Journal of Applied Electrochemistry

, Volume 48, Issue 9, pp 985–993 | Cite as

Design of bifunctional electrodes for co-generation of electrical power and hydrogen peroxide

  • Winton Li
  • Arman Bonakdarpour
  • Előd GyengeEmail author
  • David P. WilkinsonEmail author
Research Article


We present a method of co-generating hydrogen peroxide and electrical power via the two-electron cathodic reduction of oxygen in a H2/O2 proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC). The cell uses a continuous flow of carrier water through its cathodic chamber to remove the hydrogen peroxide product at a neutral pH. To improve the co-generation of electric power and hydrogen peroxide, a number of different cathode configurations, using both four- and two-electron oxygen reducing electrocatalysts, were constructed and examined. With a bifunctional cathode structure consisting of side-by-side carbon-supported Pt– and Co–C-based catalyst layers, and a carbon-based micro-porous layer (MPL), a hydrogen peroxide generation flux of 8 µmol h−1 cm−2 is achieved. The corresponding power density is about 133 mW cm−2. The co-generation of power and hydrogen peroxide could be used in a variety of applications, including the on-site production of hydrogen peroxide for water treatment by advanced oxidation processes.

Graphical Abstract


Hydrogen peroxide electrosynthesis PEM fuel cell Oxygen electrode Neutral pH 



Funding for this work has been provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) through the NSERC Strategic Res’Eau WaterNet program (NSERC NETGP 364635-07).


  1. 1.
    HealthCanada (2017) Water talk—drinking water quality in Canada. Accessed 20 May 2017
  2. 2.
    WorldWaterCouncil (2017) Water crisis. Accessed 20 May 2017
  3. 3.
    RES’EAU_WaterNet (2017) No title. Accessed 20 May 2017
  4. 4.
    Li W, Bonakdarpour A, Gyenge E, Wilkinson DP (2013) Drinking water purification by electrosynthesis of hydrogen peroxide in a power-producing pem fuel cell. ChemSusChem 6:2137–2143. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Samanta C (2008) Direct synthesis of hydrogen peroxide from hydrogen and oxygen: an overview of recent developments in the process. Appl Catal A Gen 350:133–149. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Riedl H-J, Pfleiderer G (1939) Production of hydrogen peroxideGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim K (1992) Electrocheimical oxygen technology. Wiley-Interscience, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bonakdarpour A, Esau D, Cheng H et al (2011) Preparation and electrochemical studies of metal-carbon composite catalysts for small-scale electrosynthesis of H2O2. Electrochim Acta 56:9074–9081. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Verdaguer-casadevall A, Deiana D, Karamad M et al (2014) Trends in the electrochemical synthesis of H2O2: enhancing activity and selectivity by electrocatalytic site engineering. Nano Lett. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Siahrostami S, Verdaguer-Casadevall A, Karamad M et al (2013) Enabling direct H2O2 production through rational electrocatalyst design. Nat Mater 12:1137–1143. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Alcaide F, Cabot PL, Brillas E (2006) Fuel cells for chemicals and energy cogeneration. J Power Sources 153:47–60. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    van der Does T (1996) Fuel cell co-generation: the future of co-generation. J Power Sources 61:49–51. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hwang JJ, Zou ML (2010) Development of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell cogeneration system. J Power Sources 195:2579–2585. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Otsuka K, Yamanaka I (1990) One step synthesis of hydrogen peroxide through fuel cell reaction. Electrochim Acta 35:319–322. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yuan XZ, Ma ZF, Jiang QZ, Wu WS (2001) Cogeneration of cyclohexylamine and electrical power using PEM fuel cell reactor. Electrochem Commun 3:599–602. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Agladze GR, Nikoleishvili P, Tsurtsumia G et al (2010) DMFC with hydrogen peroxide cogeneration. J Electrochem Soc 157:E140–E147. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Agladze G, Nikoleishvili P, Kveselava V et al (2012) A novel aluminium-air semi-fuel cell operating with hydrogen peroxide co-generation. J Power Sources 218:46–51. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yamanaka I, Tazawa S, Murayama T et al (2010) Catalytic synthesis of neutral hydrogen peroxide at a CoN2Cx cathode of a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC). ChemSusChem 3:59–62. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yamanaka I, Onizawa T, Takenaka S, Otsuka K (2003) Direct and continuous production of hydrogen peroxide with 93% selectivity using a fuel-cell system. Angew Chemie 42:3653–3655. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yamanaka I, Hashimoto T, Otsuka K (2002) Direct synthesis of hydrogen peroxide (> 1 wt%) over the cathode prepared from active carbon and vapor-grown-carbon-fiber by a New H2-O2 fuel cell system. Chem Lett 31:852–852. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yamanaka I, Tazawa S, Murayama T et al (2008) Catalytic synthesis of neutral H2O2 solutions from O2 and H2 by a fuel cell reaction. ChemSusChem 1:988–992. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kiassen NV, Marchington D, Mcgowant HCE (1994) H2O2 determination by the I3- method and by KMnO4 titration. Anal Chem 66:2921–2925. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Owejan JP, Trabold TA, Jacobson DL et al (2007) Effects of flow field and diffusion layer properties on water accumulation in a PEM fuel cell. Int J Hydrogen Energy 32:4489–4502. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nam JH, Kaviany M (2003) Effective diffusivity and water-saturation distribution in single- and two-layer PEMFC diffusion medium. Int J Heat Mass Transf 46:4595–4611. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Park GG, Sohn YJ, Yang TH et al (2004) Effect of PTFE contents in the gas diffusion media on the performance of PEMFC. J Power Sources 131:182–187. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Holmström N, Ihonen J, Lundblad A, Lindbergh G (2007) The influence of the gas diffusion layer on water management in polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Fuel Cells 7:306–313. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lin G, Nguyen T, Van (2005) Effect of thickness and hydrophobic polymer content of the gas diffusion layer on electrode flooding level in a PEMFC. J Electrochem Soc 152:A1942–A1948. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fawell J (2004) Fluoride in drinking water. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kim JH, Gibb HJ, Howe PD (2006) Cobalt and inorganic cobalt compounds. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering and the Clean Energy Research CenterUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations