Activity and stability improvement of platinum loaded on reduced graphene oxide and carbon nanotube composites for methanol oxidation

  • Natthapong Pongpichayakul
  • Paralee Waenkeaw
  • Jaroon Jakmunee
  • Suwaphid Themsirimongkon
  • Surin SaipanyaEmail author
Research Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Fuel cells


A series of platinum nanoparticle-loaded carbon composites composed of reduced graphene oxide and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (rGO-CNT/Pt) was chemically synthesized at room temperature. The prepared catalysts were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The results confirm that rGO mixed CNT composites were successfully prepared with small and highly dispersed Pt nanoparticles on the composite supports. The cyclic voltammetry (CV) and chronoamperometry (CA) electrochemical measurements indicated that the composite carbon catalyst increased the intensity and stability for the methanol oxidation reaction (MOR). In addition, fewer carbon intermediate species were observed in the CO stripping experiment. The incorporation of CNTs into rGO decreases the agglomeration between rGO sheets and increases the active surface of dispersed Pt nanoparticles, resulting in the enhanced oxidation activity of the as-prepared electrocatalysts. The combined characteristics of the highly active Pt nanoparticles and potent electron transfer of the rGO-CNTs enable excellent methanol oxidation with high stability. Consequently, this hybrid carbon material is a good candidate for MOR catalysis, which can be applied to direct methanol fuel cells.

Graphic abstract


Platinum Methanol oxidation Reduced graphene oxide Carbon nanotubes Mixed carbon 



This work was supported by Centre of Excellence in Materials Science and Technology (CoE), Environmental Science Research Centre (ESRC), CMU Mid-Career Research Fellowship program, Graduate School, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, and Science Achievement Scholarship of Thailand (SAST) for financial and experimental set-up.


  1. 1.
    Kamarudin SK, Achmad F, Daud WRW (2009) Overview on the application of direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) for portable electronic devices. Int J Hydrog Energy 34:6902–6916. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lamy C, Coutanceau C (2012) Chapter 1 electrocatalysis of alcohol oxidation reactions at platinum group metals. In: Catalysts for alcohol-fuelled direct oxidation fuel cells. The Royal Society of Chemistry, pp 1–70. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ramli ZAC, Kamarudin SK (2018) Platinum-based catalysts on various Carbon supports and conducting polymers for direct methanol fuel cellapplications: a review. Nanoscale Res Lett 13:410. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pereira JP, Falcão DS, Oliveira VB, Pinto AMFR (2014) Performance of a passive direct ethanol fuel cell. J Power Sources 256:14–19. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhou W (2003) Pt based anode catalysts for direct ethanol fuel cells. Appl Catal B Environ 46:273–285. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu M, Zhang R, Chen W (2014) Graphene-supported nanoelectrocatalysts for fuel cells: synthesis, properties, and applications. Chem Rev 114:5117–5160. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Samad S, Loh KS, Wong WY et al (2018) Carbon and non-carbon support materials for platinum-based catalysts in fuel cells. Int J Hydrog Energy 43:7823–7854. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chung DY, Lee KJ, Sung YE (2016) Methanol electro-oxidation on the Pt surface: revisiting the cyclic voltammetry interpretation. J Phys Chem C. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Parkinson CR, Walker M, McConville CF (2003) Reaction of atomic oxygen with a Pt(1 1 1) surface: chemical and structural determination using XPS, CAICISS and LEED. Surf Sci 545:19–33. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sakong S, Groß A (2017) Methanol oxidation on Pt(111) from first-principles in heterogeneous and electrocatalysis. Electrocatalysis 8:577–586. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li M, Liu P, Adzic RR (2012) Platinum monolayer electrocatalysts for anodic oxidation of alcohols. J Phys Chem Lett 3:3480–3485. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ozkaya D (2008) Particle size analysis of supported platinum catalysts by TEM. Platin Met Rev 52:61–62. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans (2017) Carbon nanotubes; Iarc Monographs—111. 1991.
  14. 14.
    Twigg MV (2009) Carbons and carbon supported catalysts in hydroprocessing. Platin Met Rev 53:135–137. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khan M, Tahir MN, Adil SF et al (2015) Graphene based metal and metal oxide nanocomposites: synthesis, properties and their applications. J Mater Chem A 3:18753–18808. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sudirman S, Indriyati I, Adi WA et al (2017) Structural analysis of platinum nanoparticles on carbon nanotube surface as electrocatalyst system. Int J Chem 9:60. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ramli ZAC, Kamarudin SK (2018) Platinum-based catalysts on various carbon supports and conducting polymers for direct methanol fuel cell applications: a review. Nanoscale Res Lett. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jha N, Jafri RI, Rajalakshmi N, Ramaprabhu S (2011) Graphene-multi walled carbon nanotube hybrid electrocatalyst support material for direct methanol fuel cell. Int J Hydrog Energy 36:7284–7290. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fan W, Zhang L, Liu T (2017) Graphene-carbon nanotube hybrids for energy and environmental applications. Springer, Singapore, pp 21–51. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kwok YH, Wang YF, Tsang ACH, Leung DYC (2018) Graphene-carbon nanotube composite aerogel with Ru@Pt nanoparticle as a porous electrode for direct methanol microfluidic fuel cell. Appl Energy 217:258–265. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pham K-C, McPhail DS, Mattevi C et al (2016) Graphene-carbon nanotube hybrids as robust catalyst supports in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J Electrochem Soc 163:F255–F263. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang X, Zhang J, Huang H et al (2017) Platinum nanoparticles anchored on graphene oxide-dispersed pristine carbon nanotube supports: high-performance electrocatalysts toward methanol electrooxidation. Electrochim Acta 258:919–926. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wise AM, Richardson PW, Price SWT et al (2018) Inhibitive effect of Pt on Pd-hydride formation of Pd@Pt core-shell electrocatalysts: an in situ EXAFS and XRD study. Electrochim Acta 262:27–38. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Edelstein AS (2001) Nanomaterials. Encycl Mater Sci Technol. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bin WuJ, Lin ML, Cong X et al (2018) Raman spectroscopy of graphene-based materials and its applications in related devices. Chem Soc Rev 47:1822–1873. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang X, Wang H, Wang R et al (2012) Carbon-supported platinum-decorated nickel nanoparticles for enhanced methanol oxidation in acid media. J Solid State Electrochem 16:1049–1054. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fujimoto A, Yamada Y, Koinuma M, Sato S (2016) Origins of sp 3 C peaks in C 1s X-ray photoelectron spectra of carbon materials. Anal Chem 88:6110–6114. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Themsirimongkon S, Ounnunkad K, Saipanya S (2018) Electrocatalytic enhancement of platinum and palladium metal on polydopamine reduced graphene oxide support for alcohol oxidation. J Colloid Interface Sci 530:98–112. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jonathan JB, Steven KB (2013) Electrodeposition of Pt nanoparticle catalysts from H2Pt(OH)6 and their application in PEM Fuel Cells. J Phys Chem C 117:18957–18966. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Iwasita T (2010) Methanol and CO electrooxidation. Handb Fuel Cells 2:603–624. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Liu G, Pan Z, Li W et al (2017) The effect of titanium nickel nitride decorated carbon nanotubes-reduced graphene oxide hybrid support for methanol oxidation. Appl Surf Sci 410:70–78. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Eichhorn B, Tsypkin M, Seland F et al (2011) CO stripping as an electrochemical tool for characterization of Ru@Pt core-shell catalysts. J Electroanal Chem 655:140–146. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Calderón JC, García G, Calvillo L et al (2015) Electrochemical oxidation of CO and methanol on Pt-Ru catalysts supported on carbon nanofibers: the influence of synthesis method. Appl Catal B Environ 165:676–686. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mu X, Xu Z, Ma Y, Xie Y, Mi H, Ma J (2017) Graphene-carbon nanofiber hybrid supported Pt nanoparticles with enhanced catalytic performance for methanol oxidation and oxygen reduction. Electrochim Acta 253:171–177. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gorle DB, Kulandainathan MA (2017) One-pot synthesis of highly efficient graphene based three-dimensional hybrids as catalyst supporting materials for electro-oxidation of liquid fuels. J Mater Chem A 5:15273–15286. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zhao L, Wang Z-B, Li J-L, Zhang J-J, Sui X-L, Zhang L-M (2016) Hybrid of carbon-supported Pt nanoparticles and three-dimensional graphene aerogel as high stable electrocatalyst for methanol electrooxidation. Electrochim Acta 189:175–183. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yan H, Meng M, Wang L, Wu A, Tian C, Zhao L, Fu H (2016) Small-sized tungsten nitride anchoring into a 3D CNTrGO framework as a superior bifunctional catalyst for the methanol oxidation and oxygen reduction reactions. Nano Res 9:329–343. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yi G, Chang Z, Liu G, Yang L (2019) In situ fabrication of copper nanocubes with platinum skin on 3D graphene-carbon nanotubes hybrid for efficient methanol electrooxidation. Int J Electrochem Sci 14:7232–7240. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Yan M, Jiang Q, Zhang T, Wang J, Yang L, Lu Z, He H, Fu Y, Wang X, Huang H (2018) Three-dimensional low-defect carbon nanotube/nitrogen-doped graphene hybrid aerogel-supported Pt nanoparticles as efficient electrocatalysts toward the methanol oxidation reaction. J Mater Chem A 6:18165–18172. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mani V, Chen SM, Lou BS (2013) Three dimensional graphene oxide-carbon nanotubes and graphene-carbon nanotubes hybrids. Int J Electrochem Sci 8:11641–11660Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemistry, Faculty of ScienceChiang Mai UniversityChiang MaiThailand
  2. 2.Faculty of Science, Materials Science Research CentreChiang Mai UniversityChiang MaiThailand

Personalised recommendations