Advertisement

Journal of Applied Electrochemistry

, Volume 49, Issue 2, pp 179–194 | Cite as

Poly(aniline-co-o-anisidine)/graphene oxide Au nanocomposites for dopamine electrochemical sensing application

  • Aisha A. GanashEmail author
  • Sara A. Alqarni
  • Mahmoud A. HusseinEmail author
Research Article
  • 76 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Sensors

Abstract

We describe here the manufacture of poly(aniline-co-o-anisidine)/graphene oxide nanocomposites, with the common abbreviation [PANI-co-PoAN/GO1−5], by the well-known in situ oxidative polymerization method with ultrasonic assistance. FE-SEM and TEM micrographs were utilized to examine the morphological characteristics of the composite materials. Moreover, FT-IR, XRD, TGA, and electrical conductivity measurements were used to investigate their complete performance. All the composites had almost equal final copolymer decomposition temperatures, which were in the range of 609.3–663.8 °C. Our essential objective is to study the electro selective application using gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) as a coating. Dopamine (DA) electrochemical sensor based on [AuNPs/PANI-co-PoAN/GO] nanocomposite covalently modified gold electrode was modified by an electroabsorption technique. The electrochemical behavior of the modified electrode towards the oxidation of DA was studied by square wave voltammetry (SWV) and cyclic voltammetry (CV) in pH 5.0 phosphate buffer solution. The sensor developed a current response to the oxidation of DA. Using SWV, the electrochemical sensor gave a linear relationship to DA in the concentration range of 5–100 µM with a limit of detection of 0.0334 µM. The modified electrode was highly stable, sensitive, and selective.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Polyaniline Poly-o-anisidine Dopamine detection Electrochemical Sensor application Graphene oxide 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This article contains the results and findings of a research project funded by King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST) Grant No. PS-38-27.

References

  1. 1.
    Ben AM, Bounab L, Choukairi M et al (2018) Selective and sensitive detection of dopamine in the presence of ascorbic acid and uric acid at a Sonogel-Carbon l-Histidine modified electrode. J Mater Environ Sci 9:66–76Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tukimin N, Abdullah J, Sulaiman Y (2018) Review—electrochemical detection of uric acid. Dopamine Ascorbic Acid 165:258–267.  https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0201807jes Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Heien MLAV, Khan AS, Ariansen JL et al (2005) Real-time measurement of dopamine fluctuations after cocaine in the brain of behaving rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:10023–10028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li W, Liu Z, Lin H et al (2010) Label-free colorimetric assay for methyltransferase activity based on a novel methylation-responsive. DNAzyme Strategy 82:4407–4413Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Park J, Myung S, Kim I et al (2013) Simultaneous measurement of serotonin, dopamine and their metabolites in mouse brain extracts by high-performance liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry following derivatization with ethyl chloroformate. Biol Pharm Bull 36:252–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carrera V, Sabater E, Vilanova E, Sogorb MA (2007) A simple and rapid HPLC-MS method for the simultaneous determination of epinephrine, norepinephrine, dopamine and 5-hydroxytryptamine: application to the secretion of bovine chromaffin cell cultures. J Chromatogr 847:88–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.09.032 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Qian C, Zhu S, Feng P et al (2015) Conjugated polymer nanoparticles for fluorescence imaging and sensing of neurotransmitter dopamine in living cells and the brains of Zebra fish larvae. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b04987 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kumbhat S, Shankaran DR, Kim SJ et al (2007) Surface plasmon resonance biosensor for dopamine using D3 dopamine receptor as a biorecognition molecule. Biosens Bioelectron 23:421–427.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2007.05.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Krishna VM, Somanathan T, Manikandan E et al (2018) Neurotransmitter dopamine enhanced sensing detection using fibre-like carbon nanotubes by chemical vapor deposition technique. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 18:5380–5389.  https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2018.15425 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yin ZZ, Cheng SW, Xu L, Bin et al (2018) Highly sensitive and selective sensor for sunset yellow based on molecularly imprinted polydopamine-coated multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Biosens Bioelectron 100:565–570.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2017.10.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cogal S (2018) Electrochemical determination of dopamine using graphene oxide-modified glassy carbon electrode electrochemical determination of dopamine using a. Anal Lett.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00032719.2017.1387791 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    March G, Dung T, Piro B (2015) Modified electrodes used for electrochemical detection of metal ions in environmental analysis. Biosensors 5:241–275.  https://doi.org/10.3390/bios5020241 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fan D, Wu S, Tian S, Zhou J, Ju Y, Ma C, Shi J (2014) Detection of dopamine on a poly(metanilic acid) decorated two-dimensional gold cavity array electrode. RSC Adv 4:49560–49568.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA07649D CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yuhong S, Jia P, Bai Y, Liao S, Wang S, Zheng Z (2013) A simple and novel strategy for the simultaneous determination of dopamine, aceelectrodetamidophenol and tryptophan based on poly(new coccine) film modified carbon paste. Anal Methods 5:5737–5745.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ay41058g CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ding A, Wang B, Zheng J et al (2018) Sensitive dopamine sensor based on three dimensional and macroporous carbon aerogel microelectrode. Int J Electrochem Sci 13:4379–4389.  https://doi.org/10.20964/2018.05.43 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang X, Lu M, Wang H et al (2015) Three-dimensional graphene aerogels—mesoporous silica frameworks for superior adsorption capability of phenols. Sep Purif Technol 153:7–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2015.08.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li J, Wang Y, Sun Y et al (2016) A novel ionic liquid functionalized graphene oxide supported gold nanoparticle composite fi lm for sensitive electrochemical detection of dopamine. RSC Adv 7:2315–2322.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA25627A CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang W, Cheng Y, Yan L et al (2015) Analytical methods highly sensitive electrochemical sensor for dopamine with a double-stranded. Anal Methods 7:1878–1883.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4AY03008G CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Baig N, Kawde A (2016) RSC Advances electrode decorated with alternating layers of Au NPs for the simultaneous detection of dopamine and uric acid in human urine. RSC Adv 6:80756–80765.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA10055D CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pandey S, Annapoorni S, Malhotra BD (1993) Synthesis and characterization of poly(ani1ine-co-o-anisidine): a processable conducting copolymer. Macromolecules 26:3190–3193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang J, Keene FR (1996) Mechanism of mediation of the electrochemical oxidation of K4Fe(CN)6 at poly-[tris(3-{ω-[4-(2,2′-bipyridyl)] alkyl}-thiophene)iron(II)]-film modified electrodes in aqueous solutions. Electrochim Acta 41:2563–2569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhuang Z, Li J, Xu R, Xiao D (2011) Electrochemical detection of dopamine in the presence of ascorbic acid using overoxidized polypyrrole/graphene modified electrode. Int J Electrochem Sci 6:2149–2161Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kulandainathan M, Gorlea D (2016) Electrochemical sensing of dopamine at the surface of a dopamine grafted graphene oxide/poly(methylene blue) composite modified electrode. RSC Adv 6:19982–19991.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA25541D CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    He X, Wu Y, Cui L, Liu Y, Lv G, Pu T, Liu D (2013) A dopamine sensor based on a methoxypolyethylene glycol polymer covalently modified glassy carbon electrode. Analyst 138:1204–1211.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C2AN36349F CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Li F, Yang L, Zhaoa C, Du Z (2011) Electroactive gold nanoparticles/polyaniline/polydopamine hybrid composite in neutral solution as high-performance sensing platform. Anal Methods 3:1601–1606.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C1AY05126A CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shi G, Yu X, Shenga K (2014) A three-dimensional interpenetrating electrode of reduced graphene oxide for selective detection of dopamine. Analyst 139:4525–4531.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4AN00604F CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pruneanua S, Biris A, Pogaceana F, Socacia C, Coros M, Rosua M, Watanabe F, Biris A (2015) The influence of uric and ascorbic acid on the electrochemical detection of dopamine using graphene-modified electrodes. Electrochimica Acta 154:197–204.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2014.12.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Srivastava R, Kaur B, Satpatib B (2015) Synthesis of NiCo2O4/Nano-ZSM-5 nanocomposite material with enhanced electrochemical properties for the simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid, dopamine, uric acid and tryptophan. New J Chem 39:1115–1124.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4NJ01360C CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yang X, Liu X, Zhua H (2014) An electrochemical sensor for dopamine based on poly(ophenylenediamine) functionalized with electrochemically reduced graphene oxide. RSC Adv 4:3706–3712.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RA45234D Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Recco L, Crulhas B, Parraa J, Pedrosa V (2016) A new strategy for detecting dopamine in human serum using polymer brushes reinforced with carbon nanotubes. RSC Adv 6:47134–47137.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA05151K CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chemistry Department, Faculty of ScienceKing Abdulaziz UniversityJeddahSaudi Arabia
  2. 2.Polymer Chemistry Lab, Chemistry Department, Faculty of ScienceAssiut UniversityAssiutEgypt

Personalised recommendations