Anodic oxidation of parabens in acetic acid–acetonitrile solutions
- First Online:
The electrochemical properties of esters of p-hydroxybenzoic acid, called parabens, were investigated on a carbon fiber microelectrode and on a glassy carbon macroelectrode in glacial acetic acid containing 20 % acetonitrile (v/v) and sodium acetate as a supporting electrolyte. The anodic oxidation of parabens in this medium proceeds in a single stage giving well-shaped peaks or waves in the same potential region of above 1.0 V (vs. Ag/AgCl). The electrode process was characterized as being quasireversible, diffusion-controlled, and proceeds with the exchange of one electron and one proton. Phenoxyl radicals as products of the electrode process are chemically unstable and participate in the successive irreversible homogenous reactions resulting in electroinactive products (EqCi mechanism). Smaller oxidation potentials for parabens in comparison to such unsaturated fatty acids as oleic, linoleic, and linolenic ones indicate that these compounds can show antioxidative properties. Since parabens are often used as preservatives in many products, the results presented can be found useful in the determination of their total content in real samples.
Keywordsp-Hydroxybenzoic acid Parabens Anodic oxidation Acetic acid Acetonitrile Voltammetry
Parabens are recognized as ideal preservatives because of their low cost, biodegradability, good stability in air and in solutions, resistance to hydrolysis, neutral pH, lack of color, non-volatility, and thus lack of perceptible odor and taste, their broad antimicrobial spectrum (antibacterial, especially antifungal), as well as because of their relatively non-irritating and non-sensitizing properties [1, 2, 3, 15, 16]. The antimicrobial activity of parabens increases with an increase in the size of the ester group [16, 17], which results from the fact that the lipophilicity of these compounds increases in the same direction [17, 18]. This property makes it easier for parabens to get thorough the cellular membrane . Since microbial replication generally occurs in the water phase of oil/water systems, the amount of parabens dissolved in water determines their preservative efficiency. In order to increase this efficiency, they are often used in combination of two or more parabens with different lipophilicity properties [1, 2, 3, 16]. Mixtures of MP and PP (less and more lipophilic, respectively) are the most commonly used preservatives because of their synergistic effect [3, 5]. As parabens are widely used in many products, humans are continuously exposed to their action.
The influence of these compounds on the human health is not totally clear. For many years, parabens have been regarded as preservatives of low toxicity. However, according to available studies, they can be harmful to the consumer due to their potential to induce allergic contact dermatitis [3, 19], they can produce inhibitory effects on mitochondrial respiratory capacities [16, 20], and they can disrupt the human reproductive potential [16, 21]. It has been suggested that the use of parabens in cosmetics may contribute to the increasing incidence of breast cancer [22, 23, 24, 25]. Nevertheless, another study reported that parabens are safe for the human health [1, 2, 3, 5, 26, 27, 28]. Soni et al.  claimed that parabens are innocuous preservatives, they are practically non-toxic, non-irritating, non-sensitizing, and non-carcinogenic. The benefit/risk ratio for the use of parabens is high, and thus they must be used to guarantee the stability and safety of products. These conclusions were confirmed by Andersen in his report on the safe use of parabens in cosmetic products . Nevertheless, the content of parabens in different products must be closely controlled. The use of parabens is permitted under the European Union Directives 95/2/EC (MP, EP, and PP) and 76/768/EEC (MP, EP, PP, BP, and BzP) in food and cosmetic products. They can then be used as preservatives in cosmetics up to the maximum concentration of 0.4 % for one ester and up to 0.8 % (w/w) for their mixtures, expressed as PHB. The limited use of these compounds in foodstuffs and drugs should not exceed 0.1 and 1 % (w/w), respectively [1, 2, 3]. Considering the controversial and not fully explained influence of parabens on the human health, it is very important to continue the investigations of their properties, including their electrochemical properties.
