## Abstract

Louis Solomon showed that the group algebra of the symmetric group \(\mathfrak{S}_{n}\) _{ n } has a subalgebra called the descent algebra, generated by sums of permutations with a given descent set. In fact, he showed that every Coxeter group has something that can be called a descent algebra. There is also a commutative, semisimple subalgebra of Solomon's descent algebra generated by sums of permutations with the same number of descents: an “Eulerian” descent algebra. For any Coxeter group that is also a Weyl group, Paola Cellini proved the existence of a different Eulerian subalgebra based on a modified definition of descent. We derive the existence of Cellini's subalgebra for the case of the symmetric group and of the hyperoctahedral group using a variation on Richard Stanley's theory of *P*-partitions.

## Keywords

descent algebra*P*-partition

## References

- 1.M. Aguiar, N. Bergeron, and K. Nyman, “The peak algebra and the descent algebras of types
*B*and*D*,”*Transactions of the Amer. Math. Soc.***356**(2004), 2781–2824.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 2.D. Bayer and P. Diaconis, “Trailing the dovetail shuffle to its lair,”
*Annals of Applied Probability***2**(1992), 294–313.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 3.N. Bergeron, “A decomposition of the descent algebra of the hyperoctahedral group. II.,”
*J. Algebra***148**(1992), 98–122.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 4.F. Bergeron and N. Bergeron, “A decomposition of the descent algebra of the hyperoctahedral group. I.,”
*J. Algebra***148**(1992), 86–97.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 5.F. Bergeron and N. Bergeron, “Orthogonal idempotents in the descent algebra of
*B*_{n}and applications,”*J. Pure and Applied Algebra***79**(1992), 109–129.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 6.P. Cellini, “A general commutative descent algebra,”
*J. Algebra***175**(1995), 990–1014.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 7.P. Cellini, “A general commutative descent algebra. II. The case
*C*_{n},”*J. Algebra***175**(1995), 1015–1026.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 8.P. Cellini, “Cyclic Eulerian elements,”
*Europ. J. Combinatorics***19**(1998), 545–552.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 9.C.-O. Chow, “Noncommutative symmetric functions of type
*B*,” Ph.D. thesis (2001).Google Scholar - 10.J. Fulman, “Affine shuffles, shuffles with cuts, the Whitehouse model, and patience sorting,”
*J. Algebra***231**(2000), 614–639.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 11.J. Fulman, “Applications of the Brauer complex: card shuffling, permutation statistics, and dynamical systems,”
*J. Algebra***243**(2001), 96–122.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 12.A. Garsia and C. Reutenauer, “A decomposition of Solomon's descent algebra,”
*Adv. Math.***77**(1989), 189–262.CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 13.I. Gessel, personal communication.Google Scholar
- 14.I. Gessel, “Multipartite
*P*-partitions and inner products of skew Schur functions,”*Contemporary Mathematics***34**(1984), 289–317.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 15.J.-L. Loday, “Operations sur l'homologie cyclique des algèbres commutatives,”
*Inventiones Mathematicae***96**(1989), 205–230.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 16.K. Nyman, “The peak algebra of the symmetric group,”
*J. Algebraic Combin.***17**(2003), 309–322.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 17.V. Reiner, “Quotients of Coxeter complexes and
*P*-partitions,”*Memoirs of the Amer. Math. Soc.***95**(1992).Google Scholar - 18.V. Reiner, “Signed posets,”
*Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A***62**(1993), 324–360.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 19.L. Solomon, “A Mackey formula in the group ring of a finite Coxeter group,”
*J. Algebra***41**(1976), 255–264.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 20.R. Stanley,
*Enumerative Combinatorics*, Volume I, Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar - 21.J. Stembridge, “Enriched
*P*-partitions,”*Transactions of the Amer. Math. Soc.***349**(1997), 763–788.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar