Then the moments of the random variable*

*converge to the moments of the standard normal distribution*.

*In particular*,

*the distribution of*\(\tilde{X}_{N,\mathbf{s}}\)

*converges weakly to the standard normal distribution*.

### Proof

*j*≥3,

We are ready to prove the advertised asymptotic normality.

### Theorem 3.5

*For*

*r*≥2

*and*

*N*∈

**N**,

*let*

*G*

_{ N,r }

*be a random variable with probability generating function*\(\mathrm {E}[q^{G_{N,r}}] = r^{-N} \cdot G_{N}^{(r)} (q)\).

*Then*,

*For fixed*

*r*

*and*

*N*→∞,

*the distribution of the random variable*

*converges weakly to the standard normal distribution*.

### Proof

*N*→∞. We will show that for any

*α*,

Note that once we have shown (3.12), the theorem follows by the method of moments: We have already shown in Proposition 3.4 that the moments of the standardized \(X_{N,\mathbf{k}_{\mathrm{c}}}\) converge to the moments of the standard normal distribution; hence the same holds for the standardized *G* _{ N,r } by linearity of the expected value and the binomial theorem.

*ε*>0, there is an

*N*

_{0}∈

**N**such that

*N*≥

*N*

_{0}. Let

*ε*>0. For

*N*∈

**N**, let

*U*

_{ N }⊂{

**x**∈

**R**

^{ r }:

*x*

_{1}+⋯+

*x*

_{ r }=

*N*} be the ball around \((\frac{N}{r}, \ldots, \tfrac{N}{r})\) of minimal radius such that \(\sum_{\mathbf{k} \in U_{N}} \binom{N}{\mathbf{k}} \geq \sqrt{1-\varepsilon } \cdot r^{N} \). By the central limit theorem for ordinary multinomial coefficients, the radii of

*U*

_{ N }are proportional to \(\sqrt{N}\) up to an error of order

*O*(1). Choose a sequence

**k**

_{min}with \(\mathbf{k}_{\min}^{(N)} \in U_{N}\) such that \(\mathrm {E}[X_{N,\mathbf{k}_{\min}}^{\alpha}] = \min_{\mathrm{k} \in U_{N}} \mathrm {E}[X_{N,\mathbf{k}}^{\alpha}]\). By (3.8), \(\mathrm {E}[X_{N,\mathbf{k}_{\min}}^{\alpha}] \sim \mathrm {E}[X_{N,\mathbf{k}_{\mathrm {c}}}^{\alpha}]\). Hence there is an

*N*

_{0}such that

*N*≥

*N*

_{0}. Consequently,

**k**=

**k**

^{(N)},

*π*=(

*α*,0,…,0), i.e., the summand

*κ*

_{1}(

*X*

_{ N,k })

^{ α }. Note that

*N*Δ

_{ r−1}denotes the dilated (

*r*−1)-dimensional standard simplex in

**R**

^{ r }. Hence,

*N*, so our summand is bounded from above by

*π*≠(

*α*,0,…,0). By the same arguments that lead to (3.11) such a summand is

*O*(

*N*

^{2α−1}). Since the number of summands (the number of partitions of

*α*) does not depend on

*N*, we have This proves (3.14). We are ready to prove the final inequality \(\mathrm {E}[G_{N,r}^{\alpha}] \lesssim \mathrm {E}[X_{N,\mathbf{k}_{\mathrm{c}}}^{\alpha}] \): Choose a sequence \(\mathbf{k}_{\max} = \mathbf{k}_{\max}^{(N)}\) in

**N**

^{ r }such that \(\mathrm {E}[X_{N,\mathbf{k}_{\max}}^{\alpha}] = \max_{\mathbf{k}} \mathrm {E}[X_{N,\mathbf{k}}^{\alpha}]\). Then This verifies (3.12) and finishes the proof of the theorem. □

## 4 Galois numbers and inversion statistics

*r*parts of size up to

*N*. Let \(p_{N,r} = \lvert \mathcal{P}_{N,r} \rvert\) denote the number of such partitions. Then

*T*⊂{1,…,

*N*} with

*t*:=|

*T*|≤

*r*, let

*T*occurs as the size of a part. Then removing one part of each size in

*T*defines a bijection \(\mathcal{P}_{N,r}^{T} \to \mathcal{P}_{N,r-t}\). Hence,

*b*≤

*a*.

### Theorem 4.1

*Consider the Galois number*\(G_{N}^{(r)}(q) \in \mathbf{N}[q]\)

*for*

*r*≥2

*and*

*N*∈

**N**.

*Let*\(\mathfrak{S}_{N}\)

*be the symmetric group on*

*N*

*elements*,

*and for a permutation*\(\pi \in \mathfrak{S}_{N}\),

*denote by*\(\operatorname {inv}(\pi)\)

*its number of inversions and by*\(\operatorname {des}(\pi)\)

*the cardinality of its descent set*

*D*(

*π*).

*Then*,

*For fixed*

*N*

*and*

*r*→∞,

*we have*

### Proof

*N*is fixed, 0≤

*t*≤

*N*−1, and

*r*→∞, we have

*q*-factorial is well known. □

## 5 Applications and discussions

### 5.1 Rogers–Szegő polynomials

Our Lemma 3.1 is a sufficient ingredient to determine the covariance of the overall distribution of coefficients in the generalized *N*th Rogers–Szegő polynomial.

### Corollary 5.1

*Given*

*N*,

*r*>0,

*let*(

**X**;

*Y*)=(

*X*

_{1},…,

*X*

_{ r };

*Y*)

*be a random vector with probability generating function*\(\mathrm {E}[\mathbf{z}^{\mathbf{X}} q^{Y}] = r^{-N}H^{(r)}_{N}(\mathbf{z},q)\).

*Then*,

*the covariance of*(

**X**;

*Y*)

*is given by*

*where*Σ(

**X**)

*is the covariance of the multinomial distribution*.

### Proof

**z**,1) gives the multinomial distribution, whereas the specialization at (

**1**,

*q*) is exactly the generalized Galois number studied in Lemma 3.1. Therefore, we only have to prove that \(\operatorname {Cov}(X_{i},Y) = 0\) for

*i*=1,…,

*r*, which can be shown as follows: By symmetry, it is clear that all \(\operatorname {Cov}(X_{i},Y)\) coincide. As

*X*

_{1}+⋯+

*X*

_{ r }=

*N*almost surely, it follows that

### 5.2 Linear *q*-ary codes

*q*, Hou [7, 8] studies the number of equivalence classes

*N*

_{ n,q }of linear

*q*-ary codes of length

*n*under three notions of equivalence: permutation equivalence (\(\mathfrak{S}\)), monomial equivalence (\(\mathfrak{M}\)), and semi-linear monomial equivalence (

*Γ*). He proves that where

*a*=|Aut(

**F**

_{ q })|=log

_{ p }(

*q*) with \(p = \operatorname {char}(\mathbf{F}_{q})\). The case of binary codes up to monomial equivalence, \(N_{n,2}^{\mathfrak{S}} \sim \frac{G_{n}(2)}{n!}\), is previously derived by Wild [24, 25]. Now, the following corollary is immediate from our Theorem 4.1.

### Corollary 5.2

*The number of linear*

*q*-

*ary codes of length*

*n*

*up to equivalence*\((\mathfrak{S})\), \((\mathfrak{M})\),

*and*(

*Γ*)

*is given asymptotically*,

*as*

*q*

*is fixed and*

*n*→∞,

*by*

*where*

*a*=|Aut(

**F**

_{ q })|=log

_{ p }(

*q*)

*with*\(p = \operatorname {char}(\mathbf{F}_{q})\).

*In particular*,

*the numerator of the asymptotic numbers of linear*

*q*-

*ary codes is the*(

*weighted*)

*inversion statistic on the permutations having at most*1

*descent*.

### 5.3 The symmetric group acting on subspaces over finite fields

Consider the character \(\chi_{N}(\tau) = \# \{ V \subset \mathbf{F}_{q}^{N} : \tau V = V \}\) of the symmetric group \(\mathfrak{S}_{N}\) acting on \(\mathbf{F}_{q}^{N}\) by permutation of coordinates. Lax [12] shows that the normalized character *χ* _{ N }(*τ*)/*G* _{ N }(*q*) asymptotically approaches the character which takes the value 1 on the identity and 0 otherwise.

### Corollary 5.3

*Consider the character*

*χ*

_{ N }(

*τ*)

*of the symmetric group*\(\mathfrak{S}_{N}\)

*acting on*\(\mathbf{F}_{q}^{N}\)

*by permutation of coordinates*.

*Then*,

*as*

*N*→∞,

*the normalized character*

*In particular*,

*the character*

*χ*

_{ N }

*approaches asymptotically the*(

*weighted*)

*inversion statistic on the permutations having at most*1

*descent*.

### 5.4 Affine Demazure modules

We refer the reader to [2, 4, 10] for the basic facts about the representation theory of affine Kac–Moody algebras and Demazure modules, and the notation used. Now, according to [6, Eq. (3.4)] and [19, Theorems 6 and 7], certain Demazure characters can be described via generalized Rogers–Szegő polynomials.

### Lemma 5.4

*Let*

*r*,

*N*∈

**N**,

*r*≥2,

*and*0≤

*i*<

*r*,

*i*≡

*N*mod

*r*.

*Let*

*q*=

*e*

^{ δ }, \(\mathbf{z} = (e^{\varLambda_{1} - \varLambda_{0}}, e^{\varLambda_{2} -\varLambda_{1}}, \ldots , e^{\varLambda_{r-1} - \varLambda_{r-2}}, e^{\varLambda_{0} -\varLambda_{r-1}})\),

*and*

*Then*,

*the character of the*\(\widehat{\mathfrak{sl}}_{r}\)

*Demazure module*\(V_{-N \omega_{1}}(\varLambda_{0})\)

*is given by*

### Proof

*σ*being the automorphism of the Dynkin diagram of \(\widehat{\mathfrak{sl}}_{r}\) which sends 0 to 1 (see, e.g., [14, Sect. 2]). Furthermore, following [19, Sect. 2], we have \([N] = t_{-N\omega_{1}} \cdot \eta_{N}\) with the convention

*σ*⋅

*η*

_{ N }=

*η*

_{ N }. Here, [

*N*]=(

*N*,0,…,0)∈

**N**

^{ r }denotes the one-row Young diagram, and

*η*

_{ N }the smallest composition of degree

*N*. That is, when

*N*=

*kr*+

*i*with 0≤

*i*<

*r*, we have

*η*

_{ N }=((

*k*)

^{ r−i },(

*k*+1)

^{ i })∈

**N**

^{ r }. Then, by [19, Theorems 6 and 7]

^{1}and [6, Eq. (3.4)] we have

*P*

_{[N]}(

**z**;

*q*,0) denotes the specialized symmetric Macdonald polynomial (see [13, Chap. VI]) associated to the partition [

*N*]. □

### Example 5.5

*r*=2, consider the specialization of the Rogers–Szegő polynomial \(H_{4}^{(2)}(z,z^{-1},q)\) and the Demazure module \(V_{-4 \omega_{1}}(\varLambda_{0})\). Via Demazure’s character formula we obtain Furthermore, by definition, Hence, with \(\mathbf{z} = (e^{\varLambda_{1} - \varLambda_{0}}, e^{\varLambda_{0} - \varLambda_{1}})\),

*q*=

*e*

^{ δ }and

*d*

_{2}(4)=4, we have the equality

The coefficient *l* in *e* ^{−lδ } is commonly referred to as the degree of a monomial in \(\mathrm {ch}(V_{-N \omega_{1}}(\varLambda_{0}))\). When *d* is a scaling element, the polynomial \(\mathrm {ch}(V_{-N \omega_{1}}(\varLambda_{0})) |_{\mathbf{C}d} \in \mathbf{N}[e^{\delta}]\) is called the basic specialization of the Demazure character (see [10, Sects. 1.5,10.8, and 12.2] for the terminology in the context of integrable highest weight representations of affine Kac–Moody algebras). Based on the relation described in Corollary 5.4, we summarize our main results, Theorem 3.5 and Theorem 4.1, in this language.

### Corollary 5.6

*For*

*r*≥2

*and*

*N*∈

**N**,

*consider the*\(\widehat{\mathfrak{sl}}_{r}\)

*Demazure module*\(V_{-N \omega_{1}}(\varLambda_{0})\).

*Let*

*Γ*

_{ N,r }

*be a random variable with probability generating function*\(\mathrm {E}[e^{\varGamma_{N,r}\delta}] = r^{-N} \cdot \mathrm {ch}(V_{-N \omega_{1}}(\varLambda_{0})) |_{\mathbf{C}d} \in \mathbf{Q}[e^{\delta}]\).

*Then*,

*for*0≤

*i*<

*r*,

*i*≡

*N*mod

*r*,

*we have*

*For fixed*

*r*

*and*

*N*→∞,

*the distribution of the random variable*

*converges weakly to the standard normal distribution*\(\mathcal{N}(0,1)\).

*Furthermore*,

*let*\(\mathfrak{S}_{N}\)

*be the symmetric group on*

*N*

*elements*,

*and for a permutation*\(\pi \in \mathfrak{S}_{N}\),

*denote by*\(\operatorname {inv}(\pi)\)

*its number of inversions and by*\(\operatorname {des}(\pi)\)

*the cardinality of its descent set*

*D*(

*π*).

*Then*,

*with*

*a*

_{ N,r }=

*N*(

*N*−1)/2−(

*N*−

*i*)(

*N*+

*i*−

*r*)/2

*r*,

*For fixed*

*N*

*and*

*r*→∞,

*we have*

It is interesting to continue the investigation of the basic specialization of Demazure characters including Kac–Moody algebra types different from *A*. The starting point should be Ion’s article [9], which is a generalization of Sanderson’s work [19], and one should also consider [11]. In view of (5.9) and [9, 11], we propose the following conjecture:

### Conjecture 5.7

*Let*

*X*=

*A*,

*B*,

*D*

*and*

*r*∈

**N**.

*Consider the*\(\widehat{X}_{r}\)

*Demazure module*\(V_{-N \omega_{1}}(\varLambda_{0})\),

*and let*\(d_{r}^{X}(N)\)

*be the maximal occurring degree*.

*For fixed*

*N*

*and*

*r*→∞,

*it holds*

*Here*,

*W*(

*X*

_{ N })

*is the Weyl group of finite type*

*X*

_{ N },

*l*:

*W*(

*X*

_{ N })→

**N**

*is the length function*,

*and*

*V*(

*ω*

_{1})

*denotes the standard representation of the finite*-

*dimensional Lie algebra of type*

*X*

_{ r }.

Note that (5.9) proves the case *X*=*A*. It is interesting to investigate an analogue of (5.8) for the types *B* and *D*.

### 5.5 Descent-inversion statistics

*r*and

*t*, and the

*t*-deformed generalized Galois number \(G_{N}^{(r)}(q,t)\) itself.

## Footnotes

## Notes

### Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant PP00P2-128455), the National Centre of Competence in Research “Quantum Science and Technology,” the German Science Foundation (SFB/TR12, SPP1388, and grants CH 843/1-1, CH 843/2-1), and the Excellence Initiative of the German Federal and State Governments through the Junior Research Group Program within the Institutional Strategy ZUK 43.

The second author would like to thank Matthias Christandl for his kind hospitality at the ETH Zurich and Ryan Vinroot for helpful conversations.

We are indebted to the referees for pointing out an error in the proof of Theorem 3.5 in an earlier version of this article.

## References

- 1.Canfield, R., Janson, S., Zeilberger, D.: The Mahonian probability distribution on words is asymptotically normal. Adv. Appl. Math.
**46**, 109–124 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.aam.2009.10.001, Erratum 7 February 2012: http://www2.math.uu.se/~svante/papers/sj239-erratum.pdf MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 2.Carter, R.: Lie Algebras of Finite and Affine Type. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 96. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005). doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511614910 zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Chung, K.L.: A Course in Probability Theory, 3rd edn. Academic Press, San Diego (2001) Google Scholar
- 4.Fourier, G., Littelmann, P.: Tensor product structure of affine Demazure modules and limit constructions. Nagoya Math. J.
**182**, 171–198 (2006) MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 5.Goldman, J., Rota, G.-C.: The number of subspaces of a vector space. In: Tutte, W.T. (ed.) Recent Progress in Combinatorics: Proceedings of the Third Waterloo Conference on Combinatorics, May 1968, pp. 75–83. Academic Press, San Diego (1969) Google Scholar
- 6.Hikami, K.: Representation of the Yangian invariant motif and the Macdonald polynomial. J. Phys. A
**30**, 2447–2456 (1997). doi: 10.1088/0305-4470/30/7/023 MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 7.Hou, X.-D.: On the asymptotic number of non-equivalent
*q*-ary linear codes. J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A**112**, 337–346 (2005). doi: 10.1016/j.jcta.2005.08.001 zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 8.Hou, X.-D.: Asymptotic numbers of non-equivalent codes in three notions of equivalence. Linear Multilinear Algebra
**57**, 111–122 (2009). doi: 10.1080/03081080701539023 MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 9.Ion, B.: Nonsymmetric Macdonald polynomials and Demazure characters. Duke Math. J.
**116**, 299–318 (2003). doi: 10.1215/S0012-7094-03-11624-5 MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 10.Kac, V.: Infinite-Dimensional Lie Algebras, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990) zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Kuniba, A., Misra, K., Okado, M., Takagi, T., Uchiyama, J.: Characters of Demazure modules and solvable lattice models. Nucl. Phys. B
**510**, 555–576 (1998). doi: 10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00685-8 MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 12.Lax, R.: On the character of
*S*_{n}acting on subspaces of \(\mathbf {F}^{n}_{q}\). Finite Fields Appl.**10**, 315–322 (2004). doi: 10.1016/j.ffa.2003.09.001 MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 13.Macdonald, I.: Symmetric Functions and Hall Polynomials, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995) zbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 14.Macdonald, I.: Affine Hecke Algebras and Orthogonal Polynomials. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 157. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003). doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511542824 zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Panny, W.: A note on the higher moments of the expected behavior of straight insertion sort. Inf. Process. Lett.
**22**, 175–177 (1986). doi: 10.1016/0020-0190(86)90023-2 MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 16.Prodinger, H.: On the moments of a distribution defined by the Gaussian polynomials. J. Stat. Plan. Inference
**119**, 237–239 (2004). doi: 10.1016/S0378-3758(02)00422-6 MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 17.Rogers, L.: On a three-fold symmetry in the elements of Heine’s series. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc.
**24**, 171–179 (1893). doi: 10.1112/plms/s1-24.1.171 zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 18.Rogers, L.: On the expansion of certain infinite products. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc.
**24**, 337–352 (1893) zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 19.Sanderson, Y.: On the connection between Macdonald polynomials and Demazure characters. J. Algebr. Comb.
**11**, 269–275 (2000). doi: 10.1023/A:1008786420650 MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 20.Stanley, R.: Binomial posets, Möbius inversion, and permutation enumeration. J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A
**20**, 336–356 (1976) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 21.Stanley, R.: Enumerative Combinatorics, vol. 1. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 49. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997) zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Szegő, G.: Ein Beitrag zur Theorie der Thetafunktionen. Sitzungsberichte Preuss. Akad. Wiss., pp. 242–252 (1926) Google Scholar
- 23.Vinroot, R.: Multivariate Rogers–Szegő polynomials and flags in finite vector spaces (2010). arXiv:1011.0984
- 24.Wild, M.: The asymptotic number of inequivalent binary codes and nonisomorphic binary matroids. Finite Fields Appl.
**6**, 192–202 (2000). doi: 10.1006/ffta.1999.0273 MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 25.Wild, M.: The asymptotic number of binary codes and binary matroids. SIAM J. Discrete Math.
**19**, 691–699 (2005). doi: 10.1007/s10801-012-0373-1 MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar