Advertisement

Journal of Applied Electrochemistry

, Volume 46, Issue 4, pp 515–525 | Cite as

Performance assessment of a four-air cathode single-chamber microbial fuel cell under conditions of synthetic and municipal wastewater treatments

  • Asimina Tremouli
  • Michalis Martinos
  • Symeon Bebelis
  • Gerasimos Lyberatos
Research Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Remediation

Abstract

A four-air cathode single-chamber microbial fuel cell (4ACMFC) with MnO2 as cathode catalyst and a packed bed of graphite granules as anode was studied, aiming at continuous treatment of municipal wastewater in parallel to electric power production. When fed with synthetic wastewater, the system achieved a maximum power density of 13.6 W m−3, a COD removal of 85 %, and a Coulombic efficiency (CE) of 21 %. When municipal wastewater was treated, the achieved COD removal was 45 %, and the CE 7.8 %. By increasing the municipal wastewater conductivity through salt addition, the CE increased to 22.3 %. During the long-term operation of the cell, non-exoelectrogenic bacteria and catalyst degradation were observed to be present. The 4ACMFC performance was assessed at different hydraulic retention times. The electrochemical impedance characterization of the 4ACMFC was also carried out.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Microbial fuel cell (MFC) Air cathode Municipal wastewater Long-term operation Oxygen stress Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research has been co-financed by the European Union (European Social Fund—ESF) and Greek national funds through the Operational Program “Education and Lifelong Learning” of the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF)—Research Funding Program: Heracleitus II. Investing in knowledge society through the European Social Fund.

References

  1. 1.
    Rabaey K, Rodriguez J, Blackall LL, Keller J, Gross P, Batstone D, Verstraete W, Nealson KH (2007) Microbial ecology meets electrochemistry: electricity driven and driving communities. ISME J 4:9–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Logan BE, Regan JM (2006) Electricity-producing bacterial communities in microbial fuel cells. Trends Microbiol 14:512–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Logan BE, Hamelers B, Rozendal R, Schroeder U, Keller J, Freguia S, Aelterman P, Verstraete W, Rabaey K (2006) Microbial fuel cells: methodology and technology. Environ Sci Technol 40:5181–5192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huggins T, Fallgren PH, Jin S, Ren ZJ (2013) Energy and performance comparison of microbial fuel cell and conventional aeration treating of wastewater. J Microbial Biochem Technol. doi: 10.4172/1948-5948.S6-002 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Logan BE (2008) Microbial fuel cells. Wiley, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lefebvre O, Uzabiaga A, Chang IS, Kim BH, Ng HY (2011) Microbial fuel cells for energy self-sufficient domestic wastewater treatment: a review and discussion from energetic consideration. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 89:259–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Oh ST, Kim JR, Premier GC, Lee TH, Kim C, Sloan WT (2010) Sustainable wastewater treatment: how might microbial fuel cells contribute. Biotechnol Adv 28:871–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sevda S, Dominguez-Benetton X, Vanbroekhoven K, Wever HD, Sreekrishnan TR, Pant D (2013) High strength wastewater treatment accompanied by power generation using air cathode microbial fuel cell. Appl Energy 105:194–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gonzalez del Campo A, Lobato J, Caρizares P, Rodrigo MA, Fernandez Morales FJ (2013) Short-term effects of temperature and COD in a microbial fuel cell. Appl Energy 101:213–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dong Y, Qu Y, He W, Du Y, Liu J, Han X, Feng Y (2015) A 90-liter stackable baffled microbial fuel cell for brewery wastewater treatment based on energy self-sufficient mode. Bioresour Technol. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.06.026 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang YP, Liu XW, Li WW, Li F, Wang YK, Sheng GP, Raymond J, Zeng RJ, Yu HQ (2012) A microbial fuel cell membrane bioreactor integrated system for cost-effective wastewater treatment. Appl Energy 98:230–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Min B, Angelidaki I (2008) Innovative microbial fuel cell for electricity production from anaerobic reactors. J Power Sources 180:641–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen Y, Luo J, Yan Y, Feng L (2013) Enhanced production of short-chain fatty acid by co-fermentation of waste activated sludge and kitchen waste under alkaline conditions, and its application to microbial fuel cells. Appl Energy 102:1197–1204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu H, Logan BE (2004) Electricity generation using an air-cathode single chamber microbial fuel cell in the presence and absence of a proton exchange membrane. Environ Sci Technol 38:4040–4046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu H, Ramnarayanan R, Logan BE (2004) Production of electricity during wastewater treatment using a single chamber microbial fuel cell. Environ Sci Technol 38:2281–2285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nimje VR, Chen CY, Chen HR, Chen CC, Huang YM, Tseng MJ, Cheng KC, Chang YF (2012) Comparative bioelectricity production from various wastewaters in microbial fuel cells using mixed cultures and a pure strain of Shewanella oneidensis. Bioresour Technol 104:315–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yu J, Seon J, Park Y, Cho S, Lee T (2012) Electricity generation and microbial community in a submerged-exchangeable microbial fuel cell system for low-strength domestic wastewater treatment. Bioresour Technol 117:172–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ahn Y, Logan BE (2010) Effectiveness of domestic wastewater treatment using microbial fuel cells at ambient and mesophilic temperatures. Bioresour Technol 101:469–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Koroglu EO, Baysoy DY, Cetinkaya AY, Ozkaya B, Cakmakci M (2014) Novel design of a multitube microbial fuel cell (UM2FC) for energy recovery and treatment of membrane concentrates. Biomass Bioenerg 69:58–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tremouli A, Intzes A, Intzes P, Bebelis S, Lyberatos G (2015) Effect of periodic complete anolyte replacement on the long term performance of a four air cathodes single chamber microbial fuel cell. J Appl Electrochem 45:755–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhuang L, Chunhua F, Zhou S, Li Y, Wang Y (2010) Comparison of membrane and cloth-cathode assembly for scalable microbial fuel cells: construction, performance and cost. Process Biochem 45:929–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhuang L, Zhou S, Wang Y, Liu C, Geng S (2009) Membrane-less cloth cathode assembly (CCA) for scalable microbial fuel cells. Biosens Bioelectron 24:3652–3656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Skiadas IV, Lyberatos G (1998) The periodic anaerobic baffled reactor. Water Sci Technol 8:401–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    APHA, Awwa, WPFC (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chae KJ, Choi MJ, Kim KY, Ajayi FF, Park W, Kim CW, In S, Kim IS (2010) Methanogenesis control by employing various environmental stress conditions in two-chambered microbial fuel cells. Bioresour Technol 101:5350–5357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zuo Y, Cheng S, Call D, Logan BE (2007) Tubular membrane cathodes for scalable power generation in microbial fuel cells. Environ Sci Technol 41:3347–3353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    You S, Zhao Q, Zhang J, Jiang J, Wan C, Du M, Zhao S (2007) A graphite-granule membrane-less tubular air-cathode microbial fuel cell for power generation under continuously operational conditions. J Power Sources 173:172–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wei L, Yuan Z, Cui M, Han H, Shen J (2012) Study on electricity-generation characteristic of two-chambered microbial fuel cell in continuous flow mode. Int J Hydrog Energy 37:1067–1073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kim KY, Yang W, Logan BE (2015) Impact of electrode configurations on retention time and domestic wastewater treatment efficiency using microbial fuel cells. Water Res 80:41–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li X, Zhu N, Wang Y, Ping Li P, Wu P, Wu J (2013) Animal carcass wastewater treatment and bioelectricity generation in up-flowtubular microbial fuel cells: effects of HRT and non-precious metallic catalyst. Bioresour Technol 128:454–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Aelterman P, Versichele M, Marzorati M, Boon N, Verstraete W (2008) Loading rate and external resistance control the electricity generation of microbial fuel cells with different three-dimensional anodes. Bioresour Technol 99:8895–8902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sharma Y, Li B (2010) The variation of power generation with organic substrates in single-chamber microbial fuel cells (SCMFCs). Bioresour Technol 101:1844–1850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Feng Y, Wang X, Logan BE, Lee H (2008) Brewery wastewater treatment using air-cathode microbial fuel cells. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 78:873–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Liu G, Yates MD, Cheng S, Call DF, Sun D, Logan BE (2011) Examination of microbial fuel cell start-up times with domestic wastewater and additional amendments. Bioresour Technol 102:7301–7306CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Asimina Tremouli
    • 1
  • Michalis Martinos
    • 2
  • Symeon Bebelis
    • 1
  • Gerasimos Lyberatos
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringUniversity of PatrasPatrasGreece
  2. 2.School of Chemical EngineeringNational Technical University of AthensZografou, AthensGreece
  3. 3.Institute of Chemical Engineering SciencesPatrasGreece

Personalised recommendations