Up to now, no exact electrochemical data concerning the electrochemical properties of parabens and the mechanism of electrode reactions have been available. They were mainly examined to evaluate the optimal conditions for their determination in real samples using electrochemical detectors [8, 29, 30, 31]. Wang et al.  suggested a rapid and reliable electrochemical method to determine the total content of parabens in cosmetics on a GC electrode modified with polymers (MIPs) containing MP and PP as dual templates. The results described show that the parabens are oxidized on this modified electrode in phosphate-buffered aqueous solutions. The curves recorded by means of the square wave voltammetry technique consist of single peaks at the same potential of about 0.94 V (vs. SCE). These results indicate that only the total content of parabens can be calculated by this electrochemical method. Martins et al.  applied a boron-doped diamond electrode (BDD) as a sensor to determine parabens in shampoo by the HPLC with amperometric detection using a mobile phase consisting of water disodium phosphate solution and acetonitrile (AN). It has been shown that all parabens investigated are irreversibly oxidized at the same potential of about 0.9 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) and the overall process is diffusion controlled. This indicates that the BDD electrode is not able to differentiate the parabens. The peak potential is shifted toward positive values with a decrease in pH values, which shows that the oxidation of these compounds is more difficult in an acidic medium. Since parabens are hydrophobic compounds, the influence of AN on the electrochemical behavior of parabens was also studied. The presence of this organic solvent in aqueous solutions enhances the peak current intensity without modifying the shape of the voltammetric peaks. These results were explained in terms of enhancing the diffusion of the analyte to the surface of the working electrode. The same BDD electrode was employed by Radovan et al.  for the determination of parabens in hydro-alcoholic solutions by cyclic voltammetry (CV) and chronoamperometry. Since all parabens investigated (MP, EP, and PP) are oxidized in aqueous solutions containing 20 % of ethanol (v/v) giving one anodic peak at the same potential of about 0.9 V (vs. SCE), it is possible to determine only the total amount of parabens, named by the authors as “overall paraben index”. The CV curves recorded in the solutions containing PHB were very similar to those for parabens. It shows that PHB can be electrochemically detected simultaneously with the accompanying parabens. The CV experiments confirmed that the anodic oxidation of parabens in this medium proceeds irreversibly and is diffusion controlled. The similar peak potentials of the anodic oxidation of parabens were also confirmed by Kang and Kim . The CV curves recorded on a GC electrode in a mixed solvent consisting of methanol and aqueous phosphoric acid showed that MP and PP are oxidized in this medium giving only one anodic peak at potentials of about 1.30 V (vs. Ag/AgCl). The existence of these peaks is due to the oxidation of the phenolic moiety in the compounds.
To the best of my knowledge, no literature data on the anodic oxidation of parabens in acidic organic solvents are available. Glacial acetic acid (HAc) is one of them. In comparison to other organic solvents, HAc has several attractive properties, such as the relatively wide potential window accessible to platinum and carbon electrodes , and the ability to dissolve both hydrophobic organic compounds and their matrix as well as the necessary supporting electrolyte. The disadvantageous feature of this solvent is its relatively low dielectric constant, ε (6.17 at 25 °C ), which results in a slight dissociation of electrolytes, and, consequently, causes significant ohmic potential drops, IR. This problem can be easily overcome by the use of microelectrodes [34, 35, 36]. As the currents recorded on microelectrodes are relatively small (pA or nA), the IR drop can be neglected even in highly resistive solutions. HAc was formerly successfully employed as a medium to investigate the electrochemical properties of hydrophobic antioxidants [37, 38] and to their voltammetric determination in pharmaceuticals [39, 40]. It seems probable that solutions of HAc can also be a good medium for anodic oxidation of parabens.
The aim of this work was to examine the anodic oxidation of parabens on carbon electrodes in HAc solutions to elucidate the mechanism of the electrode process. This paper is a logical starting point for the development of a new direct voltammetric method to be used to determine these compounds in pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and foodstuffs.
The chemicals used were as follows: PHB, >99.0 % (Fluka, China), methyl p-hydroxybenzoate (methyl paraben, MP), ≥99.0 % (Fluka, Japan), ethyl p-hydroxybenzoate (ethyl paraben, EP), 99 % (Aldrich, Germany), propyl p-hydroxybenzoate (propyl paraben, PP), ≥99.0 %, butyl p-hydroxybenzoate (butyl paraben, BP), ≥99.0 % (each Fluka, UK), benzyl p-hydroxybenzoate (benzyl paraben, BzP), 99 % (Aldrich, USA), 3-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyanisole (BHA), ≥98 % (Fluka, Switzerland), 2,6-di-tert-butyl-p-cresol (butylated hydroxytoluene, BHT), >99.0 % (Sigma, Germany), tert-butylhydroquinone (BHQ), ≥98.0 % (Fluka, Switzerland), α-tocopherol (α-TOH), ≥96 % (Sigma, Germany), oleic acid, >99 %, linoleic acid, purriss. p.a., linolenic acid, purriss. p. a. (each Fluka, Switzerland), sodium acetate, CH3COONa (AcNa), anhydrous, ≥99.5 % (Fluka, Netherlands), sodium perchlorate, NaClO4, anhydrous, p.a. (Riedel-de Haen, Germany). AN, p.a. ahydride, HAc, p.a. ACS (each Merck, Germany) or their mixture were used as solvents in all electrochemical experiments. All reagents and solvents were of high purity and used as received.
Voltammetric measurements were carried out using the EA9C electrochemical analyzer connected with a Model M152 preamplifier (both MTM, Poland). The experimental conditions were controlled via a Pentium computer by a software EAGRAPH Version 4.0 (MTM, Poland). All electrochemical studies were performed using a three-electrode system: a carbon fiber (CF) disk microelectrode of 35.4-μm diameter (BASi, United Kingdom) or a glassy carbon (GC) macroelectrode of 1-mm diameter, A = 7.85 × 10−3 cm2 (Mineral, Poland) as working electrodes, a home made platinum wire auxiliary electrode, and a Ag/AgCl reference electrode with 1 M NaCl solution (Mineral, Poland). The diameter of the CF microelectrode was determined using the well-known diffusion coefficient of ferrocene in AN with 0.1 M (But)4NPF6 as a supporting electrolyte . The surface of the working electrodes was mechanically polished with 0.01-μm alumina powder slurry on a polishing cloth (BASi, USA). Finally, the electrodes were sonicated in distilled water, rinsed with water and acetone, and dried before use. To avoid water leakage, the reference electrode was isolated from the test solutions by a salt bridge with a frit of Vicor Glass. In order to minimize electrical interferences, especially during the experiments with a microelectrode, the electrochemical cell was enclosed in a grounded Faraday cage.
Before voltammetric measurements, the solutions were deoxygenated by ultrasonication and then by purging with a stream of solvent–saturated argon of high purity (>99.99 %).
All measurements were carried out at room temperature (25 ± 1 °C).
A CX-732 multifunction computer meter equipped with a glass indicator electrode and Ag/AgCl reference electrode (each Elmetron, Poland) was used for pH measurements.
The specific conductivity of the solutions was measured using a Model inoLab 720 conductivity meter equipped with a standard conductivity cell TetraCon 325 (WTW, Germany). The cell constant, k, was 0.475 cm−1 (measurement range: 1 μS cm−1–2 S cm−1). The measurements were carried out at the automatic temperature compensation up to 25 °C.
Viscosity measurements were performed at 25 ± 1 °C using a ViscoClock equipped with a certified Ubbelohde capillary viscometer (the instrument constant K = 0.009872 mm2 s−2) (each SCHOTT Instruments, Germany).
3 Results and discussion
3.1 Choice of the solution composition
The results described indicate that the mixed solvent containing HAc and AN and 0.1 M CH3COONa as a supporting electrolyte can be a good medium for the investigations of the electrochemical properties of parabens. The results previously given indicate that a larger amount of AN limited the solubility of the hydrophobic analyte, especially in the presence of a large amount of their matrix .
3.2 Voltammetry at microelectrodes
Voltammetric parameters for the anodic oxidation of p-hydroxybenzoic acid (PHB) and parabens obtained by LSV (v = 5 mV s−1) and DPV (ΔE = 20 mV, v = 20 mV s−1, pulse width: 80 ms) on a CF disk microelectrode in HAc solutions containing 20 % AN (v/v) and 0.1 M CH3COONa
D (m2 s−1)
E1/2a (V) vs. Ag/AgCl
E3/4 − E1/4b (V)
Epd (V) vs. Ag/AgCl
1.45 × 10−9
1.39 × 10−9
1.30 × 10−9
1.30 × 10−9
1.23 × 10−9
0.97 × 10−9
The results obtained indicate that the anodic oxidation of parabens in this medium proceeds in one stage and according to the same reaction mechanism. The size of the ester group does not affect this process. All these compounds undergo oxidation on the CF microelectrode in the same potential region. The differences between peak potentials, Ep, and half-wave potentials, E1/2. characteristic of all parabens do not exceed 0.010 V (Table 1). The reason for the anodic oxidation of parabens in the same potential region can be explained in terms of similar charge densities on the oxygen atom in the hydroxyl group of the molecules (−0.220, −0.221, −0.221, −0.221, and −0.221, respectively, for MP, EP, PP, BP, and BzP). These values were calculated by a HyperChem program with PM3 semiempirical algorithm. The results obtained show that parabens cannot be electrochemically identified in this medium. The same conclusions were drawn from the earlier electrochemical investigations [8, 29, 30, 31] (see Sect. 1).
For comparison, the voltammetric curves were also recorded in solutions containing PHB. In contrast to parabens, the anodic oxidation of PHB proceeds in two stages (Fig. 3, curve a). The first part of this curve is situated in potential region characteristic for the oxidation of parabens (curves b–f in Fig. 3) and the steady-state current is similar to that observed for its esters. The similarity of the voltammetric curves recorded in hydro-alcoholic solutions containing PHB or its esters was reported by Radovan et al. . The same potential region for the anodic oxidation of these compounds can be related to comparable charge densities on the oxygen atom in the hydroxyl group for PHB (−0.219) and parabens. The second part of the curve for PHB is similar in height to the first one and is situated at the potential above 1.3 V with half-wave potential, E1/2 = 1.40 V (Table 1). The comparable heights of these waves suggest the identical number of electrons exchanged in two stages of the electrode reaction. The DPV curve recorded in the same solution consists of two peaks: the first, well-shaped with the maximum at 1.065 V and the second one, broad and smaller at 1.390 V. The differences in the shape of these peaks can be explained in terms of the irreversibility of the second part of the anodic oxidation of PHB. In addition, the second stage of the electrode reaction proceeds probably on the surface of the working electrode partially covered by the products of the oxidation (great hysteresis in the region of the second part of the wave recorded by LSV was observed—data not shown). It should be noted that there is no signal from the oxidation of parabens in this potential region (Fig. 3).
The quasireversibility of the electrode reactions confirms the Tomes criterion . The differences between potentials corresponding to ¾ (E3/4) and ¼ (E1/4) of the steady-state current recorded by LSV does not differ much from the value of 0.0564/n V, predicted for the one-electron reversible electrode process (Table 1). As can be seen from Table 1, the deviation from the reversibility of the electrode reaction gradually increases with an increase in the size of the ester group (increased values of S and of Tomes criterion from MP to BzP). The quasireversible and one-electron character of the anodic process is also confirmed by the peak width at half height (W1/2) of the curves recorded by DPV. The values of this parameter are close to the theoretic ones, predicted by Eq. (1) for a reversible exchange of one electron (Table 1). The higher value of W1/2 for the second peak of the anodic oxidation of PHB confirms the irreversibility of this stage of the electrode reaction.
The same linear dependencies Ip = f(c) and similar slopes of this relationship were observed for all the parabens investigated (data not shown). These results confirm the same number of electrons involved in the anodic oxidation of parabens, comparable values of their diffusion coefficients, and diffusion-controlled character of the electrode reaction. It is noteworthy that the peak potentials were independent of concentration and the peak currents observed were highly reproducible. The relative standard deviation (RSD) did not exceed 2 % for the ten successive recorded curves (n = 10).
The results obtained indicate that the anodic oxidation of parabens in the medium examined can apply to their determination in real samples. Since all these compounds are electrochemically undistinguishable (see Fig. 3; Table 1), only their total content can be determined and should be expressed as an amount of PHB. This procedure is recommended by the EU Directives 95/2/EC and 76/768/EEC and is described in literature [1, 3, 29, 30].
In order to check the participation of protons in the electrode reaction, the influence of pH on the Ep of parabens was examined by DPV. The relative changes of pH measured in HAc containing 20 % AN (v/v) were made by the increased concentration of sodium acetate in the solutions. Acetate anions are known to be the strongest base in the HAc medium, and their increased concentration causes an increase in the pH of the solutions. In order to keep the ionic strength constant, the solutions additionally contained different amounts of NaClO4. The total concentration of the mixture was always 0.10 M. It is noteworthy that a pH scale in acetic acid (from −7 to 7.5 ) differs from that in water. For this reason, the abbreviation pH(HAc) was applied to the pH values measured in this medium. As the glass electrode was calibrated using aqueous buffers, the pH values can be termed as apparent pH and according to Porras and Kenndler  can be used to approximate relative acidities in this non-aqueous medium.
The slope of this relationship is close to the expected theoretic value of 0.0591 v/pH and suggests that the equal numbers of protons and electrons are involved in the electrode reaction. The results described above indicate that the oxidation of parabens occurs with the exchange of one electron and thus with the transfer of one proton. Because parabens are weaker acids (dissociation constants, pKa equal 8.17, 8.22, 8.35, and 8.37 for MP, EP, PP, and BP, respectively ) in comparison to acetic acid (pKa = 4.76 ), they exist in this medium in a neutral form and this form undergoes an electrode reaction. The reason for decreasing the peak potential with an increase in the concentration of acetate anions in the solutions tested is a binding of protons which improves the electrode process. For pH(HAc) >1.5, the peak potential remains independent of pH (inset in Fig. 5). It can be accounted for by the fast and total binding of protons by the high excess of acetate anions existing in the solutions. The concentration of these anions above 0.08 M does not exert any influence on the equilibrium of the electrode reaction.
3.3 Cyclic voltammetry
As can be seen, a single-stage oxidation of MP occurs, which results in a well-shaped peak at the potential of about 1.05 V. The position of this peak corresponds with the wave and peak observed on CV and DPV curves recorded on a CF microelectrode (Fig. 2). An unlimited increase of the current above 1.6 V results in the oxidation of the supporting electrolyte (dashed line in Fig. 6a). When the direction of polarization was reversed from anodic to cathodic, no reduction peaks were recorded even when the direction of polarization was reversed at the potential Eλ near the anodic oxidation peak. The loss of the current peak on the reverse scan of a cyclic voltammogram is the most obvious indicator of a homogenous chemical reaction step consuming the product generated on the surface of the working electrode . The absence of a reduction peak indicates that the products of the anodic oxidation of MP are very unstable and participate in the successive irreversible homogenous reaction. A similar course of CV curves was also observed for other parabens investigated: EP, PP, BP, and BzP (Fig. 6b). These observations confirm the earlier assumptions that the size of the ester group exerts no influence on the mechanism of the electrode process.
On recording successive scans in the same solution, without cleaning the electrode surface, a small and gradual decrease in peak currents was observed (data not shown). This confirms the fact that the adsorption phenomena accompanying the oxidation of parabens on a GC reduce the available electrode surface area. A 15 % decrease in the peak current was obtained from the first to the tenth scan for all the parabens investigated. The largest changes were observed between the first and the second cycle (about 8 % change). The peaks in the next cycles gradually achieved a stable height. Since the anodic oxidation of parabens is diffusion controlled, the decrease in peak current probably results from the partial adsorption of the final products of the electrode process [44, 45, 46, 47]. A similar decrease of the anodic peak current corresponding to the oxidation of parabens on BDD electrode in hydro-alcoholic solutions  and of PHB on a GC electrode in phosphate buffer solutions  was observed. This phenomenon can be explained in terms of the electrode fouling caused by the electro-oxidized product. It should be stressed that no additional peaks were observed upon repetitive cycling. Between measurements, the electrode was always polished to avoid possible problems from the adsorption of oxidation products on a GC surface.
Very similar relationships were obtained for all the parabens investigated. The results obtained confirm that the anodic oxidation of these compounds is diffusion controlled and the adsorption phenomena accompanying the anodic oxidation of parabens can be related to the adsorption of the products. Moreover, the peak potentials shifted positive with an increase in the scan rate (Fig. 7). This can result from the quasireversible character of the electrode reaction, certified on the basis of the results obtained using a CF microelectrode. The quasireversible character of the anodic process confirms the width of the anodic peaks (δEpa = Epa−Epa/2), where Epa is the potential of anodic peak and Epa/2 is the potential at the half height of the peak. The values of δEpa for parabens investigated only imperceptibly differ from those expected for a reversible one-electron transfer, i.e., 0.0565 V . Thus, with v = 5–100 mV s−1, δEpa was between 0.0605 and 0.081 V. These results indicate that the oxidation of parabens is not strictly Nernstian.
The slope of this curve (0.0325 V dec−1) is similar to those obtained for EP, PP, BP, and BzP (0.0308, 0.0307, 0.0295, and 0.0305 V dec−1, respectively). These results are consistent with the EC behavior in which the charge transfer is followed by a chemical followup step. The slopes of the curves are very close to the theoretically expected value of 0.030/n per tenfold increase in v for the first order chemical reaction [42, 51].
3.4 Mechanism of the anodic oxidation of parabens
The loss of the electron is quasireversible in character and produces a phenoxyl radical. The formation of such a product in the anodic oxidation of phenol and its derivatives has been described in literature [44, 45, 46]. The increased concentration of CH3COO− ions in the solutions tested improves the electrode process by binding the protons, and thus moving the equilibrium of this reaction in the direction of products. Consequently, a decrease in the potentials of the oxidation of parabens was observed (Fig. 5). The results obtained with the use of CV indicate that a phenoxyl radical is chemically unstable and participates in the successive homogenous reaction. Consequently, no reduction peaks were observed. The nature of this chemically irreversible reaction is not fully clear. As described above, this chemical reaction is of first order and it seems probable that the phenoxyl radical formed upon the heterogenous electron transfer can react with a molecule of paraben to yield a predominantly para-linked dimeric radical. Subsequent reactions produce neutral dimers and oligomers which can form a passivating film on the surface of a working electrode. Such a mechanism for the anodic oxidation of the phenolic compounds in aqueous solutions has been described in the literature [44, 45].
It is noteworthy that the mechanism of the anodic oxidation of PHB differs from that described for parabens. The phenoxyl radical formed at the first one-electron quasireversible stage of this electrode process for PHB is probably more stable in comparison with that characteristic of parabens and can then undergo a second irreversible exchange of electron (Fig. 3, curve a) giving a quinone derivative as a final product of their oxidation. This oxidation product of PHB was postulated by Hu et al. .
Assuming the results obtained, it can be stressed that the anodic oxidation of parabens on carbon electrodes in HAc containing 20 % AN (v/v) and CH3COONa as a supporting electrolyte proceeds according to the EqCi mechanism. It is noteworthy that it is only one of the probable mechanisms of this process. In our laboratory, we could not identify primary and final products formed during the anodic oxidation of parabens.
3.5 Antioxidative properties of parabens
Since the potential windows of the solutions containing CH3COONa as a supporting electrolyte is shorter in comparison with that containing NaClO4 (dashed and dotted lines in Fig. 8a, respectively), the curves for the unsaturated fatty acids were recorded in the presence of sodium perchlorate. As the parabens are oxidized at the same potentials (Fig. 3), for the clarity of the picture, only the curve for MP was presented in Fig. 8a (curve d). The parabens are oxidized at smaller potentials in comparison with unsaturated fatty acids, and thus they can protect these compounds against oxidative damage in a direct action. Antioxidative properties of parabens are not so good as these of α-tocopherol—one of the best known natural hydrophobic antioxidant (curve a in Fig. 8a) and synthetic antioxidants: BHQ and BHA (curves b and c). The antioxidative power of parabens is, however, higher in comparison with other synthetic antioxidant BHT. A comparison of the peak potentials characteristic of these antioxidants and of unsaturated fatty acids is presented in Fig. 8b. As can be seen, the antioxidative properties of all the parabens investigated are very similar (similar peak potentials of their DPV oxidation curves). Comparable results were obtained by Krotkova et al.  by a method based on electroreduction of oxygen in the presence of parabens in phosphate buffer solutions.
The results obtained indicate that parabens can be used not only as antimicrobial preservatives but also for the oxidative stability of pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and foodstuffs as well.
The results obtained show that HAc containing 20 % AN (v/v) and CH3COONa as a supporting electrolyte can be a good medium for the investigations of the electrochemical properties of parabens. The anodic oxidation of parabens in this medium proceeds in one stage giving well-shaped voltammetric signals in the same potential region. This indicates that the size of the ester group does not affect the mechanism of the electrode reaction. This electrode process was characterized as being quasireversible, diffusion controlled, and proceeds with the exchange of one electron and one proton. The most probable product of the anodic reaction is phenoxyl radical which is chemically unstable and participates in the successive irreversible homogenous reactions. These subsequent reactions produce neutral dimers and oligomers which form a passivating film on the surface of a working electrode. Thus, the anodic oxidation of parabens on carbon electrodes in the examined medium proceeds according to the EqCi mechanism.
Very good reproducibility of peak potentials and peak currents of the curves recorded by DPV indicates that the anodic oxidation of parabens can be used in the determination of this compound in real samples. Since the parabens investigated are electrochemically undistinguishable, only their total content can be determined. Smaller potentials of the oxidation of parabens in comparison with those of unsaturated fatty acids indicate that these compounds act simultaneously as antimicrobial agents and antioxidants and can be useful in the oxidative stability of pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and foodstuffs.
We owe our gratitude to Mrs Agata Skorupa for her technical assistance.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
- 5.Andersen FA (2008) Final amended report on the safety assessment of methylparaben, ethylparaben, propylparaben, isopropylparaben, butylparaben, isobutylparaben, and benzylparaben as used in cosmetic products. Int J Toxicol 27(Suppl 4):1–82Google Scholar
- 32.Michalkiewicz S, Kaczor M (2004) Accessible potential windows of platinum and carbon electrodes in acetic acid and its mixtures with ethyl acetate. Chem Anal (Warsaw) 49:121–128Google Scholar
- 34.Brett CMA, Brett AMO (1998) Electroanalysis. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 35.Stojek Z (1991) Mikrochim. Acta (Wien). New possibilities in analytical chemistry connected with voltammetric applications of microelectrodes II:353–361Google Scholar
- 42.Sholz F (ed) (2002) Electroanalytical methods. Guide to experiments and applications. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- 43.Bard AJ, Faulkner LR (2001) Electrochemical methods. Fundamentals and applications. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 51.Greef R, Peat R, Peter LM, Pletchner D, Robinson J (1985) Instrumental methods in electrochemistry. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar